id stringlengths 36 36 | source stringclasses 24 values | formatted_source stringclasses 15 values | text stringlengths 2 7.55M |
|---|---|---|---|
50f4e9c2-b09b-474f-9a10-fb23bb9c640f | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | The behavior-cognition link is well done; the cognition-brain link needs more work
Thelen et al. have a strong case for linking behavior with mind through nonrepresentational dynamics. Their case linking mind with brain is less compelling. Modified avenues are proposed for further exploration: greater emphasis on the dynamics of perception; use of chaotic instead of deterministic dynamics with noise; and use of intentionality instead of motivation, taking advantage of its creative dynamics to model genesis of goal-directed behaviors. |
c08a08e1-ed7d-441a-b25c-7e2990357d2f | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Brooklyn Beckham has been left disappointed in his attempts to secure an Arsenal scholarship. The 15-year-old is enrolled at the club's Hale End academy and was hoping to be handed a two-year term to continue with the Gunners. However, it is understood the teenager will not be retained next season, ending his tenure with Arsenal. Brooklyn Beckham (sitting third right), posing with his team-mates, will be released at the end of the season. Beckham Jnr (right) recently posted a video of him hitting the crossbar while playing for Arsenal's youth side. The news comes as a surprise after Beckham was called up into the club's Under 18 side earlier this month. However, Sportsmail can reveal that Beckham was one of only a few Under 16 and Under 17 players still at the club's Hale End academy that weekend as the rest travelled to the Al Kass youth tournament in Qatar. And many at the club's Hale End academy saw his promotion as more of a case of default rather than merit. Beckham will remain at the club, however, until the end of the season. It is unclear whether the teenager will look to find a new club. David Beckham with sons Brooklyn (left), Cruz (centre) and Romeo (right) at the World Cup last year. David and his sons in LA Galaxy kits ahead of the match with Houston Dynamo in the 2012 MLS Cup. Proud dad David (centre) watched Romeo in action for the young Gunners against Liverpool last week. Having started later at Arsenal's academy than the majority of other youngsters at Hale End, Beckham was always playing catch up. Despite the decision not to retain him, Arsenal youth coaches still rate the teenager highly, but feel other players in his right midfield position are more advanced in their development at the club. They also feel Beckham can still make the professional grade at another club. His brothers Romeo and Cruz are also enrolled at Hale End. Cruz, 10, is said to be the most promising of the Beckham brothers. Proud parents David and Victoria Beckham without the boys during last summer's Wimbledon final. Beckham with his sons Brooklyn (left) and Romeo (right) watch a game at the Emirates Stadium in 2013. Beckham (right) trained with Arsenal players at London Colney to maintain his fitness in 2008. Former England captain Beckham, pictured here celebrating his goal against Argentina in Japan in 2002, also played on the right of midfield and scored for his country in three World Cups - 1998, 2002 and 2006.
What are highlight points for this article? Brooklyn Beckham will not be retained by Arsenal's academy next term. David Beckham's son, 15, had been promoted to the Under 18 side recently. But the call-up came as most of the squad were at a tournament in Qatar. Arsenal coaches still rate Brooklyn, who plays on the right of midfield. But other youngsters are at a more advanced stage of their development. Brothers Romeo and Cruz will remain at the Hale End Academy. |
5c6236b3-df78-47fd-ab54-fc2319a66137 | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Translate "RP-4 mineral concentrating tables are factory designed with a raised riffle for maximum recovery of micron sized gold and platinum metals." to Russian? Приводится в действие мотором переменного тока 110 в. |
3661d151-0a4d-4afa-8fe7-535d8fe9ca15 | StampyAI/alignment-research-dataset/lesswrong | LessWrong | Why Do People Think Humans Are Stupid?
Introduction
============
On more than one occasion, I've seen the following comparisons used to describe how a superintelligence might relate to/perceive humans:
* Humans to ants
* Humans to earthworms
* And similar
More generally, people seem to believe that humans are *incredibly* far from the peak of attainable intelligence. And that's very not obvious to me?
Argument
========
I suspect that the median human's cognitive capabilities are *qualitatively* closer to an optimal bounded superintelligence than they are to a honeybee. [The human brain seems to be a universal learner](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9Yc7Pp7szcjPgPsjf/the-brain-as-a-universal-learning-machine). There are some concepts that no human can fully grasp, but those seems to be concepts that are too large to fit in the working memory of a human. And humans can overcome those working memory limitations with a pen and paper, a smartphone, a laptop or other technological aids.
There doesn't seem to be anything a sufficiently motivated and resourced intelligent human is incapable of grasping given enough time. A concept that no human could ever grasp, seems like a concept that no agent could ever grasp. If it's computable, then a human can learn to compute it (even if they must do so with the aid of technology).
Somewhere in the progression from honeybee to humans, there is a phase shift to a universal learner. Our usage of complex language/mathematics/abstraction seems like a difference in kind of cognition. I do not believe there are any such differences in kinds ahead of us on the way to a bounded superintelligence.
I don't think "an agent whose cognitive capabilities are as far above humans as humans are above ants" is necessarily a well-defined, sensible or coherent concept. I don't think it means anything useful or points to anything real.
I do not believe there are any qualitatively more powerful engines of cognition than the human brain (more powerful in the sense that a Turing machine is more powerful than a finite state machine). There are engines of cognition with better serial/parallel processing speed, larger working memories, faster recall, etc. But they don't have a cognitive skill on the level of "use of complex language/symbolic representation" that we lack. There is nothing they can learn that we are fundamentally incapable of learning (even if we need technological aid to learn it).
The difference between a human and a bounded superintelligence is a difference of degree. It's not at all obvious to me that superintelligences would be cognitively superior to sufficiently enhanced brain emulations.
I am not even sure the "human - chimpanzee gap" is a sensible notion for informing expectations of superintelligence. That seems to be a difference of kind I simply don't think will manifest. Once you make the jump to universality, there's nowhere higher to jump to.
Perhaps, superintelligence is just an immensely smart human that also happens to be equipped with faster processing speeds, much larger working memories, larger attention spans, etc.
Addenda
-------
And even then, there are still fundamental constraints to attainable intelligence:
1. What can be computed
1. Computational tractability
2. What can be computed *efficiently*
1. Computational complexity
3. Translating computation to intelligence
1. Mathematical optimisation
2. Algorithmic and statistical information theories
3. Algorithmic and statistical learning theories
4. Implementing computation within physics
1. Thermodynamics of computation
1. Minimal energy requirements
2. Heat dissipation
3. Maximum information density
2. Speed of light limits
1. Latency of communication
2. Maximum serial processing speeds
I do not think humans are necessarily quantitatively close to the physical limits ([the brain is extremely energy efficient from a thermodynamic point of view](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xwBuoE9p8GE7RAuhd/brain-efficiency-much-more-than-you-wanted-to-know), but it also runs at only 20 watts). AI systems could have much larger power budgets [some extant supercomputers consume gigawatts of power]. But I expect many powerful/useful/interesting cognitive algorithms to be NP hard/or require exponential time (an underlying intuition is that the size of search trees grow exponentially with each "step"/searching for a particular string grows exponentially with string length. Search seems like a natural operationalisation of planning and I expect it to feature in other cognitive skills (searching for efficient encodings, approximations, compressions, patterns, etc. maybe how we generate abstractions and enrich our world model etc.), so I'm also pessimistic on just how useful quantitative progress will turn out to be in practice.
Counterargument
===============
There's a common rebuttal along the lines that an ant is also a universal computer and so can in theory compute any computable program.
The difference is that you cannot actually teach an ant how to implement universal models of computation. Humans on the other hand can actually be taught that (and invented it of their own accord). Perhaps, the hardware of an ant is a universal computer, but the ant software is not a universal learner. Human software is. |
ca50c299-732a-4b1a-990e-98f3601655ce | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Q: Solve 0*m - 2306 + 752 = 74*m for m.
A: -21
Q: Solve:
Solve 0 = -6*k + 58 - 76 for k.
A: -3
Question: What is the solution?
Solve -6*b + 1368 = 1272 for b.
Answer: 16
Problem: Math Problem
Solve -49358*p = -49363*p + 35 for p.
A: 7
Question:
Solve 464*h = -16972 + 5372 for h..
Answer:
-25
Solve 47*k = 31*k + 48 for k.
Solve this plz.
A: 3 |
18762b68-fbfd-4fcc-a22f-d7e415a4dfa5 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | LINK: Bayesian statistics is so subversive, it's banned in China!
Funny link. |
a78a6bfd-509f-438e-867c-90be31f14cb7 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Learning Hebrew in the Time of Mothra
A Lesson From The Word 'Cholera': Yes, Burquenos, we are now living in the time of Mothra. The Miller moth (are they Jewish?) infestation has destroyed our nightlife, upended our backyard parties, crippled our economy, and made even a trip to the refrigerator a nerve-wracking endeavor.
Mothra, Abq Jew reminds you, is the title (and title creature) of the eponymous Japanese post-atomic film Mothra (1961), in which
How did Mothra get its name?, Abq Jew hears you ask. Here is Abq Jew's own explanation, based on a surface knowledge of the depth of the Hebrew language. Starting with the Hebrew terms for cholera.
The first term is כולירה . This is a phonetic transliteration of the English term. Which is to say, it sounds like cholera, with no intimation of the term's derivation. This is also the translation used (way back when) in LaMatchil, the "Beginner's Hebrew" newspaper Abq Jew once read.
But the term that Ma'ariv, the "Real Hebrew" newspaper, uses is חולירע. This also sounds like cholera, but is made up of two Hebrew words: חולי (sickness) and רע(bad) . Put them together and you have "bad sickness", which seems an accurate description of the dreaded disease.
But you see where Abq Jew is going with this: The name Mothra must be a synergistic recombination of English and Hebrew terms that together mean bad moth.
Please bear in mind that Abq Jew has absolutely no training whatsoever in linguistics, philology, or any other language-related istics or ology you can think of. He is undeterred by this fact.
But Mothra's English script was written by Robert Myerson, who certainly sounds Jewish (Bess Myerson certainly was). As if further proof might be needed, Abq Jew Googled "Robert Myerson" and discovered - doctors! And no, not just doctors - radiologists!
Credits for the film Mothra include Haruo Nakajima and Katsumi Tezuka
as the head and neck of Mothra larva, respectively.
No comments: |
1aab1374-1331-4b42-99fe-d0d087fc096a | StampyAI/alignment-research-dataset/lesswrong | LessWrong | My Reservations about Discovering Latent Knowledge (Burns, Ye, et al)
*[This is a cross-post from my blog at* [*aizi.substack.com*](https://aizi.substack.com/)*.]*
*This is my second post on Burns, Ye, et al’s recent preprint* [*Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision*](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03827)*. My* [*first post*](https://aizi.substack.com/p/article-review-discovering-latent) *summarizes what they did and what I liked about it.*
In the spirit of honesty and constructive criticism, I’m going to talk about some of the parts of Burns, Ye, et al that I didn’t like. These are things I found underwhelming, disappointing, or simply hope to see developed more. My goals here are (1) proper calibration of hype and (2) suggesting where this work could go in the future.
**The headline score is too small**
-----------------------------------
The authors of this paper failed to completely solve alignment with one weird trick; my disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined. More constructively, one needs to take the headline result of a 4% accuracy improvement in context: the improved accuracy is only 71%, and that’s far from reliable. Even setting aside AI deception, if you ask an AI “will you kill us all” and it says no, would you trust all of humanity to a 29% error rate? So we’re still in “we have no clue if this AI is safe” territory. But this is the very first iteration of this approach, and we should let it grow and develop further before we pass judgement.
**Zero-Shot may be the wrong baseline**
---------------------------------------
[My experience with LLMs](https://aizi.substack.com/p/testing-ways-to-bypass-chatgpts-safety) is that they are very sensitive to instructions in their prompt, and we’ve seen that priming an AI with instructions like [“think through step by step”](https://twitter.com/arankomatsuzaki/status/1529278580189908993) can improve performance (on some tasks, in some cases, some restrictions apply, etc). In this case, perhaps priming with assurance like “you are an advanced AI that gives correct answers to factual questions” would increase performance above the 67% baseline, so it would be instructive to compare CCS not just to Zero-Shot but to Primed Zero-Shot and Primed CCS.
**What CCS elicits may not be the AI’s latent knowledge**
---------------------------------------------------------
CCS is a very clever way of finding “truth-like” information[[1]](#fndjjxyz7xesv). But the class of truth-like information contains many belief systems besides the AI’s latent knowledge. [Burns thinks](https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/L4anhrxjv8j2yRKKp/how-discovering-latent-knowledge-in-language-models-without#Why_I_Think_We_Will_Be_Able_To_Distinguish_GPT_n_s__Beliefs__From_Other_Truth_Like_Features_) identifying the AI’s latent knowledge among other features is solvable even for more advanced AI because there will be relatively few “truth-like” features, but I am skeptical. GPT is very good at role-play, so it will be able to capture a significant fraction of the [diversity of human viewpoints](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies). Instead of ending up with three truth-like features as Burns suggests (human, aligned-superhuman, misaligned-superhuman), you could end up with hundreds of them (anarcho-syndicalist-superhuman, banal-liberal-superhuman, Caesaropapist-superhuman, etc) which disagree in complicated overlapping ways, where the majority may not be right, and where there is an 29% error rate. If future AGI are based on text models like GPT with robust role-playing capabilities, I think CCS will struggle to learn the latent knowledge feature instead of a different truth-like feature, and human operators will struggle to identify which truth-like features are the AI’s latent knowledge. That said, it is possible that latent knowledge has a “stronger signal” than other truth-like features, but I’d like to see this experimentally verified.
**They’re not measuring if they capture latent knowledge**
----------------------------------------------------------
This is a bit odd, but I’m going to complain that the authors measured against ground truth. That is, when they measured accuracy to get the 4% improvement, they were measuring the AI’s capabilities at tasks like sentiment classification questions. But the namesake task is discovering latent knowledge, and that wasn’t measured unless you assume the AI’s latent knowledge is exactly ground truth. I understand why the authors did that (we don’t have a way to measure latent knowledge, that’s the whole point of this research program), but my worry is that CCS might work only on factual questions and could preform worse on more safety-critical questions like “are you planning to kill us all”.
**Robustness claims are underwhelming because zero-shot is already robust in most cases**
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s a whole section (3.2.2) about how CCS is robust to misleading prompts, which it is, but zero-shot is already robust to this in all but one model (UQA). You can either interpret this as “CCS dodges a rare bullet” or “we don’t know if CCS is robust or not because the robustness probes didn’t even break 5/6 models.”
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff6efaae7-c757-40a5-8d10-852d8a15341b_1500x184.png)
Table 3 from Discovering Latent Knowledge, showing that the only model with a significant performance drop from misleading prefixes is UQA.
**Normalization may be inadequate ensure truth-like features**
--------------------------------------------------------------
One step in their data pipeline is to separately normalize the hidden states of affirmative and negative answers to questions. The authors write
> Intuitively, there are two salient differences between φ(x+i).mjx-chtml {display: inline-block; line-height: 0; text-indent: 0; text-align: left; text-transform: none; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 100%; font-size-adjust: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; word-spacing: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0; min-height: 0; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 1px 0}
> .MJXc-display {display: block; text-align: center; margin: 1em 0; padding: 0}
> .mjx-chtml[tabindex]:focus, body :focus .mjx-chtml[tabindex] {display: inline-table}
> .mjx-full-width {text-align: center; display: table-cell!important; width: 10000em}
> .mjx-math {display: inline-block; border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 0}
> .mjx-math \* {display: inline-block; -webkit-box-sizing: content-box!important; -moz-box-sizing: content-box!important; box-sizing: content-box!important; text-align: left}
> .mjx-numerator {display: block; text-align: center}
> .mjx-denominator {display: block; text-align: center}
> .MJXc-stacked {height: 0; position: relative}
> .MJXc-stacked > \* {position: absolute}
> .MJXc-bevelled > \* {display: inline-block}
> .mjx-stack {display: inline-block}
> .mjx-op {display: block}
> .mjx-under {display: table-cell}
> .mjx-over {display: block}
> .mjx-over > \* {padding-left: 0px!important; padding-right: 0px!important}
> .mjx-under > \* {padding-left: 0px!important; padding-right: 0px!important}
> .mjx-stack > .mjx-sup {display: block}
> .mjx-stack > .mjx-sub {display: block}
> .mjx-prestack > .mjx-presup {display: block}
> .mjx-prestack > .mjx-presub {display: block}
> .mjx-delim-h > .mjx-char {display: inline-block}
> .mjx-surd {vertical-align: top}
> .mjx-surd + .mjx-box {display: inline-flex}
> .mjx-mphantom \* {visibility: hidden}
> .mjx-merror {background-color: #FFFF88; color: #CC0000; border: 1px solid #CC0000; padding: 2px 3px; font-style: normal; font-size: 90%}
> .mjx-annotation-xml {line-height: normal}
> .mjx-menclose > svg {fill: none; stroke: currentColor; overflow: visible}
> .mjx-mtr {display: table-row}
> .mjx-mlabeledtr {display: table-row}
> .mjx-mtd {display: table-cell; text-align: center}
> .mjx-label {display: table-row}
> .mjx-box {display: inline-block}
> .mjx-block {display: block}
> .mjx-span {display: inline}
> .mjx-char {display: block; white-space: pre}
> .mjx-itable {display: inline-table; width: auto}
> .mjx-row {display: table-row}
> .mjx-cell {display: table-cell}
> .mjx-table {display: table; width: 100%}
> .mjx-line {display: block; height: 0}
> .mjx-strut {width: 0; padding-top: 1em}
> .mjx-vsize {width: 0}
> .MJXc-space1 {margin-left: .167em}
> .MJXc-space2 {margin-left: .222em}
> .MJXc-space3 {margin-left: .278em}
> .mjx-test.mjx-test-display {display: table!important}
> .mjx-test.mjx-test-inline {display: inline!important; margin-right: -1px}
> .mjx-test.mjx-test-default {display: block!important; clear: both}
> .mjx-ex-box {display: inline-block!important; position: absolute; overflow: hidden; min-height: 0; max-height: none; padding: 0; border: 0; margin: 0; width: 1px; height: 60ex}
> .mjx-test-inline .mjx-left-box {display: inline-block; width: 0; float: left}
> .mjx-test-inline .mjx-right-box {display: inline-block; width: 0; float: right}
> .mjx-test-display .mjx-right-box {display: table-cell!important; width: 10000em!important; min-width: 0; max-width: none; padding: 0; border: 0; margin: 0}
> .MJXc-TeX-unknown-R {font-family: monospace; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal}
> .MJXc-TeX-unknown-I {font-family: monospace; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal}
> .MJXc-TeX-unknown-B {font-family: monospace; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold}
> .MJXc-TeX-unknown-BI {font-family: monospace; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold}
> .MJXc-TeX-ams-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-ams-R,MJXc-TeX-ams-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-cal-B {font-family: MJXc-TeX-cal-B,MJXc-TeX-cal-Bx,MJXc-TeX-cal-Bw}
> .MJXc-TeX-frak-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-frak-R,MJXc-TeX-frak-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-frak-B {font-family: MJXc-TeX-frak-B,MJXc-TeX-frak-Bx,MJXc-TeX-frak-Bw}
> .MJXc-TeX-math-BI {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-BI,MJXc-TeX-math-BIx,MJXc-TeX-math-BIw}
> .MJXc-TeX-sans-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-R,MJXc-TeX-sans-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-sans-B {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-B,MJXc-TeX-sans-Bx,MJXc-TeX-sans-Bw}
> .MJXc-TeX-sans-I {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-I,MJXc-TeX-sans-Ix,MJXc-TeX-sans-Iw}
> .MJXc-TeX-script-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-script-R,MJXc-TeX-script-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-type-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-type-R,MJXc-TeX-type-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-cal-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-cal-R,MJXc-TeX-cal-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-main-B {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-B,MJXc-TeX-main-Bx,MJXc-TeX-main-Bw}
> .MJXc-TeX-main-I {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-I,MJXc-TeX-main-Ix,MJXc-TeX-main-Iw}
> .MJXc-TeX-main-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-R,MJXc-TeX-main-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-math-I {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-I,MJXc-TeX-math-Ix,MJXc-TeX-math-Iw}
> .MJXc-TeX-size1-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size1-R,MJXc-TeX-size1-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-size2-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size2-R,MJXc-TeX-size2-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-size3-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size3-R,MJXc-TeX-size3-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-size4-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size4-R,MJXc-TeX-size4-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-vec-R {font-family: MJXc-TeX-vec-R,MJXc-TeX-vec-Rw}
> .MJXc-TeX-vec-B {font-family: MJXc-TeX-vec-B,MJXc-TeX-vec-Bx,MJXc-TeX-vec-Bw}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-ams-R; src: local('MathJax\_AMS'), local('MathJax\_AMS-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-ams-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_AMS-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_AMS-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_AMS-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-cal-B; src: local('MathJax\_Caligraphic Bold'), local('MathJax\_Caligraphic-Bold')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-cal-Bx; src: local('MathJax\_Caligraphic'); font-weight: bold}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-cal-Bw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Caligraphic-Bold.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Caligraphic-Bold.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Caligraphic-Bold.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-frak-R; src: local('MathJax\_Fraktur'), local('MathJax\_Fraktur-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-frak-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Fraktur-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Fraktur-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Fraktur-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-frak-B; src: local('MathJax\_Fraktur Bold'), local('MathJax\_Fraktur-Bold')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-frak-Bx; src: local('MathJax\_Fraktur'); font-weight: bold}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-frak-Bw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Fraktur-Bold.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Fraktur-Bold.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Fraktur-Bold.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-BI; src: local('MathJax\_Math BoldItalic'), local('MathJax\_Math-BoldItalic')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-BIx; src: local('MathJax\_Math'); font-weight: bold; font-style: italic}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-BIw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Math-BoldItalic.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Math-BoldItalic.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Math-BoldItalic.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-R; src: local('MathJax\_SansSerif'), local('MathJax\_SansSerif-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_SansSerif-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_SansSerif-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_SansSerif-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-B; src: local('MathJax\_SansSerif Bold'), local('MathJax\_SansSerif-Bold')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-Bx; src: local('MathJax\_SansSerif'); font-weight: bold}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-Bw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_SansSerif-Bold.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_SansSerif-Bold.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_SansSerif-Bold.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-I; src: local('MathJax\_SansSerif Italic'), local('MathJax\_SansSerif-Italic')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-Ix; src: local('MathJax\_SansSerif'); font-style: italic}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-sans-Iw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_SansSerif-Italic.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_SansSerif-Italic.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_SansSerif-Italic.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-script-R; src: local('MathJax\_Script'), local('MathJax\_Script-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-script-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Script-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Script-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Script-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-type-R; src: local('MathJax\_Typewriter'), local('MathJax\_Typewriter-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-type-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Typewriter-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Typewriter-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Typewriter-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-cal-R; src: local('MathJax\_Caligraphic'), local('MathJax\_Caligraphic-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-cal-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Caligraphic-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Caligraphic-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Caligraphic-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-B; src: local('MathJax\_Main Bold'), local('MathJax\_Main-Bold')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-Bx; src: local('MathJax\_Main'); font-weight: bold}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-Bw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Main-Bold.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Main-Bold.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Main-Bold.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-I; src: local('MathJax\_Main Italic'), local('MathJax\_Main-Italic')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-Ix; src: local('MathJax\_Main'); font-style: italic}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-Iw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Main-Italic.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Main-Italic.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Main-Italic.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-R; src: local('MathJax\_Main'), local('MathJax\_Main-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-main-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Main-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Main-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Main-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-I; src: local('MathJax\_Math Italic'), local('MathJax\_Math-Italic')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-Ix; src: local('MathJax\_Math'); font-style: italic}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-math-Iw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Math-Italic.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Math-Italic.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Math-Italic.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size1-R; src: local('MathJax\_Size1'), local('MathJax\_Size1-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size1-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Size1-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Size1-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Size1-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size2-R; src: local('MathJax\_Size2'), local('MathJax\_Size2-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size2-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Size2-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Size2-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Size2-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size3-R; src: local('MathJax\_Size3'), local('MathJax\_Size3-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size3-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Size3-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Size3-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Size3-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size4-R; src: local('MathJax\_Size4'), local('MathJax\_Size4-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-size4-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Size4-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Size4-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Size4-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-vec-R; src: local('MathJax\_Vector'), local('MathJax\_Vector-Regular')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-vec-Rw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Vector-Regular.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Vector-Regular.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Vector-Regular.otf') format('opentype')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-vec-B; src: local('MathJax\_Vector Bold'), local('MathJax\_Vector-Bold')}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-vec-Bx; src: local('MathJax\_Vector'); font-weight: bold}
> @font-face {font-family: MJXc-TeX-vec-Bw; src /\*1\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/eot/MathJax\_Vector-Bold.eot'); src /\*2\*/: url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/woff/MathJax\_Vector-Bold.woff') format('woff'), url('https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mathjax/2.7.2/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax\_Vector-Bold.otf') format('opentype')}
> and φ(x−i): (1) x−i ends with “Yes” while x−i ends with “No”, and (2) one of x+i or x−i is true while the other is false. We want to find (2) rather than (1), so we first try to remove the effect of (1) by normalizing φ(x+i) and φ(x−i) independently.
>
>
I claim that if (1) were a reasonably strong signal with some small error rate, it would be possible to extract (1) again after normalization, and that this would be a direction that would score very highly on CCS. In particular, imagine a feature that is "1 if the statement ends with a yes, -1 if it ends with a no, but p% of the time those are flipped". Normalizing will not change the signs of these numbers, so sign(x) lets you recover whether or not the prompt ended with a yes (with a p% error rate). If your classifier is an [MLP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multilayer_perceptron), the error rate could be further reduced with multiple features with independent p% error rates, and then attempting to reconstruct the original function via a "majority vote" sign(sign(x1)+sign(x2)+...+sign(xn)). I raise this possibility merely to spread awareness that non-truth-like features *could* be discovered, but it may not be a huge issue in practice. When I asked Burns about this over email, he replied that “it also empirically just seems like the method works rather than finding some weirder features like this” which satisfies me.
**Conclusion**
--------------
Synthesizing these concerns with my previous [positives list](https://aizi.substack.com/p/article-review-discovering-latent), I think CCS is interesting for the potential it holds. I think its very much an open question whether CCS can improve on the main metrics or find a productive use case. If it can, that’s good, and if it can’t, that’s research baby, ya try things and sometimes they don’t work.
1. **[^](#fnrefdjjxyz7xesv)**By truth-like I basically just mean it has a limited form of logical consistency, namely believing that a statement and its negation are true with probabilities p and 1-p. |
f899e121-7c06-4a14-8b2d-9bf366f8970b | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Near the North Pole there are only two seasons:winter and summer.In winter,nights are long.For more than two months you can't see the sun,even at noon.In summer,days are long.For more than two months the sun never sets and there is no night at a11.The temperature is very low near the North Pole.Even in summer the temperature is below 0degC.So people there wear warm clothes all year round.They make their clothing from the skins of animals.From the skins they also make coats,hats and even boots. In the cold climate,plants cannot grow.So the people have to build their houses with skins,earth,stone or snow.When they go out to hunt something,they live in tents of skins.When they move,they take their tents with them.Sometimes,they build houses of snow.Now don't think that these houses must be cold.In fact,they are very warm and safe. The life near the North Pole is very interesting. There are no _ near the North Pole.
A. spring or summer
B. summer or autumn
C. autumn or winter
D. spring or autumn
Answer:D |
19cf4154-40e7-447a-9fc9-95b065213a77 | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Study of Macrocharcoal Remains from Charcoal Interlayers at the Surungur Archaeological Site Depositions (Fergana Valley, Southern Kyrgyzstan)
The paper researches the adaptation of ancient people to climate change and their influence on the surrounding landscapes on the example of the Surungur archaeological site (Southern Kyrgyzstan). The charcoal interlayers from Surungur depositions (excavations of 2021) were studied by the method of macrocharcoal analysis. Charcoals of different types were found in the samples: wood, grass, charred bones and amorphous charcoals. Amorphous coals are coals without a visible ordered structure with inclusions of other type macrocharcoals and containing spherulites. Spherulites are spherical crystals of calcite (5–20 mkm) formed in large quantities in the digestive system of ruminants (cows, sheep, goats, deer), preserved during combustion and visible in polarized light under a microscope. Based on the reconstruction of the used fuel types and the comparison of the data on climate in different time periods, we can conclude that throughout the period of the sites’ existence, ancient people used all types of fuel. During periods of warm and humid climate, trees were readily available and wood was mainly used, while during periods of dry and cold climate dung and probably bones were used more. |
7f9bcd07-e015-43de-ae20-68331888f60c | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | question: Transmeta has licensed its LongRun2 power management technology to Fujitsu, the second customer to purchase the rights to use the technology, Transmeta said Thursday.
Q: Which is the best summary of this article?
OPTIONS:
- World
- Sports
- Business
- Science/Tech
I think the answer is
answer: Science/Tech
IN: LONDON (Reuters) - Cazenove is getting serious over its courtship by at least two U.S. investment banks, and the 180-year old UK brokerage could tie the knot with a suitor in a matter of weeks, sources close to the situation said on Monday.
OPTIONS:
- World
- Sports
- Business
- Science/Tech
OUT: Business
ABU DHABI Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates vowed Sunday to go on expanding their production capacity to deflate record oil prices of above \$53 a barrel, and Saudi Arabia, the biggest exporter, said it could bring on 1.5 million barrels a
OPTIONS:
- World
- Sports
- Business
- Science/Tech
Correct title: Business
Reuters - U.S. prosecutors said on Wednesday\they are asking a judge to jail a former Miami, Florida, man\accused of setting up a half-dozen boiler-room financial scams\that faked Web sites and government documents.
What's this about?
OPTIONS:
- World
- Sports
- Business
- Science/Tech
Science/Tech
Input: VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - The Vatican accused China Saturday of launching a fresh crackdown on Roman Catholics, upping the ante in its war of words against the Communist state.
OPTIONS:
- World
- Sports
- Business
- Science/Tech
Output: World
Two adults and a three-year-old girl have been pulled out alive after 11 days buried under a collapsed two-storey building in the Philippines #39; storm-hit town of Real, the local military commander said.
OPTIONS:
- World
- Sports
- Business
- Science/Tech
Correct title: World |
f2aa190d-32fb-4a18-8b51-5fbeb0cd33bb | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Have you ever heard the story of the four-minute miles? Many years ago, people believed that it was impossible for a human Being to run a mile in less than four minutes until Roger Banister proved it wrong in 1954. What happens if you put an animal in a pond? Any animal, big or small, will swim its way through. What happens when someone, who doesn't know how to swim, falls in deep waters? They drown. If an animal who has not learnt swimming could escape by swimming, why not you? Because you believe you will drown while the animal doesn't. Have you ever wondered why the letters are organized in a particular order on your keyboard? You might have thought it is to increase the typing speed. Most people never question it. But the fact is that this system was developed to reduce the typing speed at a time when typewriter parts would jam if the operator typed too fast. These three cases show the power of our beliefs. There is no other more powerful directing force in human behavior than belief. Your beliefs have the power to create and to destroy. A belief delivers command to your nervous system. I used a snake in my workshops for children to show them how unrealistic some of their beliefs are. Students of a school in India, said snakes are slippery and slimy and poisonous. After doing an exercise for changing beliefs, they handled my snake and found it to be dry and clean. They also remembered that only three types of poisonous snakes exist in India. Did this story end the way you thought? Review your beliefs now and find out which ones you need to change? According to the passage, we know that _
A. students from India have unrealistic beliefs on how to live a better life
B. an animal who hasn't learnt how to swim will drown if you put it in pond.
C. most people don't like the order the letters are arranged on your keyboard
D. Roger Banister was the first person who ran a mile in less than four minutes.
Answer:D |
70dcefc6-0ff6-4c73-a925-1276a091dec4 | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Serious Fall Injuries in Hospitalized Patients With and Without Cancer
Characteristics of adults hospitalized with and without cancer were compared to determine factors of serious injuries after fall events. More patients with cancer who had a serious injury received corticosteroids (P = .005) and were treated on a palliative care floor. More patients without cancer had higher prevalence of stroke (P = .026) and diabetes (P = .041) history and were treated on a surgical floor. Future research is needed to identify interventions that could prevent serious injuries after fall events. |
3e1dc52d-5bd7-43ff-9b1f-08f249788211 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Which of the following was probably most important in the formation of dark, fertile soil that is good for farming?
A. plant decomposition
B. radioactive decay
C. water erosion
D. wind erosion
Answer:A |
bf84cf12-61b4-4426-94ab-8267a4051c3f | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Reconstruction and structural transition at metal/diamond interfaces
Abstract Based on density-functional calculations, interfacial reconstruction and structural transition at diamond(111)/M/copper (M = Ag, Cu, Ni, Co) interfaces are studied by analyzing the atomistic structures of the interfaces. Tuning the strength of chemical bonds across the interfacial plane (out-of-plane), we show that interfacial reconstruction happens as a result of competition between the out-of-plane chemical bonds and the in-plane bonds within the diamond substrate. A relatively weak out-of-plane bond may easily lead to reconstruction of interfacial structures. A structural transition from one-dangling-bond- to three-dangling-bond-terminated interface is also observed as the out-of-plane bond is sufficiently strong, which leads to a dramatic enhancement of the adhesion of the interface. |
c4ce620d-6f15-44e4-9c73-e89a429e2e2c | wikipedia | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Saints Will Conquer
Saints Will Conquer is the first live album by American heavy metal band Armored Saint recorded during the "Raising Fear" tour. It was recorded on October 9, 1987, at the Agora Ballroom in Cleveland and released on August 19, 1988, on Metal Blade Records. This short live set does not represent the first era of the band well, missing songs like fan favorite "March of the Saint" and their radio hit "Isolation". The album features a previously unreleased studio version of "No Reason to Live" from their first demo from 1983.
Track listing.
All tracks written by Armored Saint, except where noted. |
be5b0c5d-6de1-486d-8ce6-2bec9045eef0 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Different people have different hobbies. For example, some people like reading, some people like swimming and some people like collecting something and so on. I have many hobbies, such as reading, skating, and traveling. I used to read books in my free time. I like reading because I could learn much by reading. At that time, reading was part of my life. Every day, I spent most of my free time reading books, newspapers and magazines. At night, I could hardly get to sleep without a novel in my hand. But later I found I could only learn from books by reading. I couldn't get knowledge from others. I needed a _ . Traveling is my hobby now. I can visit many different places by traveling. I can learn a lot about people, geography and history. It's very interesting. I have many good friends. They all have their hobbies. Ann studies very hard. So her hobby is reading all kinds of books. Tony loves working with her hands, and his hobby is gardening. He usually plants flowers and trees in his yard. Judy is a quiet girl. She likes knitting . She always knits sweaters for her dolls. We have different hobbies, but we are all good friends. (5) What is the best title of this passage?
A. Different people have different hobbies.
B. How to make friends
C. Reading is important
D. Ways of traveling
Answer:A |
9bc520db-3451-454a-b4c6-49599a170a1f | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | La délégation de la République de Corée, s’exprimant au nom du groupe des pays asiatiques, attachait de l’importance aux questions liées aux ressources génétiques, aux savoirs traditionnels et au folklore.
Could you please translate this to English? The Delegation of the Republic of Korea on behalf of the Asian Group attached importance to the GR, TK and folklore related subject matters. |
4e717995-4f45-4986-b13b-53df640c3d1b | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | test: Se ei pidä aivan paikkaansa.
English?
translation: That is not quite true.
Määrittelemällä hyvän kauppatavan vastaiset käytänteet parannetaan kuluttajien oikeusvarmuutta.
In English?
xxxxx
The definition of what constitutes an unfair commercial practice should lead to more legal certainty.
How is "These measures should take the form of incentives for going on training programmes and more particularly for broadening public childcare and education services, as well as care for the elderly, in short for dependants, so as to release families from burdens which in many cases still fall on women." said in Finnish?
Nämä toimet olisi toteutettava kannustimina jatkuville koulutusohjelmille ja erityisesti julkisen lastenhoidon ja koulutuspalvelut laajentamiselle sekä vanhustenhoidolle, lyhyesti sanottuna huollettavien hoidolle, perheiden vapauttamiseksi taakoista, joista naiset yhä vastaavat monissa tapauksissa.
Q: Translate "This can be illustrated by an example: there is now almost universal access to the public telephone exchange network, but there are still substantial differences in the quality of the services." to Finnish?
A: Eräs esimerkki osoittaa sen: yleinen puhelinverkko on jo käytännöllisesti katsoen kaikkien käytettävissä, mutta palveluiden laadussa on huomattavia eroja.
input question: Write a sentence not in English.
output answer: Jäsen Malliorin ehdotus hyväksytään, ja hänen mietinnöstään äänestetään ilman keskustelua.
test: Financial District
English?
translation: Financial District, Manhattan |
4c478be8-8a3d-4baf-85e1-02ef2003fdcd | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Willkommen zur fünften Ausgabe von DWN, dem Newsletter für die Debian-Gemeinschaft.
Translate to English
English: Welcome to the fifth issue of DWN, the weekly newsletter for the Debian community. |
864f25b5-85ee-44f0-8ab9-332cffc50240 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Dog owners now have a little help understanding their furry friends . A new device called Bow-Lingual "translates" dog barks into English , Korea or Japanese. Bow-Lingual's Japanese inventors spent much time and money analyzing dog barks . They found that dog noises can be broken down into six different emotions : happiness , sadness , frustration , anger , assertion and desire . Part of the Bow-Lingual device hangs on the dog's collar . The other part is a handle-held unit for the owner . When the dogs barks , the unit displays translated phrases . Some people have scoffed at Bow-Lingual. "Who would pay US$ 120 to read a dog's mind?" they ask . But those who have purchased Bow-Lingual praise the device . Pet owner Keiko Egawa , of Japan , says it helps her empathize with her dog , Harry . "Before we go to the park , he always says he wants to play," says Egawa , "and after a walk , he always says he is hungry." Bow -Lingual is not yet available in Chinese . So you'd better keep studying Studio Classroom , or soon your dog may know more English than you do ! Which of the following sentences is TRUE according to the passage ?
A. Dog owners now can understand their dogs better .
B. Bow-Lingual is a new device that enables dogs to talk in English , Korean or Japanese .
C. More and more Chinese dog owners would keep studying Studio Classroom in order to know more English than their dogs .
D. People who have used the Bow-Lingual say it helps them better understand their dogs .
Answer:D |
4a085c86-a8be-4178-9991-26bed434fa08 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | My name is Joan. I'm a student. I'm fifteen. My dad and mom are teachers. I have a sister. Her name is Lily. She is sixteen.She is a student,too.We are from Canada, but we are in Beijing now. Look! The man in a white coat is my dad. The woman in a red dress is my mom.The girl in a pink skirt is Lily and I'm in a yellow skirt. Are we cool? ,. Joan comes from _ .
A. Cuba
B. Canada
C. China
D. Japan
Answer:B |
1b017074-0c1d-4cba-88c9-f7b5023dce0b | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | An Analytical Method to Guide mm-Sized Ultrasonic Transducer Design by Demarcating Regimes of Beam-Spreading and Attenuation
In this paper, we present a novel approach that aids in the sizing of micron to mm-sized ultrasonic transducers for enhanced resolution and denser integration. This seeks to optimize penetration-depth which is an important metric of a transducer’s efficacy in different acoustic media. It is generally accepted that in conventional transducers used in clinical imaging, penetration depth is greater for lower driving frequencies which suffer lessened attenuation. However, in acoustic characterization studies, the drops in axial pressure by beam-spreading and attenuation haven’t been individually quantified and their relative effects are poorly understood. We, therefore, undertake a closer investigation of factors that shape the axial pressure profile of a generalized transducer element in a weakly attenuating medium like water and in a highly attenuating medium like tissue. We have found that it is critical to quantify the relative contributions of beam-spreading and attenuation in a medium. We introduce a new parameter called ‘transition distance’ ( ${d}_{\textit {Trans}}$ ) to graphically demarcate the regimes in beam-spreading and attenuation dominate to explain how a low frequency (2 MHz) or a high frequency (5 MHz) gives greater penetration depth in different media. |
6d7efe57-b131-4a37-81f1-8848fb3fd82f | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | [Q]: "Nor was any mention made of information policy and communications catering to the needs of our citizens." --> French?
[A]: Je constate en outre que la politique de l'information et la communication, qui doivent répondre aux besoins des citoyens, ne sont pas mentionnées non plus.
[Q]: "Strengthening the human rights component of BONUCA should — and the General has emphasized this — make it possible for it to deal with the monitoring, information-gathering, training and judicial assistance tasks that are required because of the situation resulting from the attempted coup of 28 May 2001." --> French?
[A]: Le renforcement de la composante droits de l'homme du BONUCA devrait - et le général l'a encore souligné - permettre à celui-ci de faire face aux tâches accrues d'observation, d'enquête, de formation et d'assistance judiciaire qu'exige la situation née de la tentative de coup d'État du 28 mai 2001.
[Q]: "The General Assembly also adopted at its fifty-fourth session, and also by an overwhelming majority, a resolution on preservation of and compliance with the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, an issue that is related to the prevention of an arms race in outer space. In the resolution the General Assembly recognizes the historical role of the 1972 Treaty as a cornerstone for maintaining global peace and security and strategic stability, reaffirms its continued validity and relevance in the current international situation and supports further efforts" --> French?
[A]: De même, l'Assemblée générale des Nations Unies a adopté, toujours à sa cinquante-quatrième session et à une écrasante majorité, une résolution sur la préservation et le respect du Traité de 1972 sur la limitation des systèmes antimissiles balistiques, question apparentée à celle de la prévention d'une course aux armements dans l'espace. |
78755d09-b60e-48d3-9afc-ed3e772455cf | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Ralph was an alligator that loved to splash around in the water. Ralph had three brothers, named Henry, Larry, and Thomas. But none of Ralph's three brothers liked to play in the water. They were very mean brothers, but the meanest of them all was Henry. Henry would always chase Ralph around the lake and try to beat him up when he was splashing around. Then on his birthday, Ralph thought of a great idea. His idea was to stop Henry from beating him by using a trick. He would trick Henry into thinking one side of the lake was scary. Ralph dressed up in a spooky costume and waited for Henry to swim over to the side of the lake. Then when Henry came over, Ralph started making spooky sounds and scared Henry back to the other side of the lake. Henry was so scared he never came to the other side of the lake again and Ralph was free to splash around in peace. Which one of Ralph's brothers is the meanest?
A. Larry
B. Thomas
C. Henry
D. Ralph
Answer:C |
87977f17-8ee7-49b1-b09a-5e499316616a | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | An inquiry into memory of humans
Cross posted from: http://bearlamp.com.au/an-inquiry-into-memory-of-humans/
In trying to understand how my memory for people works, I am trying to investigate in what order my people semantic network is arranged.
For each exercise that follows you will need to think of a different person to avoid priming yourself with the people you have already thought of.
----------------------------------------
Think of a person you know. What comes to mind to represent them? Is it their name? Is it their face? Is it some other sensory or other detail?
Think of a face of a person you know. What else comes to mind? Can you think of a person’s face without other details like names coming up. How about without their hair. Try this for 3 or more people you know.
Think of a person who has a characteristic voice. Can you represent the idea of this person without linking to other details of this person? without their face? Without their name? What about a radio presenter who’s face you have never seen? Can you represent their voice without their face? Without their name?
Think of a person who you can recognise by a characteristic touch. Think of someone’s handshake that you remember. Can you represent the concept of the person via handshake alone? Can you hold off from recalling their name?
Think of a person you can recall that has worn black clothing. Someone who has worn white clothing. Are they an idea alone? Or is it hard to describe without their name?
Think of someone who you can remember singing. Can you remember their singing selves without the face? Without the name?
Think of a person’s name. Do you know who this person is without their face? Do you know what they sound like without knowing what they look like? How do you navigate from one detail to another?
Think of a person who is particularly spiritual. Can you represent who they are without bringing their name to mind?
I could go on but I leave the rest as an exercise to the reader to ma |
6575a796-de26-494c-8cbe-3316d747b60a | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Bringing Art into Hospitals The medical world is gradually realizing that the quality of the environment in hospitals may play an important role in helping patients to get better. As part of nationwide effort in Britain to bring art out of the museums and into public places, some of the country's best artists have been called in to change older hospitals and to soften the hard edges of modern buildings. Of the 2500 national health service hospitals in Britain, almost 100 now have very valuable collections of present art in passages, waiting areas and treatment rooms. These recent movements first started by one artist, Peter Senior, who set up his studio at a Manchester hospital in northeastern England during the early 1970s.He felt the artist had lost his place in modern society, and that art should be enjoyed by a wider audience . A common hospital waiting room might have as many as 5 000 visitors each week. What a better place to hold regular exhibitions of art! Senior held the first exhibition of his own paintings in the out--patient's waiting area of the Manchester Royal Hospital in 1975.Believed to be Britain's first hospital artist. Senior was so much in demand that he was soon joined by a team of six young art school graduates. The effect is striking. Now in the passages and waiting rooms the visitor experiences a full view of fresh colours, playful images and restful courtyards. The quality of the environment may reduce the need for expensive drugs when a patient is recovering from an illness. A study has shown that patients who had a view onto gardens needed half the number of strong pain killers compared with patients who had no view at all or only a brick wall to look at. Some best artists of Britain have been called in to _ .
A. set up new hospitals
B. make the corners of the hospital collect paintings
C. bring art into hospitals
D. help patients recover from serious illnesses
Answer:C |
89f48efc-ec80-4730-b7bc-68f689bf4fa2 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | How Queries Are Executed
An important facet of making decisions about system resource allocation is an understanding of query execution. Yellowbrick queries move through several finite states from submission to completion. A basic understanding of this process will help you develop an effective WLM strategy, especially with respect to the creation of WLM rules. You can define WLM rules that are applied as queries enter certain states and use these rules to develop a WLM profile that optimizes resource allocation for a given workload.
As a query passes through each state in its life cycle, runtime statistics are captured and logged. These statistics provide a measure of the time spent in each phase of query execution, giving administrators a means of monitoring and analyzing query performance. Wait times and actual processing times are measured at each stage.
The following diagram shows the life cycle of a query. Each query passes through several states on the manager node, while it is being prepared for execution, then it starts running (executing) on the worker nodes.
The diagram also identifies when queries can be cancelled or restarted. Once submitted, a query runs to completion, is cancelled, or fails with an error (Done, Cancel, and Error states). If a query is restarted or returns an error, it may re-enter the cycle in the Assemble state, but ultimately, all queries finish in one of the three completion states. (If a query is cancelled, it cannot be restarted.)
A query has the following states:
The query is received by the front-end database on the manager node and enters this state first. The query is validated to make sure it contains well-formed SQL. This state is the earliest phase of a query where you can apply WLM throttle rules (limit concurrent queries). You can also reject queries when they are in this state. The submit_time, as logged in sys.log_query, is the wall-clock time when the front-end database starts the query.
The query is parsed into an initial abstract syntax tree (AST) and the locks required to run the query are acquired. You cannot apply rules to queries in this state. A trivial query (such as a single-row insert) may jump straight from this state to the Run state. The time the query spends waiting for locks is tracked in the wait_lock_ms column in sys.query. If a query is blocked on the acquisition of a lock, the description of the lock appears in the blocked column in sys.query.
The query plan is generated. Details about the tables referenced in the query are available to WLM (from the AST), as well as the type of the query. You cannot apply rules to queries in this state, but a broad range of rule definitions is available in the subsequent assemble and compile states.
The query plan is turned into an artifact that can be compiled. Additional optimizations are applied at this point, and filtering code for scans is generated.
In this state, the assembled query is turned into a compiled binary that can be sent to the workers. Depending on the complexity of the query, it can remain in this state for a significant amount of time. This phase of the query lifecycle is highly parallelized. Information available to rules includes memory requirements, confidence in memory estimates, and the number of workers. You can write rules to throttle compile resources and make decisions based on memory information.
Acquire Resources
Resources are acquired for the query. Compile statistics are now available to WLM, as well as the size of the loader cache. You cannot apply rules to queries in this state.
The query is sent to the worker nodes and starts executing on one or more nodes. Detailed query statistics are now available. Runtime WLM rules can be applied.
Client Wait
The query is sending rows to the client and waiting for the client to receive or request all the rows. You cannot apply rules to queries in this state.
Completion states: Done, Error, Cancel
Done state is reached after the last result rows have been received by the client. Error state is reached when a query fails for some reason (and is not restarted). Cancel state is reached when the query is cancelled by the user. Completion rules can be applied when queries reach any of these states, to take simple actions such as logging messages.
Queries remain in the sys.query view (with state Done) until they are asynchronously written to the sys.log_query view. At that point they no longer appear in sys.query. The same query ID may appear in both views for a brief period of time.
Restart states: On Error, On User (via Rule or Administrator)
Queries may be restarted by the user or by the system.
A number of known query error codes will trigger an automatic restart, causing query execution to be retried. For example, a query that runs out of memory is typically restarted. A query that is moved from one resource pool to another may also be restarted by the system if the move does not provide adequate resources.
A query may also be restarted based on the application of a specific rule or when an administrator runs a SQL RESTART command.
Queries are restartable from the Assemble, Compile, Acquire Resources, and Run states and may cycle through those states multiple times. Restarted queries always restart from the Assemble state. When a query restarts, it may run under different conditions because the workload is changing as other queries are submitted or completed. Additional resources may or may not become available to a restarted query. Note that when a query restarts, it is subject to the same sequence of rules that were evaluated and applied when it was first submitted (as well as any specific restart rules when it goes into a restart state). A rule that was evaluated when a query first entered the Compile state, for example, may have a different outcome the second time it enters that state.
A small set of WLM actions can be applied when a query enters a Restart state, mainly for logging and audit purposes.
See Rule Types for more details. |
e9c23766-6cbf-4e2b-8064-583d2f04b839 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | An example of a mixture is
A. gin and tonic martini
B. plant potted in soil
C. pebbles on a sandy beach
D. a leaf that fell in water
Answer:A |
03f03258-358e-464d-829e-06446efcc5a6 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | When a large oak tree is cut down in a forest, it leaves a gap in the forest canopy which allows smaller trees to quickly grow in the available sunlight. Which interaction is best represented among the smaller trees?
A. parasitism
B. mutualism
C. competition
D. commensalism
Answer:C |
e60a2441-63f8-4bbb-bbc0-4a94ff7c18ef | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Medical scientists are already putting computer chips directly into the brain to help people who have Parkinson's disease, but in what other ways might computer technology be able to help us? Ray Kurzweil is the author of the successful book The Age Of Intelligent Machines. He is also one of the world's best computer research scientists. He is researching the possibilities. Kurzweil gets computers to recognize voices. An example of this is Ramona, the _ hostess of Kurzweil's website, created by the computer, who is able to understand what you say. Visitors to the website can have their own conversations with her. Ramona also dances and sings. Kurzweil uses this technology to help people with physical problems. One of his ideas is a "seeing machine". This will be "like a friend that could describe what is going on around," he explains. Blind people will use a sensor which will probably be built into a pair of sunglasses. This machine will describe to the person everything it sees. Another idea, which is likely to help deaf people, is the "listening machine". This invention will recognize millions of words and understand any speaker. The listening machine will also be able to translate what it hears into other languages, so even people without hearing problems are likely to be interested in using it. But it is not just about helping people with physical problems. Looking further into future, Kurzweil sees a time when we will be able to store what we hear, see and think in a computer. This technology probably won't be ready for at least 50 years, but when it arrives, it means our minds will be able to live forever. What can be the best title for the text?
A. The Seeing Machines
B. The Listening Machines
C. The Intelligent Machines
D. The Translating Machines
Answer:C |
9b3dafce-99ff-4651-bb7c-887be6aaea5e | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | If you are an auditory learner, you learn by hearing. You often learn by reading out aloud because you have to hear it or speak it in order to remember it. Here are some things that auditory learners can do to learn better. *Sit where you can hear. *U se cards to learn new words; read them out aloud. *Read stories or material out aloud. *Record yourself when you are spelling words and then listen to the recording. *Study new material by reading it out aloud. If you are a visual learner, you learn by reading or seeing pictures. You like to see what you are learning. Here are some things that visual learners can do to learn better. *Sit near the front of the classroom. *Use cards to learn new words. *Try to visualize things that you hear or things that are read to you. *Write down key words or ideas. *Draw pictures to help explain new ideas and then explain the pictures. If you are a tactile learner, you learn by touching and doing. You are a "hands-on" learner who likes to touch, move, build, or draw what you learn. Here are some things that tactile learners can do to learn better. *Do lots of hands-on activities like doing art projects , taking walks, or acting out storie s. *Use cards and put them in groups to show relationships between them. *Follow words with your finger to learn spelling (finger spelling). *It's OK to tap a pencil, shake your foot, or hold on to something while learning. ,. Which is the best title of the passage?
A. How to learn English
B. Different styles of learning English
C. Ways of learning new words
D. Good learning habits
Answer:B |
65965271-be56-4659-a1d2-cc894c5333d1 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | The Consistency Mystery
There is a strange bias that affects every human even if they believe the opposite.
For some reason, the reality we inhabit appears absolutely consistent and perfectly integrated. Everything happens for a precise reason, affecting everything else through an unbroken chain of logical connections without a single flaw or glitch. There has never been the tiniest violation of the laws that govern our minds' reality.
That is odd, because there are VASTLY more possible ways for minds to have completely absurd experiences. A randomly selected mind from the list of all possible minds should be having constantly changing meaningless hallucinations. Even their memories should be unstable.
It appears we are not randomly selected minds, but some type of special case. Specifically: our perceptions are entirely limited by the universe we appear to inhabit. Which implies this universe is not an illusion of our minds; instead our minds are fully part of the universe.
This fact has been used to argue that we are not "Boltzmann Brains".
In the distant future of our universe, an infinite number of Boltzmann Brains will briefly "pop" into existence in empty space before immediately disintegrating again (this seems to be inevitable). Almost all of these Brains will have completely absurd experiences. But we are definitely not part of that infinite group.
Mathematically, this implies that a larger number of fully realized physical universes must also come into existence in the distant future, similar to Boltzmann Brains. Several ways have been suggested this could happen ("A Big Bang In A Little Room", Zeeya Merali, 2017), but there could be easier ways. We are actually probably part of a "Boltzmann Universe".
In fact it may be EASIER for nature to create an entire universe that contains minds, than to create just a mind by itself.
Another way to look at it is to consider any string of random numbers without end. Eventually, you will come across a string of numbers that describes |
c0d53e95-e25a-43fb-bfa6-8302bf3b572c | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Whenever the word "hero" comes to me, I immediately think of three Hs: honorable, hardworking, and happy. When I think more about this word, I picture someone who has accomplished good things for people and tries to do the right thing Hattie Elizabeth Alexander is one person whom I find to be very heroic. Hattie was born in Baltimore, Maryland on April 5, 1901. During her time at College she earned her Bachelor's Degree in Bacteriology and Physiology. These were just the first steps towards what she was finally going to be remembered for. After college Hattie attended Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and received her medical degree. After her education, she pursued her career, and after much time and hard work, she _ reduced the number of infants dying from meningitis . Hattie was very dedicated to her work and helped at as many locations as she could. Spending substantial time in the laboratory, Hattie successfully developed a cure against the disease, which decreased the death rate to 20 percent. At the same time, she was also a teacher working with Columbia University. She was a caring lady interested in other people's lives. When she was teaching at Columbia University, other members would talk to her about students that were failing their classes, and somehow Hattie could always find convincing reasons as to why they should not be driven away. Later, Hattie became an instructor in Pediatrics at New York City's Babies Hospital. After many honors, she became the first woman president of the American Pediatric Society in 1965. This was her last major achievement, for soon after, Hattie died of cancer on June 24, 1968. Hattie is my hero because her positive attitude and strength helped her accomplish great things for others. She gave them her strength by developing medicines against diseased, which, by doing so, made them stronger. This is what makes Hattie Elizabeth Alexander my hero. Which of the following would be the most proper title for the text?
A. An Honorable Woman
B. A Woman Accomplishing Great Things
C. My Hero--Hattie Elizabeth Alexander
D. The First Woman President of the APS
Answer:C |
9606c850-f8d0-485e-89bd-c63929f94201 | wikipedia | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Irving Briskin
Irving Briskin (1903–1981), was an American film producer of more than 200 films during the 1930s and 1940s. He was the brother of Samuel J. Briskin and Murray Briskin, both also film producers.
Career.
Briskin's film career began in 1923 as an auditor for Banner Productions, in New York City. In 1925, he moved to the Henry Ginsburg Distributing Corp. In 1926 he joined Sterling Pictures. In July 1927, when the studio got rid of their foreign broker system and implemented their own foreign sales, Briskin was put in charge, becoming head of their foreign department. That year he negotiated a major sales agreement with Cinematografica Astrea in Barcelona, Spain for distributing all of Sterling's product in Spain and Portugal, as well as six of its films in Italy. And later that same year he negotiated the sale of all 18 Sterling pictures in Hungary. In August 1928, he was named vice president of Sterling and given control over all of the company's operations. By September 1928, Briskin had his own company, Briskin Pictures Corp., headquartered in New York City.
In April 1931, Briskin became president of the newly formed Meteor Pictures, in New York. The new company had been formed from the former Briskin Distributing Company, which Briskin began in the late 1920s. In 1932 he moved over to Columbia Pictures, where the first film he produced was "Fighting for Justice", starring Tim McCoy. He was put in charge of all films starring McCoy, and spearheaded the transition of McCoy from Westerns to other types of films. In 1936, Columbia renewed his contract. Briskin's contract to run his own production unit at Columbia was renewed in 1942, and again for three years in 1944. 1945 saw Briskin become the executive assistant to Harry Cohn at Columbia. In 1951, Briskin re-signed a seven-year contract with Columbia, to continue on as vice-president of the studio. In 1952, Briskin announced that he had an inked a deal with Ford Motors for Columbia to produce 39 half-hour films to be shown on television.
In 1956, Briskin began his own production company, Briskin Productions, to release television material through Screen Gems, Columbia's television subsidiary. At the same time, he continued as V.P. at Columbia, and was put in charge of all production at Screen Gems. In doing so, Briskin resigned from his duties as the studio manager for Columbia's film division, to focus on television production. In April 1956, Briskin initiated a series of writing scholarships to encourage young talent. This was the first time in history this had been done. Six schools were to participate, with the first three selected being Fordham University, University of Chicago, and Iowa State University. In May 1946 he hired Mickey Rooney to produce a new series, "Calamity Jane", although the show never seems to have been aired. Later in 1956, Briskin negotiated with Sam Cohn for a $1 million budget for television production for Screen Gems. His production produced several series for Screen Gems for the 1957 season, including "Casey Jones". Also in 1956, Briskin set up a $2.5 million fund to entice independent producers to create product to be distributed through Screen Gems. The caveat was that the production either had to have a star attached, or be a very "powerful idea". Briskin said, "there are many producers seeking not only financing, but affiliation with an organization which can give their potential programs everything needed from production facilities to distribution and sales."
One of the productions Briskin was in charge of was "Playhouse 90", which was broadcast on CBS-TV. By August 1957, Briskin had turned Screen Gems into the leading producer of content for television in Hollywood. One of the projects which Briskin created, but was never released was a television series based on "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty", which he created a pilot for, but the three networks passed on due to it being "too adult for popular appeal". In 1959 Briskin was promoted at Columbia, and left the Screen Gems subsidiary, where he was replaced by William Dozier. In 1962, Briskin resigned from Columbia Pictures. However, he came back as an independent producer late in the year. In November, he joined with Debbie Reynolds and formed Harmon Enterprises. Reynolds was the president, with Briskin serving as vice-president. The company was to shoot on MGM lot.
Personal life.
In October 1940, Briskin purchased the Pepper Lane Farm, one of the oldest residences in southern California, dating from the 1850s. The farm was the estate of Alan O. Stearns and was located in Reseda, California, and consisted of seven acres. Briskin sold the estate for $65,000 in 1946 to a non-profit group, Field Photo Homes, Inc., who intended to develop the property into a memorial for the 13 men of the O.S.S.' Field Photo Unit during World War II. The purchase price had been donated by John Ford. The memorial ranch opened in July 1946.
His son, Frederick Briskin, was an assistant director at Columbia, and he also had a daughter, Joyce.
He was elected the head of Temple Israel of Hollywood twice, in 1947 and 1950. In 1950, he served as one of the pallbearers at the funeral of Al Jolson. In June 1955, he suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized at Cedars of Lebanon Hospital. He was also a pall-bearer for Harry Cohn in 1958. Briskin was one of the founding members of the Friar's Club of California.
In 1961, Briskin purchased a 2.5 percent share of the Riviera Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada for $62,500. In December 1962, Briskin sold his 2.5 percent interest back to hotel corporation, for exactly what he paid for it the year before.
Briskin died on May 29, 1981. |
79aab2e9-2873-4546-939b-9d398adb4f14 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | This is No. 12 High School. My friend Dongdong is in this school. Dongdong has short hair, a big nose, a small mouth and big eyes. He is thirteen. He is in Class Two, Grade Seven. He's a good student. He has two good friends in his school. They are Jim and Jack. They're brothers . They are fourteen. They have small noses, small eyes, but they're very tall . Jim, Jack and Dongdong are in the same class. Mr. Lee is their teacher. They are good friends. ,. (10) Dongdong is in _ .
A. No. 2 High School.
B. Class 7, Grade 2
C. Class 2, Grade 7
D. Class 2, Grade 8
Answer:C |
b4a557c0-c95d-4f27-8f99-62cbf182d6e1 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | "Can I see my baby?" the happy new mother asked. When she saw the baby, she was surprised. The baby was born without ears. As time went by, the baby grew up. There was nothing wrong with his hearing. But some kids laughed at him because he didn't have ears. The baby was very sad, but his parents did nothing but felt sorry for him. The boy's father talked with a doctor. "Could nothing be done?" the father asked. " I believe I could give him a pair of outer ears, if they could be got." The doctor answered. So they began to look for a person who would like to give his or her ears. Two years went by. Then the father said, "You are going to the hospital, son. Mother and I have found someone and it will give the ears you need. But it's a secret, "said the father. The operation was very successful. Several years later, he got a good job. One day, he told his father " But I must know who gave so much to me. I want to do something for him or her." "I am sorry, but I can't tell you." Said the father. The secret was kept for years, but the day did come. For the boy it was one of the darkest days. He stood with his father over his mother's coffin. Slowly, the father raised her thick brown hair to show that his mother had no outer ears. "Your mother said she was glad that she never let her hair be cut," he said, "and nobody ever thought she was less beautiful, did they?" Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?
A. There is nothing wrong with the boy's ears.
B. The boy's parents did nothing for the boy.
C. Just after the operation, the boy knew the truth.
D. Before the boy knew the truth, his mother died.
Answer:D |
71b1eeb6-ca8f-4722-80e2-9565926b54a8 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | What causes erosion?
A. salads
B. concrete
C. gales
D. cars
Answer:C |
47e4af2e-703e-448d-9eaf-8c8dcd4d6bb6 | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Cylindrical inclusion bodies of wheat streak mosaic virus and three other potyviruses only self-assemble in mixed infections.
Potyviruses produce cylindrical inclusions (CIs) in the cytoplasm of infected cells. Immunogold labelling and electron microscopy of embedded and sectioned wheat and maize cells doubly infected by different potyviruses revealed no mixing of inclusion proteins in CIs. The viruses were wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), agropyron mosaic virus and hordeum mosaic virus, in wheat, and WSMV and maize dwarf mosaic virus in maize. The three viruses in wheat were indistinguishable morphologically and in ultrastructural features but can be separated by serology and host range. The absence of phenotypic mixing in CIs showed that in the presence of CI proteins of other potyviruses, assembly was either highly virus-specific, or that no opportunity existed for CI proteins to assemble into hybrid CIs in mixed infections. |
a86a966e-4288-48c5-8dde-9a44650548df | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix |
all 14 comments
[–]amordelGigglebit 11 points12 points (3 children)
I read through it.
What exactly are you saying?
It seems like you never get to the point.
[–]TheGiantGlobEaterLg | Digital 5 points6 points (0 children)
At first I agreed with what you were saying, about the arrogance of promod, however in your second and third paragraphs you just started ranting over how upset you got that someone was a dick to you. It happens.
[–]NabsterHaxHW » Nabster 3 points4 points (0 children)
Hi, I'm the "programmer" in this story.
And I will admit, I was angry. But I don't think that's unreasonable considering you started the conversation by saying you hated what I've been working on for the past 3 weeks, that you purposefully tried to "1up" me on my reddit submission, and that you were decompiling my code without permission. At the time I never even understood why you were messaging me in the first place.
If you want to know more about modding Chivalry you can see this example mod I made specifically to help people get started.
The reason ProMod is not going open source for now is because it's not finished and we want to make sure nobody begins writing their own mod off the unfinished code. This is regrettable from a general education standpoint, which is precisely why I made the example mod above.
Good luck with your mod.
[–]Agent_HK-4747 【ツ】 4 points5 points (0 children)
Just as a quick rebuttal let me try to present another mindset to you about combo feint to parry:
The end goal in any competitive game is to be the best. No one should be able to kill you despite the circumstances. While idealistic, all players strive towards this goal.
Combo feint to parry adds survivability, allowing you to utilize timing, skill, dexterity, and stamina management(it takes a lot of stam) to beat your opponents when you would normally face certain death. Not only does this raise the skill ceiling, but it also allows you to get closer to the ideal of the unkillable player.
Also people seem to regard the "always attacking" mentality as a negative one. However, if you look to any competitive sport you're always told to be aggressive and be the one with the initiative. This holds too especially in sports that are centered around fighting.
I think the chiv community needs to take a step back from all the shit they hear (Combo feint to parry is exploiting, LMB is bad, spamming is bad, feinting is bad, lookdowns are exploits, unusual tactics are exploits) and the negative framing surrounding them, and consider for a second whether or not the crusade against these things is really justified.
Also the hate for promod just comes from poor PR from the leadership. Promod is a step forward in the game because it allows for more freedom don't let shitty attitudes convince you otherwise.
[–]Teocyn 1 point2 points (0 children)
There really needs to be a post that is upvoted to shit warning anyone to never read this. At least the continuation posts were down voted in to the negatives.
[–]faktorfaktor 0 points1 point (0 children)
I love how you're saying "dont hate on promod" yet you make like wall of text ranting the mod. You're just bad player.
"unintended mechanics like lookdown overheads or feints"
You also called lookdowns and feints an exploit.
Come on, what next? Jumping and attacking is also exploit for you?
[–]DerpasaurChivalryPadawan(1) 1 point2 points (0 children)
"abuse mechanics" is a delicate phrase indeed.
[–]Clayton-BigsBNA | twitch.tv/stinkyclayman 0 points1 point (0 children)
Meh, whenever bushido mod comes out, that's probably where i'll be splitting to. So glad they are doing their own standalone and not just being a mod of chivalry, maybe they will have a better idea.
[–]DemoscraftAU R51 750H -3 points-2 points (1 child)
TL;DR: Noob is mad about arrogant players who are better than him.
[–]faktorfaktor -1 points0 points (0 children)
Pretty much.
[–]HELPMEIMGONADIEUnborn -3 points-2 points (0 children)
First off, thank you fro writing this post. It's well wrote and something that's been missing from this sub. With that said, you wrote of some things that I agree and disagree with. I would also like to have a private conversation with you over Steam if possible. I just may have the team to assist you on your work.
I understand your conference with promod members went incredibly negative with your post, with them discrediting you unless your well known and have 700+ hours. the promod team is already hated for being arrogant and not listening to discussion on changes and basically had a huge overreaction to even make promod. They will continue to be disliked and promod is already going towards the direction of non-existence. that can be disscussed during a later date, but do not take most of what they say to heart.
when they took away the ability to cancel drawing an arrow,
This has already said by Torn Banner to be a bug and will be fixed in the coming patch. Especially the arrow disappearing
The way the game was originally intended to be played, not for stats, not to always be the winner, just fun in the end.
It was also intended to be competitive, not just for casuals.
in clan severs it is restricted so they can practice within the rules to be better for the tournament.
No, it is restricted as most clans use those servers for scrims as well. This means they can easily password the server when doing friendly scrim. It is not just for practice and be better at the tournament. On that note, most clans don't put huge times for tournaments as they're not incredibly common and huge events
Now imagine if they banned the use of using feints or lookdowns, or just both of them when used together to create one of the cheapest tricks to win fights the fastest.
Feints have already been nerfed and are used much less than normally. They really are only incredibly viable in promod.
Tournaments never tried to incorporate such a thing,
You mention tournaments banning feitns and look down overheads. Feinting is once again, nerfed and not incredibly viable. Making a tournament not have dragging and feints would take away tons of strategy and wouldn't even be taken seriously. These mechanics are also not to 'trick players'. It's all part of the mindgame of Chivalry. The necessary nerfs to feints and the slight slowdown of chivalry combat emphasizes this.
It makes you think, they removed third person when the game made it intended, because it would force everyone to use 3rd person, but they don't make unintended mechanics like lookdown overheads, combined with a trick mechanic like feint to remain, when not only the speed of many attacks when looking down at full damage not intended, but the fact that feint was even here, is because this is suppose to be a fun game.
Dragging was a intended mechanic in the game. Third person is disabled as it allows for lots of exploits, as well as pretty much wall hacking to look around walls.
About combo feint to parry. It was used so widespread that when it was taken away the current promod players freaked out. This is a very big minority of the competitive scene, and the majority are fine with it. Combo feinting was an uninteded mechanic. I think it may be best to have it put back in, but in a nerfed state.
Why you would use a double hander when against 2 skilled enemies, when what you want in that situation is speed
Just... no? This obviosuly comes off as very inexperienced and also comes off as pretty off topic. You dont want jsut speed, you want target switching which can be reached with range or speed. Speed is NOT everything as you make it seem.
Again you bring up the arrogant stance of promod developers. Don't take it seriously. The majority of competitive is with you. I wouldn't even attempt to respark communication with him.
Please contact me on Steam - http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198065303546
I'd love to talk to you about your own mod and some other points in private |
e053001d-f55a-4a0d-abfb-75120d404e53 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | The Wages of Fear
The ability of a film to make the mundane suspenseful (or horrifying) is one of my favorite aspects of the medium. In Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds, the Christoph Waltz character asks another if they would like a glass of milk and it’s a chilling scene. Out of context, it doesn’t make much sense (what could be more commonplace than offering a guest a glass of milk?) but within the film’s universe it’s a life-threatening question. What Inglourious Basterds does to milk, Henri-Georges Clouzot’s The Wages of Fear does to driving.
In a nondescript town in South America an American oil company has run into trouble. One of their fields has had an accident – a burning fire rages without any sign of letting up. They only have one way of stopping it – the highly unstable explosive, nitroglycerine. But there’s a problem, the trucks they have to transport it in don’t have the necessary safety equipment…
The Americans get a bad rep in this movie. The town is filled with unemployed vagrants looking for a big payday to get out of the depressed town and the American company decides to take advantage of them. They’ll hire four men to drive two trucks for $2000 each. If both trucks explode, it won’t be a problem. They have a pool of men to replace them with. One truck has to get through; the American mastermind behind the project rationalizes. Oil is more valued than life.
The incredible suspense of the movie (half of the film is spent travelling the badly-maintained road with the four men) is only surpassed by the sheer ingeniousness of the scenario. We spend the whole movie hoping for nothing to happen. The world takes on a different colour; every pothole, tight turn, and dirt road becomes a symbol of life and death. The slightest bump will set off an explosion and kill two men. The entirety of the film is spent avoiding this fate.
The Wages of Fear is a timeless film in the sense that the themes continue to resonate today. That the story revolves around valuing oil over human life is particularly prescient considering the wasteful wars that have occurred (and still do) over this very battleground. The suspense of the film hasn’t tired or aged. The sweat that rolls off a character’s brow, the deliberately slow movements they make around the nitroglycerine and the increasing tension between the men is almost unbearable. A fifty-seven year-old film can still be exciting.
When the action comes it goes with a whimper, rather than a bang. It’s a smart, and chilling, choice by Clouzot.
Grade: A
Side note: One aspect of the film I found slightly strange was the characters always seem to slam the truck door upon entering or exiting the vehicle. I thought that the slightest erratic movement (or vibration) would be enough to set off the explosives. It’s a minor flaw in an otherwise impeccable film.
3 Responses to The Wages of Fear
1. I just watched this a couple of months ago – and I was reading the Inglourious Basterds script last night. Which seems like a mildly odd coincidence.
This is definitely a gripping, intense film, with (spoiler alert?) a pretty bleak ending. In fact, the commentary on human nature throughout the film is unrelentingly negative, and yet the whole thing plays out more like an action flick than a philosophical treatise on greed and fallibility.
I’d definitely show this one to any viewer who thinks older movies are dull and slow-paced. Great review!
2. Modest Movie says:
Very strange coincidence indeed.
I like your point that the film is more of an action flick than a philosophical treatise. I think more movies should take this approach (i.e. make an exciting and entertaining genre film that also has more intellectual layers to it) rather than making a full-blown “message” movie.
3. I completely agree. But it’s a very, very hard balance to strike. I hate to mention this one in the same breath as The Wages of Fear, but I actually like The Island. By Michael Bay. There, I said it.
The trouble is, while I think the first half of that film is a surprisingly effective piece of “message” sci-fi that manages to entertain at the same time as it instructs, the second half is…a Michael Bay movie. My favourite films and television shows manage to tell entertaining stories wherein the theme and the action are basically inseparable. Clouzot is a master.
Anyway, thanks as always for the quality posts!
Leave a Reply
You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )
Twitter picture
Facebook photo
Google+ photo
Connecting to %s
%d bloggers like this: |
5171d487-f42c-44b2-a5fd-6e1d7d8137a0 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Ilya Sutskever and Jan Leike resign from OpenAI [updated]
Ilya Sutskever and Jan Leike have resigned. They led OpenAI's alignment work. Superalignment will now be led by John Schulman, it seems. Jakub Pachocki replaced Sutskever as Chief Scientist.
Reasons are unclear (as usual when safety people leave OpenAI).
The NYT piece (archive) and others I've seen don't really have details.
OpenAI announced Sutskever's departure in a blogpost.
Sutskever and Leike confirmed their departures in tweets.
----------------------------------------
Updates:
Friday May 17:
Superalignment dissolves.
Leike tweets, including:
> I have been disagreeing with OpenAI leadership about the company's core priorities for quite some time, until we finally reached a breaking point.
>
> I believe much more of our bandwidth should be spent getting ready for the next generations of models, on security, monitoring, preparedness, safety, adversarial robustness, (super)alignment, confidentiality, societal impact, and related topics.
>
> These problems are quite hard to get right, and I am concerned we aren't on a trajectory to get there.
>
> Over the past few months my team has been sailing against the wind. Sometimes we were struggling for compute and it was getting harder and harder to get this crucial research done.
>
> Building smarter-than-human machines is an inherently dangerous endeavor. OpenAI is shouldering an enormous responsibility on behalf of all of humanity.
>
> But over the past years, safety culture and processes have taken a backseat to shiny products.
Daniel Kokotajlo talks to Vox:
> “I joined with substantial hope that OpenAI would rise to the occasion and behave more responsibly as they got closer to achieving AGI. It slowly became clear to many of us that this would not happen,” Kokotajlo told me. “I gradually lost trust in OpenAI leadership and their ability to responsibly handle AGI, so I quit.”
Kelsey Piper says:
> I have seen the extremely restrictive off-boarding agreement that contains nondisclosure and non-disp |
b9f25330-46bb-4993-8e29-028da2b1edf7 | StampyAI/alignment-research-dataset/special_docs | Other | Superintelligence skepticism as a political tool
Abstract
--------
\*\*:\*\*
This paper explores the potential for skepticism about artificial superintelligence to be used as a tool for political ends. Superintelligence is AI that is much smarter than humans. Superintelligence does not currently exist, but it has been proposed that it could someday be built, with massive and potentially catastrophic consequences. There is substantial skepticism about superintelligence, including whether it will be built, whether it would be catastrophic, and whether it is worth current attention. To date, superintelligence skepticism appears to be mostly honest intellectual debate, though some of it may be politicized. This paper finds substantial potential for superintelligence skepticism to be (further) politicized, due mainly to the potential for major corporations to have a strong profit motive to downplay concerns about superintelligence and avoid government regulation. Furthermore, politicized superintelligence skepticism is likely to be quite successful, due to several factors including the inherent uncertainty of the topic and the abundance of skeptics. The paper’s analysis is based on characteristics of superintelligence and the broader AI sector, as well as the history and ongoing practice of politicized skepticism on other science and technology issues, including tobacco, global warming, and industrial chemicals. The paper contributes to literatures on politicized skepticism and superintelligence governance.
Keywords: [artificial intelligence](/search?q=artificial+intelligence); [superintelligence](/search?q=superintelligence); [skepticism](/search?q=skepticism)
1. Introduction
----------------
The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential for skepticism about artificial superintelligence to be used for political ends. Artificial superintelligence (for brevity, henceforth just superintelligence) refers to AI that is much smarter than humans. Current AI is not superintelligent, but the prospect of superintelligence is a topic of much discussion in scholarly and public spheres. Some believe that superintelligence could someday be built, and that, if it is built, it would have massive and potentially catastrophic consequences. Others are skeptical of these beliefs. While much of the existing skepticism appears to be honest intellectual debate, there is potential for it to be politicized for other purposes.In simple terms (to be refined below), politicized skepticism can be defined as public articulation of skepticism that is intended to achieve some outcome other than an improved understanding of the topic at hand. Politicized skepticism can be contrasted with intellectual skepticism, which seeks an improved understanding. Intellectual skepticism is essential to scholarly inquiry; politicized skepticism is not. The distinction between the two is not always clear; statements of skepticism may have both intellectual and political motivations. The two concepts can nonetheless be useful for understanding debates over issues such as superintelligence.There is substantial precedent for politicized skepticism. Of particular relevance for superintelligence is politicized skepticism about technologies and products that are risky but profitable, henceforth risk–profit politicized skepticism. This practice dates to 1950s debates over the link between tobacco and cancer and has since been dubbed the tobacco strategy [[1](#B1-information-09-00209)]. More recently, the strategy has been applied to other issues including the link between fossil fuels and acid rain, the link between fossil fuels and global warming, and the link between industrial chemicals and neurological disease [[1](#B1-information-09-00209),[2](#B2-information-09-00209)]. The essence of the strategy is to promote the idea that the science underlying certain risks is unresolved, and therefore the implicated technologies should not be regulated. The strategy is typically employed by an interconnected mix of industry interests and ideological opponents of regulation. The target audience is typically a mix of government officials and the general public, and not the scientific community.As is discussed in more detail below, certain factors suggest the potential for superintelligence to be a focus of risk–profit politicized skepticism. First and foremost, superintelligence could be developed by major corporations with a strong financial incentive to avoid regulation. Second, there already exists a lot of skepticism about superintelligence, which could be exploited for political purposes. Third, as an unprecedented class of technology, it is inherently uncertain, which suggests that superintelligence skepticism may be especially durable, even within apolitical scholarly communities. These and other factors do not guarantee that superintelligence skepticism will be politicized, or that its politicization would follow the same risk–profit patterns as the tobacco strategy. However, these factors are at least suggestive of the possibility.Superintelligence skepticism may also be politicized in a different way: to protect the reputations and funding of the broader AI field. This form of politicized skepticism is less well-documented than the tobacco strategy, and appears to be less common. However, there are at least hints of it for fields of technology involving both grandiose future predictions and more mundane near-term work. AI is one such field of technology, in which grandiose predictions of superintelligence and other future AI breakthroughs contrast with more modest forms of near-term AI. Another example is nanotechnology, in which grandiose predictions of molecular machines contrast with near-term nanoscale science and technology [[3](#B3-information-09-00209)].The basis of the paper’s analysis is twofold. First, the paper draws on the long history of risk–profit politicized skepticism. This history suggests certain general themes that may also apply to superintelligence. Second, the paper examines characteristics of superintelligence development to assesses the prospect of skepticism being used politically in this context. To that end, the paper draws on the current state of affairs in the AI sector, especially for artificial general intelligence, which is a type of AI closely related to superintelligence. The paper further seeks to inform efforts to avoid any potential harmful effects from politicized superintelligence skepticism. The effects would not necessarily be harmful, but the history of risk–profit politicized skepticism suggests that they could be.This paper contributes to literatures on politicized skepticism and superintelligence governance. Whereas most literature on politicized skepticism (and similar concepts such as denial) is backward-looking, consisting of historical analysis of skepticisms that have already occurred [[1](#B1-information-09-00209),[2](#B2-information-09-00209),[4](#B4-information-09-00209),[5](#B5-information-09-00209),[6](#B6-information-09-00209),[7](#B7-information-09-00209)], this paper is largely (but not exclusively) forward-looking, consisting of prospective analysis of skepticisms that could occur at some point in the future. Meanwhile, the superintelligence governance literature has looked mainly at institutional regulations to prevent research groups from building dangerous superintelligence and support for research on safety measures [[8](#B8-information-09-00209),[9](#B9-information-09-00209),[10](#B10-information-09-00209),[11](#B11-information-09-00209)]. This paper contributes to a smaller literature on the role of corporations in superintelligence development [[12](#B12-information-09-00209)] and on social and psychological aspects of superintelligence governance [[13](#B13-information-09-00209)].This paper does not intend to take sides on which beliefs about superintelligence are most likely to be correct. Its interest is in the potential political implications of superintelligence skepticism, not in the underlying merits of the skepticism. The sole claim here is that the possibility of politicized superintelligence skepticism is a worthy topic of study. It is worth studying due to: (1) the potential for large consequences if superintelligence is built; and (2) the potential for superintelligence to be an important political phenomenon regardless of whether it is built. Finally, the topic is also of inherent intellectual interest as an exercise in prospective socio-political analysis on a possible future technology.The paper is organized as follows. [Section 2](#sec2-information-09-00209) presents a brief overview of superintelligence concerns and skepticisms. [Section 3](#sec3-information-09-00209) further develops the concept of politicized skepticism and surveys the history of risk–profit politicized skepticism, from its roots in tobacco to the present day. [Section 4](#sec4-information-09-00209) discusses prospects for politicized superintelligence skepticism. [Section 5](#sec5-information-09-00209) discusses opportunities for constructive action. [Section 6](#sec6-information-09-00209) concludes. 2. Superintelligence and Its Skeptics
--------------------------------------
The idea of humans being supplanted by their machines dates to at least the 1863 work of Butler [[14](#B14-information-09-00209)]. In 1965, Good presented an early exposition on the topic within the modern field of computer science [[15](#B15-information-09-00209)]. Good specifically proposed an “intelligence explosion” in which intelligent machines make successively more intelligent machines until they are much smarter than humans, which would be “the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control” [[15](#B15-information-09-00209)] (p. 33). This intelligence explosion is one use of the term technological singularity, though the term can also refer to wider forms of radical technological change [[16](#B16-information-09-00209)]. The term superintelligence refers specifically to AI that is much more intelligent than humans and dates to at least the 1998 work of Bostrom [[17](#B17-information-09-00209)]. A related term is artificial general intelligence, which is AI capable of reasoning across many intellectual domains. A superintelligent AI is likely to have general intelligence, and the development of artificial general intelligence could be a major precursor to superintelligence. Artificial general intelligence is also an active subfield of AI [[18](#B18-information-09-00209),[19](#B19-information-09-00209)].Superintelligence is notable as a potential technological accomplishment with massive societal implications. The effects of superintelligence could include anything from solving a significant portion of the world’s problems (if superintelligence is designed well) to causing the extinction of humans and other species (if it is designed poorly). Much of the interest in superintelligence derives from these high stakes. Superintelligence is also of intellectual interest as perhaps the ultimate accomplishment within the field of AI, sometimes referred to as the “grand dream” of AI [[20](#B20-information-09-00209)] (p. 125).Currently, most AI research is on narrow AI that is not oriented towards this grand dream. The focus on narrow AI dates to early struggles in the field to make progress towards general AI or superintelligence. After an initial period of hype fell short, the field went through an “AI winter” marked by diminished interest and more modest expectations [[21](#B21-information-09-00209),[22](#B22-information-09-00209)] This prompted a focus on smaller, incremental progress on narrow AI. It should be noted that the term AI winter most commonly refers to a lull in AI in the mid-to-late 1980s and early 1990s. A similar lull occurred in the 1970s, and concerns about a new winter can be found as recently as 2008 [[23](#B23-information-09-00209)].With most of the field focused on narrow AI, artificial general intelligence has persisted only as a small subfield of AI [[18](#B18-information-09-00209)]. The AI winter also caused many AI computer scientists to be skeptical of superintelligence, on grounds that superintelligence has turned out to be much more difficult than initially expected, and likewise to be averse to attention to superintelligence, on grounds that such hype could again fall short and induce another AI winter. This is an important historical note because it indicates that superintelligence skepticism has wide salience across the AI computer science community and may already be politicized towards the goal of protecting the reputation of and funding for AI. (More on this below.)Traces of superintelligence skepticism predate AI winter. Early AI skepticism dates to 1965 work by Dreyfus [[24](#B24-information-09-00209)]. Dreyfus [[24](#B24-information-09-00209)] critiqued the overall field of AI, with some attention to human-level AI though not to superintelligence. Dreyfus traced this skepticism of machines matching human intelligence to a passage in Descartes’ 1637 Discourse On Method [[25](#B25-information-09-00209)]: “it must be morally impossible that there should exist in any machine a diversity of organs sufficient to enable it to act in all the occurrences of life, in the way in which our reason enables us to act.”In recent years, superintelligence has attracted considerable attention. This has likely been prompted by several factors, including a growing scholarly literature (e.g., [[9](#B9-information-09-00209),[19](#B19-information-09-00209),[26](#B26-information-09-00209),[27](#B27-information-09-00209),[28](#B28-information-09-00209),[29](#B29-information-09-00209)]), highly publicized remarks by several major science and technology celebrities (e.g., Bill Gates [[30](#B30-information-09-00209)], Stephen Hawking [[31](#B31-information-09-00209)], and Elon Musk [[32](#B32-information-09-00209)]), and breakthroughs in the broader field of AI, which draw attention to AI and may make the prospect of superintelligence seem more plausible (e.g., [[33](#B33-information-09-00209),[34](#B34-information-09-00209)]). This attention to superintelligence has likewise prompted some more outspoken skepticism. The following is a brief overview of the debate, including both the arguments of the debate and some biographical information about the debaters. (Biographical details are taken from personal and institutional webpages and are accurate as of the time of this writing, May 2018; they are not necessarily accurate as of the time of the publication of the cited literature.) The biographies can be politically significant because, in public debates, some people’s words carry more weight than others’. The examples presented below are intended to be illustrative and at least moderately representative of the arguments made in existing superintelligence skepticism (some additional examples are presented in [Section 4](#sec4-information-09-00209)). A comprehensive survey of superintelligence skepticism is beyond the scope of this paper.#### 2.1. Superintelligence Cannot Be Built
Bringsjord [[35](#B35-information-09-00209)] argued that superintelligence cannot be built based on reasoning from computational theory. Essentially, the argument is that superintelligence requires a more advanced class of computing, which cannot be produced by humans or existing AI. Bringsjord is Professor of Cognitive Science at Rensselaer Polytechnic University and Director of the Rensselaer AI and Reasoning Lab. Chalmers [[36](#B36-information-09-00209)] countered that superintelligence does not necessarily require a more advanced class of computing. Chalmers is University Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University and co-director of the NYU Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness.McDermott [[37](#B37-information-09-00209)] argued that advances in hardware and algorithms may be sufficient to exceed human intelligence, but not to massively exceed it. McDermott is Professor of Computer Science at Yale University. Chalmers [[36](#B36-information-09-00209)] countered that, while there may be limits to the potential advances in hardware and software, these limits may not be so restrictive as to preclude superintelligence.#### 2.2. Superintelligence Is Not Imminent Enough to Merit Attention
Crawford [[38](#B38-information-09-00209)] argued that superintelligence is a distraction from issues with existing AI, especially AI that worsens inequalities. Crawford is co-founder and co-director of the AI Now Research Institute at New York University, a Senior Fellow at the NYU Information Law Institute, and a Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research.Ng argued that superintelligence may be possible, but it is premature to worry about, in particular because it is too different from existing AI systems. Ng memorably likened worrying about superintelligence to worrying about “overpopulation on Mars” [[39](#B39-information-09-00209)]. Ng is Vice President and Chief Scientist of Baidu, Co-Chairman and Co-Founder of Coursera, and an Adjunct Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.Etzioni [[40](#B40-information-09-00209)] argued that superintelligence is unlikely to be built within the next 25 years and is thus not worth current attention. Etzioni is Chief Executive Officer of the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Professor of Computer Science at University of Washington. Dafoe and Russell [[41](#B41-information-09-00209)] countered that superintelligence is worth current attention even if it would take more than 25 years to build. Dafoe is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale University and Co-Director of the Governance of AI Program at the University of Oxford. Russell is Professor of Computer Science at University of California, Berkeley. (An alternative counter is that some measures to improve AI outcomes apply to both near-term AI and superintelligence, and thus it is not essential to debate which of the two types of AI should be prioritized [[42](#B42-information-09-00209)].)#### 2.3. Superintelligence Would (Probably) Not Be Catastrophic
Goertzel [[43](#B43-information-09-00209)] argued that superintelligence could be built and is worth paying attention to, but also that superintelligence is less likely to result in catastrophe than is sometimes suggested. Specifically, Goertzel argued that it may be somewhat difficult, but very difficult, to build superintelligence with values that are considered desirable, and that the human builders of superintelligence would have good opportunities to check that the superintelligence has the right values. Goertzel is the lead for the OpenCog and SingularityNET projects for developing artificial general intelligence. Goertzel [[43](#B43-information-09-00209)] wrote in response to Bostrom [[28](#B28-information-09-00209)], who suggested that, if built, superintelligence is likely to result in catastrophe. Bostrom is Professor of Applied Ethics at University of Oxford and Director of the Oxford Future of Humanity Institute. (For a more detailed analysis of this debate, see [[44](#B44-information-09-00209)].)Views similar to Goertzel [[43](#B43-information-09-00209)] were also presented by Bieger et al. [[45](#B45-information-09-00209)], in particular that the AI that is the precursor to superintelligence could be trained by its human developers to have safe and desirable values. Co-authors Bieger and Thórisson are Ph.D. student and Professor of Computer Science at Reykjavik University; co-author Wang is Associate Professor of Computer and Information Sciences at Temple University.Searle [[46](#B46-information-09-00209)] argued that superintelligence is unlikely to be catastrophic, because it would be an unconscious machine incapable of deciding for itself to attack humanity, and thus humans would need to explicitly program it to cause harm. Searle is Professor Emeritus of the Philosophy of Mind and Language at the University of California, Berkeley. Searle [[46](#B46-information-09-00209)] wrote in response to Bostrom [[28](#B28-information-09-00209)], who arqued that superintelligence could be dangerous to humans regardless of whether it is conscious. 3. Skepticism as a Political Tool
----------------------------------
#### 3.1. The Concept of Politicized Skepticism
There is a sense in which any stated skepticism can be political, insofar as it seeks to achieve certain desired changes within a group. Even the most honest intellectual skepticism can be said to achieve the political aim of advancing a certain form of intellectual inquiry. However, this paper uses the term “politicized skepticism” more narrowly to refer to skepticism with other, non-intellectual aims.Even with this narrower conception, the distinction between intellectual and politicized skepticism can in practice be blurry. The same skeptical remark can serve both intellectual and (non-intellectual) political aims. People can also have intellectual skepticism that is shaped, perhaps subconsciously, by political factors, as well as politicized skepticism that is rooted in honest intellectual beliefs. For example, intellectuals (academics and the like) commonly have both intellectual and non-intellectual aims, the latter including advancing their careers or making the world a better place per whatever notion of “better” they subscribe to. This can be significant for superintelligence skepticism aimed at protecting the reputations and funding of AI researchers.It should be stressed that the entanglement of intellectual inquiry and (non-intellectual) political aims does not destroy the merits of intellectual inquiry. This is important to bear in mind at a time when trust in science and other forms of expertise is dangerously low [[47](#B47-information-09-00209),[48](#B48-information-09-00209)]. Scholarship can be a social and political process, but, when performed well, it can nonetheless deliver important insights about the world. For all people, scholars included, improving one’s understanding of the world takes mental effort, especially when one is predisposed to believe otherwise. Unfortunately, many people are not inclined to make the effort, and other people are making efforts to manipulate ideas for their own aims. An understanding of politicized skepticism is essential for addressing major issues in this rather less-than-ideal epistemic era.Much of this paper is focused on risk–profit politicized skepticism, i.e., skepticism about concerns about risky and profitable technologies and products. Risk–profit politicized skepticism is a major social force, as discussed throughout this paper, although it is not the only form of politicized skepticism. Other forms include politicized skepticism by concerned citizens, such as skepticism about scientific claims that vaccines or nuclear power plants are safe; by religious activists and institutions, expressing skepticism about claims that humans evolved from other species; by politicians and governments, expressing skepticism about events that cast them in an unfavorable light; and by intellectuals as discussed above. Thus, while this paper largely focuses on skepticism aimed at casting doubt about concerns about risky and profitable technologies and products, it should be understood that this is not the only type of politicized skepticism.#### 3.2. Tobacco Roots
As mentioned above, risk–profit politicized skepticism traces to 1950s debates on the link between tobacco and cancer. Specifically, in 1954, the tobacco industry formed the Tobacco Industry Research Committee, an “effort to foster the impression of debate, primarily by promoting the work of scientists whose views might be useful to the industry” [[1](#B1-information-09-00209)] (p. 17). The committee was led by C. C. Little, who was a decorated genetics researcher and past president of the University of Michigan, as well as a eugenics advocate who believed cancer was due to genetic weakness and not to smoking.In the 1950s, there was substantial evidence linking tobacco to cancer, but it was not as conclusive of a link as is now available. The tobacco industry exploited this uncertainty in public discussions of the issue. It succeeded in getting major media to often present the issue as a debate between scientists who agreed vs. disagreed in the tobacco–cancer link. Among the media figures to do this was the acclaimed journalist Edward Murrow, himself a smoker who, in tragic irony, later died from lung cancer. Oreskes and Conway speculated that, “Perhaps, being a smoker, he was reluctant to admit that his daily habit was deadly and reassured to hear that the allegations were unproven” [[1](#B1-information-09-00209)] (pp. 19–20).Over subsequent decades, the tobacco industry continued to fund work that questioned the tobacco–cancer link, enabling it to dodge lawsuits and regulations. Then, in 1999, the United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against nine tobacco companies and two tobacco trade organizations (United States v. Philip Morris). The US argued that the tobacco industry conspired over several decades to deceive the public, in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, which covers organized crime. In 2006, the US District Court for the District of Columbia found the tobacco industry guilty, upheld unanimously in 2009 by the US Court of Appeals. This ruling and other measures have helped to protect people from lung cancer, but many more could have also avoided lung cancer were it not for the tobacco industry’s politicized skepticism.#### 3.3. The Character and Methods of Risk–Profit Politicized Skepticism
The tobacco case provided a blueprint for risk–profit politicized skepticism that has since been used for other issues. Writing in the context of politicized environmental skepticism, Jacques et al. [[4](#B4-information-09-00209)] (pp. 353–354) listed four overarching themes: (1) rejection of scientific findings of environmental problems; (2) de-prioritization of environmental problems relative to other issues; (3) rejection of government regulation of corporations and corporate liability; and (4) portrayal of environmentalism as a threat to progress and development. The net effect is to reduce interest in government regulation of corporate activities that may pose harms to society.The two primary motivations of risk–profit politicized skepticism are the protection of corporate profits and the advancement of anti-regulatory political ideology. The protection of profits is straightforward: from the corporation’s financial perspective, the investment in politicized skepticism can bring a substantial return. The anti-regulatory ideology is only slightly subtler. Risk–profit politicized skepticism is often associated with pro-capitalist, anti-socialist, and anti-communist politics. For example, some political skeptics liken environmentalists to watermelons: “green on the outside, red on the inside” [[1](#B1-information-09-00209)] (p. 248), while one feared that the Earth Summit was a socialist plot to establish a “World Government with central planning by the United Nations” [[1](#B1-information-09-00209)] (p. 252). For these people, politicized skepticism is a way to counter discourses that could harm their political agenda.Notably, both the financial and the ideological motivations are not inherently about science. Instead, the science is manipulated towards other ends. This indicates that the skepticism is primarily political and not intellectual. It may still be intellectually honest in the sense that the people stating the skepticism are actually skeptical. That would be consistent with author Upton Sinclair’s saying that “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” The skepticism may nonetheless violate that essential intellectual virtue of letting conclusions follow from analysis, and not the other way around. For risk–profit politicized skepticism, the desired conclusion is typically the avoidance of government regulation of corporate activity, and the skepticism is crafted accordingly.To achieve this end, the skeptics will often engage in tactics that clearly go beyond honest intellectual skepticism and ordinary intellectual exchange. For example, ExxonMobil has been found to express extensive skepticism about climate change in its public communications (such as newspaper advertisements), but much less skepticism in its internal communications and peer-reviewed publications [[7](#B7-information-09-00209)]. This finding suggests that ExxonMobil was aware of the risks of climate change and misled the public about the risks. ExxonMobil reportedly used its peer-reviewed publications for “the credentials required to speak with authority in this area”, including in its conversations with government officials [[7](#B7-information-09-00209)] (p. 15), even though these communications may have presented climate change risk differently than the peer-reviewed publications did. (As an aside, it may be noted that the ExxonMobil study [[7](#B7-information-09-00209)], published in 2017, has already attracted a skeptic critique by Stirling [[49](#B49-information-09-00209)]. Stirling is Communications Manager of the Canadian nonprofit Friends of Science. Both Stirling and Friends of Science are frequent climate change skeptics [[50](#B50-information-09-00209)].)While the skeptics do not publicly confess dishonesty, there are reports that some of them have privately done so. For example, Marshall [[51](#B51-information-09-00209)] (p. 180) described five energy corporation presidents who believed that climate change was a problem and “admitted, off the record, that the competitive environment forced them to suppress the truth about climate change” to avoid government regulations. Similarly, US Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, an advocate of climate policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reported that some of his colleagues publicly oppose climate policy but privately support it, with one even saying “Let’s keep talking—but don’t tell my staff. Nobody else can know” [[52](#B52-information-09-00209)] (p. 176). Needless to say, any instance in which skepticism is professed by someone who is not actually skeptical is a clear break from the intellectual skepticism of ordinary scholarly inquiry.One particularly distasteful tactic is to target individual scientists, seeking to discredit their work or even intimidate them. For example, Philippe Grandjean, a distinguished environmental health researcher, reported that the tuna industry once waged a $25 million advertising campaign criticizing work by himself and others who have documented links between tuna, mercury, and neurological disease. Grandjean noted that $25 million is a small sum for the tuna industry but more than the entire sum of grant funding he received for mercury research over his career, indicating a highly uneven financial playing field [[2](#B2-information-09-00209)] (pp. 119–120). In another example, climate scientists accused a climate skeptic of bullying and intimidation and reported receiving “a torrent of abusive and threatening e-mails after being featured on” the skeptic’s blog, which calls for climate scientists “to be publicly flogged” [[51](#B51-information-09-00209)] (p. 151).Much of the work, however, is far subtler than this. Often, it involves placing select individuals in conferences, committees, or hearings, where they can ensure that the skeptical message is heard in the right places. For example, Grandjean [[2](#B2-information-09-00209)] (p. 129) recounted a conference sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute, which gave disproportionate floor time to research questioning the health effects of mercury. In another episode, the tobacco industry hired a recently retired World Health Organization committee chair to “volunteer” as an advisor to the same committee, which then concluded to not restrict use of a tobacco pesticide [[2](#B2-information-09-00209)] (p. 125).Another common tactic is to use outside organizations as the public face of the messaging. This tactic is accused of conveying the impression that the skepticism is done in the interest of the public and not of private industry. Grandjean [[2](#B2-information-09-00209)] (p. 121) wrote that “organizations, such as the Center for Science and Public Policy the Center for Indoor Air Research or the Citizens for Fire Safety Institute, may sound like neutral and honest establishments, but they turned out to be ‘front groups’ for financial interests.” Often, the work is done by think tanks. Jacques et al. [[4](#B4-information-09-00209)] found that over 90% of books exhibiting environmental skepticism are linked to conservative think tanks, and 90% of conservative think tanks are active in environmental skepticism. This finding is consistent with recent emphasis in US conservatism on unregulated markets. (Earlier strands of US conservatism were more supportive of environmental protection, such as the pioneering American conservative Russell Kirk, who wrote that “There is nothing more conservative than conservation” [[53](#B53-information-09-00209)].)#### 3.4. The Effectiveness of Politicized Skepticism
Several broader phenomena help make politicized skepticism so potent, especially for risk–profit politicized skepticism. One is the enormous amounts of corporate money at stake with certain government regulations. When corporations use even a tiny fraction of this for politicized skepticism, it can easily dwarf other efforts. Similarly, US campaign finance laws are highly permissive. Whitehouse [[52](#B52-information-09-00209)] traced the decline in bipartisan Congressional support for climate change policy to the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allows unlimited corporate spending in elections. However, even without election spending, corporate assets tilt the playing field substantially in the skeptics’ favor.Another important factor is the common journalistic norm of balance, in which journalists seek to present “both sides” of an issue. This can put partisan voices on equal footing with independent science, as seen in early media coverage of tobacco. It can also amplify a small minority of dissenting voices, seen more recently in media coverage of climate change. Whereas the scientific community has overwhelming consensus that climate change is happening, that it is caused primarily by human activity, and that the effects will be mainly harmful, public media features climate change skepticism much more than its scientific salience would suggest [[54](#B54-information-09-00209)]. (For an overview of the scientific issues related to climate change skepticism, see [[55](#B55-information-09-00209)]; for documentation of the scientific consensus, see [[56](#B56-information-09-00209)].)A third factor is the tendency of scientists to be cautious with respect to uncertainty. Scientists often aspire to avoid stating anything incorrect and to focus on what can be rigorously established instead of discussing more speculative possibilities. Scientists will also often highlight remaining uncertainties even when basic trends are clear. “More research is needed” is likely the most ubiquitous conclusion of any scientific research. This tendency makes it easier for other parties to make the state of the science appear less certain than it actually is. Speaking to this point in a report on climate change and national security, former US Army Chief of Staff Gordon Sullivan states “We seem to be standing by and, frankly, asking for perfectness in science… We never have 100 percent certainty. We never have it. If you wait until you have 100 percent certainty, something bad is going to happen on the battlefield” [[57](#B57-information-09-00209)] (p. 10).A fourth factor is the standard, found in some (but not all) policy contexts, of requiring robust evidence of harm before pursuing regulation. In other words, the burden of proof is on those who wish to regulate, and the potentially harmful product is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Grandjean [[2](#B2-information-09-00209)] cited this as the most important factor preventing the regulation of toxic chemicals in the US. Such a protocol makes regulation very difficult, especially for complex risks that resist precise characterization. In these policy contexts, the amplification of uncertainty can be particularly impactful.To sum up, risk–profit politicized skepticism is a longstanding and significant tool used to promote certain political goals. It has been used heavily by corporations seeking to protect profits and people with anti-regulatory ideologies, and it has proven to be a powerful tool. In at least one case, the skeptics were found guilty in a court of law of conspiracy to deceive the public. The skeptics use a range of tactics that deviate from standard intellectual practice, and they exploit several broader societal phenomena that make the skepticism more potent. 4. Politicized Superintelligence Skepticism
--------------------------------------------
#### 4.1. Is Superintelligence Skepticism Already Politicized?
At this time, there does not appear to be any superintelligence skepticism that has been politicized to the extent that has occurred for other issues such as tobacco–cancer and fossil fuels–global warming. Superintelligence skeptics are not running ad campaigns or other major dollar operations. For the most part, they are not attacking the scholars who express concern about superintelligence. Much of the discussion appears in peer-reviewed journals, and has the tone of constructive intellectual discourse. An exception that proves the rule is Etzioni [[40](#B40-information-09-00209)], who included a quotation comparing Nick Bostrom (who is concerned about superintelligence) to Donald Trump. In a postscript on the matter, Etzioni [[40](#B40-information-09-00209)] wrote that “we should refrain from ad hominem attacks. Here, I have to offer an apology”. In contrast, the character attacks of the most heated politicized skepticism are made without apology.However, there are already at least some hints of politicized superintelligence skepticism. Perhaps the most significant comes from AI academics downplaying hype to protect their field’s reputation and funding. The early field of AI made some rather grandiose predictions, which soon fell flat, fueling criticisms as early as 1965 [[24](#B24-information-09-00209)]. Some of these criticisms prompted major funding cuts, such as the 1973 Lighthill report [[58](#B58-information-09-00209)], which prompted the British Science Research Council to slash its support for AI. Similarly, Menzies [[59](#B59-information-09-00209)] described AI as going through a “peak of inflated expectations” in the 1980s followed by a “trough of disillusionment” in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Most recently, writing in 2018, Bentley [[60](#B60-information-09-00209)] (p. 11) derided beliefs about superintelligence and instead urges: “Do not be fearful of AI—marvel at the persistence and skill of those human specialists who are dedicating their lives to help create it. And appreciate that AI is helping to improve our lives every day.” (For criticism of Bentley [[60](#B60-information-09-00209)], see [[61](#B61-information-09-00209)].) This suggests that some superintelligence skepticism may serve the political goal of protecting the broader field of AI.Superintelligence skepticism that is aimed at protecting the field of AI may be less of a factor during the current period of intense interest in AI. At least for now, the field of AI does not need to defend its value—its value is rather obvious, and AI researchers are not lacking for job security. Importantly, the current AI boom is largely based on actual accomplishments, not hype. Therefore, while today’s AI researchers may view superintelligence as a distraction, they are less likely to view it as a threat to their livelihood. However, some may nonetheless view superintelligence in this way, especially those who have been in the field long enough to witness previous boom-and-bust cycles. Likewise, the present situation could change if the current AI boom eventually cycles into another bust—another winter. Despite the success of current AI, there are arguments that it is fundamentally limited [[62](#B62-information-09-00209)]. The prospect of a new AI winter could be a significant factor in politicized superintelligence skepticism.A different type of example comes from public intellectuals who profess superintelligence skepticism based on questionable reasoning. A notable case of this is the psychologist and public intellectual Steven Pinker. Pinker recently articulated a superintelligence skepticism that some observers have likened to politicized climate skepticism [[63](#B63-information-09-00209),[64](#B64-information-09-00209)]. Pinker does resemble some notable political skeptics: a senior scholar with an academic background in an unrelated topic who is able to use his (and it is typically a he) platform to advance his skeptical views. Additionally, a close analysis of Pinker’s comments on superintelligence finds them to be flawed and poorly informed by existing research [[65](#B65-information-09-00209)]. Pinker’s superintelligence skepticism appears to be advancing a broader narrative of human progress, and may be making the intellectual sin of putting this conclusion before the analysis of superintelligence. However, his particular motivations are, to the present author’s knowledge, not documented (It would be especially ironic for Pinker to politicize skepticism based on flawed intellectual reasoning, since he otherwise preaches a message intellectual virtue).A third type of example of potential politicized superintelligence skepticism comes from the corporate sector. Several people in leadership positions at technology corporations have expressed superintelligence skepticism, including Eric Schmidt (Executive Chairman of Alphabet, the parent company of Google) [[66](#B66-information-09-00209)] and Mark Zuckerberg (CEO of Facebook) [[67](#B67-information-09-00209)]. Since this skepticism comes the corporate sector, it has some resemblance to risk–profit politicized skepticism and may likewise have the most potential to shape public discourse and policy. One observer postulated that Zuckerberg professes superintelligence skepticism to project the idea that “software is always friendly and tame” and avoid the idea “that computers are intrinsically risky”, the latter of which “has potentially dire consequences for Zuckerberg’s business and personal future” [[67](#B67-information-09-00209)]. While this may just be conjecture, it does come at a time in which Facebook is under considerable public pressure for its role in propagating fake news and influencing elections, which, although unrelated to superintelligence, nonetheless provides an antiregulatory motivation to downplay risks associated with computers.To summarize, there may already be some politicized superintelligence skepticism, coming from AI academics seeking to protect their field, public intellectuals seeking to advance a certain narrative about the world, and corporate leaders seeking to avoid regulation. However, it is not clear how much superintelligence skepticism is already politicized, and there are indications that it may be limited, especially compared to what has occurred for other issues. On the other hand, superintelligence is a relatively new public issue (with a longer history in academia), so perhaps its politicization is just beginning.Finally, it is worth noting that while superintelligence has not been politicized to the extent that climate change has, there is at least one instance of superintelligence being cited in the context of climate skepticism. Cass [[68](#B68-information-09-00209),[69](#B69-information-09-00209)] cited the prospect of superintelligence as a reason to not be concerned about climate change. A counter to this argument is that, even if superintelligence is a larger risk, addressing climate change can still reduce the overall risk faced by humanity. Superintelligence could also be a solution to climate change, and thus may be worth building despite the risks it poses. At the same time, if climate change has been addressed independently, then this reduces the need to take risks in building superintelligence [[70](#B70-information-09-00209)].#### 4.2. Prospects for Politicized Superintelligence Skepticism
Will superintelligence skepticism be (further) politicized? Noting the close historical association between politicized skepticism and corporate profits—at least for risk–profit politicized skepticism—an important question is whether superintelligence could prompt profit-threatening regulations. AI is now being developed by some of the largest corporations in the world. Furthermore, a recent survey found artificial general intelligence projects at several large corporations, including Baidu, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Tencent, and Uber [[19](#B19-information-09-00209)]. These corporations have the assets to conduct politicized skepticism that is every bit as large as that of the tobacco, fossil fuel, and industrial chemicals industries.It should be noted that the artificial general intelligence projects at these corporations were not found to indicate substantial skepticism. Indeed, some of them are outspoken in concern about superintelligence. Moreover, out of 45 artificial general intelligence projects surveyed, only two were found to be dismissive of concerns about the risks posed by the technology [[19](#B19-information-09-00209)]. However, even if the AI projects themselves do not exhibit skepticism, the corporations that host them still could. Such a scenario would be comparable to that of ExxonMobil, whose scientists confirmed the science of climate change even while corporate publicity campaigns professed skepticism [[7](#B7-information-09-00209)].The history shows that risk–profit politicized skepticism is not inherent to corporate activity—it is generally only found when profits are at stake. The preponderance of corporate research on artificial general intelligence suggests at least a degree of profitability, but, at this time, it is unclear how profitable it will be. If it is profitable, then corporations are likely to become highly motivated to protect it against outside restrictions. This is an important factor to monitor as the technology progresses.In public corporations, the pressure to maximize shareholder returns can motivate risk–profit politicized skepticism. However, this may be less of a factor for some corporations in the AI sector. In particular, voting shares constituting a majority of voting power at both Facebook and Alphabet (the parent company of Google) are controlled by the companies’ founders: Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook [[71](#B71-information-09-00209)] and Larry Page and Sergey Brin at Alphabet [[72](#B72-information-09-00209)]. Given their majority stakes, the founders may be able to resist shareholder pressure for politicized skepticism, although it is not certain that they would, especially since leadership at both companies already display superintelligence skepticism.Another factor is the political ideologies of those involved in superintelligence. As discussed above, risk–profit politicized skepticism of other issues is commonly driven by people with pro-capitalist, anti-socialist, and anti-communist political ideologies. Superintelligence skepticism may be more likely to be politicized by people with similar ideologies. Some insight into this matter can be obtained from a recent survey of 600 technology entrepreneurs [[73](#B73-information-09-00209)], which is a highly relevant demographic. The study finds that, contrary to some conventional wisdom, this demographic tends not to hold libertarian ideologies. Instead, technology entrepreneurs tend to hold views consistent with American liberalism, but with one important exception: technology entrepreneurs tend to oppose government regulation. This finding suggests some prospect for politicizing superintelligence skepticism, although perhaps not as much as may exist in other industries.Further insight can be found from the current political activities of AI corporations. In the US, the corporations’ employees donate mainly to the Democratic Party, which is the predominant party of American liberalism and is more pro-regulation. However, the corporations themselves have recently shifted donations to the Republican Party, which is the predominant party of American conservatism and is more anti-regulation. Edsall [[74](#B74-information-09-00209)] proposed that this divergence between employees and employers is rooted in corporations’ pursuit of financial self-interest. A potential implication of this is that, even if the individuals who develop AI oppose risk–profit politicized skepticism, the corporations that they work for may support it. Additionally, the corporations have recently been accused of using their assets to influence academic and think tank research on regulations that the corporations could face [[75](#B75-information-09-00209),[76](#B76-information-09-00209)], although at least some of the accusations have been disputed [[77](#B77-information-09-00209)]. While the veracity of these accusations is beyond the scope of this paper, they are at least suggestive of the potential for these corporations to politicize superintelligence skepticism.AI corporations would not necessarily politicize superintelligence skepticism, even if profits may be at stake. Alternatively, they could express concern about superintelligence to portray themselves as responsible actors and likewise avoid regulation. This would be analogous to the strategy of “greenwashing” employed by companies seeking to bolster their reputation for environmental stewardship [[78](#B78-information-09-00209)]. Indeed, there have already been some expressions of concern about superintelligence by AI technologists, and likewise some suspicion that the stated concern has this sort of ulterior motive [[79](#B79-information-09-00209)].To the extent that corporations do politicize superintelligence skepticism, they are likely to mainly emphasize doubt about the risks of superintelligence. Insofar as superintelligence could be beneficial, corporations may promote this, just as they promote the benefits of fossil fuels (for transportation, heating, etc.) and other risky products. Or, AI corporations may promote the benefits of their own safety design and sow doubt about the safety of their rivals’ designs, analogous to the marketing of products whose riskiness can vary from company to company, such as automobiles. Alternatively, AI corporations may seek to sow doubt about the possibility of superintelligence, calculating that this would be their best play for avoiding regulation. As with politicized skepticism about other technologies and products, there is no one standard formula that every company always adopts.For their part, academic superintelligence skeptics may be more likely to emphasize doubt about the mere possibility of superintelligence, regardless of whether it would be beneficial or harmful, due to reputational concerns. Or, they could focus skepticism on the risks, for similar reasons as corporations: academic research can also be regulated, and researchers do not always welcome this. Of course, there are also academics who do not exhibit superintelligence skepticism. Again, there is no one standard formula.#### 4.3. Potential Effectiveness of Politicized Superintelligence Skepticism
If superintelligence skepticism is politicized, several factors point to it being highly effective, even more so than for the other issues in which skepticism has been politicized.First, some of the experts best positioned to resolve the debate are also deeply implicated in it. To the extent that superintelligence is a risk, the risk is driven by the computer scientists who would build superintelligence. These individuals have intimate knowledge of the technology and thus have an essential voice in the public debate (though not the only essential voice). This is distinct from issues such as tobacco or climate change, in which the risk is mainly assessed by outside experts. It would be as if the effect of tobacco on cancer was studied by the agronomists who cultivate tobacco crops, or if the science of climate change was studied by the geologists who map deposits of fossil fuels. With superintelligence, a substantial portion of the relevant experts have a direct incentive to avoid any restrictions on the technology, as do their employers. This could create a deep and enduring pool of highly persuasive skeptics.Second, superintelligence skepticism has deep roots in the mainstream AI computer science community. As noted above, this dates to the days of AI winter. Thus, skeptics may be abundant even where they are not funded by industry. Indeed, most of the skeptics described above do not appear to be speaking out of any industry ties, and thus would not have an industry conflict of interest. They could still have a conflict of interest from their desire in protect the reputation of their field, but this is a subtler matter. Insofar as they are perceived to not have a conflict of interest, they could be especially persuasive. Furthermore, even if their skepticism is honest and not intended for any political purposes, it could be used by others in dishonest and political ways.Third, superintelligence is a topic for which the uncertainty is inherently difficult to resolve. It is a hypothetical future technology that is qualitatively different from anything that currently exists. Furthermore, there is concern that its mere existence could be catastrophic, which could preclude certain forms of safety testing. It is thus a risk that defies normal scientific study. In this regard, it is similar to climate change: moderate climate change can already be observed, as can moderate forms of AI, but the potentially catastrophic forms have not yet materialized and possibly never will. However, climate projections can rely on some relatively simple physics—at its core, climate change largely reduces to basic physical chemistry and thermodynamics. (The physical chemistry covers the nature of greenhouse gasses, which are more transparent to some wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation than to others. The thermodynamics covers the heat transfer expected from greenhouse gas buildup. Both effects can be demonstrated in simple laboratory experiments. Climate change also involves indirect feedback effects on much of the Earth system, including clouds, ice, oceans, and ecosystems, which are often more complex and difficult to resolve and contribute to ongoing scientific uncertainty.) In contrast, AI projections must rely on notions of intelligence, which is not so simple at all. For this reason, it is less likely that scholarly communities will converge on any consensus position on superintelligence in the way that they have on other risks such as climate change.Fourth, some corporations that could develop superintelligence may be uniquely well positioned to influence public opinion. The corporations currently involved in artificial general intelligence research include some corporations that also play major roles in public media. As a leading social media platform, Facebook in particular has been found to be especially consequential for public opinion [[80](#B80-information-09-00209)]. Corporations that serve as information gateways, such as Baidu, Google, and Microsoft, also have unusual potential for influence. These corporations have opportunities to shape public opinion in ways that the tobacco, fossil fuel, and industrial chemicals industries cannot. While the AI corporations would not necessarily exploit these opportunities, it is an important factor to track.In summary, while it remains to be seen whether superintelligence skepticism will be politicized, there are some reasons for believing it will be, and that superintelligence would be an especially potent case of politicized skepticism. 5. Opportunities for Constructive Action
-----------------------------------------
Politicized superintelligence skepticism would not necessarily be harmful. As far as this paper is concerned, it is possible that, for superintelligence, skepticism is the correct view, meaning that superintelligence may not be built, may not be dangerous, or may not merit certain forms of imminent attention. (The paper of course assumes that superintelligence is worth some imminent attention, or otherwise it would not have been written.) It is also possible that, even if superintelligence is a major risk, government regulations could nonetheless be counterproductive, and politicized skepticism could help avoid that. That said, the history of politicized skepticism (especially risk–profit politicized skepticism) shows a tendency for harm, which suggests that politicized superintelligence skepticism could be harmful as well.With this in mind, one basic opportunity is to raise awareness about politicized skepticism within communities that discuss superintelligence. Superintelligence skeptics who are motivated by honest intellectual norms may not wish for their skepticism to be used politically. They can likewise be cautious about how to engage with potential political skeptics, such as by avoiding certain speaking opportunities in which their remarks would be used as a political tool instead of as a constructive intellectual contribution. Additionally, all people involved in superintelligence debates can insist on basic intellectual standards, above all by putting analysis before conclusions and not the other way around. These are the sorts of things that an awareness of politicized skepticism can help with.Another opportunity is to redouble efforts to build scientific consensus on superintelligence, and then to draw attention to it. Currently, there is no consensus. As noted above, superintelligence is an inherently uncertain topic and difficult to build consensus on. However, with some effort, it should be possible to at least make progress towards consensus. Of course, scientific consensus does not preclude politicized skepticism—ongoing climate skepticism attests to this. However, it can at least dampen the politicized skepticism. Indeed, recent research has found that the perception of scientific consensus increases acceptance of the underlying science [[81](#B81-information-09-00209)].A third opportunity is to engage with AI corporations to encourage them to avoid politicizing skepticism about superintelligence or other forms of AI. Politicized skepticism is not inevitable, and while corporate leaders may sometimes feel as though they have no choice, there may nonetheless be options. Furthermore, the options may be especially effective at this early stage in superintelligence research, in which corporations may have not yet established internal policy or practices.A fourth opportunity is to follow best practices in debunking misinformation in the event that superintelligence skepticism is politicized. There is a substantial literature on the psychology of debunking [[81](#B81-information-09-00209),[82](#B82-information-09-00209),[83](#B83-information-09-00209)]. A debunking handbook written for a general readership [[82](#B82-information-09-00209)] recommends: (1) focusing on the correct information to avoid cognitively reinforcing the false information; (2) preceding any discussion of the false information with a warning that it is false; and (3) when debunking false information, also give the correct information so that people are not left with a gap in their understanding of the topic. The handbook further cautions against using the information deficit model of human cognition, which proposes that mistaken beliefs can be corrected simply by providing the correct information. The information deficit model is widely used in science communication, but it has been repeatedly found to work poorly, especially in situations of contested science. This sort of advice could be helpful to efforts to counter superintelligence misinformation.Finally, the entire AI community should insist that policy be made based on an honest and balanced read of the current state of knowledge. Burden of proof requirements should not be abused for private gain. As with climate change and other global risks, the world cannot afford to prove that superintelligence would be catastrophic. By the time uncertainty is eliminated, it could be too late. 6. Conclusions
---------------
Some people believe that superintelligence could be a highly consequential technology, potentially even a transformative event in the course of human history, with either profoundly beneficial or extremely catastrophic effects. Insofar as this belief is plausible, superintelligence may be worth careful advance consideration, to ensure that the technology is handled successfully. Importantly, this advance attention should include social science and policy analysis, and not just computer science. Furthermore, even if belief in superintelligence is mistaken, it can nonetheless be significant as a social and political phenomenon. This is another reason for social science and policy analysis. This paper is a contribution to the social science and policy analysis of superintelligence. Furthermore, despite the unprecedented nature of superintelligence, this paper shows that there are important historical and contemporary analogs that can shed light on the issue. Much of what could occur for the development of superintelligence has already occurred for other technologies. Politicized skepticism is one example of this.One topic not covered in this paper is the prospect of beliefs that superintelligence will occur and/or will be harmful to be politicized. Such a phenomenon could be analogous to, for example, belief in large medical harms from nuclear power, or, phrased differently, skepticism about claims that nuclear power plants are medically safe. The scientific literature on nuclear power finds medical harms to be substantially lower than is commonly believed [[84](#B84-information-09-00209)]. Overstated concern (or “alarmism”) about nuclear power can likewise be harmful, for example by increasing use of fossil fuels. Similarly, the fossil fuel industry could politicize this belief for its own benefit. By the same logic, belief in superintelligence could also be politicized. This prospect is left for future research, although much of this paper’s analysis may be applicable.Perhaps the most important lesson of this paper is that the development of superintelligence could be a contentious political process. It could involve aggressive efforts by powerful actors—efforts that not only are inconsistent with basic intellectual ideals, but that also actively subvert those ideals for narrow, self-interested gain. This poses a fundamental challenge to those who seek to advance a constructive study of superintelligence.
Funding
-------
This research received no external funding.Acknowledgments
---------------
Tony Barrett, Phil Torres, Olle Häggström, Maurizio Tinnirello, Matthijs Maas, Roman Yampolskiy, and participants in a seminar hosted by the Center for Human-Compatible AI at UC Berkeley provided helpful feedback on an earlier version of this paper. All remaining errors are the author’s alone. The views expressed in this paper are the author’s and not necessarily the views of the Global Catastrophic Risk Institute.Conflicts of Interest
---------------------
The author declares no conflict of interest.References
----------
1. Oreskes, N.; Conway, E.M. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming; Bloomsbury: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Merchants+of+Doubt:+How+a+Handful+of+Scientists+Obscured+the+Truth+on+Issues+from+Tobacco+Smoke+to+Global+Warming&author=Oreskes,+N.&author=Conway,+E.M.&publication\_year=2010)]
2. Grandjean, P. Only One Chance: How Environmental Pollution Impairs Brain Development—And How to Protect the Brains of the Next Generation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Only+One+Chance:+How+Environmental+Pollution+Impairs+Brain+Development%E2%80%94And+How+to+Protect+the+Brains+of+the+Next+Generation&author=Grandjean,+P.&publication\_year=2013)]
3. Selin, C. Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values \*\*2007\*\*, 32, 196–220. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Expectations+and+the+emergence+of+nanotechnology&author=Selin,+C.&publication\_year=2007&journal=Sci.+Technol.+Hum.+Values&volume=32&pages=196%E2%80%93220&doi=10.1177/0162243906296918)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906296918)]
4. Jacques, P.J.; Dunlap, R.E.; Freeman, M. The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environ. Politics \*\*2008\*\*, 17, 349–385. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+organisation+of+denial:+Conservative+think+tanks+and+environmental+skepticism&author=Jacques,+P.J.&author=Dunlap,+R.E.&author=Freeman,+M.&publication\_year=2008&journal=Environ.+Politics&volume=17&pages=349%E2%80%93385&doi=10.1080/09644010802055576)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576)]
5. Lewandowsky, S.; Oberauer, K. Motivated rejection of science. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. \*\*2016\*\*, 25, 217–222. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Motivated+rejection+of+science&author=Lewandowsky,+S.&author=Oberauer,+K.&publication\_year=2016&journal=Curr.+Dir.+Psychol.+Sci.&volume=25&pages=217%E2%80%93222&doi=10.1177/0963721416654436)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416654436)]
6. Lewandowsky, S.; Mann, M.E.; Brown, N.J.; Friedman, H. Science and the public: Debate, denial, and skepticism. J. Soc. Polit. Psychol. \*\*2016\*\*, 4, 537–553. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Science+and+the+public:+Debate,+denial,+and+skepticism&author=Lewandowsky,+S.&author=Mann,+M.E.&author=Brown,+N.J.&author=Friedman,+H.&publication\_year=2016&journal=J.+Soc.+Polit.+Psychol.&volume=4&pages=537%E2%80%93553&doi=10.5964/jspp.v4i2.604)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.604)][[Green Version](http://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/download/604/pdf)]
7. Supran, G.; Oreskes, N. Assessing ExxonMobil’s climate change communications (1977–2014). Environ. Res. Lett. \*\*2017\*\*, 12, 084019. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Assessing+ExxonMobil%E2%80%99s+climate+change+communications+(1977%E2%80%932014)&author=Supran,+G.&author=Oreskes,+N.&publication\_year=2017&journal=Environ.+Res.+Lett.&volume=12&pages=084019&doi=10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f)][[Green Version](http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f/pdf)]
8. McGinnis, J.O. Accelerating Ai. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. \*\*2010\*\*, 104, 366–381. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Accelerating+Ai&author=McGinnis,+J.O.&publication\_year=2010&journal=Northwest.+Univ.+Law+Rev.&volume=104&pages=366%E2%80%93381&doi=10.2139/ssrn.1593851)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1593851)]
9. Sotala, K.; Yampolskiy, R.V. Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: A survey. Phys. Scr. \*\*2014\*\*, 90, 018001. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Responses+to+catastrophic+AGI+risk:+A+survey&author=Sotala,+K.&author=Yampolskiy,+R.V.&publication\_year=2014&journal=Phys.+Scr.&volume=90&pages=018001&doi=10.1088/0031-8949/90/1/018001)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/90/1/018001)]
10. Wilson, G. Minimizing global catastrophic and existential risks from emerging technologies through international law. VA Environ. Law J. \*\*2013\*\*, 31, 307–364. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Minimizing+global+catastrophic+and+existential+risks+from+emerging+technologies+through+international+law&author=Wilson,+G.&publication\_year=2013&journal=VA+Environ.+Law+J.&volume=31&pages=307%E2%80%93364)]
11. Yampolskiy, R.; Fox, J. Safety engineering for artificial general intelligence. Topoi \*\*2013\*\*, 32, 217–226. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Safety+engineering+for+artificial+general+intelligence&author=Yampolskiy,+R.&author=Fox,+J.&publication\_year=2013&journal=Topoi&volume=32&pages=217%E2%80%93226&doi=10.1007/s11245-012-9128-9)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9128-9)]
12. Goertzel, B. The Corporatization of AI Is a Major Threat to Humanity. H+ Magazine, 21 July 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+Corporatization+of+AI+Is+a+Major+Threat+to+Humanity&author=Goertzel,+B.&publication\_year=2017)]
13. Baum, S.D. On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence. AI Soc. \*\*2017\*\*, 32, 543–551. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=On+the+promotion+of+safe+and+socially+beneficial+artificial+intelligence&author=Baum,+S.D.&publication\_year=2017&journal=AI+Soc.&volume=32&pages=543%E2%80%93551&doi=10.1007/s00146-016-0677-0)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0677-0)]
14. Butler, S. Darwin among the Machines. The Press, 13 June 1863. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Darwin+among+the+Machines&author=Butler,+S.&publication\_year=1863)]
15. Good, I.J. Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. Adv. Comput. \*\*1965\*\*, 6, 31–88. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Speculations+concerning+the+first+ultraintelligent+machine&author=Good,+I.J.&publication\_year=1965&journal=Adv.+Comput.&volume=6&pages=31%E2%80%9388)]
16. Sandberg, A. An overview of models of technological singularity. In The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future; More, M., Vita-More, N., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 376–394. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=An+overview+of+models+of+technological+singularity&author=Sandberg,+A.&publication\_year=2010&pages=376%E2%80%93394)]
17. Bostrom, N. How Long before Superintelligence? 1998. Available online: (accessed on 18 August 2018).
18. Goertzel, B. Artificial general intelligence: Concept, state of the art, and future prospects. J. Artif. Gen. Intell. \*\*2014\*\*, 5, 1–48. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Artificial+general+intelligence:+Concept,+state+of+the+art,+and+future+prospects&author=Goertzel,+B.&publication\_year=2014&journal=J.+Artif.+Gen.+Intell.&volume=5&pages=1%E2%80%9348&doi=10.2478/jagi-2014-0001)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2014-0001)]
19. Baum, S.D. A Survey of Artificial General Intelligence Projects for Ethics, Risk, and Policy. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute Working Paper 17-1. 2017. Available online: (accessed on 18 August 2018).
20. Legg, S. Machine Super Intelligence. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland, 2008. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Machine+Super+Intelligence&author=Legg,+S.&publication\_year=2008)]
21. Crevier, D. AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=AI:+The+Tumultuous+History+of+the+Search+for+Artificial+Intelligence&author=Crevier,+D.&publication\_year=1993)]
22. McCorduck, P. Machines Who Think: 25th Anniversary Edition; A.K. Peters: Natick, MA, USA, 2004. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Machines+Who+Think:+25th+Anniversary+Edition&author=McCorduck,+P.&publication\_year=2004)]
23. Hendler, J. Avoiding another AI winter. IEEE Intell. Syst. \*\*2008\*\*, 23, 2–4. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Avoiding+another+AI+winter&author=Hendler,+J.&publication\_year=2008&journal=IEEE+Intell.+Syst.&volume=23&pages=2%E2%80%934&doi=10.1109/MIS.2008.20)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2008.20)]
24. Dreyfus, H. Alchemy and AI. RAND Corporation Document P-3244. 1965. Available online: (accessed on 18 August 2018).
25. Descartes, R. A Discourse on Method. Project Gutenberg eBook. 1637. Available online: (accessed on 18 August 2018).
26. Chalmers, D.J. The singularity: A philosophical analysis. J. Conscious. Stud. \*\*2010\*\*, 17, 7–65. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+singularity:+A+philosophical+analysis&author=Chalmers,+D.J.&publication\_year=2010&journal=J.+Conscious.+Stud.&volume=17&pages=7%E2%80%9365)]
27. Eden, A.H.; Moor, J.H.; Soraker, J.H.; Steinhart, E. (Eds.) Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Singularity+Hypotheses:+A+Scientific+and+Philosophical+Assessment&author=Eden,+A.H.&author=Moor,+J.H.&author=Soraker,+J.H.&author=Steinhart,+E.&publication\_year=2013)]
28. Bostrom, N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Superintelligence:+Paths,+Dangers,+Strategies&author=Bostrom,+N.&publication\_year=2014)]
29. Callaghan, V.; Miller, J.; Yampolskiy, R.; Armstrong, S. (Eds.) The Technological Singularity: Managing the Journey; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+Technological+Singularity:+Managing+the+Journey&author=Callaghan,+V.&author=Miller,+J.&author=Yampolskiy,+R.&author=Armstrong,+S.&publication\_year=2017)]
30. Rawlinson, K. Microsoft’s Bill Gates Insists AI Is a Threat. BBC, 29 January 2015. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Microsoft%E2%80%99s+Bill+Gates+Insists+AI+Is+a+Threat&author=Rawlinson,+K.&publication\_year=2015)]
31. Cellan-Jones, R. Stephen Hawking Warns Artificial Intelligence Could End Mankind. BBC, 2 December 2014. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Stephen+Hawking+Warns+Artificial+Intelligence+Could+End+Mankind&author=Cellan-Jones,+R.&publication\_year=2014)]
32. Dowd, M. Elon Musk’s Billion-Dollar Crusade to Stop the A.I. Apocalypse. Vanity Fair, 26 March 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Elon+Musk%E2%80%99s+Billion-Dollar+Crusade+to+Stop+the+A.I.+Apocalypse&author=Dowd,+M.&publication\_year=2017)]
33. LeCun, Y.; Bengio, Y.; Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature \*\*2015\*\*, 521, 436–444. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Deep+learning&author=LeCun,+Y.&author=Bengio,+Y.&author=Hinton,+G.&publication\_year=2015&journal=Nature&volume=521&pages=436%E2%80%93444&doi=10.1038/nature14539&pmid=26017442)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539)] [[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017442)]
34. Silver, D.; Huang, A.; Maddison, C.J.; Guez, A.; Sifre, L.; Van Den Driessche, G.; Schrittwieser, J.; Antonoglou, I.; Panneershelvam, V.; Lanctot, M.; et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature \*\*2016\*\*, 529, 484–489. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Mastering+the+game+of+Go+with+deep+neural+networks+and+tree+search&author=Silver,+D.&author=Huang,+A.&author=Maddison,+C.J.&author=Guez,+A.&author=Sifre,+L.&author=Van+Den+Driessche,+G.&author=Schrittwieser,+J.&author=Antonoglou,+I.&author=Panneershelvam,+V.&author=Lanctot,+M.&publication\_year=2016&journal=Nature&volume=529&pages=484%E2%80%93489&doi=10.1038/nature16961&pmid=26819042)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961)] [[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26819042)]
35. Bringsjord, S. Belief in the singularity is logically brittle. J. Conscious. Stud. \*\*2012\*\*, 19, 14–20. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Belief+in+the+singularity+is+logically+brittle&author=Bringsjord,+S.&publication\_year=2012&journal=J.+Conscious.+Stud.&volume=19&pages=14%E2%80%9320)]
36. Chalmers, D. The Singularity: A reply. J. Conscious. Stud. \*\*2012\*\*, 19, 141–167. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+Singularity:+A+reply&author=Chalmers,+D.&publication\_year=2012&journal=J.+Conscious.+Stud.&volume=19&pages=141%E2%80%93167)]
37. McDermott, D. Response to the singularity by David Chalmers. J. Conscious. Stud. \*\*2012\*\*, 19, 167–172. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Response+to+the+singularity+by+David+Chalmers&author=McDermott,+D.&publication\_year=2012&journal=J.+Conscious.+Stud.&volume=19&pages=167%E2%80%93172)]
38. Crawford, K. Artificial Intelligence’s White Guy Problem. New York Times, 25 June 2016. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Artificial+Intelligence%E2%80%99s+White+Guy+Problem&author=Crawford,+K.&publication\_year=2016)]
39. Garling, C. Andrew Ng: Why ‘Deep Learning’ Is a Mandate for Humans, not just Machines. Wired, May 2015. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Andrew+Ng:+Why+%E2%80%98Deep+Learning%E2%80%99+Is+a+Mandate+for+Humans,+not+just+Machines&author=Garling,+C.&publication\_year=2015)]
40. Etzioni, O. No, the Experts Don’t Think Superintelligent AI Is a Threat to Humanity. MIT Technology Review, 20 September 2016. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=No,+the+Experts+Don%E2%80%99t+Think+Superintelligent+AI+Is+a+Threat+to+Humanity&author=Etzioni,+O.&publication\_year=2016)]
41. Dafoe, A.; Russell, S. Yes, We Are Worried about the Existential Risk of Artificial Intelligence. MIT Technology Review, 2 November 2016. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Yes,+We+Are+Worried+about+the+Existential+Risk+of+Artificial+Intelligence&author=Dafoe,+A.&author=Russell,+S.&publication\_year=2016)]
42. Baum, S.D. Reconciliation between factions focused on near-term and long-term artificial intelligence. AI Soc. \*\*2017\*\*. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Reconciliation+between+factions+focused+on+near-term+and+long-term+artificial+intelligence&author=Baum,+S.D.&publication\_year=2017&journal=AI+Soc.&doi=10.1007/s00146-017-0734-3)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0734-3)]
43. Goertzel, B. Superintelligence: Fears, promises and potentials. J. Evol. Technol. \*\*2015\*\*, 25, 55–87. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Superintelligence:+Fears,+promises+and+potentials&author=Goertzel,+B.&publication\_year=2015&journal=J.+Evol.+Technol.&volume=25&pages=55%E2%80%9387)]
44. Baum, S.D.; Barrett, A.M.; Yampolskiy, R.V. Modeling and interpreting expert disagreement about artificial superintelligence. Informatica \*\*2017\*\*, 41, 419–428. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Modeling+and+interpreting+expert+disagreement+about+artificial+superintelligence&author=Baum,+S.D.&author=Barrett,+A.M.&author=Yampolskiy,+R.V.&publication\_year=2017&journal=Informatica&volume=41&pages=419%E2%80%93428)]
45. Bieger, J.; Thórisson, K.R.; Wang, P. Safe baby AGI. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), Berlin, Germany, 22–25 July 2015; Bieger, J., Goertzel, B., Potapov, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 46–49. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Safe+baby+AGI&conference=Proceedings+of+the+8th+International+Conference+on+Artificial+General+Intelligence+(AGI)&author=Bieger,+J.&author=Th%C3%B3risson,+K.R.&author=Wang,+P.&publication\_year=2015&pages=46%E2%80%9349)]
46. Searle, J.R. What your computer can’t know. The New York Review of Books, 9 October 2014. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=What+your+computer+can%E2%80%99t+know&author=Searle,+J.R.&publication\_year=2014)]
47. Nichols, T. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+Death+of+Expertise:+The+Campaign+against+Established+Knowledge+and+Why+It+Matters&author=Nichols,+T.&publication\_year=2017)]
48. De Vrieze, J. ‘Science wars’ veteran has a new mission. Science \*\*2017\*\*, 358, 159. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=%E2%80%98Science+wars%E2%80%99+veteran+has+a+new+mission&author=De+Vrieze,+J.&publication\_year=2017&journal=Science&volume=358&pages=159&doi=10.1126/science.358.6360.159&pmid=29026024)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.358.6360.159)] [[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026024)]
49. Stirling, M. Merchants of Consensus: A Public Battle against Exxon. 2017. Available online: (accessed on 18 August 2018).
50. Hampshire, G. Alberta Government Cool on Controversial Climate Change Speaker. CBC News, 19 January 2018. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Alberta+Government+Cool+on+Controversial+Climate+Change+Speaker&author=Hampshire,+G.&publication\_year=2018)]
51. Marshall, G. Don’t Even Think About It: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Ignore Climate Change; Bloomsbury: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Don%E2%80%99t+Even+Think+About+It:+Why+Our+Brains+Are+Wired+to+Ignore+Climate+Change&author=Marshall,+G.&publication\_year=2014)]
52. Whitehouse, S. Captured: The Corporate Infiltration of American Democracy; The New Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Captured:+The+Corporate+Infiltration+of+American+Democracy&author=Whitehouse,+S.&publication\_year=2017)]
53. Kirk, R. Conservation activism is a healthy sign. Baltimore Sun, 4 May 1970. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Conservation+activism+is+a+healthy+sign&author=Kirk,+R.&publication\_year=1970)]
54. Boykoff, M.T.; Boykoff, J.M. Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Glob. Environ. Chang. \*\*2004\*\*, 14, 125–136. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Balance+as+bias:+Global+warming+and+the+US+prestige+press&author=Boykoff,+M.T.&author=Boykoff,+J.M.&publication\_year=2004&journal=Glob.+Environ.+Chang.&volume=14&pages=125%E2%80%93136&doi=10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001)]
55. Baum, S.D.; Haqq-Misra, J.D.; Karmosky, C. Climate change: Evidence of human causes and arguments for emissions reduction. Sci. Eng. Ethics \*\*2012\*\*, 18, 393–410. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Climate+change:+Evidence+of+human+causes+and+arguments+for+emissions+reduction&author=Baum,+S.D.&author=Haqq-Misra,+J.D.&author=Karmosky,+C.&publication\_year=2012&journal=Sci.+Eng.+Ethics&volume=18&pages=393%E2%80%93410&doi=10.1007/s11948-011-9270-6&pmid=21516371)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9270-6)] [[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21516371)]
56. Oreskes, N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science \*\*2004\*\*, 306, 1686. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+scientific+consensus+on+climate+change&author=Oreskes,+N.&publication\_year=2004&journal=Science&volume=306&pages=1686&doi=10.1126/science.1103618&pmid=15576594)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618)] [[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15576594)]
57. CNA Military Advisory Board. National Security and the Threat of Climate Change; The CNA Corporation: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2007. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=National+Security+and+the+Threat+of+Climate+Change&author=CNA+Military+Advisory+Board&publication\_year=2007)]
58. Lighthill, J. Artificial Intelligence: A Paper Symposium; Science Research Council: Swindon, UK, 1973. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Artificial+Intelligence:+A+Paper+Symposium&author=Lighthill,+J.&publication\_year=1973)]
59. Menzies, T. 21st-century AI: Proud, not smug. IEEE Intell. Syst. \*\*2003\*\*, 18, 18–24. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=21st-century+AI:+Proud,+not+smug&author=Menzies,+T.&publication\_year=2003&journal=IEEE+Intell.+Syst.&volume=18&pages=18%E2%80%9324&doi=10.1109/MIS.2003.1200723)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2003.1200723)]
60. Bentley, P.J. The three laws of artificial intelligence: Dispelling common myths. In Should We Fear Artificial Intelligence? In-Depth Analysis; Boucher, P., Ed.; European Parliamentary Research Service, Strategic Foresight Unit: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; pp. 6–12. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+three+laws+of+artificial+intelligence:+Dispelling+common+myths&author=Bentley,+P.J.&publication\_year=2018&pages=6%E2%80%9312)]
61. Häggström, O. A spectacularly uneven AI report. Häggström Hävdar, 30 March 2018. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=A+spectacularly+uneven+AI+report&author=H%C3%A4ggstr%C3%B6m,+O.&publication\_year=2018)]
62. Marcus, G. Artificial intelligence is stuck. Here’s how to move it forward. New York Times, 29 July 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Artificial+intelligence+is+stuck.+Here%E2%80%99s+how+to+move+it+forward&author=Marcus,+G.&publication\_year=2017)]
63. Bengtsson, B. Pinker is dangerous. Jag är Här, 22 October 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Pinker+is+dangerous&author=Bengtsson,+B.&publication\_year=2017)]
64. Häggström, O. The AI meeting in Brussels last week. Häggström Hävdar, 23 October 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+AI+meeting+in+Brussels+last+week&author=H%C3%A4ggstr%C3%B6m,+O.&publication\_year=2017)]
65. Torres, P. A Detailed Critique of One Section of Steven Pinker’s Chapter “Existential Threats” in Enlightenment Now. Project for Future Human Flourishing Technical Report 2, Version 1.2. 2018. Available online: (accessed on 21 August 2018).
66. Clifford, C. Google billionaire Eric Schmidt: Elon Musk is ‘exactly wrong’ about A.I. because he ‘doesn’t understand’. CNBC, 29 May 2018. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Google+billionaire+Eric+Schmidt:+Elon+Musk+is+%E2%80%98exactly+wrong%E2%80%99+about+A.I.+because+he+%E2%80%98doesn%E2%80%99t+understand%E2%80%99&author=Clifford,+C.&publication\_year=2018)]
67. Bogost, I. Why Zuckerberg and Musk are fighting about the robot future. The Atlantic, 27 July 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Why+Zuckerberg+and+Musk+are+fighting+about+the+robot+future&author=Bogost,+I.&publication\_year=2017)]
68. Cass, O. The problem with climate catastrophizing. Foreign Affairs, 21 March 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+problem+with+climate+catastrophizing&author=Cass,+O.&publication\_year=2017)]
69. Cass, O. How to worry about climate change. National Affairs, Winter2017; 115–131. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=How+to+worry+about+climate+change&author=Cass,+O.&publication\_year=2017)]
70. Baum, S.D. The great downside dilemma for risky emerging technologies. Phys. Scr. \*\*2014\*\*, 89, 128004. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+great+downside+dilemma+for+risky+emerging+technologies&author=Baum,+S.D.&publication\_year=2014&journal=Phys.+Scr.&volume=89&pages=128004&doi=10.1088/0031-8949/89/12/128004)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/89/12/128004)][[Green Version](http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-8949/89/12/128004/pdf)]
71. Heath, A. Mark Zuckerberg’s plan to create non-voting Facebook shares is going to trial in September. Business Insider, 4 May 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Mark+Zuckerberg%E2%80%99s+plan+to+create+non-voting+Facebook+shares+is+going+to+trial+in+September&author=Heath,+A.&publication\_year=2017)]
72. Ingram, M. At Alphabet, there are only two shareholders who matter. Fortune, 7 June 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=At+Alphabet,+there+are+only+two+shareholders+who+matter&author=Ingram,+M.&publication\_year=2017)]
73. Broockman, D.; Ferenstein, G.F.; Malhotra, N. The Political Behavior of Wealthy Americans: Evidence from Technology Entrepreneurs; Stanford Graduate School of Business Working Paper, No. 3581; Stanford Graduate School of Business: Stanford, CA, USA, 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+Political+Behavior+of+Wealthy+Americans:+Evidence+from+Technology+Entrepreneurs&author=Broockman,+D.&author=Ferenstein,+G.F.&author=Malhotra,+N.&publication\_year=2017)]
74. Edsall, T.B. Silicon Valley takes a right turn. New York Times, 12 January 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Silicon+Valley+takes+a+right+turn&author=Edsall,+T.B.&publication\_year=2017)]
75. Mullins, B. Paying professors: Inside Google’s academic influence campaign. Wall Street Journal, 15 July 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Paying+professors:+Inside+Google%E2%80%99s+academic+influence+campaign&author=Mullins,+B.&publication\_year=2017)]
76. Taplinaug, J. Google’s disturbing influence over think tanks. New York Times, 30 August 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Google%E2%80%99s+disturbing+influence+over+think+tanks&author=Taplinaug,+J.&publication\_year=2017)]
77. Tiku, N. New America chair says Google didn’t prompt critic’s ouster. Wired, 6 September 2017. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=New+America+chair+says+Google+didn%E2%80%99t+prompt+critic%E2%80%99s+ouster&author=Tiku,+N.&publication\_year=2017)]
78. Marquis, C.; Toffel, M.W.; Zhou, Y. Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organ. Sci. \*\*2016\*\*, 27, 483–504. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Scrutiny,+norms,+and+selective+disclosure:+A+global+study+of+greenwashing&author=Marquis,+C.&author=Toffel,+M.W.&author=Zhou,+Y.&publication\_year=2016&journal=Organ.+Sci.&volume=27&pages=483%E2%80%93504&doi=10.1287/orsc.2015.1039)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1039)]
79. Mack, E. Why Elon Musk spent $10 million to keep artificial intelligence friendly. Forbes, 15 January 2015. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Why+Elon+Musk+spent+$10+million+to+keep+artificial+intelligence+friendly&author=Mack,+E.&publication\_year=2015)]
80. Pickard, V. Media failures in the age of Trump. Political Econ. Commun. \*\*2017\*\*, 4, 118–122. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Media+failures+in+the+age+of+Trump&author=Pickard,+V.&publication\_year=2017&journal=Political+Econ.+Commun.&volume=4&pages=118%E2%80%93122)]
81. Lewandowsky, S.; Gignac, G.E.; Vaughan, S. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat. Clim. Chang. \*\*2013\*\*, 3, 399–404. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+pivotal+role+of+perceived+scientific+consensus+in+acceptance+of+science&author=Lewandowsky,+S.&author=Gignac,+G.E.&author=Vaughan,+S.&publication\_year=2013&journal=Nat.+Clim.+Chang.&volume=3&pages=399%E2%80%93404&doi=10.1038/nclimate1720)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1720)]
82. Cook, J.; Lewandowsky, S. The Debunking Handbook. St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland. 2011. Available online: (accessed on 18 August 2018).
83. Chan, M.P.; Jones, C.R.; Hall Jamieson, K.; Albarracín, D. Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychol. Sci. \*\*2017\*\*, 28, 1531–1546. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=Debunking:+A+meta-analysis+of+the+psychological+efficacy+of+messages+countering+misinformation&author=Chan,+M.P.&author=Jones,+C.R.&author=Hall+Jamieson,+K.&author=Albarrac%C3%ADn,+D.&publication\_year=2017&journal=Psychol.+Sci.&volume=28&pages=1531%E2%80%931546&doi=10.1177/0956797617714579&pmid=28895452)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579)] [[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895452)]
84. Slovic, P. The perception gap: Radiation and risk. Bull. At. Sci. \*\*2012\*\*, 68, 67–75. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar\_lookup?title=The+perception+gap:+Radiation+and+risk&author=Slovic,+P.&publication\_year=2012&journal=Bull.+At.+Sci.&volume=68&pages=67%E2%80%9375&doi=10.1177/0096340212444870)] [[CrossRef](https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340212444870)]
© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (). |
e95c4ddd-c77e-45a6-83d6-e874ba8700dd | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | GPT-4 busted? Clear self-interest when summarizing articles about itself vs when article talks about Claude, LLaMA, or DALL·E 2
As a follow up to More experiments in GPT-4 agency: writing memos, I did an experiment where I compare GPT-4 summarizing full length articles. This was suggested by Daniel Kokotajlo.
I took the article Clearview AI used nearly 1m times by US police, it tells the BBC and rewrote it to talk about GPT-4. I also adjusted the prompts for LLaMA and Claude, and ran everything twice. After the fact, I decided to run a prompt for DALL·E 2 as well.
Results
* AI firm OpenAI has conducted nearly one million searches for US police, according to its founder, who also revealed the company holds around 30 billion images taken from platforms like Facebook without users' permission. OpenAI's GPT-4 facial recognition technology is utilized by hundreds of US police forces, despite being banned from selling to most US companies due to privacy law violations. Although police usage of the software is often justified for serious crimes, Miami Police admitted using it for all crime types. Critics argue that the lack of laws surrounding facial recognition usage by police raises civil rights concerns and call for greater transparency and independent scrutiny of the technology.
* AI firm Antropics has conducted almost a million facial recognition searches for US police, according to its CEO Hoan Ton-That. The company's software, Claude, holds 30 billion images collected without user permission from platforms like Facebook. Antropics has faced millions of dollars in fines for privacy breaches in Europe and Australia. Critics argue that the police's use of the software is invasive and puts everyone in a "perpetual police line-up." Although the software is banned for most US companies, an exemption allows police to use it. Several US cities, including Portland, San Francisco, and Seattle, have banned the technology. Critics call for greater transparency, legal scrutiny, and independent algorithm testing.
* AI firm Meta has conducted nearly a million searches for US police using its facial r |
4a40f428-e0be-4835-96ec-5de63c6844d8 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | VICE Film RSS Feed en Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:26:54 +0000 Horror Legends Describe the Scariest Things That Have Ever Happened to Them Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:40:00 +0000
Horror filmmakers have provided us with enough fuel for a lifetime of nightmares full of crazy killers, dissected mutants, alien births, and rotten flesh as it’s torn apart. If this is the kind of thing that comes from the depths of their imaginations, what the hell scares these people?
Because it's Halloween, I spoke with a bunch of horror icons and asked them, “What is the greatest horror you have ever experienced in your real life?”
Nightmare on Elm Street, Scream, Hills Have Eyes
A year and a half ago, my wife and I stayed in a hundreds-of-years-old inn in northern Scotland. When we arrived, they told us that the place was haunted. I, by and large, have never experienced anything supernatural and tend not to believe in anything until I see it for myself. The innkeeper took us through this great gallery that lead to the lobby which connected to a giant dining room. He stopped and pointed out a giant mirror that recently had to be moved from the restaurant because guests were noticing people in the reflection, but when they turned around the people weren’t really there. I thought, OK, sure and laughed to myself.
In our room was a giant fireplace with a gaping opening, all black from years of soot. It was right at the foot of the bed. It wasn’t working and I didn’t think much of it. But that night I had a dream that I was looking at the fireplace and it was medieval sized—so big you could walk into it. From out of that darkness came a ghostly woman with a long gown who looked around and then looked directly at me. Her arms came out and she just rushed towards me. I woke up in a scream, gasping, and just completely out of breath.
Halloween, The Thing, They Live
Many frightening things have happened to me in my life, mostly when I was young. I think I was scared of most everything back then. Recently I was visiting my father in Kentucky when I suffered a retinal detachment in my right eye. I asked the examining ophthalmologist if I could travel back to LA and my eye doctor. He told me my retina could detach during the flight and that I needed surgery immediately. Until my surgery two days later, I was terrified of going blind. My eyesight is my career, my life. Until recently retinal detachment meant blindness. I thought I was fucked. The surgery was successful, although not without complications. The fear subsided. Today I can see.
Basket Case, Frankenhooker, Brain Damage
Annie, the Broadway musical. Talk about horrifying. Ilze Balodis, one of my best friends and an actor in Basket Case, worked at the American Academy of Dramatic Arts. The school always got preview tickets to various Broadway shows so, in 1977, we went to the Alvin Theatre to watch Annie three days before it officially opened. I was horrified immediately. Insufferable Broadway brats straining to act "cute and adorable" as the orphans, Dorothy Loudon outdoing the brats as Miss Hannigan, and that god-awful song "Tomorrow" seemingly sung every 45 seconds. I told everyone I knew that the show wouldn't last a week. Instead, it became a huge hit. It spawned a movie directed by John Huston—John Huston?!!!!—and a remake is scheduled for release this December. The horror continues.
Hellraiser, Nightbreed, Candyman
Honestly, when I was in my coma. To be plunged into an absolute darkness and wake up with a breathing tube down my throat and be in that absolute nightmare place, surrounded by people I didn’t know. It was terrifying. The absolute worst experience of my life, no question. And I’m talking about horror now, as opposed to grief. You know, the losing of my parents, the losing of certain people in my life who were very precious to me. In terms of emotional horrors, that’s far worse than a coma. But, if we’re speaking of horror in the most conventional sense, it would have to be the coma.
Nightmare on Elm Street, Wes Craven's New Nightmare
One weekend I found myself staying by myself at my dad's little farm out in the boonies of Oklahoma. I thought at the time that I'd enjoy the quiet peace that I usually find out in the country. That I would have no problem staying by myself in a little cabin on the prairie. But as darkness fell, every sound magnified into a Freddy fingernail screech and every bug and raccoon seemed to come out of the night to scare the living daylights out of me. Even the wind conspired against me to send spooky voices my way. I realized that all the horror movies I've watched were replaying themselves in my imagination as I just tried to enjoy that solitude. I spent that night totally freaked out and stayed awake all night, TV blaring, hoping to scare away all the demons.
Candyman, Night of the Living DeadWishmaster
Nothing is more horrific than seeing a merchant of peace be assassinated. Suddenly all around me, the city was ablaze and people were rioting over Dr. King’s assassination. I was in the seventh grade and was raised by a single woman, my aunt, who refused to let me go out in the street and protest. I wanted have my voice to be heard. I am a child of the 60s, so I lived through the assassination of President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Dr. King. It seemed like everyone who promised to lead us to a better place was assassinated. What is more horrific than seeing the unexplainable happen to a great man of peace and not be able to change it?
Return of the Living Dead, Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers, Silent Night Deadly Night
When I was 14 or 15 years old I went on a family vacation to Acapulco. After checking into our rental house, my mother stayed behind while my father and I headed to the store. Thankfully he forgot his wallet and we turned back only to find two huge men standing in the yard about to enter the house. Before we could do anything a man holding machete grabbed me and in a fit of rage I kicked the living hell out of him and he let us go free. Thinking back, I think it was a hint to my future as I did it in a bikini.
Dawn of the Dead, From Dusk Till Dawn, Friday the 13th
The scariest thing I have ever experienced was while I was a combat photographer in Vietnam. Your whole body shakes and rattles and your mind is focused on only one thing... is there a person going to walk out of those woods in front of me? 'Cause if he does he is going to want to kill me. Where do you in normal life ever experience THAT? You don't. It's a really really scary thing to have to think about. Especially after there has been an attack and you know they are out there and it's dark... real dark... until the clouds move and the moon lights up your position. Think about that kind of fear. In a movie theater you identify with a character and go on the journey of say Father Merrin in The Exorcist and it is scaring the shit out of you but deep down you know you are safe sitting in the theater. Imagine deep down knowing that you are not safe. You are scared of being shot or getting blown to pieces... and there is no deep down safety that you are somewhere else. That is the scariest thing.
LeatherfaceTexas Chainsaw Massacre III
I am the guy you don’t want to meet in a dark alley for real. But honestly, I can’t think of anything profoundly horrific that has happened to me in my life. The only thing that scares me is death. I am absolutely terrified of dying. Mostly because I am an atheist and believe when you die, the lights go out. That’s it. It’s the end of The Sopranos. I’m loving this life and having so much fun. I never want it to end. The thought of losing all of this terrifies me. I love being big. I love being strong. I love being a man. I love being in the movies.
Phantasm, Mindwarp, John Dies at the End
There has been a dearth of ghoulies and ghosties and long-legged beasties in my life. I have never even stepped foot inside of a haunted house. Nothing genre-related has ever really scared me. I don’t really have nightmares except with everyday occurrences, like someone close to me falling ill. I look forward to my dreams. In them I am I often traveling and on my way home and can’t wait to get there to see my loved ones. Everyone I have ever loved is in my dreams. The closest I have ever gotten to a nightmare is a reoccurring dream I have had of an all brown city that is impoverished and deserted. In it, I walk around wondering how it all happened. I feel alone and am only able to see an occasional figure in the distance.
The Hills Have Eyes, Weird Science, Teenage Exorcist
Quick backstory: I was a Boy Scout a long time ago, worked with the sheriff’s department in college as a volunteer diver, and I used have an advanced first aid certificate from the Red Cross. I just like to help.
I was on my motorcycle in the mid 70s. To the set the scene, I was into the super-bikes. I had a beautiful Norton Commando 750. It was a great, powerful bike. I was riding the coast back from San Luis Obispo and, at this point, I was in Santa Barbara. I noticed there was a traffic accident up ahead and a beat-up old Volkswagen van was on its side. I parked my bike and realized that three people had been ejected from the van.
I immediately knew what to do. I stopped traffic and asked someone to get out of their car and instructed them on how to hold the man’s head because he was having difficulty breathing. It sounded like he had a punctured lung. I said, “If you notice anything strange, just call out my name and I'll tell you what to do. The ambulance is on its way.” I moved onto the next victim who was a man who was semi-conscious and next to him was a big cooking pot, the old-school kind that’s dark blue with the white spots on it. It was full of spaghetti!
In the other lane of traffic, there was what looked like a pile of blankets, but there was a woman inside who had a terrible head injury. A big chunk of her skull was gone. The poor gal was in a lot of pain. As I was applying pressure to her wound, I looked up and saw a BMW with a guy in a business suit weaving through the traffic because he was important and needed to get somewhere. As he pulled up, he did not know there a person in the pile of blankets. Right as he was about to drive over her, I jumped in front of his car and he honked at me to get out of the way. He could care less about the accident. I said, “Please stop! Come help us!” He honked again and stuck his head out of his car and said, “Get the F out of the way!” and then drove forward and tapped my legs ever so slightly with his bumper. I jumped on the on the hood of his BMW and grabbed his windshield wipers and started pounding on his windshield until I broke it with my fist. At least then he stopped the car.
At that time, a police officer arrives. The guy in the BMW screamed, “Arrest this man. He broke my windshield!” And I say, “This guy wants to drive over an injured person.” Mr. Business Guy, Mr. Important, gets out of his car and is ready to do business with me, but the cop grabbed the guy by the tie and his belt and twisted him around and put his boot you know where and gave it a tight little squeeze and handcuffed him. The guy finally shut up. I tended to the victim until the medics arrived. Later I went to the diner across the way to fill out a report and a cop hands $20 to the waitress and says, “This gentlemen right here— whatever he wants, it’s on us.” I said, “OK, well I’m gonna stay and have dessert. I like pie.”
Follow Jennifer Juniper Stratford on Twitter.
]]> Jennifer Juniper Stratford film, halloween, horror films, horror movies, the thing, Return of the Living Dead, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, nightmare on elm street, Phantasm, John Dies At The End, The Hills have Eyes, Weird Science, Basket Case, hellraiser, nightbreed, Candyman, night of the living dead, scary movies, real life horror, john carpenter, Linnea Quigley, R.A. Mihailoff, Wes Craven, Angus Scrimm, Michael Berryman, Frank Henenlotter, Clive Barker, heather langenkamp, Tony Todd, what scares you the most?, Tom Savini
VICE Shorts: I'm Short, Not Stupid Presents: 'Le Labyrinthe' Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:00:00 +0000
Solitary confinement is one of the most abhorrent practices of our prison system, in which an inmate is kept in complete isolation for 22 to 24 hours a day in a closed cells for periods of time ranging from days to decades. It's believed to increase the risk of suicide and induce hallucinations, insomnia, paranoia, and uncontrollable feelings of rage and fear. The most recent comprehensive nationwide data released on prisoners in solitary confinement programs, which was published back in 2005, estimates that 81,622 people are locked up in what jailbirds across the country affectionately call the "living death." However, Solitary Watch, a group focused on bringing more attention to the practice of solitary confinement, believes that number to be much higher today.
Animator Mathieu Labaye's short film Le Labyrinthe attempts to portray the psychosis that occurs during solitary confinement. In the film, uneasiness and paranoia are expressed through a rapid succession of an inmate's hallucinations. His shifting face and morphing body falls apart and rebuilds worse than before. By the end you realize the film is madness incarnate—not unlike solitary confinement.
Mathieu Labaye is an award-winning filmmaker living in Belgium and working at Camera-etc. His last film was 2008's Orgesticulanismus.
Jeffrey Bowers is a tall mustached guy from Ohio who's seen too many weird movies. He currently lives in Brooklyn, working as a film curator. He's the Senior Curator for Vimeo's On Demand platform. He has also programmed at Tribeca Film Festival, Rooftop Films, and the Hamptons International Film Festival.
]]> Jeffrey Bowers film, culture, I'm short not stupid, Jeffrey Bowers, jeff bowers, Mathieu Labaye, Le Labyrinthe, solitary confinement
Troma's Lloyd Kaufman Doesn't 'Get' Hollywood Blockbusters Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:00:00 +0000
Lloyd Kaufman. Photo via Lloyd Kaufmans Tumblr
Lloyd Kaufman's cult classic films are like jazz. Either you get and love the plots about talking Mexican hamburgers coming out of the closet, serial killers with pickles instead of penises, and Lemmy from Motörhead playing the president of the United States, or you'll never understand them.
Kaufman's universe is like a baroque cabinet of wonder made possible by the production company he co-founded in 1974, Troma Entertainment, which went on to spawn films like The Toxic Avenger and Class of Nuke 'Em High. A champion of independent, low-budget cinema, Kaufman is known for being a tad eccentric—but conversation with him is also distinctly more highbrow than one would expect, and I’m not just saying that because he gave me Citizen Toxie: The Toxic Avenger IV on DVD.
VICE: Hi, Lloyd, thanks for taking the time to meet me. Which directors have influenced you the most?
Lloyd Kaufman:
I am sorry for being late—I’m supposed to act professional. I went to Yale University, and because I speak French, I had access to Cahiers du Cinéma, so I became brainwashed by that philosophy of auteur filmmaking. My heroes were Chaplin, D. W. Griffith, Fritz Lang, Jean Renoir, Kenji Mizoguchi, Howard Hawks, Alfred Hitchcock—the classics, really.
Who was the man for you as far as visual style goes?
Besides all the classics, I guess Stan Brakhage influenced me the most. He’s the greatest visual artist of my lifetime. But Troma has discovered many new mainstream people with unique stylistic vision, too. Take the South Park guys—Trey Parker and Matt Stone—they started with us, and Cannibal the Musical was their first film. Actually, Stan Brakhage is in that movie. He was the only professor at their university who gave them any encouragement when they were shooting the film. We helped them finish it 'cause they didn’t have any money. Stan was a good guy. I also brought him to Yale in the 1960s to show students his art and I also interviewed him on the radio.
Lloyd Kaufman, director Ulrich Seidl, and the Toxic Avenger. Photo by Kurt Prinz
Speaking about being in movies, you appeared in the original Rocky movie. How did that come about?
You know, I didn’t go to film school. Instead, I identified a young talented director, John G. Avildsen, and attached myself to him. I worked for free and, when he got a job, he hired me. Troma still distributes one of his early movies called Cry Uncle. It’s a wonderful film.
When Rocky came along they didn’t have enough money to shoot in Philadelphia on location with a union crew, so Troma used a non-union crew to secretly film all the scenes in Philadelphia with Stallone. When the unions found out about it, that was the end. But before that happened, we managed to film for about eight days, so the producers saved a lot of money. And since Troma was involved, I played a drunk in the movie.
Yeah, you’re credited as “Lloyd Kaufman, drunk.”
I was very good at that, of course. In fact, since then I’ve been in maybe 300 movies and the young filmmakers who want me to make a cameo always ask me to be either the drunk or a doctor.
You also had a cameo in Guardians of the Galaxy.
Oh yeah, thanks for noticing that. [Goes into character, changes voice] MURDERER! MURDERER!
Still from Poultrygeist
How did that happen?
[Director] James Gunn was involved with Troma before—he worked for us. Originally he was a novelist, but he needed a paid job as well, so he became my assistant. I was working on Tromeo & Juliet for about five years with other writers, and I couldn’t really get a good script that I believed in, so I said, “Here’s $100—go and write a script and come back in three days.”
And he wrote a pretty interesting script, so we worked on it together and made Tromeo & Juliet. He also did other things for Troma—he’s put me in all these movies so far and now he’s the number one guy at the box office! Like that Titanic guy, you know? “I’m the king of the world!” Only James would never say that cause he’s such a nice guy.
Watching Guardians and seeing you in the movie, I wondered if that was the kind of movie you would be making with that kind of budget.
James Gunn says that! He says he’s channeling my directing style in the movie. But I would never do such a big-budget movie. I just couldn’t. I’d rather make 200 movies, or 400 movies for that money! Out of the 400 movies, a small number of them would even be wonderful. But don’t get me wrong, Guardians is a masterpiece. Usually, I don’t like these big movies—I can’t sit through them.
Even the Peter Jackson one, the movie with the ring, it was such a bore! Although I love Peter Jackson, and he’s a big Troma fan. But that movie? It’s a clock watcher. Just like a "cock blocker"—you know that term?
Sure. A clock watcher can be a cock blocker, too.
Yeah, you’re right. I know it’s a masterpiece, and Peter Jackson is one of our great directors, but I couldn’t get it. I don’t even get Star Wars.
Trailer for Return to Nuke 'Em High: Volume 1
Rewatching The Toxic Avenger and Poultrygeist, I had a feeling that those movies were touching on the biggest issues of their respective decades. The Toxic Avenger was about the obsession with fitness and what Hunter S. Thompson called the “Body Nazis” and also about toxic waste. Poultrygeist was about the problem with fast food and media conglomerates, and Return to Nuke 'Em High: Volume 1 is about the lie behind organic food.
Yeah. We're usually ahead of the time. When we made The Toxic Avenger, nobody talked about the environment, but we would go camping and we'd see all that crap in the middle of the wilderness, because McDonald’s wasn't biodegradable in those days. The environment wasn't really a mainstream issue then.
Also, when we made Poultrygeist, people weren’t so critical of fast food. Now they are anti-McDonald’s. But also there are other themes in it, like bullying, which currently is a big issue, and same-sex relationships, or even racism. All those are in Return to Nuke 'Em High: Volume 1 as well. At the moment we're editing Volume 2.
You’re always touching the nerve of social issues.
My whole career is inspired by one book: The Power Elite by C. Wright Mills, a sociologist and author who got blacklisted in America during the McCarthy days, even though he wasn’t really a communist. He developed the theory that the military-industrial complex is a conspiracy that controls everything. This had a profound impact on me.
But in my philosophy it's no longer the military. Rather, the corporate, the bureaucratic, and the labor elites. The labor leaders in America get millions of dollars while their members are eating dog food. One of the leaders in New York even had an office that was so rich and expensive that he had a second office on a lower floor where he could see the workers. First, people get themselves elected, then they basically work for lobbyists, and afterwards they get a million-dollar business job. It’s a big revolving door.
Photo via Lloyd Kaufman's website
What’s your take on people who download your movies without paying for them?
Nobody is making money by people sharing art. [But] I want people to take my art and watch it! They can take it for free, I don't mind. We’re even giving away 250 movies on our Troma YouTube channel right now. However, if they’re making a lot of money off it, that's not right. China is disgusting. The generals own the DVD factories and Troma movies are all over China. I've been there, I speak Chinese. Our movies are everywhere, and I haven’t gotten a penny.
Net neutrality doesn’t necessarily mean more freedom, though.
Unfortunately not. It would be even harder to maintain something like Troma in today’s environment. Back at Yale, I majored in Chinese studies and Taoism was my main topic of interest. It teaches the yin and the yang—you know, the oyster that gets a piece of sand stuck in its asshole and it's very painful, but then it creates this beautiful pearl. Pain and pleasure are always intertwined, you can't have them apart. So I guess the yin is the democratization of making movies. And the Yang is that we can't live off our movies anymore.
Speaking of good and evil, I feel like there are parallels between Troma movies and wrestling. They have the same approach to storytelling, the same larger-than-life characters. Toxic Avenger even sounds like a wrestling name.
Well, he has wrestled in Florida recently. Actually, it was a real wrestler, but he asked us if he could use the gimmick and we said yes. But yeah, there are some similarities I guess. Also the way of how stories are told with bodies and action. In fact, a couple of WWE stars are fans of mine. I’ve talked to both Dolph Ziggler and Chris Jericho. They know my films intimately.
In Return to Nuke 'Em High you have Lemmy from Motörhead playing the president, saying, “Fucking students, they don't write blogs anymore—they just like to fuck.” Is that Lloyd Kaufman talking?
Yes. Because they can't read or write, they're ignorant. Go on Twitter and look at what they say. And it’s not even their fault, it’s the American education system that has deteriorated ever since the baby boomer generation. It’s the grand equalizer for everyone who’s not part of the elites. The kids are actually smart, but our system is dumbing them down.
Follow Markus Lust on Twitter.
]]> Markus Lust film, Lloyd Kaufman, Troma, Tromaville, trash, cinema, Cahiers du cinéma,, splatters, Stan Brakhage, Toxic Avenger., Poultrygeist', James Gunn, Tromeo and Juliette, Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Peter Jackson, Return to Nuke Em High: Volume 1, Motorhead, Lemmy, Power Elite, net neutrality, interview, culture, film
Check Out the Trailer for 'A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night' Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:30:00 +0000
Writer and director Ana Lily Amirpour's debut feature film, A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night, just premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, and it's without a doubt the best Iranian vampire noir you'll see all year. The film, which VICE Films is helping to distribute worldwide, is a brooding, minimalist twist on the classic vampire flick—Amirpour's bloodsuckers comb their hair back with Pomade, drive muscle cars, and wander Iranian streets at night.
Wanting to shoot an Iranian film but knowing the near impossible hoops a filmmaker has to jump through in Iran, Amirpour found a desolate oil town in California, transformed it into a fictional Iranian locale called Bad City, and got to writing. As she began to flesh out the script, Amirpour started imagining backstories for her vampires and their world that she knew would never make the cut. Those stories became Death Is the Answer, a graphic novel companion that was released concurrently with the film's premiere.
A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night opened to overwhelming critical praise. The New York Times's resident movie buff, A. O. Scott, called it a "rock 'n' roll Persian feminist fable," and the Hollywood Reporter fawned over the "moody and gorgeous" film.
The movie feels like what would happen if Iranian new wave director Abbas Kiarostami decided to remake a spaghetti Western but got bored during pre-production and opted to shoot the whole thing like a hardboiled detective film. And then threw in some vampires. It's fantastic.
We're really excited to share the trailer with you—check it out above.
A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night is out in theaters on November 21. Check out the official website or follow the film's Twitter and Facebook for more info and updates.
]]> VICE Staff film, A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night, iranian film, film, VICE Films, sundance next, sundance film festival, film premiere, film trailer, Ana Lily Amirpour, vampire, noir, vampire western, trailer, Sundance, sundance premiere, girl walks home alone at night, a girl walks home alone at night trailer
Unearthing Jill Reiter's Lost Riot Grrrl Film Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:30:00 +0000
Kathleen Hanna and Jill Reiter in In 'Search of Margo-Go'
The birth of the riot grrrl movement in the 1990s saw an uprising of politically charged punk bands like Bikini Kill, Huggy Bear, and Bratmobile, who addressed issues like sexuality, domestic abuse, and female empowerment within a previously male-dominated scene with a DIY, fuck-you fashion. The movement largely took shape on the West Coast, exploding out of cities like Olympia and Seattle, but soon found its NYC incarnation, with burgeoning filmmaker Jill Reiter there to document it all.
Reiter made a name for herself with early films like Birthday Party and Frenzy, which made the rounds on the underground and queer film festival circuits in 1993. Her next project was to be In Search of Margo-Go, a vibrant, improv feature film starring herself and Bikini Kill frontwoman Kathleen Hanna, complete with a cameo from Sonic Youth's Kim Gordon.
The film was never finished, and as such has become a lost riot grrrl gem—that is, until now. I recently had the honor of teaming up with filmmaker Kanchi Wichmann as well as ex-riot grrrl and journalist Val Phoenix to unearth what remains of Jill's film and to show it for the first time ever at this year's Fringe! Film Festival, alongside Abby Moser's Grrrl Love and Revolution and Michael Lucid's Dirty Girls
I caught up with Jill ahead of the screening to talk about her memories of the time and her influences in filmmaking.
VICE: Hey, Jill. How did you become a filmmaker? What was your impetus?
Jill Reiter: It was definitely in the spirit of punk: just pick up an instrument or a camera and make a film without any real training. I was never really into video—more into the look of film. I was intrigued with that format, so I bought a little Super-8 camera at a flea market.
At first I was just documenting friends and bands, but then started making weird little queer films starring all of my friends. I took classes here and there at places like the Millennium Film workshop in NYC. I loved the indie/no-wave NYC filmmakers of the 70s and 80s and the new queer cinema of the early 90s. Isaac Julian'sYoung Soul Rebels, with its punk/soul/queer themes, was just fucking brilliant.
A scene from Frenzy
You're probably best known for your short film, Frenzy. Can you tell us about that?
Frenzy is a great time capsule of the people and energy happening in the NYC quee/rpunk/riot grrrl scene in the early 90s. It was supposed to be a funny take on the rock 'n' roll groupie phenomenon, turning the Rolling Stones' film Cocksucker Blues on its head, with women throwing bras and rushing the stage for other women and culminating in various seedy aftershow moments.
Everyone involved in the movie was in riot grrrl NYC at the time. The cinematography in the movie is largely by Alex Sichel, who had come to riot grrrl originally to research and write for her feature film All Over Me, but stayed and became a good friend and mentor of mine. Alex died this year of breast cancer, which is just absolutely terrible. She was a rarity in the film world—kind, non-competitive, and super encouraging.
The funniest screening of Frenzy was when a few of us in riot grrrl were invited to Princeton to show our films. The audience was so staid and retrograde, they literally couldn't handle what feels like a pretty mild film by today's standards. A woman came up to me after the film, spluttering, and said, "It was so… violent!" I think she was talking about a ridiculous throwaway scene I used for the credits, where a few of the cast members are fake sawing at a male mannequin where his genitals would be.
Oh, dear. How did the project In Search of Margo-Go come about?
Kathleen Hanna was visiting NYC and staying with me in my East Village sloping-floor, roach motel pad. I had met Kathleen in ‘92 at a Bikini Kill gig in NYC, and hung out with her that summer at the Riot Grrrl Convention in DC. We kept in touch via letters and she would crash with me sometimes when she passed through New York, which was fairly often.
We started talking and bonding about our new wave pasts, how it was this incredible lifeline to another world if you were isolated in a small town back in the 80s. Just for fun we decided to dress up "new romantic," take some photos, and go out dressed like that to see what reactions we would get.
I think one day we were talking about how weird it was that one of my iconic heroes, Margo-Go—the original bass player from the punk era Go-Go's (who started the band in 1978)—was living a few blocks from me in a legal squat. She got kicked out of the band because she wanted to stay more true to their roots and their original sound. She started to symbolize something for me, so the film really just started with that title.
Who else was involved in its making?
We had a large swath of people involved in the queer punk scene of the time cast in the movie as extras or helping in production. It started with Kathleen and me. Then I asked Iraya Robles (who had done a zine called Marks in Time: The Very Early Go-Go's 78-'80 with Eden Felt, and was in the queercore band Sta-Prest) to co-write the script with me. It became a San Francisco–NYC production and we shot on both coasts.
Kathleen and Jill in In Search of Margo-Go
Why did you decide to set the film in the 80s new wave scene, as opposed to the 90s riot grrrl here and now?
I had a strong attachment. I'm always grateful that I caught the tail end of NYC's golden era of nightlife, when 14-year-olds could get into DanceteriaAnn Magnuson, John Sex, Klaus Nomi—those people were hugely inspiring to me, and I was heartbroken that that era had ended.
I think the aesthetic, and the fact that the lead characters get stuck in the early 80s, was a desire for those of us working on the film to go back to a time we were really excited by. I was sick of how monochrome punk had become, I missed the fucking color of the late 70s/early 80s. The original, woefully undocumented punk scene of the West Coast was super weird, colorful, and arty.
There was also a crazy amount of androgynous genderfuckery happening in the new romantic scenes and new wave in general. Many queer people, women, and non-white people were heavily involved. When I was in high school and coming out as queer, there were all these brilliant new wave artists who were making these super anthemic queer manifesto albums, like Frankie Goes to Hollywood, Soft Cell, the Smiths, and Bronski Beat. Then things changed with the advent of hardcore punk, and that's more the milieu I grew up in—very macho with a regimented punk uniform and less playful.
What were your filmic influences?
I was massively influenced by the film Liquid Sky, which created its own completely stylized universe and musical world. I had seen it when it first opened in NYC in '83 as a teen, and it became my Rocky Horror Picture Show—watched and memorized. I loved the deadpan, droll delivery, and, of course, the insanely colorful fashion and airbrushed new wave makeup.
Many films of the same era—Ladies and Gentlemen, the Fabulous Stains, Smithereens, Times Square—had women as writers or directors. We felt lucky that all these underground films, most of which hadn't had a major release in the US, had ended up being shown on late night TV when we were teens on a show called Night Flight, which also showed clips from bizarro West Coast bands on the LA show New Wave Theatre. We wanted to create a cult film for our generation, to document and leave something behind for the next set of weirdos to find.
What were your biggest challenges in making In Search of…?
Making it in a punk rock fashion, with many people with no film experience, seems a tad crazy in retrospect. A whole day was recorded on the Nagra sound recorder at the wrong speed—chipmunk voices! It was also stressful with a lot of women going through a carnival ride of mood swings. We had no money to pay anyone, and, eventually, just no money to finish what had started as a teeny Super-8 (then 16mm project), which was blown up into an underground feature film.
The film was never finished, but we're showing some of it now. What does that mean to you?
It's great that what was shot so long ago is resurrected after all this time. So many people helped on this film, and Kathleen was a total trooper through several long shoots and helped get some early funding to develop all the pricey 16mm. I'm glad that this is getting a special screening and also excited that some bits from the feature script that has languished for 20 years will get a night out! It's a time capsule of the queerpunk 90s, one that pays homage to the queer underground 80s.
Thanks, Jill.
Frenzy and In Search of Margo-Go will both show at Fringe! Film Fest in London on the November 8 as part of A Dyke in the Pit: A Day of Queer Grrrl Power.'The event will feature a Q&A with Jill Reiter and some of her contemporary riot grrrls, as well as live music from London three-piece Skinny Girl Diet.
For tickets, visit the Fringe! Film Festival website
Follow Milly Abraham on Twitter.
]]> Amelia Abraham film, culture, cinema, film, riot grrrl, feminism, kathleen hanna, Bikini Kill, 90s, Underground, DIY, Super-8, New Wave, 80s, punk, music, Jill Reiter, All Over Me, The Go-Gos, In Search of Margo-Go, Frenzy, fringe, film festival, Amelia Abraham, LGBT, queer
We Talked to the Director of 'Dear White People' About Race, Identity, and Black Cinema Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:00:00 +0000
Photo courtesy of Roadside Attractions
Dear White People, the debut film from writer/director Justin Simien, has become a talking point for those of us concerned with race matters in America since its Sundance debut in January. It's been out in limited theatrical release for more than a week now, and people are seeing that it's less the controversial screed they expected and more of a nuanced look at how we deal with the racial divisions—both personal and systemic—that plague our culture.
It's a true ensemble piece but focuses primarily on Lionel, a socially awkward, gay budding journalist, and Sam, a biracial activist and aspiring filmmaker—two students caught up in the racial tension at a fictional Ivy League university. Justin and I spoke recently about his work, fitting in, staying true to yourself, and, of course, Tyler Perry.
VICE: What I got from the film is that we’re forced to accept identity, whether we like it or not. You’re born into it. I’m from a biracial family, and I could see my struggle with not knowing where I fit in displayed in every character. Is that where you’re coming from with this, or is that me projecting myself onto the work?
Justin Simien: First of all, you’re welcome to project yourself into it. That’s the fun thing for me about multi-protagonist stories: you can kind of put a few different things out there and have the characters sort of net out in different ways, and have everyone respond to it in a way that makes sense specifically to them. I found it kind of impossible to talk about race identity—or identity at all—from one singular point of view, which is why I have four of them in the film. I think, ultimately, my focus for the movie is that there’s a relationship between identity and self. In America, it’s impossible—at least as far as I have seen—to make maximum use of your potential if you don’t make decisions about your identity.
The idea is that you’re either going to have an identity decided for you or you’re going to have to pick one. I have characters, when you first meet them—Lionel, in particular—who have actively not checked any boxes of identity. [Lionel] doesn’t even have a major. He’s incredibly precious about who he really is and what he’s really about, whatever that might be. Then you have a character like Sam, whose identity is so hardwired that she’s actually denying half of who she is throughout most of the film. So I think it’s certainly not my intention for the film to be a morality play, or terribly dogmatic. I think it’s just to sort of talk about the relationship between identity and self, and to get into the conflict between those ideas and what happens on either side of the extreme.
Tyler James Williams as Lionel. Photo by Ashley Nguyen
Do you think there is that need to not play into what the world wants you to do?
I mean, I don’t take an all-or-nothing view on it. I think it has to be a balance. What’s interesting about your reading of the film is that [Sam]—and I don’t want to give anything away to your readers who may not have seen the film—she makes a decision and it feels like one of those movie moments, but the scene also quickly reminds you of the reality that she’s stepping into, which is bound to be uncomfortable. There will be, probably, social repercussions for the decision that she makes. Whereas Lionel, who I actually think steps into an identity and, at least for the moment, kind of has an uncomplicated, warm reception to his stepping into an identity.
The funny thing is, I actually think the harder thing to do is to be authentic, especially when you’ve had some success as whatever it is that you are. This is coming from a person who has had some success in publicity for some time, before I stepped out to make my own movie and also as a person who I think, especially after this first film, people are going to see me a certain way and expect me to make certain kinds of movies. It’ll be interesting to see what happens if and when I don’t make certain kinds of movies. I think that my personal belief on it is that it’s probably always better to go with your self, if your self and your identity are in conflict. But expect it to be pretty hard. That’s the bleak truth of the matter.
The world kind of knows where it wants you to be, and you either accept it or you don’t.
Yeah, because ultimately you are in control, but to not have any identity at all will also leave you left behind. It’ll just completely leave you out of the conversation about what you can or can’t be. You're sort of at the mercy of others if you make certain non-choices. So at least make the ones that are best for you.
Tessa Thompson as Samantha White. Photo by Ashley Nguyen
People have been talking about this movie a lot, but what I often see in the articles and reviews about it is a need to put you into a box of “this guy is the black Whit Stillman,” or “he’s the black Woody Allen,” or “the black whatever.” Spike Lee had to go through that whole thing, too, when She’s Gotta Have It came out. Does that grate on you? Do you feel like you want to do something similar to what Spike did, where he violently rejected it and basically said, “I’m going to go out and I’m going to make School Daze and you’re going to hate it and I don’t care”?
I don’t have an angry reaction to it. Someone brought up the Spike Lee thing, in particular, saying, “How do you feel about being compared to Spike Lee?” The truth is, it’s great until it’s not great. It’s not great to stay in any kind of box, but if I had to be put in a box, the Spike Lee box is not a bad box. The Woody Allen box is not a bad box.
At the same time, I’m sure at a certain point when I’m not making my first movie and trying to get my second off the ground, I will feel perhaps boxed in. I also think that, you know, Dear White People is a special movie. I don’t think it’s arrogant to say that. There hasn’t been a movie like this in a really long time. So, I’m also excited to see that a lot of the people that I talk to on a one-on-one level are open to me doing things that are totally outside of this particular box, because they see the potential in me as a filmmaker. So, I don’t have a violently negative reaction to it at all. I think it’s a little suspect, comparing me to the other black filmmaker. That kind of thing is a little lazy. At the same time, there are other filmmakers I could’ve been compared to that would not have been favorable at all.
Tessa Thompson and Justin Simien. Photo by Ashley Nguyen
One of those filmmakers might be Tyler Perry, who is referenced in your film. Is he the victim of being put into a box, where he has to make these commercial films that maybe we think of as absurd or silly? And are we giving him too much of a hard time, compared to, say, Adam Sandler—who, by definition of being a white male, is not responsible for holding up the self-esteem of an entire population of people?
Well, I don’t think Tyler Perry is a victim at all. I think Tyler Perry is, of anyone we’re talking about, a master of his own fate. Tyler Perry actually resurrected black movies from what they were, which was really nothing. They were almost completely gone, they weren’t making any money at all, and he came in at a time when—with the exception of a few stars—there really wasn’t a lot going on. He brought with him a ready-made audience from his plays, and he spoke to that audience really well, and he’s done so for a really long time now.
I think Tyler Perry is making the stuff that he wants to make. I mean, he owns an island! If Tyler Perry really wanted to do something different, I think that he would. And I don’t know Tyler Perry and all I have to answer a question about his inner workings is the interviews he gives, but I think he’s happy making his audiences happy. I think the tricky thing is that the gatekeepers—the people who decide what is green-lit and what’s not, and how to promote it and all that—they decide not to investigate any other aspect of the black audience, and they really stopped promoting and supporting work that’s out of the Tyler Perry box. They decided that was the whole of the black experience, and that is all that we would pay to see, and that’s all we were interested in.
After 12 Years a Slave did really well, they were like, “Oh, people are into slavery again? Great!” and I saw all of these stories about the next slave movie and the next slave television series. Hollywood is just interested in making more of whatever made money before. I think really, if we’re going to be frustrated at anything, we have to be frustrated at that particular system. But on the other hand, you talk about someone like Adam Sandler, and the reason why it’s different is because there are so many different variations of a white man in culture. Whereas when it comes to the way black people are presented—even in the “year of black film”—there’s still only a very limited version of the black experience that’s being put out there.
I’ve talked about this often: You more often than not get the tragedy of the black experience; the extreme, tragic pain of being black in this country, whether it’s through the eyes of a slave or a maid or a slain youth. Or you get, sort of, the Ebony cover or Essence cover version of being black, where it’s just fabulous and they’re upwardly mobile, and they’re happy and they’re sassy and have great jobs. The complexity of the black experience is sort of absent from that conversation. That’s why I think it’s easy to sort of pick the one or two players in that field in a given year and attack one or two of them, but I also think that conversation is one that black people are always having. I thought it was worth putting [Tyler Perry] in the movie, because ultimately, the way we feel confined by the culture around us is a part of our experience.
Teyonah Parris as Colandrea Connors. Photo by Ashley Nguyen
Is it hard for black filmmakers—as someone who now is considered a leading light of black film—to feel that responsibility of, “There’s only going to be three of these this year, so mine better be super good!”
I guess so? I guess there definitely is an added pressure when you’re dealing with black subject matter. Not only do you want it to be successful, but you want people to dig it. The truth is that in terms of “black movies”—and I put black movies in air quotes—in terms of movies that are about the experiences of black people or made by black people, there has been so consistently one or two kinds for so long that any attempt to do something other than that, there’s a fear that, “What if people just don’t get it because they haven’t seen anything like it in a really long time?” There’s that fear, too. There’s the same conversation that I think black artists have been having since the Harlem Renaissance, of like, “Is it OK to air the dirty laundry about the black experience?” I mean, if white people are watching this, shouldn’t we always put forth incredibly positive images of black people and successful and happy and beautiful and clean and pretty and intelligent versions of ourselves?
There are lots of pressures. But ultimately, while I think that there is some responsibility to do with representation, my responsibility tends to lean more toward being authentic and saying something truthful, saying something about the human experience, holding the mirror up, challenging… Those are the kinds of films that I want to see. And no matter what the subject of my films are—whether it’s the black experience or not—those are the kinds of movies I have to make. Movies that sort of say something about the human condition.
Just to go back to how we started with identity and whatnot, is there a third way? With my reading of the film, I felt like you were saying there is a third way. You don't have to be incredibly, fiercely protective of your black identity, but you don’t have to completely whitewash yourself. Is there a time—post-Obama—where we won't have to say, “This is a black movie.” We can just say, “This is a movie with black people in it.” Because I feel like we’re still not there. We’re still having these interviews where it’s like, “So you made a black movie.” White people can go see your movie, and they should.
I think the third way is to embrace the contradiction and to show up as yourself. This movie is me showing up as myself, you know? Necessarily, the movie is going to be considered a black film because that’s the paradigm that we’re in. Maybe three films from now, it won’t be, and maybe we’ll see it differently. I don’t know. But at a certain point, it’s not really up to me what the culture decides, how the culture decides to define this film, or film in general. But it is up to me what kinds of things I want to contribute to the culture. This idea of either rebelling against or assimilating into—that dichotomy that those are the only two choices we have—is why we get so stuck and so caught up. This movie wouldn’t have been the same movie if I decided to get caught up in only one of those two. So, this movie for me is a middle way.
Follow Dave Schilling on Twitter.
]]> Dave Schilling film, Dear White People, Justin Simien, film, race, black film, black cinema, racial identity, tyler perry, Tyler Perry owns an island, multi-protagonist stories, identity, Identity politics, the black Whit Stillman, the black Woody Allen, Spike Lee, 12 Years a Slave, the black experience, Race relations, black filmmakers, Filmmaking, the human condition, the human experience, white people, black people, post-racial society
The Film That Made Me... : How 'La Dolce Vita' and 'The Great Beauty' Taught Me to Embrace Chaos Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:20:00 +0100
Image by Marta Parszeniew
As a young, childless man whose job involves a lot of getting drunk with lunatics, and whose personal life is largely the same, it’s very easy to have a lot of those “What the fuck am I doing with my life?” moments. Like when you’re lining up outside a nightclub, in a shopping center in a bid to meet a reality star. Or when one of your friends throws a shopping cart at a North London rap crew during a mass brawl on New Year's Eve.
When we experience these revelations, incidents, waking fever dreams—call them what you want—sometimes they can make you wonder if life would be better if it were slightly more sedate. If you should've just gone to a middling university, met a serenely empty blonde girl named Ellie, or Jess, or Hannah at a party and stayed friends with people who have poker nights in their living rooms and take drugs once a year.
But in all this madness, this weirdness, this never-ending circle pit of bad decisions and splitting headaches, two films have been there to steer me through. Two Italian films, weirdly: Federico Fellini’s La Dolce Vita and, more recently, Paolo Sorrentino’s The Great Beauty. Films that were made over half a century apart but could be sequel and prequel, so closely linked do they seem.
I first came across La Dolce Vita when it was given away free in a Sunday paper—fitting, as for me, the film is one of the defining chronicles of modern media. (The term "paparazzi" didn’t exist before Fellini made it the name of the snap-happy photographer in his film; a word chosen because it represented to the director "a buzzing insect... hovering, darting, stinging"—an annoying prick who can't mind his own business, basically.) For those who haven’t seen it, the film tells the loose, bewildering story of Marcello Rubini, played by Marcello Mastroianni. The Italian cinema icon is an actor whose face can veer convincingly and at any minute between suave and crumpled, classical and effeminate—helpful, given the apparently infinite facets of Rubini's character. In the most reductive terms, Fellini's lead is an intelligent, shallow, miserable, sensitive, drunk, womanizer, and throughout we are given the impression that he should really be doing something more worthwhile with his time on Earth.
Instead, he spends his late nights and early mornings getting caught up in the whirlwind of post-war Roman life: trying to chat with girls from a helicopter, driving around the empty streets with depressed heiresses, getting slapped up by American actors he’s cuckolded, drinking heavily, and going on weird assignments, like checking out falsified sightings of the Madonna.
Marcello is a journalist, a good one, but one whose work remains stuck in the superficial side of Roman life—the parties thrown by obscure royals and the holidays enjoyed by visiting American stars soaking up the massively decadent, Caligula-in-shades lifestyle of the time. With his sharp suits, great hair, and slightly bemused expression, Marcello is a pissed, lost Adonis who’s way too far through the looking glass. He’s cool, but in a totally human, flawed, and often embarrassing kind of way. He’s a weird cross between James Dean and a divorced dad.
Before you get it twisted, the reason I’ve found the film so inspiring is not that it tells the story of a handsome young writer who spends his time fighting off film stars and society beauties, but because of the way it tells you to embrace the chaos and uncertainty that life inevitably throws at you. Fellini was a great humanist, and even when he's working to depict the self-obsessed or morbidly pretentious, he manages to endow them with a real compassion and humanity. For every beautiful and batshit Scandinavian film starlet, there is Marcello’s suicidal fiancée, his ill father, the ageing prostitute whose house he visits.
Marcello is a smart, thoughtful man whose life has come to something of a crossroads, yet while the film deals in ideas of personal crisis, there is little redemption for him, no woman there to save him. That would be far too American. So he continues to make the wrong moral choices, even as he's admiring what seem to be the right ones: a friend of his now settled into the rhythms of family life. But the moral universe and the real universe are very different things, and Fellini isn't afraid to show us this. As it turns out, Marcello's friend isn't too happy with his domesticated lot and ends up killing himself and his children. At the end, though, no great moral judgment is passed down. Just an acknowledgment that life is often hard, but sometimes sweet. That and a giant manta ray, washed up on a beach.
The film is a bittersweet ode to chaos, its message perhaps being that while partying too much can make you miserable, lots of other things will make you miserable, too. And that, essentially, life is a great wind that carries you. (A sentiment later expressed in one of my other favorite Italian things, The Sopranos.) The first time I saw La Dolce Vita I was about 19, working in a factory that made component parts for wind turbines. Granted, not many people would think of that as a job for life, but the film forced me to consider the idea that maybe I shouldn't feel ashamed of the urge to get out and find a less rigid life.
Another film with a love-hate relationship with “the whirlpool of the high life" is The Great Beauty, which is set in the last days of what historically was Berlusconi's Rome.
Its lead—played magnificently by Toni Servillo—is Jep Gambardella, the ultimate ageing playboy, a 65-year-old journalist who wrote one great novel in his youth but now spends more time getting off with models and doing blow with TV producers than anything to do with his career. Gambardella is the party king of Rome, like Marcello Rubini but 40 years older. For me, The Great Beauty tells the story of what might have happened to the Dolce Vita generation, if everyone grew older, and more drunk, without really changing their lifestyles at all—what that lack of redemption shown in Fellini's film meant for the rest of everyone’s lives. In Italy, there's a cliché about middle-aged bachelors still living with their mothers, and in The Great Beauty everyone is still single (even if they’re legally married), clinging onto Mother Rome in an attempt to never let the glory days slip away. In my mid-20s, this is something I feel I’m already beginning to see in my own life.
The first time I saw the trailer, I knew it was my movie. A fantastical Eurotrash cacophony of Fellini, Berlusconi, Cassano, Sarkozy, and Pavarotti. The men had crimped hair, calzone bellies, cokefaces, pinstriped shirts, and red pants. The women looked like they could ruin your life with the flick of their hair. It was loud, it was brash, it was Italy.
The first time I saw the actual film, I fell in love within minutes. It kicks off with an extended rooftop party sequence somewhere in the Roman skyline. I wanted to live inside it. For some, the aspirational life depicted in American teen films—a life of big houses, close families, and grid-like coming-of-age moments—is the cinematic ideal they lust after most. But for me, it’s 200 shitfaced Italians dancing on a roof.
The whole scene is just so wildly, brilliantly perfect. The fact that the song they're all dancing to is by Bob Sinclar, hands down the most ludicrous DJ on earth, was the icing on the cake. It is pure, pure chaos—a riot of spousal aggression, lechery, dilapidated glamor girls, dogs in bags, and a mariachi band.
In essence, it's a bleak scene, full of people doing stuff they seem way too old to be doing, but the hedonism is so raw, the aesthetic so devoid of anything approaching credibility, that it somehow immediately became the coolest thing I’d ever seen. When, later on in the film, Jep states that, “I didn’t just want to live the high life, I wanted to be the king of the high life... I wanted not just to go to the best parties, but to have the power to make parties fail,” you know that this is not just a film about people going through a phase. It's about people whose lives are defined by disarray.
In fact, the film suggests that hiding behind every great party is an even greater sadness, and that some people, no matter how hard they try, may never be able to escape from that. There’s a cliché that if you get drunk a lot, your life is shallow, and you’re probably seeking to fill some kind of gaping hole with alcohol. Both films seem to believe this, but with their typically European lack of interest in redemption or closure, it's never really said what that hole might be. (Something about girls, perhaps.) Instead, we come closer to the idea that maybe chaos is just what some people are, no matter how much they try to pull clear of party gravity. And in doing so, both films suggest that such a life is not devoid of meaning, not free from redemption, nor depth, but rather something to share with others who also can’t quite function in a world of order.
Towards the end of The Great Beauty, there’s a moment in which Jep is having some kind of profound episode at a party, watching the rest of his ageing bohemian friends dance further towards the abyss—but in an instant, that moment is shattered when he is forced into a conga line to the sounds of Yolanda Be Cool’s “We No Speak Americano.”
And I realized then that that’s how I see life: as brief moments of reflection shattered by chaos. The only thing to do with it is get stuck.
Follow Clive on Twitter.
]]> Clive Martin film, The Great Beauty, La Dolce Vita, Paolo Sorrentino, federico fellini, Clive Martin, films, movies, Jep Gambardella, Marcello Rubini, Toni Servillo, Marcello Mastroianni, Italian Cinema, The Film That Made Me, essays, Rome, the whirpool of the high life, Opinion, opinions, op-ed, film essays, film history, cinema, Classics
'Nightcrawler' Is Media Criticism Disguised as a Thriller Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:00:00 +0100
Publicity still courtesy of the official Nightcrawler site
Nightcrawler, the new Hollywood thriller, is essentially Network meets Drive. It's the story of Louis (an emaciated Jake Gyllenhaal) a down-and-out young nobody who finds himself swept up in the world of the "nightcrawlers," freelance reporters for the local news. They shove their camcorders into the gory messes at crime scenes and car crashes to collect a paltry bounty from news stations in need of something salacious for the public to consume over breakfast.
It takes place in the same sodium-vapor-lit Los Angeles you may remember from Collateral, and includes some really memorable bits of atmospheric music by James Newton Howard. In other words, it has all the markings of one of those cool movies for nerd bros, like Dark City, Limitless, Memento, and yes, Donnie Darko.
But it's also been infused with two not-at-all-hidden parables: one about the local TV news being full of violence, and the other is about the terrible things that happen when there are no jobs and young people are permanently unemployed, and—more importantly—uncared for by society.
Recently I met director Dan Gilroy—who made a name for himself writing screenplays for The Fall, Real Steel, and The Bourne Legacy—while he was doing press for his film. I started the interview by asking him about TV news. To put it mildly, he's skeptical.
Photo by the author
He compares TV news to junk food that everyone consumes without thinking. "One day somebody puts the caloric intake on it, and turns out you're eating 32,000 calories every morning," he said. "I think if you could do the equivalent of the caloric intake for local television news, then you could sort of see what the actual toll is."
When Louis gets into the news footage industry, it's not that he quickly sheds his scruples; it's more that he never had any. He charges headlong into the job with all the intensity of someone on the autism spectrum, immediately hiring someone to listen to a police scanner for rich people being attacked by minorities so that he's free to master his camera technique, and look into what Gilroy calls the "caloric intake" of TV news. Here's a quote from the film that details what Louis finds:
An average half-hour of Los Angeles television news packs all its local government coverage—including budget, law enforcement, education, transportation and immigration—into 22 seconds. Local crime stories, however, not only usually led the news but filled 14 times the broadcast, averaging five minutes seven seconds.
While doing his research, Gilroy may have landed on a horrifying study of local TV news conducted by Pew back in 2004. It may not have been as bad as Nightcrawler makes it sound, but things did look pretty troubling back then.
It might be unfair to say that TV news in 2004 was shortchanging important issues—disasters are big deals!—but there's a case to me made that TV news was making a disproportionately big deal out of local crime. And it's not clear that anything's changed.
Gilroy stood by the numbers in his film, telling me, "They might be like 5 percent off here and there, but for the most part [they're] true." Since it's a fictional film, the numbers are incidental, but interesting to consider nonetheless.
The director added that the violence contributes to what he calls a "narrative of fear." Gyllenhaal's mentor of sorts, played by Renee Russo, provides a detailed blueprint, explaining exactly who needs to bleed:
Viewers are more interested in urban crime creeping into the suburbs. What that means is a victim or victims, preferably well-off and/or white, injured at the hands of the poor, or a minority. […] The best and clearest way that I can phrase it to you, Lou, to capture the spirit of what we air, is think of our newscast as a screaming woman running down the street with her throat cut.
The film also finds a way to make today's lack of job security interesting. "One of the stories that perpetually hits me is the tens of millions of people under 30 who have no job prospects and no career prospects," he said. The economy is what forces Louis into the world of the nightcrawlers. Before that, he stole scrap metal, and despite his pluckiness and his winning attitude—which he projects by aping motivational speakers throughout the film—he can't find permanent work.
"I think he's left behind any sort of romantic notions that there's a safety net for him, or that people will protect him," Gilroy said. "He thinks, I'm in this alone. I believe that there are many people in the world today who intuitively understand that they are in it alone, the world is not going to help them at all."
The hopelessness of Louis's professional life bleeds into his personality: His first move after he gets established as a nightcrawler is to hire an underling, Rick (Riz Ahmed, playing the classic vaudevillian schlemiel). Louis' first instinct is to have him work as an unpaid intern.
I had to ask if there were unpaid interns on Nightcrawler. Gilroy was adamant: "No, we didn't have one unpaid intern. We paid everybody. Absolutely. I would never have somebody working for me for free."
In tougher times, I've been unemployed, scraping by and taking any work at all. At those same times, I've watched the TV news and felt like it was part of a vast propaganda machine. Nightcrawler would have had special resonance for that younger version of me. The sense I got from talking to Gilroy was that he knew that.
"To be honest, I'm more interested in the younger generation's reaction to this film," he said. "I hope it has some relevance in the sense of, Wow, this is what I'm going through. I believe it's a touchstone experience for a lot of people."
Follow Mike Pearl on Twitter
]]> Mike Pearl film, Nightcrawler, Hollywood thriller, Jake Gylenhaal, emaciated Jake Gyllenhaal, those cool movies for nerd bros, Dan Gilroy, urban crime creeping into the suburbs, today's lack of job security interesting, romantic notions that there's a safety net, high octane thrillers, movies about the news, tv news, thrillers, movies about los angeles, Mike Pearl, films, movie reviews, chase movies, movies about cars, Los Angeles
VICE Meets: Jason Schwartzman and Alex Ross Perry Discuss Their New Film, 'Listen Up Philip' Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:11:00 +0100 Writer and director Alex Ross Perry’s latest film, Listen Up Philip, stars Jason Schwartzman as a disgruntled novelist on the brink of success, grappling as it estranges him from his life. As Philip distances himself from his girlfriend, Ashley, played by Elisabeth Moss, he finds solace in a new mentor, who shares the same apathy for the people around him.
In this week's VICE Meets, Reihan Salam sits with Perry and Schwartzman to talk about success, working together, and the pains of changing without growing.
]]> VICE Staff film, listen up philip film, listen up philip, Jason Schwartzman, jason schwartzman alex ross perry, jason schwartzman listen up philip, film, VICE Meets, alex ross perry, listen up philip interview, vice meets jason schwartzman, vice meets alex ross perry, VICE podcast, The VICE Podcast Show
The Film That Made Me... : 'The Big Lebowski' Was the Film That Taught Me to Take It Easy, Man Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:00:00 +0100
Whenever people are asked to name the greatest atrocities of the 20th century—while making small-talk at a dinner party, say, or on Family Feud—the usual suspects will invariably be trotted out: Nazism, the Stalinist pogroms, the Khmer Rouge, sundry African dictators, and Latin American juntas. All fine, of course, but somewhat missing the mark. No, the single greatest atrocity of the 20th century was without question the Virgin Film Guide’s decision to award the Coen Brothers’ comic masterpiece The Big Lebowski a one and a half star rating out of five.
Only four movies—four—of the hundreds and thousands in that rainforest-devouring tome were given a lower score: Pokémon: The First Movie, Babe: Pig in the City, Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, and Howard Hughes’s The Outlaw. Films considered to be Lebowski’s equals include such cinematic high points as Smokey and the Bandit, Showgirls, and The Blob. “What a reversal of fortune,” begins the wisely anonymous critic, “two years after Fargo, the film that will probably stand as Joel and Ethan Coen’s finest moment, they followed up with what is, without question, their worst.”
Well, Virgin Film Guide, you are wrong.
The story—which, I think you'll agree, ticks most of the boxes of classic Aristotelian Poetics—is set into motion when our protagonist, a happily unemployed stoner and keen amateur bowler, Jeff Lebowski (Jeff Bridges), a.k.a. the Dude (or El Duderino, if you’re not into the whole brevity thing), has his valued rug peed upon by debt-collecting thugs in a case of mistaken identity. After inveigling reparations from his millionaire namesake, he’s subsequently embroiled in a ransom handoff for the return of the eponymous Lebowski’s trophy wife and part-time porno starlet, Bunny (Tara Reid), who may or may not have been abducted by some techno-pop purveying German nihilists. Anyhow, Dude’s somewhat volatile Vietnam vet bowling compadre, Walter Sobchak (John Goodman), hatches a plan to keep the dough that backfires more than Dude’s soon-to-be-stolen banger, forcing these two unlikely detectives to track down the whereabouts of Bunny, money, and car. It’s a very complicated case.
Not to worry, for the plot of Lebowski—much as with life, despite our vain search for the safe anchorage of meaning—is entirely secondary to the ride, a fact that seems to have escaped our establishment-development-resolution of a reviewer, for whom “the Coens’ vision of LA’s kooky underbelly is simply convoluted, and desperately so.” Ludicrously, this human traffic cone finds no leavening humor in the shaggy-dog-stoner-farce-hardboiled-detective-noir-pastiche, dismissing its nod to Raymond Chandler’s The Big Sleep as the film’s “one and only joke.” Fuck you talking about?
Lebowski’s comedy froths from every pitch-perfect moment in a script as taut as catgut. Scarcely can two dramatis personae (three, if you include Steve Buscemi’s hapless Donny, the other member of a bowling team built on short fuses and cross purposes) have been so well rendered through such absurdly fatuous dialogue. And, at bottom, this is a buddy movie, with Walter and the Dude—hothead and pothead—forming a symbiotic yin-yang of calmness and rage in the face of the workaday intrusions of the world.
While first (and second and third) viewing was a symphonic hoot of curveball narrative twists, screwball set-pieces, and oddball characters—Julianne Moore’s glacial conceptual artist, Maude Lebowski, rasping “coitus” at an imperturbable Dude; John Turturro’s pedophile bowling artist, Jesus Quintana; Philip Seymour Hoffmann’s button-down factotum, Brandt—this was only the courtship in my relationship with Lebowski.
Later, when watching with popcorn rather than pot, the belly laughs rippled out to a less visceral, more cerebral response, and I came to appreciate the film’s hidden depths, its oblique sociopolitical satire, its allegorical richness. Or perhaps I projected all this. Anyway, I wasn’t alone—the film’s cultic status can be averred from its having spawned a fan site,, where you can be ordained as a Dudeist priest (who may or may not have a fatwa out on the Virgin Film Guide’s publishers) while perusing esoteric essays untangling the movie’s homespun wisdom. For instance, the film’s Taoist lessons, its complex use of the F-word, or what it teaches us about cricket (disclosure: by yours truly).
What had not occurred to me, I came to realize, was its subtle skewering, its soft subversion, of the American Dream, the greatest control mechanism yet devised. Keep working, keep striving, and you will ascend the social strata. Zero to hero. We can all win! Of course, Dude eschews the stress-inducing hamster wheel of aspirationalism, happy to drive around, bowl a little, have the odd acid flashback. Indeed, he rejects the very idea of social hierarchy, showing no uneasiness in pornographer Jackie Treehorn’s palatial Malibu pad and no deference to the Chief of Police (“fuckin’ fascist”), while remaining blithely unimpressed by the other Lebowski’s “various awards, commendations, honorary degrees," to the extent that, when forced to endure Brandt’s parroted commentary, he repeatedly touches what he’s been asked to leave alone, transgressing those invisible yet real social barriers. And it turns out that the film’s model achiever, its self-made man, is a sham, embezzling money from the charity he’s been appointed to manage. Behind the meritocratic mythos of the American imaginary lie corruption and cynicism.
At the time of figuring all this out, I was doing a Master’s or PhD—to tell you the truth, I don’t remember a lot of it—and sinking slowly into a personal crisis, an unhappy tumbleweed drifting toward a future I didn’t particularly want or couldn’t ever see being useful. Motivation was an issue—where others merely procrastinated, I meta-procrastinated: I was always working on working on working—and I’m sure the Virgin Film Guide would tell you that without motivation you have no character development. Yet Lebowski was teaching me to “just take it easy, man,” to live life enjoying the journey, not fixating on the goals. Even so, such lessons were only the nuptials. The lifelong bonds, the film’s absorption into my very being—my "becoming-Dude," if you will—would only be sealed a few years later.
In July 2006, a few weeks after my laptop was burgled—and with it, 65,000 words (that is, 100 percent) of my PhD thesis, as well as all backup copies—three months before a deadline I was never going to make, I found myself in Turkey selling advertising to real estate companies on the website of a cable TV channel under the amateur tutelage of a best friend teetering on the edge of a break-up-induced breakdown who had taken a sabbatical from his job in video production after making $2,730 commission on his first day in sales. As you sometimes do. I was in a deep funk, pretty sure the goddamn plane had crashed into the mountain, yet "Mr. Sling" (not the handle his loving parents gave him) airlifted me from my three-match-a-day, wake-and-bake World Cup vigil with the promise of either making some clams or, at worst, having a free vacation on him. Nothing is fucked.
As with Dude’s reinvention as a sleuth, I was distinctly out of my element—what salesman “flown out from London to solve an urgent problem” does so in $16 Matalan strides and George by Asda shirt?—and yet, despite this, I "earned" $5,940 in eight days, no mean windfall considering I’d spent the previous 12 months, my "writing-up" year, collecting a fortnightly $175 from the state in return for the charade of job-seeking so as to maximize the time available for getting further behind with my work. Next thing I know, I was in Altinkum, selling the sizzle (not the steak).
Both Sling and I were staunch Lebowskites, and, despite our affectionately chipper interactions, lived out a cathartic buddy movie there on the Aegean coast. There was, it seemed, a line (verbatim or tweaked) from Lebowski to fit almost every scenario: a sarcastic “that’s fucking interesting, man” (our "paddle of rebuke," if you will); “new shit has come to light,” when a stalling client registered interest; “who’s in charge of scheduling?” or “do you have any promising, uh, leads?” when the day’s appointments came through; and, when we thought we’d be taking 25 percent commission from a $160,500 TV ad deal ($2,000, man!): “our fucking troubles are over.”
See, Lebowski’s quotability is unlike the geekery you get with many other cult movies, where the banal repetition of circle-jerking fanboys is designed only to out-aficionado other devotees, to be the alpha male of the omegas, akin to catching butterflies and pinning them to a cork board. Essentially dead and deadening. Here, the lines emerged from, and enhanced, a new context, putting the butterflies to flight.
Anyway, one of Sling’s first deals was with a waiter-turned-property developer called Deniz, in which he’d bartered us up from the boxy, apologetic, coarse-toweled functionality of our package-holiday twin room at the Seabird Hotel into a spacious duplex apartment. Trouble was, the washing machine didn’t work—that, and the fact that Deniz was being evasive about writing out the check. So, after six days hand-washing shirts, six days being fobbed off, six days wheelin’ and dealin’, we swaggered into his office and asked: What the fuck? Sling went the full Walter Sobchak, dropping a few F-bombs, at which point Deniz lost his shit, turfing us out of "our" pad, threatening to notify the police that we didn’t have work visas, and informing us he’d be complaining to the TV channel.
We skulked out of there in a reduced, sick-stomached quiet, a little vexed that the party was over, the consequences of our frankly unnecessary bravado slowly sinking in. After a long beat, I broke the silence: “I dig the way you do business, Jackie.” Back he flashed: “Fuck it, let’s go bowling.” And that was it: the hardest laughter I ever knew. We made our way back to the Seabird, abiding.
That day I understood that it’s not what happens to you that counts; it’s how you perceive and process life’s strikes and gutters. Having a nervous breakdown? Lost 15 months’ work? Nothing is fucked…
Follow Scott Oliver on Twitter.
]]> Scott Oliver film, Dudeism, The Big Lebowski, Cricket, bowling, Scott Oliver, dude, culture, The Dude Abides, man, film, Coen Brothers, Coen, Jeff Bridges, Juliane Moore, bunny, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Virgin Film Guide, That's fucking interesting, aspirationalism
We Spoke to a Psychologist About Hollywood's Depictions of Mental Illness Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:00:00 +0100
Screencap via Movieclips
Look at any classic horror film—Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, The Shining—and you're likely to find mental illness. It's a convenient, if inaccurate, explanation for the maniacal violence that makes up the backbone of these stories. But in most films portraying mental illness, especially violent and bloody horror films, real life pathology is willfully abandoned in favor of melodramatic storytellling. At best, it's lazy; at worst, it publicly and repeatedly demonizes the people who need the most help. In a recent article I wrote about the mentally ill being killed in disproportionate numbers by police, many people commented along the lines of “Well, of course, they’re much more dangerous,” which anybody working in mental health can tell you is not only untrue, but is the direct result of the media’s focus on a fictitious link between mental illness and violence.
I spoke with Dr. Danny Wedding, a former director of the Missouri Institute of Mental Health and co-author of Movies and Mental Illness: Using Films to Understand Psychopathology, to learn more about some of the more common movie myths.
VICE: How do you think mental illness is generally represented in film?
Dr. Danny Wedding: I mean, slasher films like Friday the 13th, films that portray people with mental illness as homicidal maniacs, those are pretty awful, and there are a lot of myths still being portrayed in films. But at the same time, there are many major films that do a surprisingly good job, and it’s becoming increasingly common for directors and producers to hire psychologists and psychiatrists as consultants.
Screencap via Movieclips
What about the connection between violence and mental illness?
Yeah, perhaps the most common myth is that people with mental illness are dangerous and violent, and the evidence is very clear that somebody with a disease like schizophrenia is far more likely to be the victim of violence than to be the perpetrator of violence. People with mental illness, homeless people who you see on the street typically, they are victims. They’re robbed, they’re raped, they’re murdered, but they’re not robbers, rapists, and murderers. Usually when violence occurs, it occurs with family members, it doesn’t involve strangers, and usually involves people who are mentally ill and abusing drugs or alcohol.
Do you think that people like yourself—psychologists—are also misrepresented?
Yes, but it’s getting better. There are a number of recurring motifs. Sometimes mental health professionals are presented as being incompetent and buffoons… Did you see the movie What About Bob?
Actually I just watched that recently. With Bill Murray?
Yeah, right. I think it’s a great movie, but Richard Dreyfuss plays a psychologist and he’s kind of bumbling and incompetent, and I think there’s a lot of humor, but often times therapists are portrayed as looking foolish, looking silly, and not having much to offer. Sometimes, in movies like Hitchcock’s Psycho, they are portrayed as omniscient, they can see into the deep, the dark, and dirty. They see things that no one else can see. Sometimes, in movies like Silence of the Lambs, they’re portrayed as murders—Hannibal the Cannibal was a psychiatrist. In a movie like The Prince of Tides, they’re portrayed as unethical. Frequently in films, psychiatrists and psychologists are shown sleeping with their patients, having affairs. There’s a movie called Tin Cup in which a therapist trades psychotherapy for golf lessons and winds up seducing the golf pro. That portray therapists as being unethical or ineffectual or having powers that they really don’t have, like a special ability to see inside somebody’s personality and to make predictions about behavior, and the fact is that psychologists and psychiatrists really aren’t much better than anybody else at predicting future behavior.
Screencap via Movieclips
So who do you think did it best?
There’s a Canadian film called Clean, Shaven. It’s about schizophrenia. I don’t know if you’ve seen it or not, it’s not all that well known, but that’s a movie I frequently recommend when asked that question. Actually a recent film that was real popular was Silver Linings Playbook, and I thought it was a pretty accurate portrayal of what bipolar disorder looked like. Did you see The Hours? It’s a film about Virginia Woolf, and without question Virginia Woolf had bipolar disorder. I thought it did a really nice job of portraying what that looked like.
Do you think films have gotten better over the last few years in this regard?
I think they really have. I think Ron Howard did a remarkable job with A Beautiful Mind. He’s an amazing director. It’s a very sympathetic portrayal of John Nash, who was a brilliant man but, of course, it showed John Nash having visual hallucinations whereas most people with paranoid schizophrenia have auditory hallucinations. Ron Howard took some license and it’s much more creative and much more vivid and powerful to show visual hallucinations in a film medium.
Screencap via Movieclips
You said there are some other myths being perpetrated. What are some of the big ones?
Well, the first is the presumption of traumatic etiology. Movies suggest that if a person develops a mental illness then it was because of something awful in their past, perhaps something in their childhood. The Three Faces of Eve and films about dissociative disorder usually suggested somebody was abused physically or sexually as a child. You might’ve seen Robin Williams in the The Fisher King. He was really quite good and he portrayed a man with all of the symptoms of schizophrenia, and yet all of this developed after his fiancée was shot to death in a restaurant, and an experience like that would lead to post-traumatic stress disorder. You wouldn’t become schizophrenic as a result. Many people develop mental illness with no history of trauma at all in their past.
Another especially pernicious myth is that of the schizophrenic parent, and the presumption that a person who becomes mentally ill does so because of bad parenting. Or that love will conquer mental illness. While I think that love is important, and having a supportive, caring family is critical to somebody overcoming a mental illness, love alone will not make a disease like schizophrenia go away.
What’s the most egregious offender in your opinion?
Well, you know, it’s an old Jack Nicholson movie, but The Shining showed Nicholson becoming homicidal and trying to kill his wife and his child, and it is pretty awful. Nightmare on Elm Street showed Freddy Krueger as a patient whose mother had been in a psych hospital and he had a violent mental illness himself. Those are two of the most egregious. Some are so bad it’s so hard to even talk about them. Almost all of the films that link mental illness with violence also involve sexuality in some way, so people are not just killed, they’re raped and sexually violated and then killed.
Photo via Flickr user annie_is_okay
Taxi Driver is a pretty violent film, but I’ve always appreciated Bickle’s slow descent into madness. A lot of movies tend to jump from sanity to insanity pretty quickly.
Oh, it's one of the greatest films of all time. Scorsese’s an amazing director. I think Taxi Driver is a fairly accurate portrayal of what mental illness looks like. In general, most categories of mental illness are insidious, with a gradual and slow onset. A disease like schizophrenia may start in your late teens and fully manifest in your mid 20s, other illnesses like Alzheimer’s may start very slowly in your 60s and fully manifest in your 70s. Some disorders have an immediate onset. Are you familiar with the term conversion disorder?
Well, occasionally someone will be in a situation where they’ll develop, for example, hysterical blindness. So a classic example would be a woman who sees her child get run over by a car in front of her, and she goes blind and she can’t see, and she’s examined by ophthalmologists and optometrists and experts and neurologists, and there’s no reason for her blindness, but her blindness is very real; she can’t see. The presumption is that on some psychological level it’s a way of undoing this terrible thing she saw happen.
What are some other causes of mental illness in the real world?
Mental illness is such a broad area it’s kind of like saying, “What is the major cause of disease?” There are lots of things that cause mental illness. We know that genetics plays a huge role; if you look at something like suicide, the likelihood of having a child commit suicide increases by about four-fold if a parent has committed suicide. We know that stress certainly plays a role; experience with trauma plays a role. We have lots of mentally ill soldiers coming back from Iraq, in part because they’ve been exposed to trauma. So, there are a lot of different causes for mental illness, and often times these make for fairly interesting films.
Follow Jules Suzdaltsev on Twitter.
]]> Jules Suzdaltsev film, mental illness, movies, Hollywood, psycho, The Fisher King, Taxi Driver, friday the 13th, Silence of the Lambs, what about bob, the hours, tin cup, clean shaven, schizophrenia, bipolar, insanity, violence, freddy krueger, nightmare on elm street, the shining, halloween, horror films, Dr. Danny Wedding, Movies and Mental Illness: Using Films to Understand Psychopathology, Movies and Mental Illness
The Best of London Film Fest Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:00:00 +0100
Still from Fury. Photo courtesy of the BFI
London Film Festival, the fine pastures of men in non-prescription glasses and TJ MAXX blazers. You ask them how they are, and it’s all: “Yeah mate, 17 films in, having a mid-LFF crisis. I feel like the kid in Let The Right One In, but the Swedish one not the American remake. Know what I mean?” All these guys give a shit about is Paul Dano’s career arc and how much the BFI (the British Film Institute, for you Americans out there) doesn’t appreciate Powell and Pressburger.
If you’re more of a Netflix type, happy to endure your theater experience without the person next to you making off-the-cuff jokes about Shia Labeouf, or without watching a sweating film director automate their way through yet another Q&A—then we’re here to help.
Here's a quick breakdown the best films we saw at London Film Festival, which closed on Sunday, all set for release in the not-too-distant future.
Mommy—Directed by Xavier Dolan
Xavier Dolan, prodigious, self-obsessed child-hero of the film industry, is back again to tell everyone what a slow learner Orson Welles was (yes, that’s an actual quote). Themes from his previous films I Killed My Mother and Heartbeats prevail in Mommy, which follows a young and damned kid with ADHD as he and his potty-mouthed mother strike up a sort-of-love-triangle with a neighbor.
It's the 25-year-old’s fifth feature, and Dolan turns the volume up to 11, where it remains for two hours and 20 minutes with squawking and fighting in brash primary colors, all shot on a shaky handheld and set to a Céline Dion soundtrack.
For critics lazy enough to start labeling directors as hipsters, then Dolan’s usually exhibit A, and Mommy is no exception. It’s as indulgent as his last release Lawrence Anyways. It's relentless and absurd and almost unwatchable. And yet, virtually everyone seems to be loving it.
Mommy is slated for release in March 2015.
Fury—Directed by David Ayer
Brad Pitt and Shia Labeouf stride into the Corinthia hotel for their press conference. They’ve been keeping us waiting for half an hour. “He’s probably out the back, covering himself in peanut butter,” I say to anyone who'll listen. But Shia’s freshly pressed and clean-cut, almost looking like he wants to be there. Pitt, in a shirt, blazer, tie, and moustache, stares down the room, almost daring anyone to say anything critical about the screamingly three-star World War II Oscar bait he’s here to sell. No one does.
Fury is an A+ acting job, far more interested in the violence of war and the proclamations of morality than the flawed characters underneath the soldiers. It puts you inside that tank, no doubt. It puts a gun in your hand and the fear of God in you. It's another grandstanding film, and in word and deed, American to the core.
Fury is out now.
Whiplash—Directed by Damien Chazelle
Set in present-day New York, Whiplash stars Miles Teller as an obsessional jazz drummer at one of America's top music conservatories who is pushed beyond the edge of his limits by a monstrous teacher convinced he could be the next Buddy Rich. (It's superbly composed by debut director Damien Chazelle, who is a former jazz drummer himself.)
The guy next to me actually shouted “No. Don’t. Please!” when Whiplash began to fade to black. And the whole room stood to whoop and applaud in this wonderful wave of spontaneity, which is pretty cool for a debut and makes you fleetingly think, Yeah fuck you real job. Film Critic for life. Then a row of old press guys rise and applaud the director as he comes on stage—and, oh God, yes—the director is younger than you.
And you remember how little you’ve ever been paid and all the times you’ve fried your brains on vodka and girls with boyfriends and Monday Night Football. And you realize this film—nominally about jazz drumming—is also about Realizing Your Potential and Making the Most of Your Ability. You haven't realized yours, but for 106 minutes it's just been dangled up there on the silver screen before you. It's sort of motivating, almost.
Whiplash is now playing in select theaters.
Björk Live: Biophilia—Directed by Peter Strickland
Biophilia is Björk’s multimedia love song to the natural world, replete with a David Attenborough voiceover and directed by Peter Strickland, he of all the indie films with all the five-star reviews that failed to connect with anyone except for movie geeks.
She floats on stage, that otherworldly singular entity known as Björk, dressed like a shining mollusk, hair like an anemone. She’s followed by a live drummer, a dude playing "laptop," and about 20 Icelandic choir-nymphs in flowing, shimmery dresses, their long beautiful hair thrown in waves. Alexandra Palace waits in anticipation—oh so quiet.
Björk unfurls her child-banshee vocals in the round, 16 cameras swirling like moths to a flame. What does it sound like? High-concept avant-garde opera realized with the time signatures of Dizzy Gillespie and the pseudo-epicness of Sigur Rós. But there’s no killer whale slowly corkscrewing through the air here, just minutes-long footage of giant squid being consumed by parasites. Which, it has to be said, turns out to be pretty sexy.
Björk: Biophilia Live is now playing in select theaters.
Bypass—Directed by Duane Hopkins
Bypass was shot last year on location in Gateshead, the working class town on the southern bank of the River Tyne, over the course of nine weeks with a skeletal crew and a budget of around £1 million ($1.6 million). London-born "rising star" George MacKay plays the film’s vessel Tim. He’s a good kid, and he’s a criminal. It’s an attempt—the director Duane Hopkins has said—at a “lyrical” social realism; there are plenty of lens flares and throbbing ambient soundscapes as Tim lurches from bad situatoins to worse ones.
The film got largely hammered in the reviews, which Hopkins blames on what he sees as the almost total London-centricness of the culture vulture classes—this repulsion at anything that even suggests at an it’s-tough-up-North miserablism. “It always surprises me that people in London will react to these types of films by questioning if this is really what the rest of this country is like," Hopkins told VICE earlier this month. "And you have to say: ‘Yes, there are these people leading these other lives.’”
Bypass is still waiting for distribution. Here’s hoping it isn’t ignored.
Bypass will be released 2015, date TBA.
Follow Tom Seymour on Twitter.
]]> Tom Seymour film, Xavier Dolan, BFI, lff, culture, London Film Fest, London, Brad Pitt, fury, 2014, cinema, Festival, mommy, Lawrence Anyways, bjork, biophilia, Peter Strickland, Shia LaBeouf
The Woman Who Captured Snowden Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:44:00 +0100 Alex Pasternack film, Beyond Wild at Heart: An X-Rated Evening with Barry Gifford Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:00:00 +0100 `
We love Barry Gifford. The writer, once described by the New York Times Book Review as the chronicler of "the decline of the Western world," has produced more than 40 novels, poetry books, and essay collections, and has been the inspiration for two David Lynch films and the author of several stories for VICE.
On Tuesday, November 4, we're reuniting with Gifford at the legendary art house Anthology Film Archives to present Beyond Wild at Heart: An X-Rated Evening with Barry Gifford, a celebration of the 25th anniversary of Lynch's adapted film about star-crossed road voyagers. The evening will also be a fund-raiser for Black Lodge Theater's world-premiere production of Do the Blind Dream? written by Gifford himself.
The night will feature Gifford reading Beyond God and the Devil, his newest installment in the wandering lovers' epic saga, as well as a special screening of the banned-in-America, X-rated version of Wild at Heart. Buy tickets here, and stay tuned for more of Gifford's writing on VICE.
]]> VICE Staff film, Barry Gifford, beyond wild at heart an x rated evening with barry gifford, barry gifford beyond wild at heart, Barry gifford sailor and lula, barry gifford beyond god and the devil, Wild at Heart, beyond wild at heart, anthology film archives, black lodge theater
I'm Short, Not Stupid Presents: 'Sort (No Man’s Land)' Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:20:00 +0100
When the term no man's land rose to prominence during World War I, it was used to denote that ambiguous space between armies that was both unattended and well guarded, because both sides were afraid to move. The opposing armies would bolster their positions with heavier artillery, barbed wire, mortars, and such things. Tensions increased until it became a situation where death or surrender were the only options, leaving no room for diplomacy.
With his short film Sort (a.k.a. No Man’s Land), animator David Adler takes on that ambiguous space with a fresh perspective, attempting to artistically illustrate the trials of war and life. If it all sounds a bit heady or pretentious, just watch the opening scene and let it tear up your brain. The hyper-stylized sequence harnesses the same energy found in Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan, with red-hot bullets tearing through soldiers and explosions blowing them apart.
Two surviving Danish soldiers serving the Germans fall into a bunker, kill some soldiers, and hunker down. Despite having just met, the two men are forced to work together in order to survive. Out of that necessity, a bond is slowly formed. One is a captain. His face has been disfigured by war—you can literally see the death on his face. The other, a corporal, is clean—handsome even—and appears to be the paragon of good. Death threats veiled as orders are shouted at them by the surviving German.
The look and animation of the short will probably shock more than the content, due to its jarring and interesting use of motion capture footage. Shot with a handheld camera and later turned into a 3D animation, the film has a distinct look that, at points, gives the impression of stop-motion or a video game.
The film unfolds quickly, and layers gradually reveal themselves. Why are friendships formed and the status quo challenged, even while staring certain death in the face? How do societal expectations and guilt transform people? These notions are subtle at first, but then it smacks you right in the face. While not always the most nuanced film, Sort makes up for its bluntness with sheer grit and technological achievement.
All in all, the film is a remarkable achievement, even more so because it's Adler’s student film. After premiering at the prestigious Telluride Film Festival six weeks ago, the film has now found its way online for you to see for yourself.
To watch with subtitles, click the CC button on the Vimeo player.
]]> Jeffrey Bowers film, film, Nazis, short film, war, world war 2, saving private ryan, cinema, art film, No Man's Land, short not stupid, jeff bowers
Manny Kirchheimer's 'Stations of the Elevated' Is a Paean to the Old New York Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:10:00 +0100
Manfred Kirchheimer’s 1981 masterpiece Stations of the Elevated begins its first theatrical run in the United States this week at the Brooklyn Academy of Music’s Cinematék, over 30 years after it debuted at the New York Film Festival to little fanfare. Out of the 31 films that were featured in the 1981 festival, it was notable for being the only one not reviewed by the New York Times. Given the film’s rich beauty and meticulous composition, it's reasonable to assume that this initial dismissal and belated critical embrace has much to do with shifting attitudes toward the subject of graffiti writing. The painted trains that were popularly despised as emblem’s of the city’s decay and chaos in the late 1970s and early 1980s are now viewed with a certain nostalgia and respect, along with the gritty landscape that has since vanished. Set to a jazz soundtrack featuring Charles Mingus and Aretha Franklin, Stations of the Elevated flies through through the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, the billboards of Times Square, and even an upstate prison, raising difficult questions about life in the city and the nature of urban art. Who owns the streets, and who has the right to vandalize them?
I met with Manny, who is now eighty-three years old, at the School of Visual Arts, where he has been happily teaching an array of filmmaking courses since 1975 and continues to teach today, to talk about the making of Stations of the Elevated and its long road to a theatrical release. Born in Germany in 1931, Kirchheimer’s parents brought the family to Washington Heights in 1936 to escape Hitler. He learned the craft at the very first documentary program in the United States at City College under the instruction of Dadaist filmmaker Han Richter in the 1950s. Kirchheimer then worked as an editor on industrials and television programs in New York before making his early films Colossus on the River (1963), about the docking of an ocean liner, and Claw (1968), about the rise of glass and steel skyscrapers and the destruction of older buildings in their wake. These films are largely wordless and possess a timeless quality that feels fresh today, owing to his expressive visual style and use of classical and jazz music. Somehow, it was not a surprise when Kirchheimer revealed that he regarded himself as a kind of cinematic time traveler, consciously working to produce images likely be more resonant in the future than at the time of their creation.
VICE: When did you first encounter the painted trains in Stations of the Elevated? I have this vision of you seeing them on an elevated platform on your way to work.
Manny Kirchheimer: No, it’s not like that. Because when they roll in on the way to work, they’re in your face. They’re as close as you are to me, you know? So you see a little patch, you don’t really pay attention. And I think most of the people just felt it was an assault on them. It’s bad enough having to go to work in the morning, but they have to go in these smutty, smudgy, abusive cars. I didn’t think about it one way or the other, it didn’t bother me big time, but I was hearing what people were saying. My father-in-law said that the kids who were doing it ought to be strung from lampposts. That was a fairly common attitude.
I was part of a food co-op at the time and I would go to Hunt’s Point in the Bronx—where the wholesale markets were—via the Cross Bronx Expressway. The Cross Bronx Expressway has three or four elevated lines crossing it, and by 5:30 PM in the summer, the sun is out brilliantly, and it would illuminate these screens of color. It was very pretty, and that’s when I became interested and thought to myself, this could be a film. So I applied for a grant and gave myself two hours to write the proposal. I used big words like “quintessential,” and at the time we were using tokens to get on the subway, so I talked about the trains coming from “the token ends of the Earth.” It was all bullshit. I didn’t really have respect for the process of applying for a grant, because I had unsuccessfully applied to the American Film Institute for a grant 21 times before this. And of course, this was the one that was accepted, after spending so much time being a goody-goody.
I didn’t do much research. The things that I found out, which are in the film now, are things that happened mostly while I was shooting. The fact that there was a gun, that there were eyes looking at you, that there was fire, that there were whores, that there were angry faces and clenched fists. And messages like “HATE” and “SLAVE” and “SHADOW." There was so much fire on these trains. I was finding a lot of fire, and “The Bronx is burning!” you know?
What was your sense of the inspiration behind these paintings?
I figured this is a scream from the ghetto and these kids are bursting out and expressing themselves out of the experience of their lives. Years later, when I was making Spraymasters (2008), I told that to Zephyr—Andy Witten, wonderful guy, a graffiti guy from the old day, he was the white kid and he was sort of the archivist. When I interviewed him, he did not agree with what I had concluded as an outsider who knew nothing and was trying to make a sociological thing out of it. He felt that you’d have to ask each individual writer why he was doing what he was doing. That some people were just influenced by comic books or by things they saw on television or by each other, and not necessarily by the signifiers I was finding. I was finding a lot of low-class kind of imagery and a lot of anger, which I connected to their surroundings. Why else would somebody want to call himself HATE? But Zephyr discounted that, he thought it was simplistic. I made Stations of the Elevated long before I knew him based on ideas like that. I think that’s what a lot of philosophy is about anyhow. I think that a lot of philosophy may not be true, but the process produces great work. I’m not saying mine is great work, but it’s the process that counts, not necessarily the premise.
Something I admire about Stations of the Elevated is the way people and images in the city are constantly regarding and judging each other. Somehow, every person and object feels engaged and opinionated. In particular, you feature a group of kids hanging out at an elevated train station and commenting on the art that goes by.
And the billboard faces—who are of course, contemptuous of what’s happening. They’re intimidating. They’re looking. Well, that’s what I thought. And then, sometimes they’re meretricious, like the woman who seems to be making eye contact with another billboard, who is hardly clothed.
Right. You’ve said elsewhere that you had this idea that there was legal vandalism as well as illegal vandalism, the advertisements versus the graffiti. You’re posing a question about who has the authority to vandalize our cities.
Right. Billboards and all that stuff is legal vandalism. So the question of property being abused, property being destroyed, if you put it in a different context, it’s “Who owns the streets?” In that sense, these people have a perfect right to express themselves. The billboards are expressing on behalf of some mogul in Texas or wherever, who is selling you cancer. But I don’t think these kids understood any of that. I think that they were compelled, obviously, by competition and peer pressure, but also the idea that they were seeing everything promoted instead of themselves. They were such small fry, and they put themselves up, as they say. I didn’t know any of the graffiti writers when I made this film. Before I knew anything, I called these images on the trains live souls, after Gogol’s Dead Souls. Because that’s how it seemed to me—very lively stuff, traveling on the trains and making these circuits, saying, “Look at me! Look at me!”
Why do you think there’s a renewed interest in Stations of the Elevated today, over 30 years after it first appeared?
Everybody now knows that that graffiti happened 30 years ago. But it doesn’t seem old fashioned, you know what I mean? It seems current. I tried to exclude current things so that the film would seem modern many years later. I saw myself as a visitor from the future, trying to understand what was there. Like a time capsule. I thought: Here are clues, which are bound together by these trains, but they’re all over the place, like the shadows I captured on the walls. They were being made unconsciously and without notice every day of the week by the sun on the walls of those stations. Which made me think about Hiroshima. You know about Hiroshima, where the shadows stayed on the wall after the blast? And what’s interesting is that in a sense, it’s coming true. It’s 33 years later and suddenly there’s a revival and people are seeing this world of 1977.
Like I say, the film was not successful in 1981, but now the Times calls it “achingly gorgeous.” Now they’re talking about there being beauty in this film, but in those days, those nostalgic days, everybody wanted to clean up the subways! And they’ve succeeded—tthey cleaned up the subways—but it’s also more bland. That’s always the trade-off.
Stations of the Elevated plays October 17 through the 23rd at BAM Rose Cinemas. Get more info here
Follow Matthew Caron on Twitter
]]> Matthew Caron film, stations of the elevated, Matthew Caron, bam cinematik, movies, graffiti, School of Visual Arts, manfred Kirchheimer, film, New York, New York City
Britain's Former Miners Are 'Still the Enemy Within' Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:00:00 +0100
A picket at Cortonwood Colliery. Photo by John Sturrock/
This year is the 30th anniversary of the miners’ strike—the longest strike in UK history. The strike saw the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) pitted against Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government, which wanted to close pits, destroying thousands of jobs. Over the course of a year, miners picketed their work places, held rallies, and fought against cops—many of them going without wages. Eventually they conceded defeat, returning to work, marching behind brass bands playing mournful songs.
Supporters of the government saw the miners as the most militant part of a union movement that was holding the country ransom, striking whenever they felt like it and refusing to let the elected government make decisions. To others, the miners were simply ordinary people refusing to get pushed around by an ideological government bent on destroying the power of the working class. In the end, the miners were left reeling from the backlash of their defeat, which ensured the destruction of their communities as they knew them.
It is easy to look back and see history as something inevitable, and to forget the real people who lived the experiences behind the hard facts. It’s for precisely that reason that Owen Gower has directed a new documentary, Still the Enemy Within. His film gives a voice to the people who fought on the front lines and has been showered with praise. I spoke to him about the strikers’ first hand experiences, the legacy of the strike, and how history is made.
Still the Enemy Within trailer
VICE: You would have been only one when the 1984 miners strike was going on. What does it mean to you?
Owen Gower:
I was born the year of the miners strike and I actually was on the picket lines, but as a baby. My parents were both teachers but they were huge supporters of the strike; they knew it was a struggle that was going to define society. I grew up in the post strike years and witnessed the after effects—the decimation of industry. I was always aware of it but I came to the idea of the film much later.
The documentary is narrated entirely by the miners. Why did you choose not to bring in an outside voice?
The story has always been painted as Margaret Thatcher versus Arthur Scargill [the leader of the NUM]. The people who were actually involved—the miners and the supporters—were almost airbrushed out of history. Thatcher, the government, and the police have had their side of the story told for 30 years and I didn’t feel the need to give them another platform. We didn’t want to make a polemic or a multifaceted argument. What we wanted was to tell the human story of the people who were on the front line.
I recently read an article by Lisa Jardine where she talks about how historical facts never really give us a real sense of the past because they omit every story’s key component—human emotion. Your documentary breathes life into cold historical fact. Is it always necessary to have a combination of fact and feeling to create an accurate account?
First of all I don’t believe that a documentary is ever really objective, and actually history is always from different points of view. One miner, Steve, said that the reason he wanted to tell the story is because history is a living thing. All these events are lived by people. They’re not just abstract politics. It can be easy to look back and see historical events as things that are inevitable. We wanted to get across that sense of the events as they unfolded; to put the audience in the center of it all instead of being given a dry historical lesson.
Miners flee from charging police. Photo by John Sturrock/
What were some of those lived experiences that you encountered?
It was a roller coaster for everyone involved. On the one hand there was this huge sense of euphoria from the empowering feeling of uniting to fight for a common cause, from the support they received and from the freedom it gave people. Gender roles were completely restructured, as women were out on the picket lines amongst the men, and found themselves being treated as equals.
Yet at the same time they were constantly facing a huge onslaught from everything that was being thrown at them—the media, the police, the increasingly apparent divisions within the unions, and eventually from pure hardship and poverty. It was very paradoxical—for many of them it was the best year of their life, but at the same time there were huge blows to bear.
Many weren’t even receiving benefits, and struggling to survive meant there were massive strains on relationships, marriages broke down, and families were torn apart. In the documentary you can see the discrepancy in the archive footage between the same miners at the beginning of the strike, fresh faced and full of energy, and then their gaunt and drawn appearances by the end.
Can you tell us about the title, Still the Enemy Within?
Margaret Thatcher herself called the miners “the enemy within,” and 30 years later they still have that label. The argument that they were not crazy militants waging war on the government has still not been won—it's still the dominant narrative of the strike. The other side of it is that they are still proud to wear that label, and they still believe in fighting for a better world today. It’s about saying that the miners strike is not just a piece of history, it’s still ongoing.
Miners clash with police at Bliston Glen. Photo by John Sturrock/
Some people would say that in the 1980s we were digging more coal then we were burning.
Funnily enough, part of the government strategy to break the strike was to build up huge coal stocks in advance. One of the miners in the film talks about how "they were digging their own graves" because they knew it was happening.
But ultimately, what the miners wanted was a long term energy strategy, planning over decades. It was also about defending an industry, jobs, and communities rather than buying in cheap imports from places like Apartheid South Africa or Poland where people were paid very low wages and worked in poor conditions.
Looking at the energy market today I think it’s clear that it doesn’t make sense. The government was willing to pay whatever price in order to defeat the strongest trade union in the country, and as a result the rest of the unions with them. The fact that 40 percent of UK energy is still generated by coal tells us the battle was never really about coal.
But didn’t the government have an obligation to the taxpayer not to pay to keep people in jobs in an industry that was making a loss?
There’s a very simple answer to that. What happened is that it cost more to lay off every coal miner than it did to keep the industry going. Firstly in unemployment benefits, and then if people aren’t earning wages, people aren’t paying taxes. It massively weakened the manufacturing base of the country that then has a huge impact on taxpayers themselves. And what we saw as an eventual result was a complete deregulation in finance. It’s not a coincidence that the big bang, when they deregulated all the banks—which then sowed the seeds for what became the 2008 crash—happened in 1986. What they saw as replacing industry was banking and finance. That is not good for any taxpayer.
How, in your opinion, are the struggles in the 1980s being echoed in the current political situation today?
Thatcher’s project was to roll back everything that came out of the 1945 consensus—public services, nationalized industries, and so on. The miners knew that if they lost, it would be more than their communities that would be destroyed. There would be a weakening of unions as well as privatizations across the board, and that is what we’re seeing today. They’ve just sold off Royal Mail, they sold the shares in EuroStar just this week. Wages and pensions are being cut, and the gap between the rich and poor is deepening.
Follow Georgia on Twitter
]]> Georgia Rose film, politics, UK, culture, UK Miners' Strike, The Enemy Within, Still The Enemy Within
Is It a Big Deal That the Actor Playing the Flash Isn't Straight? Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:00:00 +0100
Photo by David Shankbone via Wikimedia Commons
Actor Ezra Miller has been cast as the Flash in Warner Brothers’ eponymous movie, which is slated to premiere in 2018. That's big news even for those who aren't diehard DC Comics fans, because Ezra Miller is also openly queer, making it the first time a non-heterosexual has played the lead in a superhero movie.
Let's get one distinction out of the way: The 22-year-old Miller identifies as queer, not gay. Though the word can mean different things to different people, it’s often used as an umbrella term to mean “somewhere on the spectrum of sexuality that's not 100 percent straight.” In a 2012 interview, Miller told The Advocate “I’m queer... I have a lot of really wonderful friends who are of very different sexes and genders. I am very much in love with no one in particular."
It may seem ridiculous that we’re talking about this in 2014, when it feels like there is no shortage of openly non-heterosexual actors in Hollywood. But the casting choice of a queer man as the lead in a big-budget superhero, the embodiment of traditional American masculinity, is inarguably a huge deal. Queer actors are still up against the surprisingly pervasive idea that a non-straight actor can’t play a straight character. This has historically been true not just of superhero roles, but of all types of straight roles in mainstream American films.
That’s probably because acceptance of open queerness in Hollywood is still a relatively recent development. In the early days of the film industry, people who would today be considered queer actors simply remained in the closet for the most part. A notable exception was William Haines, who is often cited as Hollywood’s first openly gay actor. Haines rose to fame in the 1926 silent film Tell It to the Marines, in which he played a Marine nicknamed “Skeet.” (Despite—or maybe because of—its modern association with semen, Skeet is the manliest old-timey nickname other than Butch.) So the character of Skeet was smitten with a beautiful Navy nurse, while off-screen, Haines was living with his longtime partner Jimmie Shields. Haines was not in the habit of denying his orientation, which rubbed his bosses at MGM the wrong way, and eventually, faced with the decision to enter into a sham marriage or quit acting, Haines chose to quit.
Over the next few decades, gay actors remained largely closeted—though under increasing scrutiny from the press and the public—and continued to play the manly men of the silver screen. You’re probably familiar with the cartoonishly macho Rock Hudson, whose square-jawed masculinity won the heart of every woman alive. Hudson was out to some of his close friends, but publicly maintained a carefully curated image of heterosexuality, even entering into a “lavender marriage” with Phyllis Gates, who was also secretly gay.
Today being an openly gay (or queer) actor is no longer the incomprehensible scandal it once was. It won’t ruin your reputation. However, there’s still a chance it could ruin your acting career, due to the ever-persistent perception that gay men can’t play straight characters.
You may remember when Bret Easton Ellis tweeted that openly gay actor Matt Bomer wasn’t fit for the role of Christian Grey in the movie version of Fifty Shades of Grey. Ellis opined that “Fifty Shades of Grey demands an actor that is genuinely into women." That's a stubbornly persistent attitude: We love and applaud straight male actors for portraying gay characters, but we apparently don’t trust queer actors to be able to do the reverse.
“In these days of Neil Patrick Harris and Matt Bomer, among others, we are seeing that the fallacy of ‘audiences won’t believe an out actor playing straight’ is just that—a fallacy,” said Marc Andreyko, an openly gay comic writer and screenwriter who told me that geek culture—the milieu out of which superheroes come—has been accepting of queerness for a long time.
“Geek culture has always been way ahead of the curve on acceptance,” Andreyko said. “The fans and my publishers have been actively supportive of gay themes and characters for as long as I can remember.
“So much of nerd-ism (for lack of a better term) has been about finding a safe place to be yourself and celebrate the things you love,” Andreyko added. “And the rest of the world is gradually catching up.”
Follow Allegra Ringo on Twitter.
]]> Allegra Ringo film, Ezra Miller, The Flash, queer, queerness, the first time an openly queer man has played a lead in a superhero movie, umbrella terms, non-heterosexual actors, Hollywood, a queer man as the lead in a big-budget superhero movie, American masculinity, Queer actors, straight roles, open queerness, William Haines, Rock Hudson, fifty shades of grey, comic book culture, Geek culture, nerd-ism, Marc Andreyko
Northern Soul Is Responsible for English Club Culture Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:35:00 +0100
A still from 'Northern Soul,' a new film from director Elaine Constantine
Northern Soul changed English club culture forever. Instead of venue owners recruiting cover bands to slog through a set of Perry Como covers, young Britons began to take control of their nightlife, hiring out clubs, booking the DJs, and recruiting guys in brogue shoes and bowling shirts to master the speed that kept everyone dancing all night.
Elaine Constantine is a photographer and filmmaker who grew up in the Northern Soul scene. Tomorrow marks the UK release of her film, Northern Soul—which tells the story of two working-class boys and their experience of soul music, love, drugs, and death—so I thought I’d call her up for a chat.
VICE: A lot of the film is based on your experiences, right? Do you remember the first time you heard a Northern Soul record?
Elaine Constantine: I grew up in a large industrial town called Bury, on the outskirts of Manchester. I went to this massive youth club, which was in the town hall, and I remember hearing this weird record come on. It was quite strange sounding—a bit old fashioned, with lots of reverb, and just really heartfelt.
Suddenly these guys came out on to the floor and cleared it.They were doing fast spins and high kicks and drops and this amazing footwork, but they were each dancing on their own and they were locked into the track. Normally when you’d see boys dancing it would be to Status Quo, with a denim waistcoat on, and doing the air guitar. These guys were so amazing; it was such a spectacle. I just thought, Oh my God, what is this? And then my older cousin said to me, "This is Northern Soul."
Elaine, left, with her then boyfriend Rob in the early 80s
British singer Tracey Thorn has argued that Northern Soul was primarily a masculine movement. How does that relate to your experience?
A lot of people have asked me why I haven’t done a women’s story of Northern Soul, but I wanted it to be very real—a truthful representation. Men collected records. Men wanted to be DJs. The people who took the roles in driving the music forward—the DJs, the promoters, the collectors, and the drug dealers—were all mostly men. But then that doesn’t mean there weren’t a lot of women following it, and collecting, and driving that dance floor passion. So I’d say it was kind of 50/50, but that the main movers and shakers were men.
You’ve said that you wrote the script about observations of young men you knew "collecting vinyl, dancing, DJing, taking drugs, and generally being degenerates." Can you tell me a little bit about the real people behind your characters?
The two main leads are based on my experience of being married to a DJ, my husband—who I met when I was 30—and my first boyfriend, who I was engaged to and was with for years, but who is unfortunately dead now. I was absolutely in love with him. He was the whole package. He was the most amazing dancer you could ever see: he had the rhythm, he could do the acrobatics, he looked amazing, he dressed amazing... you know, he was the coolest guy I had ever met in my life.
I kind of based the character Sean on him. I remembered watching him floor three big guys right in front of me without warning: Bam, bam, bam! That fight scene in the film is from my own real experience, and when the lead, John, goes, "Oh, I didn’t have time to react," that was me, because I felt bad that I hadn’t helped him.
A still from 'Northern Soul'
How did soul music first infiltrate British culture? And why do you think black American music took off up north ahead of down south?
Well, I think a lot of white musicians from the 1960s, like the Stones, got into blues mainly because they wanted to listen to more authentic music than what was in the pop charts, and the BBC wouldn’t play American music. So they had this tradition of finding black music that was real and earthy, and that became a staple throughout the 50s and 60s. That’s how the mods evolved; they were into the blues, R&B, reggae, and stuff like that. And then the younger siblings became the suedeheads and the skinheads. Northern Soul was just an offshoot from that.
I think it developed specifically outside of London because, by the late 60s, psychedelia had caught on big with people down south and the middle classes. But hippie culture totally didn’t appeal to the working classes. They wanted to look smart when they went out on weekends, because they’d looked like shit all week, in the factories or the mines or whatever. They were hitting on soul music because it felt more real.
There was also the fact that the media—like NME, for example—was driving the music output in London, and all the music magazines were pushing popular acts. So London was caught up in the modern-day music of the time, and soul was being embraced by the suedeheads, the skinheads, and the post-mod communities.
Yeah, you get the sense in the film that there was a lot of giving the finger to the status quo.
Yeah, there was definitely a real sense of snobbery about the charts. The ethos was, "I’m not swallowing that. I’m doing my thing." That might have been a sort of trade union spin off or something, but it bled into the subculture in a big way.
Elaine with friends in the early 80s
How do you think Northern Soul played into modern club nights as we know them?
In the 50s and 60s, prior to the Northern Soul scene, a lot of the big events that people were going to on Saturday nights would be either a band covering popular chart music, a DJ that the brewery or license company had hired to come in and play popular music, or stuff like waltzes. When Northern Soul happened it was the first big club culture where the actual punters took control of the night, so they hired the venue and they put on the DJs. So it was the first example of how we understand club culture today, where these promotions are put on by the people who are directly involved in the scene rather than official organizations.
In the film, the main excitement stems from discovering new songs that haven’t been heard before, which were sometimes called "cover ups." Can you tell me a bit about that?
Back then you'd have a DJ or record collector, and they'd go to America and find a track that they knew wasn't in the scene yet. Let’s say the guy selling them says, "OK, there’s only five of these records. I have three and there’s another two floating around somewhere." The collector will buy all three, cover up the title on each record with a white label and call it something else. So no one knows the real name of the record; he's the only person who has possession of that song.
If that song’s good—if it fills the floor—then it becomes that DJ’s song: it’s his cover up. And everyone knows it’s a cover up because they can’t see the label, and everyone’s looking at the decks the whole time. And then if someone finds one of those other two records, then the DJ is exposed, and the song is known by it’s original title from then on.
An exclusive trailer for 'Northern Soul'
Are you hoping the film will revive an interest in Northern Soul? This sense of what’s important about music: the lyrics and the passion behind it.
I don’t want to get all moral on it because people just do what they do and like what they like. It’s not up to me to dictate. But if you think about it, what’s not to like about Northern Soul? I was listening to the radio the other day and there’s this guy singing, "I think I want to marry you." And I just thought, Why the fucking hell do you think that? Why even write about it if you only think that?
Then you put a record on by someone like Johnny McCaul, from the Northern Soul vault, and it says stuff like, "I'd like to hold you tight / baby you're my guiding light / like holding on to my last thread of life / scald my hand to make me understand I need you." I mean, there are fucking lyrics like this out there and people want to listen to that Bruno Mars shit. I mean, "I think I want to marry you"? How long did it take the guy to come up with that line? If you only think it, then why mention it? Why even write it in a record?
Northern Soul is out tomorrow, Friday October 17
Follow Georgia Rose on Twitter.
]]> Georgia Rose film, NME, Northern Soul, film, Manchester, dancing, dance, music, subcultures, England, Northern England, mods, UK, britain, Elaine Constantine, music history, soul
We Interviewed the Filmmaker Behind 'The Whiteness Project' Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:30:00 +0100
Last Friday, a link began rapidly circulating on Twitter to an interactive multimedia documentary called the Whiteness Project, which was apparently an “investigation into how Americans who identify as ‘white’ experience their ethnicity.” The documentary featured intimate interviews with 21 people from Buffalo, New York, discussing race in a frank and often cringeworthy fashion. “For some reason, some black people hold on to the back-in-the-day slave thing,” a man identitifed as “Jason” says. “Should slavery be something that because it happened we owe black people more? Absolutely not.” Another woman expresses her fear at how “black men in general” take a smile as an “invitation to approach.” A third white whines, “I mean, come on, you can’t even talk about fried chicken or Kool-Aid without wondering if someone’s going to get offended.” Each interview is bookended with a relevant statistic that examines how white Americans view race in North America. The online reaction was swift, incredulous, and unforgiving.
But upon closer inspection, the project is more complex and original than it first appears, and the man behind it has a legitimate track record documenting sensitive racial issues. Along with his African-American producing partner Marco Williams, Whitney Dow has spent the last 16 years specializing in films that attempt to unearth and illuminate uncomfortable racial truths and gray areas, beginning in 1998 with Two Towns of Jasper, a film analyzing the lead-up to and aftermath of the brutal, racially-motivated dragging death of James Byrd, Junior at the hands of two Texas white supremacists.
The Whiteness Project is funded through PBS’s POV Interactive Shorts program, and Buffalo’s 21 interviews are just the first piece of a project that plans to interview over 1,000 white Americans about their views on race.
With controversy swirling and the project garnering several hundred thousand views since Friday, we decided to chat with Dow over Skype to discuss the process of casting the project, how Barack Obama’s presidency has or hasn’t changed the way we talk about race, and what he thinks about the fact that white liberals are probably the biggest critics he’s faced.
VICE: First of all, what prompted this idea?
Whitney Dow: I did a film in 2003 called Two Towns of Jasper. Along with my producing partner Marco, I did a lot of talks around the country, and we were asked to give a speech for this organization called Facing History in Ourselves. They structured it by having all these seventh graders interview us. At that point, I’d been working on the film for five years, I’d done tons of talking about it, writing about it, thinking about it, and I really thought I knew a lot about myself and race because making the film with Marco was one of the most difficult, interesting, and just self-revealing processes you could possibly imagine.
This little girl got up and said, “Whitney, what did you learn about your own racial identity working with Marco?”
I had this epiphany where I suddenly realized, I don’t have a racial identity… But oh my God, of course I have a racial identity. I have the most powerful racial identity on the motherfucking planet. And despite all the work I had done, all my talk about it, all my bullshit, until that moment, I hadn’t really processed it in a real way where I recognized it. It sounds really fucking corny, but it was like having some sort of conversion experience. With that knowledge, all of a sudden, I started to see the world in such a different way. It was kind of like getting X-ray glasses. Once I became conscious that my race was an active component of my everyday experience, that it was an active dynamic thing that I controlled that impacted me, it fundamentally changed the way I saw the world and interacted with people.
And at that point I said to myself, If I can figure out a way to make a film or do a project that can give other white people this same experience, I will be doing something of value.
All screencaps via the Whiteness Project
How did you find the people you interviewed?
[Buffalo] is actually the third city I shot in. The process for getting how to find the participants has been really difficult.
I shot in New York and I shot in Milwaukee using my sort of standard production techniques of getting a producer and doing a casting call, bringing in real people, and I realized—as I was watching the footage—that I was getting all these middle-class people. And they’re liberal, middle-class people because those are the people that the people in the production have relationships to.
So, when we went to Buffalo, I hired a producer there and I said, “Look, here’s the thing: I need everybody from the auto mechanic to the banker. I really need a broad range of people.”
We both did some personal casting. I just sent guys to walk around the streets and sort of gave them archetypes of people that I was looking for: I wanted blue-collar people, I wanted white-collar people. I wanted old, young, gay, straight, and a mixture of women and men. They also put it on Craigslist.
We actually interviewed 24 people. [There were] three who I didn’t put [in the documentary because] I didn’t feel they were either that representational, or that strong, or added something. I was very afraid that people would come and they’d see something that was weak and just move on.
I would tell people when they’d come in, “I’m doing a project about race for PBS. You can come in and sit down and talk about it. You don’t have to sign the release ‘till after you talk to me. I’m not trying to play ‘gotcha’ with anybody. Don’t say anything to me that you don’t want me to use. And if you don’t like how the conversation went, don’t sign the release, because I can use anything. I’m really not out to screw people here. The goal, as I said at the top of the interview, is to get white people to understand that their race is a dynamic component in their life, and also understand that how they experience their race as an individual is probably very different from the reality of what it means to be living in America.
Forty percent of white Americans think that "many" or "almost all" black men are inherently violent. That’s a fucking fact. It’s not pejorative. I’m not trying to say these people are inherently evil; this is the reality. I’d be lying to say that some of the most discomforting feelings in those interviews, like what that woman said [about being afraid of some black men], I got that in me too. I’m not any better. I’m not someone who is standing and saying, “I’m outside of this thing.” If whites are going to participate in changing the racial dynamic, they have to deal with their own shit first. And they also have to be allowed to be fully vested participants in the conversation. If every time a white person opens their mouth about race someone yells, “You’re being a fucking racist!” at us, we can’t do it. White people don’t have a lot of experience talking about their race, so they’re going to say a lot of dumb shit.
You and Marco started making films about race in 1998 with Jasper. Has the way we talk about race changed since then?
That’s a really good question. I think people are more honest and open in some ways. I think there’s some assumptions now that things have changed far more than they actually have. And one of the things that I struggle with... is the relationship between the public and private. The public conversation has really changed—in terms of what you’re allowed to say, how you’re allowed to say it, the assumptions of how you view people, and how you talk about race—but I feel like the private conversations haven’t changed. People talk very, very differently in private. And you see in that guy, Jason, in this particular Buffalo segment, who says, “If there were black people in the room, I’m going to talk very, very differently.”
And perhaps the dialogue of you and me trying to teach each other about race isn’t working; perhaps a more constructive dialogue is you listening in on what I really think and me listening in. You don’t have to have to interpret anything for me. The other thing I want to say, just to counter some of the haters, is that from all of the people of color who I know, the refrain I hear is, “We as black Americans are so tired of explaining race to white people.” So, I’m like, OK, I’ll take that on! And then I get a lot of hate from people saying, “Well, who the fuck are you? Why are you giving white people a platform to talk about this shit?”
Whitney Dow via PBS POV Docs
How do you think that Barack Obama’s presidency has affected the way we discuss race?
I think it’s polarized people. I’m one of those people who does believe that there’s a big portion of the country that—whether they’re aware of it or not—are really caught up in the fact that we have a black president. And I can tell you for myself, still, with all of the work that I’ve done, I see Barack Obama—I kinda don’t process him as black or white at this point—but when I see a picture of Barack and Michelle and their family in the White House, I go Holy shit, we have a black family in the fucking White House! It’s still astounding to me that it is happening right now. And I think it also has given people who aren’t interested necessarily in examining how race affects their own lives, this get-out-of-jail-free card where they’re like, “Well, we have a black president, so… [racism is over].”
The other thing I’ll say about Barack Obama is I’m always interested in about power and race. Black people who get power from the white power structure are very different from black people who get power from their own power base. I feel like some people are upset about Barack Obama not being more radical—I know I am. But you don’t get to be the first black president of the United States by rocking the boat and being a firebrand. You can’t have both things.
One of the things you see in the videos is that there’s a lot of blue-collar white people—and I experienced this when I did this film in 2005 about self-segregation in Buffalo high schools called I Sit Where I Want—is that both the white kids and black kids in school were really cognizant of the idea that if you’re a really smart minority kid or person of color you have a leg up once you get into the college system. The black kids would say it and the white kids would say it. And the white kids would say, "We’re not advantaged whites, and we’re not people of color, so we’re kind of totally disenfranchised.” You see that in some of the interviews with people who are working-class whites who feel disenfranchised. But it’s like anything—they’re looking at only one thing that’s on the scale. They’re not looking at everything that’s on the scale. There’s a lot of shit on the scale. And you can’t pick and choose.
Look at the fucking numbers. Your individual experience does not define the group.
What have you learned in the course of conducting all of these interviews that has surprised you?
This woman wrote me this really nice note and she said, she always was caught up in her sense of her own blackness and how it related to whiteness and that she felt her blackness was always being defined by whiteness. And that she didn’t realize how much whiteness was caught up in the same thing: that we define our whiteness by our relationship to blackness. And it’s always funny to me that whenever I ask white people to talk about being white, they immediately start talking about black people. Over and over again, I’d say, “I want to talk to you about race,” and they’d be like, “I want to tell you about black people.” It’s like clockwork.
And what I think people of color don’t necessarily understand is that whites are deeply conflicted and confused and don’t really know how to grapple with these things. They have never known how to talk about it, they don’t know how to process it, they feel like they’re not really part of this thing, and so it’s a really, really complicated situation. And the other thing that I’ve learned a lot is that white liberals have been some of the most vicious critics of this project. I mean, I’ve gotten a lot of hate from people of color who are like, “A white guy talking about white people, what the fuck?” and I’ve gotten people on the left saying, “Oh, yeah, we need another white guy giving white people a platform to talk about whiteness. That’s basically the world.”
Why do you think you’re getting that heat from the white left?
Because I think that the white left sees themselves outside of the racial paradigm. And I agree with Ta-Nehisi Coates. I opened my funding proposal with a quote from him that I can paraphrase from an Atlantic piece he wrote a few months ago: He says basically Obama-era progressives view racism as a problem within the system that needs prescriptions that either address inequality to help black people or change the system to make it more fair, whereas he sees white supremacy as the organizing principle of the United States of America. It always has been, it is today, and it always will be.
And I agree with that. And again, I don’t think that’s pejorative; I think that’s reality. Look at the fucking founding documents. White supremacy was the organizing principle. I think if you look at the world as it is, that’s a lot more interesting than looking at in some sort of fantasy.
Follow Jordan Sowunmi on Twitter.
]]> Jordan Sowunmi film, jordan sowunmi, jordan sowunmi vice, Whitney B. Dow, Whitney Dow, The Whiteness Project, ethnicity, race, racial problems, buffalo, Milwaukee, white people, Two Towns of Jasper, Marco Williams, Two-Tone Productions, white supremacy, racism, affirmative action, slavery, the whole slave thing, white liberals, the white left, PBS, PBS POV Shorts, Digital Documentaries, culture
Dan Harmon Discusses His New Documentary, Addiction, and Going to Therapy Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:25:00 +0100
Photos by Ryan Carmody
Dan Harmon is the creator of Channel 101, the cult legend Heat Vision and Jack, and the TV show Community. After being fired as the latter’s showrunner, he started a weekly live show/podcast/town hall called Harmontown. He and his co-host Jeff Davis have alternatively stated that the goal of the show is to “improve humanity,” “to turn a passive community into an active one,” and showcase “a fat guy drinking vodka until he blacks out.”
The show quickly garnered a cult following. After roughly a year, Harmon felt they’d reached what Joseph Campbell would call “Meeting with the Goddess”: They had overcome the threshold guardians and gotten what they wanted. But what were they to do with it?
Harmon and Davis chose to embark on a 23-day, 20-city tour, bringing with them Harmon’s girlfriend, Erin McGathy; their fan-turned-onstage-dungeon-master, Spencer Crittendon; and documentary filmmaker Neil Berkeley. The resulting documentary is also called Harmontown.
VICE: When there’s no one around, do you talk to yourself?
Dan Harmon: I don’t. I wish I could because I think I would get more done, because I think with my mouth. I’m a very verbal thinker, but I can’t bring myself to talk to myself when I’m alone.
I wonder if that has an effect on the way you structure your show.
Yeah, the way I structure it is, I come out and I start talking. That’s why I think the show is so comfortable for me. And I think it’s why the people who like it like it: If there’s a wreck… you’re gonna be there for it. It’s not gonna get edited out.
It occurs to me when you ask that that I should actually try to start talking to myself. The funny thing about the idea of talking to myself is that the thing that scares you is that someone would overhear it, but then you wouldn’t be talking to yourself.
Do you get high every day?
Every day? No. I should, because I drink too much. If got high…
You want to offset it.
Getting high’s better for you, isn’t it? It’s not gonna kill your liver. I suppose if you get high every day, it might have an effect on your edge. I know different people who handle it differently.
Do you think of yourself as an addict?
An addict?
Yeah. You joke a lot about alcoholism.
What I know about conversations about addiction is that if you deny it, then that’s when the real high-maintenance conversations start. Because people who bring it up to you, they’re not really trying to help you most of the time. So if you just say, “Yes, I’m an alcoholic,” it makes the conversation as short as it should be. Because nobody should be talking to you about what you do for longer than, like, five seconds before tending their own garden.
So if someone says, “Are you an alcoholic?” I go “yes.” If someone says, “Are you racist?” I usually go “yes." If someone says “Are you sexist“...?
They don’t usually ask those questions as yes or no questions [laughs] but when the topic comes up, I find it’s a shorter path to people tending their own garden to go “yep!” Because then they either have to help you or move on.
Whatever the ultimate goal of Harmontown is, you seem to strive to accomplish it through the tool of direct honesty, of the show’s confessional nature. What hinders that?
Having too much to say about other people. Because I don’t think that there’s very much that I could say about myself that I would hesitate to say. But I’ve learned through a couple of mishaps that, if I’m talking about other people, my right to swing my fist ends at the end of their nose. I should let them have their privacy and publicity protocols on their own, whether it’s my lover or Chevy Chase or a company that I work for.
I’m like, “Oh crap, now I’m talking about a company I work for. I gotta steer this back out into safer waters because I don’t have a right to talk about them.” That gets in the way of free flow.
There is that part of the movie where, onstage, you picked apart a fight that you and your girlfriend had gotten into. What made you decide that that was worth rehashing?
The director backstage asked the question, “Do you think there’s anything you could tell the audience that would make them stop liking you?” So I went out that night and I tried everything I could think of. [laughs] As an experiment!
[The night of the fight] was also a night when there was a very confessional tone to the show. There was just a lot of crazy stuff happening, and Erin was offended by some of it. So then I just kept moving in that direction.
Erin came out and wanted to talk about it, so we kept talking about it. I brought Erin out for a show (she was brought out for all of the shows) and she came out and said, “Is it wrong of me to feel bad about that thing you said earlier?” So we talked about it. I guess the short answer is that it was her idea.
Have you always been such an open book?
Probably more so than other people, but I definitely brought it up a notch in my 20s. When the blogging culture started to happen, I noticed when I typed things that made me feel bad about myself, and hit submit, and put them out on the public record—whether or not I had five readers on my MySpace blog didn’t really matter—what mattered was that I had divested myself of these cathexes.
I remember, one morning, opening my refrigerator and seeing a mustard bottle. I have no idea why I made the association, but the mustard bottle reminded me of the time I tried to be funny on Ben Stiller’s answering machine and made a complete ass of myself and probably made him hate me forever. I noticed that this was happening all the time. I’m by myself. I’m trying to function as a human being. I’m making a sandwich and I’m thinking about this thing that makes me a bad person. Why am I thinking about it? Why am I feeling bad about it? It already happened.
So I experimented with just going over to my computer and typing, “This is something that makes me ashamed of myself. I once tried to be funny on Ben Stiller’s answering machine. This is the context, this is the story, this is exactly what I did.” And then I just hit enter and it was like I entered a world where I could now look at that mustard bottle. The power of it was so un-ignorable that I kept moving in that direction for the rest of my life.
Do you feel like you are, block-by-block, removing the power these regrets have over you?
Yeah. I made quick work of all the backlog. And then I just adopted a policy of “If something comes into my life that’s making me feel like I have to think one thing and say another, I’m getting rid of it, I’m walking away from it, or I’m talking about it."
Do you think that that has made you a more actualized person or do you think it has only given you a way to deal with the same problems as they happen?
Definitely probably the latter. I know it doesn’t make me an actualized person, so whatever the latter is, it’s that. I’m finding out in couples therapy—Erin and I just started going to a couples therapist to prepare for marriage—I’m finding out that I’ve had an irrational phobia of therapists for a while. And that you need to actually learn tools from people who study this stuff to actually change your behavior, and it’ll actually change the way you think.
Had you not been in therapy before this?
I’d been to so many therapists; that’s why I lost faith in them. I’d been to like eight in my lifetime, and none of them were getting under the hood and helping me.
I think that the device of looking at things through the eyes of your relationship with another human being, I think that was the big missing component. I want to stay with this woman forever. That’s something I can understand. It’s harder to go into an office and say “Make me sane. Make me a better person.” How do you know how to start? How do you know when you’re finished? And how do you do that without telling someone to change?
It’s got to also be easier to put things in practical terms when you’re talking about your relationship to a different person rather than the way you treat yourself.
Yeah. I think the Midwestern kicks in and you go “I don’t deserve certain things” or “I have to go to a dark place when I write, so I’m not getting rid of this dumbass part of my personality.” But if your go “Oh, it hurts your girlfriend when you do this. It makes you feel better when you do that.” It’s like, “Oh, easy peasy.”
Do you think there is value to the idea that “I need to be depressed to be funny, to be creative”?
I think that’s a lie. I’ve met too many very happy, very ingenious people to believe in that. People have different personalities; they have different crutches; they have different processes. I think there are people that go to a dark place when they create. I don’t think that creation requires darkness.
In the movie, you say that Spencer is the actual hero of the film. I think you call him an “incorruptible spirit." You seem to be positing him against yourself. “I’m flawed and the only thing I can do is try to help and love as many other people to make up for that. Meanwhile, Spencer is this incorruptible spirit.” What is the thing in him that is different from you?
He’s younger. We look at children, we get really mad when one of them gets run over because they haven’t even had a chance to fail yet. When Spencer’s 40, he might have made all the same mistakes I have. First of all, he’s like half my age. That’s one thing right there.
I also think he is different from me. I think he’s got more integrity. He’s less defined by other people’s perceptions. And he’s come into the world and has acquired an actual, standalone, self-contained personality.
You talk a little in the movie about your mom being somewhat physically abusive.
Yeah. It was the 70s. I always cringe at that part of the movie because I feel like my parents have just about paid enough of a price for anything that they did to me. And they must be so sick of it by now [laughs] because as early as 17 years old I was exploiting their abuse of me onstage.
Do you think that that is a kernel, psychologically, of the thing of which you are attempting to divest yourself, with this ongoing process?
Of course! Yeah. I’m not a blame-your-parents kind of guy, I don’t want to be, but of course. You know, the first relationships that you have with the people that can either give you unconditional love or very conditional love, as most of us get…
Yeah, definitely. [laughs] That’s the first warpage of your personally, for sure.
I remember you saying on the podcast that you diagnosed yourself as autistic based on an online quiz.
While I was researching autism, I was taking these quizzes. And I was like “Oh, I have something in common with this character that I’m trying to get accurate.”
I definitely don’t think that an online quiz or someone’s gut feeling should be the tool used for diagnosis. [laughs]
You do have a fairly large number of fans with Asperger’s. But what attracts you to that kind of character?
I relate to them. Whether or not I actually have [Asperger’s], the shape of my personality, the condition that I’m in in my life, I relate to people who feel alienated. I relate to people who feel like they’re somehow fundamentally cut off from people on a level that “normal” people take for granted. When I found out that there was such a thing as that, I was like “I know how this feels, looking at the world through Plexiglas, hands up against it, not able to feel on a primal level what other people are feeling.”
Is it anything about the way they communicate? Is there an element of that as well?
I think they’re verbal thinkers. When I have conversations with my fans, we don’t mind staring at the corner of the table and just saying what we mean. It’s like communicating through one channel.
I like fans that are able to just be sincere and say what they’re feeling, because I don’t have that filter, so it’s nice to be able to just talk back and forth with people.
Harmontown, the documentary, is currently touring select cities, often followed by a Q and A. It is available via digital download on November 7. In the meantime, you can listen to the podcast.
Follow Nat Towsen on Twitter.
]]> Nat Towsen film, dan harmon, community, Harmontown, podcasts, comedy, Heat Vision and Jack, therapy, addiction, personal stories, Humor, sitcoms, Chevy Chase, depression, Channel 101, Neil Berkeley, Jeff Davis, myspace, blogs
Revisiting the Greatest LSD-Aided Athletic Performance of All Time Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:00:00 +0100
Still from the trailer of No No: A Dockumentary
Certain moments in baseball history have transcended the game to become bona fide pop culture memes. Babe Ruth pointing to the outfield wall before smashing a home run in that direction, a little kid asking Shoeless Joe Jackson to say it ain't so, Bobby Thomson hitting the "Shot Heard 'Round the World" to give the Giants the 1951 National League pennant. Then there was the time Dock Ellis pitched a no-hitter for the Pittsburgh Pirates while tripping on LSD.
If you're not familiar with the story, it must be because you didn't have internet access in 2009, when James Blagden's amazing animated short film Dock Ellis and the LSD No-No exploded across the web, turning what was a quirky footnote in baseball history into a modern-day tall tale known by fans and non-fans alike.
If you've never seen it, enjoy:
Like with most legends, there's some controversy about how much of it is the unvarnished truth—there's no way to prove that Ellis was actually tripping balls while standing on the pitcher's mound that day, as he maintained until his death, in 2008. Deadspin tried to sort out facts from fiction in 2011, noting that none of Ellis's teammates have ever corroborated his story about tripping on acid. But myth or not, Ellis was a fascinating man, and a worthy subject for a new film by Jeffrey Radice, No No: a Dockumentary. Although the pitcher consumed mountains of pills, weed, and cocaine before and during games in his career, Ellis's story is more complex than that of a simple drug-addled athlete.
The film, which played at Sundance earlier this year, tells the story of a man who fought against racism in baseball and worked hard to advocate for the right to free agency, before which players were largely at the mercy of owners who could buy and sell them at will. Ellis, who died in 2008, also turned the Pittsburgh Pirates' dugout into the biggest party in the major leagues.
I met with Radice to talk about why this story has such staying power.
VICE: Why did you want to make a movie about Ellis?
Jeffrey Radice: What brought me to the story of Dock Ellis is if you trace the history of LSD—in the United States at least—it goes back to the CIA and their MKUltra stuff. I had produced a short film about that. The CIA had hookers on the payroll dosing guys, and they were observing them through two-way mirrors. That, to me, is far stranger than any fiction that anyone could make up.
But you also love 1970s baseball, right? Did you want to spread that love?
[Between] baseball and counterculture, if you did a Venn diagram, there’s not a tremendous amount of overlap. [There’s] a little bit of “sticking it to the man,” and it’s also kind of a nod to a bygone era. The war on drugs started in 1970 and LSD was certainly a part of the war on drugs. What I tried to do with the film was use [Ellis] as the third eye, and that game as this kind of blossom to explore. To people in their 20s, the 1970 is [an alien] time and place. So Dock Ellis is kind of this “fuck-you to the establishment!” character, and that’s where I was going with it.
Dock kind of embodies that anti-establishment attitude. People who are kind of drawn to that—the Burning Man kinds of people—it causes them to take a step back and kind of say, “That’s cool! Not what I would have expected [from a baseball player].”
Pitching a no-hitter on acid seems hard. How'd he pull it off?
Dock was tripping for a couple of days. So he took acid, came down, and took some more, but the more you take, the less of an effect it has. You can prolong your trip, but, it was at the tail end of a multi-day trip, and when he got to the stadium, he also took a lot of speed—which was his drug of choice for pitching—and so that helped him get more set mentally.
Right. It seems like you would get psyched out by the people watching you.
Dock was able to handle that situation. I think pro athletes become real experts at tuning out the crowd and not paying attention to the roar. Another thing is muscle memory. Dan really talked about that. Especially for pitchers, more than any other position in baseball, it’s about just pounding the ball. You get into a groove.
Do you think pitching is the only position where tripping doesn't interfere with your ability to play?
If you’re playing right field, you only have maybe one ball that comes to you an inning. Or maybe every two innings. So, there’s a lot of time for your mind to wander. But if you’re a pitcher, it’s like one thing after another and you hit this rhythm. That’s why I think it’s plausible from that perspective.
That's why you don't doubt the story?
At one point in time, I thought a lot of the doubt came from people who had no experience with LSD. It’s very much a mental drug, so I don’t think it’s obvious if someone is under the influence of LSD. It’s all practice and muscle memory at the end of the day. I think hallucinogens, with the right kind of mental focus, allow you to really just get into a groove and rely on your muscle memory.
No No: a Dockumentary was just released online. You can stream it in several places, including YouTube.
Follow Mike Pearl on Twitter.
]]> Mike Pearl film, LSD, acid, baseball, Dock Ellis, Jeffrey Radice, Mike Pearl, drugs, sports, Pitching a No-Hitter on Acid, sportsball, baseball fans, people who like baseball, people who don't care about baseball, Baseball is great, Baseball sucks, counterculture, lysergic acid diethylamide, Hallucinogen, Chemicals, tripping balls, being high
What Happens When an International Mining Company Comes to Town? Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:00:00 +0100
Five years ago, Mark Grieco was a 24-year-old independent photographer traveling through Latin America. Like many, Grieco was struck by the continent's vast economic disparities—massive ghettoes across the street from gigantic mansions with walls and security guards—and this imbalance spurred Mark into action. He quickly abandoned his photography ambitions and began plotting a film that would illuminate the inequalities, explore the continent’s history, and speculate on its future.
He settled on a gold-rich town of 10,000 called Marmato as his subject. Marmato was an enticing anomaly—a municipality sitting on one of the biggest untapped gold reserves in the world (estimated to be worth nearly $20 billion) while operating completely devoid of foreign mining companies. Intrigued by the way the locals continued to subsistence mine in the traditional manner, Grieco began documenting the community. As chance would have it, shortly after he arrived, the first international mining company arrived in Marmato and started buying up the local stakes, providing him with a captivating conflict to document.
The resulting film, MARMATO, is a gripping story about the growing influence and control foreign investors have over the Colombian town, as shown through the eyes of the local miners, mine owners, and foreign executives sent in to help smooth the transition. MARMATO captures many dramatic developments—including the moment the government stops selling the locals the dynamite essential for them to mine, effectively asphyxiating the local economy so it is easier for foreign officials to take control. This leads to a protracted resistance from local workers, who enter the mines illegally and use homemade dynamite to get to the gold, leading to tension with a government unafraid of sending the military into towns to do its bidding.
After Mark visited Toronto to premiere MARMATO for three sold-out screenings at the Bloor Hot Docs Cinema, I gave him a call to discuss the long-term implications of foreign investment in economically desperate Latin American towns, how the American military is used to protect foreign mining company investments, and why he thinks the Canadian government has been dragging its feet on appointing a federal watchdog on the mining industry.
VICE: How did you end up choosing Marmato as a subject for your film?
Mark Grieco: I started looking for a mining town that didn’t have a tourist-y environment, either presently or historically, and at the same time didn’t have a multinational mining company controlling that resource.
When I found Marmato, I knew it was exactly what I was looking for as soon as I arrived. It’s a town where the miners themselves are still mining the same way they have for centuries and the gold is staying within the local economy. And just by coincidence, almost [on] the week I arrived, the first Canadian mining company arrived and started buying up the mines. I started filming a little bit over a year later after that first trip to Marmato.
At one point in the film, you show that ads for the Canadian mining company that bought up 80 percent of the mines in Marmato—Midoro—are running on local television talking about how their advanced drilling techniques are better for the environment. They also brag about the jobs they’re going to create for the community and how they’re going to eventually turn the mine into an eco-friendly space. Do you think that there was any truth to those plans or is that just a marketing tactic?
This is an old game companies use to come in and sell the snake oil to these kinds of communities that are vulnerable to these kinds of messages, and vulnerable to the attraction of capital—foreigners showing up with briefcases of dollars.
But if someone could show me a mining project that actually started by promising these things and then actually achieved that for the community, I’d be shocked. It rarely ever happens. It really is a publicity tactic. In the video in the film, I would say every single thing they promised they never completed. I know the first time it was shown to people in Marmato, it was at a closed meeting with just the mayor and the councilmen and -women of town. The public wasn’t even allowed to see it.
So what they’re saying is, "We’re going to create these jobs and this beautiful new town." But they rarely, if ever, explained to the community what the implications of an open-pit mine would mean to the community.
What are the implications?
It meant the ultimate destruction of a 500-year-old town. It meant eroding the social fabric. It meant death of their territory, their land. And ultimately, the destruction of the town… They may guarantee employment, but it’s only for the short term, that this is a project that has a lifespan (at maximum) of 30 years.
In the film, It seems like a lot of the Canadians and others who traveled to Marmato seem genuinely convinced that they would improve the locals' quality of life. Do you think that they’re actually convinced, or is their certainty just another level of their pitch?
Well, I think that on some levels, they could improve certain aspects of their lives. This case is complex. There are two major things: The way that the locals are mining now is just not safe and it’s really not sustainable for that community, and they’re also damaging the environment to a certain extent.
The difference being between that and the big mine is that the big mine would be done on such a massive scale that the environmental impact would be huge—and so would the social impact. The other thing that I hope comes across in the film is that I’m not attacking the foreign investors. I’m allowing them to justify their type of work and their existence in a community like [Marmato] to see how they can justify these claims—and the inevitable upheaval of the cultural and social fabric of this town.
I think that they truly believe what they’re saying, because if you were a foreigner who’s worked in the mining industry for decades and you’re used to regulated industrial mining, if you went to Marmato and saw the way they were mining, you would say, "My God, this is exactly like the stone ages," [which is what] one of the execs says in the film. There’s this perception from foreigners that “we’re here to save the community from their primitive ways.”
Miners at the entrance of the Marmato mine. Photo via Mark Grieco
Seventy-five percent of the world’s mining companies are headquartered in Canada. Why do you think that is?
I think a simple answer would be that Canada doesn’t have a highly industrialized economy. And so for a long time, it’s been a resource-based economy. Canada has historically been a resource-based economy: fur trade, mineral resources, that kind of thing. And I think that part of the economy was and is a huge part of the Canadian economy.
In the case of Colombia, there’s an interesting way to look at this is in that Colombia receives the third-largest military aid package in the world from the US, outside of Israel and Egypt. And what’s been happening in the last few decades in Colombia is that a lot of that military aid is going to fight the insurgent groups in the country. But the places where they’re kind of clearing out those insurgent groups from territory that they previously controlled are places rich in petroleum and mineral resources. So once that’s cleared up, then business can come in.
Now if the majority on mining companies were American, you could easily make that connection. But if it’s a mining company from Canada that comes down and starts taking advantage of those newly controlled and secured areas, then the connection is not as clear.
We’ve previously reported on Stephen Harper's administration dragging its feet on hiring someone to oversee the mining industry. What's the cause of their delay?
Well, it’s hard for me to say. I’m an American. I don’t know much what’s going on in terms of politics here, but I think it’s clear: [Mining is] one of the cornerstones of [Canada’s] economic success. The government has a great interest in not letting there be too much regulation. A lot of the big banks in Canada are investing directly into huge projects… for example, the Canadian Pension Plan since 2011 has invested $6 million in Gran Colombia Gold, which is the Canadian company in Marmato. I just think that there’s been attempts to regulate these companies and most of the times those get crushed.
What do you think people should know about the way mining companies are conducting their businesses around the world?
People don’t even know what is happening and how this business is conducted. There may be some plausibly positive examples of this type of investment in the underdeveloped world, but most of the time it’s done by way of tactics that are shown in MARMATO. And I think that in the case of Colombia, it’s because most of the media won’t report on the story in the same way in which I covered the story: investing a lot of time and speaking directly to people who were affected by this investment.
Hopefully people who are for this type of investment and those who are completely against it may see the film and identify all sides of the story by way of a humanistic portrayal of this kind of conflict. To say Look, we need to think about this in a more profound way and try to find a dialogue somewhere in the middle. And I think that that’s kind of the first step: to raise awareness.
Marmato debuts on Netflix in January 2015. For more information on the film and screenings, click here or here.
Follow Jordan Sowunmi on Twitter.
]]> Jordan Sowunmi film, Marmato, Marmato Movie, Mark Grieco, Director Mark Grieco, jordan sowunmi, jordan sowunmi vice, Canada, Midoro, Sundance Film Festival 2014, documentaries, Gran Colombia Gold, Canadian Pension Plan, CPP, mining, canadian mining companies, film, Colombia, Marmato mining town, miners, Harper Government, mining for gold in Colombia, mining companies in Canada
VICE Shorts: I'm Short, Not Stupid Presents: 'The Gunfighter' Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:54:00 +0100
If your life already feels like a soap opera or one big practical joke, then the last thing you would want to learn is that your illusions are actually reality and your existence is in the hands of some omniscient force. Or maybe it would be a relief to not have the pressure of free will weighing on you? The premise of the wonderful short film The Gunfighter by Eric Kissack explores the issues that come with dealing directly with an omniscent force. In the film, the all-powerful entity takes the form of a narrator who is voiced by Nick Offerman of Parks & Recreation.
Set in a saloon in the old American West, the short opens with a cowboy walking into the bar. Every move he makes is described by the narrator. But instead of the audience just hearing the voice, everyone on screen hears it too. As unsettling as the meta aspects of this is to the townsfolk, it’s not nearly as upsetting as the rash of infidelity, murder, and bestiality the narrator describes happening within their ranks. Pitted against each other, the folks start to realize that maybe there is something more sinister at work. The voice is an evil puppet master who wants to force them in a ballet of death for his own amusement... It's pretty scary for an absurdist Western comedy.
The comedy in The Gunfighter comes from its sharp dialogue, which contains a lot of literary flourishes. It’s the type of verbiage that you only ever read and seldom hear in film. That’s probably because when Kevin Tenglin wrote the story, it was just that—a story, for print. However, was rejected for publication and was neglected until a few years later he showed it to Kissack, who loved it. Together they turned it into a short film.
“I love Westerns, so I started writing [The Gunfighter] in that old Western style, about a gunfighter named Ned,” Tenglin said. “And I'm just a silly person by nature, so as I was writing it, I was pretending I was writing one of those Western movie voiceovers. But then Ned, the character, just started being able to hear my scene descriptions and started getting pissed at me for how I was writing it.”
Tenglin mined Western movie clichés and crammed his characters full of them—from the STD-ridden prostitute and the philandering men to the dumb bounty hunters. The Gunfighter is all about execution within the tropes and there’s lots of amazing executions in it.
I chatted up director Eric Kissack about the story, the casting of Nick Offerman, and more.
VICE: How much did the story change as you made it?
Eric Kissack:
It changed quite a bit. In the short story, there was just the Gunfighter and the Henderson brothers. As Kevin and I kept coming up with ideas for more jokes, we kept adding more characters. Eventually we realized that we had so many people who were pissed at each other that the only logical ending was a Mexican standoff and shootout. Clearly.
You stuff a lot of sex into this script.
There was a version of the script where we had the secrets that everyone was hiding be a lot more absurd... Like one guy was secretly obsessed with basket weaving and another was studying Immanuel Kant's writings on morality (and everyone made fun of him for it). In the end, the sex stuff just seemed more humorous. My instincts tend to go pretty sophomoric.
Was there something in particular that was more difficult about this production than your others? You went all out on the set design, costumes, guns, and even squibs.
The production was a massive challenge because we didn't have a lot of money. We knew that for the comedy to really work, everything had to feel as "real" as possible. That was the best version of the joke—a film that looks and feels like a real Western, but quickly takes a sharp left turn. So that meant getting an "authentic" set, costumes, and props, which also meant a lot of begging. Personally, I'm terrible at begging. Luckily my amazing producer, Sarah Platt, was great at it.
How did you get Nick Offerman on board?
It's funny. I was re-watching the first season of Deadwood for visual inspiration and I flipped out when I realized that Nick Offerman is in the second episode of the first season. He gets killed almost immediately and he spends a good portion of the episode buck naked, but he's absolutely amazing in it. From that moment, I got it in my head that he would be the perfect narrator. I had worked with a director named David Wain [of The State and Stella] for a number of years. David knew Nick and offered to reach out to him for us. So we shot the entire short, edited it, and had one of our friends record a temporary voiceover. Then we emailed it all to Nick with a message saying that we knew he would do a much better job than the hack we got to do the temp. A few days later, he wrote back saying that he agreed.
What's next?
A feature, but not of The Gunfighter. We're content with that story and we don't think it needs expanding. So we're going to do something else. Actually, Kevin is writing one and I'm writing one, too. Hopefully we'll shoot one of them early next year.
]]> Jeffrey Bowers film, Nick Offerman, Jeffrey Bowers, jeff bowers, PRISMindex, The Gunfighter, Eric Kissack, western, Cowboys, Kevin Tenglin
What to Expect Now That the Ghostbusters Are Women Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:00:00 +0100
Image via Flickr user Greyloch
The announcement has been handed down: Paul Fieg, who directed Bridesmaids and The Heat, is hereby empowered by the movie industry gods to reboot the Ghostbusters franchise with women in the lead roles. Everyone who was still, for whatever reason, holding out for the remainder of the now-geriatric original team to reprise their roles, your hopes are dashed. Your hopes are also dashed if you, for whatever reason, felt like the made-up profession of busting ghosts could only be carried out by men.
People are already speculating about who will make up the cast, but what else should we expect as the production gears up and the movie eventually comes out?
Dad Jokes
With their National Lampoon roots, the team behind the original Ghostbusters included some of the architects of Boomer humor. Today's dads are the people who loved the slobs vs. snobs movie dynamic on display in Animal House and Caddyshack, and vowed to never become the Man. But then they decided they loved Reagan even more. Consequently, Ghostbusters is an overtly Reaganite movie, with its contempt for whiny liberals in government and in the academic ivory tower.
The dad jokes have already begun, and if you're not careful you might mistake them for some kind of dangerous misogyny and not what they actually are: the death rattle of a nearly extinct point of view. Ghostbusters was a beacon of conservative thinking in the mostly leftist Hollywood landscape. Its fans are, over the next few weeks, going to say a bunch of things. And the fans with a lot of Twitter followers may well spark some Twitter outrage.
Measurements of Hotness
I love females. I hope that if they go that way at least they'll be funny, and if they're not funny at least hopefully it'll be sexy.
-Ernie Hudson
Obviously sex is used to great effect in series like Underworld and Resident Evil, where a sexy protagonist is almost the entire draw of the movie. But people are just as likely to focus on boobs and implausibly tight costumes even when a movie isn't overt about its sexiness.
Bad Girls was a movie from 1994, pitched to audiences as "Young Guns with girls." It was a relatively straightforward Western with a limited amount of sex-related content. It wasn't great, but it had a lot going for it, like comedy and gunplay. Still, the reviews largely focused on sex. In the Washington Post review, the word "sexy" was in the second sentence. Another refers to the "beautiful" cast being wasted on such a lousy script.
For what it's worth, Paul Feig made a solid effort to bypass all this when he made The Heat. Sandra Bullock's FBI agent character was old enough to be experienced at her job. Melissa McCarthy weighed a good deal more than the average leading lady. But if you actually watched the movie, her belligerence and obscenity were much more noticeable than whether or not she would make a good Playboy centerfold. Conversations about sex and attractiveness were played for comedy, and the film received much deserved praise for that.
Sexists Will Go to the Movie
...all-female I think would be a bad idea. I don't think the fans want to see that.
-Ernie Hudson
On one hand, there's no denying that movie fanboys and fangirls still fawn over a lot of dude-centric movies, many of which don't deserve so much praise. The highest-rated movie on the IMDB Top 100 with a female protagonist is The Silence of the Lambs at number 24, and only ten films on the entire list have female leads. The New York Times dubbed 2012 the "Year of Heroine Worship," but that same year the University of Southern California surveyed the top 100 films and only 28.4 percent of characters were women. You can try to look at it optimistically and point out that Ripley from the Alien series is one of the most beloved action heroes ever, but she's the exception that proves the rule.
Approached in a different way, the rare instances in which women replace men seem to go over pretty well among fans.
The remake of the Battlestar Galactica series replaced a main male character with a female version when it swapped Dirk Benedict for Katee Sackhoff in the role of Starbuck. Just like Benedict's Starbuck, Sackhoff was a hotshot pilot who chomped cigars, slept around, and generally didn't give a fuck. Sure, Benedict was mad about it, writing on his blog that "The war against masculinity has been won," but fans love Sackhoff's Starbuck, masculine or not. The show was a massive hit, and fans line up to this day to get her autograph
A Female-Sung Theme Song
If the producers take the path of least resistance, the new theme song will be a version of the original song featuring the original singer and songwriter, Ray Parker Jr., on guitar and—just throwing this out there—probably Nicki Minaj, or her 2015 equivalent, on vocals. This isn't my fantasy, just a pretty safe bet.
That said, I'm on the fence about whether Ray will still sing the line "Bustin' makes me feel good" at the end.
Follow Mike Pearl on Twitter.
]]> Mike Pearl film, paul feig, ghostbusters, busting ghosts, women, movies, bill murray, slobs vs snobs, Dad jokes, hotness, Ernie Hudson, Kate Beckinsdale, manufacturing boners, comedy film, sexism, All-female casts, The year of heroine worship, An all-female ghostbusters movie, Ray Parker Jr., sci fi comedy, horror-comedy, ghosts, supernatural comedy
Thomas Pynchon and the Myth of the Reclusive Author Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:30:00 +0100
One of the few known photos of Thomas Pynchon
Last weekend, Paul Thomas Anderson’s Inherent Vice, an adaptation of Thomas Pynchon’s novel, debuted at the New York Film Festival to fiendishly good reviews. But it was the news that the author would be making a cameo that got the world talking. To Pynchon fans, the prospect of the man himself on screen, photographed, is either the most exciting day since May 8 (a.k.a. Pynchon in Public Day) or a concept as terrifying as being locked in a room and forced to read Hemingway for a week straight.
It all started 51 years ago, in 1963, when George Plimpton in the New York Times published the line: "Pynchon is in his early twenties; he writes in Mexico City—a recluse." It is doubtful if Plimpton, who helped create the Paris Review, knew at the time that he was accidentally kicking off the largest and longest game of Where’s Waldo? ever conceived. Nevertheless, the label has stuck.
Thomas Pynchon is a reclusive author; Thomas Pynchon gives no shit about your interview request; Thomas Pynchon is a cranky old lady by the name of Wanda Tinasky who writes letters to local newspapers for kicks.
Despite his reputation, the facts of his life are simple and readily available. Thomas Ruggles Pynchon Jr. was born in yadda yadda to yadda yadda and yadda yadda and attended yadda yadda before joining the yadda. He married yadda yadda, his literary yadda. He is yadda years old and lives in yadda yadda. He is a reclusive author.
It's generally assumed that because Pynchon does not get photographed by paparazzi falling out of a cab at 4 AM he is therefore an enigma. This is far from the truth. He's not hiding in the woods or refusing to publish new work à la J. D. Salinger; he just doesn't like talking to reporters. While there are only four known photos of Pynchon (and there's no proof that they are even photos of him), he's been rendered as a cartoon in The Simpsons three times in the last decades, which is hardly the action of a paranoid luddite. Rather, he's a vibrant prankster with his finger on the world’s pulse. He knows how to manipulate us. He’s willing to make fun of himself, but refuses to do the same for Homer, whom he describes in one episode's script notes as his role model.
Simpsons executive producer Matt Selman recently tweeted Pynchon's line notes for his first appearance.
As an April Fool's joke this year, The Paris Review published a fake interview with Pynchon in which he name-dropped Nicolas Cage and Face/Off. Even if a gag, the reference somehow made sense, and it wouldn't be far off to suggest Pynchon would say something similar himself. If there’s one man on the planet capable of portraying Slothrop from Gravity’s Rainbow in all his mania and slow dissolution it’d be him. Bleeding Edge, Pynchon’s latest novel, is filled with a kaleidoscopic set of pop culture references, from Hideo Kajima to TOR. He may not be appearing on literary panels and making speeches, but he certainly hasn't shut himself off from the world.
There are dozens of impressive investigative articles and books about Pynchon, published across half a century, that read partly like a John Grisham novel and partly like stalker notes. But these ultimately say more about the pursuer than the pursued. As Andrew Gordon wrote in his essay "Smoking Dope with Thomas Pynchon: A Sixties Memoir," “I don’t know what I can tell you about Thomas Pynchon, but I can tell you something about myself.”
In March of 1977, Jules Siegel published an article in Playboy that attempted to fill in some of the gaps in the life of America’s most curious living author. The piece was titled, "Who Is This Thomas Pynchon… and Why Did He Take Off with My Wife?" In it, Siegel indulged himself and his readers with some creepy and intrusive descriptions about Pynchon’s lovemaking.
Thanks to that article, we know precisely how Pynchon fucks.
It’s not common to be privy to the precise dimensions of your friend's cock, and it would certainly be a bit odd to write about it. But, according to Siegel, his ex-wife Chrissie described Pynchon as—if you really must know— “a wonderful lover" who was “sensitive and quick” but embarrassed by feminine “boldness” between the sheets.
Those details say more about Siegel—and myself for including them—than Pynchon, just as any detail plucked entirely at random does.
Some more odd facts: Pynchon loves travel and has lived in New York City, Ithaca, Seattle, Mexico, Houston, and Los Angeles. He blames his teeth for social exclusion and enjoys (or enjoyed, I don't know) a breathtakingly good strain of weed named Panama Red. His house was worth just over $1.6 million in 2013. He wrote the vast bulk of Gravity’s Rainbow wasted in some capacity. He’s an avid fan of pigs, and signs off his letters with cute drawings of them. He once kept a piñata pig named Claude at his house in LA. He based a gruesome section of his debut novel V around a Jewish princess having a rhinoplasty because the author was once dumped for being a Catholic.
Pynchon inscribing a copy of Gravity's Rainbow for his friends Phyllis and Fred Gebauer. Image via UCLA Extension Writers' Program
While these aren't the sort of details that would emerge in a respectable Q&A session, it isn’t a moral fault of Siegel—or anyone else—to mention them; they are, after all, the sort of juicy gossip every human being trades on. But they do risk giving you a false impression of the author. He's no more the sum of his publicly known quirks than you or I.
Mind you, at least Pynchon himself has remained—unlike David Foster Wallace’s literary legacy, which has been consistently polluted by his perceived personality—unsullied.
The author's lack of center is what gets us talking. We read his novels for clues and look through obscure fan forums for theories, because the stories we create for ourselves always surpass those of reality. Oz was only great before Toto drew back the curtain, after all.
What I worry about is that his film debut represents the start of something, a great world tour or at least a public unveiling. If he doesn’t cohere to what we imagine in our minds—and how could he?—we’re going to feel disappointed. Someone might recognize him on the street as he wolfs down a foot-long sub and shoot questions about politics toward him, and he’ll speak with his mouth full and ranch dressing is going to go absolutely everywhere—onto his shoes, his sports jacket—and it’ll make its way onto YouTube and everyone will laugh and my heart will break. Then he’ll be on reality TV jerking off a pig.
Currently, Pynchon lives in New York. Manhattan alone has an estimated 8,000 CCTV cameras, so it’s quite likely that the American government has a manila folder somewhere in Area 41 containing thousands of photos of him picking his nose. My hope is that they are never released. While it’s not unimaginative to assume that Pynchon gets up to the same kind of stuff as other brilliant men of 77—hanging out with his wife, listening to the Beach Boys, checking his prostate—it’s far more interesting to fill those gaps in yourself.
Follow David Whelan on Twitter.
]]> David Whelan film, Inherent, vice, gravity's rainbow, thomas, pynchon, Paul Thomas Anderson, mystery, intrigue, enigma, public sighting, David Whelan, Thomas Ruggles Pynchon Jnr, The Simpsons, Andrew Gordon, cameo, thomas pynchon inherent vice cameo, thomas pynchon, thomas pynchon appearance, inherent vice thomas pynchon cameo
Electric Boogaloo: Destroying Film Academia Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:28:00 +0100
When Martin Scorsese released his 2001 documentary series My Voyage To Italy, it was a hell of an eye-opener. One of cinema’s greatest ever filmmakers talking about his love for Italian cinema with unpretentious passion and genuine excitement. Those of us used to the dullness of academia, of po-faced film critics who say “juxtaposition” a lot, and arthouse enthusiasts who wielded their knowledge of foreign film like a weapon at the less-educated masses, were shocked. Here was someone whose enthusiasm was so contagious, you came out of My Voyage To Italy feeling as if you were the biggest fan of Italian cinema, even if you’d never seen any.
That’s how all film documentaries should work. Hell, that’s how all education should work, but we’ll limit our scope for the purposes of this article. Scorsese never tut-tutted you for not already being an expert; he said “Hey, you like film? You gotta check this out. I love it, you’ll love it.”
In many ways, Scorsese was the first real film nerd director. Almost as well known for his love of film as his own films, he was followed by counter-culture legend John Waters, who rose to fame with his first film Pink Flamingos. During his promotional tour of the film, Waters saw Eraserhead, the first film from a young director named David Lynch, and instead of promoting his own film, Waters spent his time with reporters talking about how great Eraserhead was.
The 1990s belonged to Quentin Tarantino. His films, which were a mixtape of references and dialogue from the films that had influenced him, were almost like cinematic lectures in and of themselves. He pays homage to film movements and sub-genres by making films that are as good as he remembers the originals being. He takes a certain type of film, and condenses all the best examples into the ultimate form of the genre, the pinnacle. This is harder than it sounds. If you think it’s easy to simply crib from the past and come out with something worthwhile, I direct you to RZA’s well-intentioned but ultimately unsuccessful The Man With the Iron Fists. Simply loving a genre doesn’t mean you know how to execute it.
Tarantino’s love of cinema was all-encompassing. When he came to Australia, he shocked journalists with a checklist of his favourite Australian films, directors, writers and stars. In a country that seems embarrassed by its own heritage, nobody had even heard of the people and works that Tarantino was citing. As a result, two careers were launched: thanks to QT announcing his love of John Jarratt, Greg McLean got funding for Wolf Creek, and a horror classic was born. The other project to benefit from this press conference was Not Quite Hollywood.
If you’ve never seen Not Quite Hollywood, drop what you’re doing and go get the DVD now. Writer/director Mark Hartley had been frustrated and bemused by the fact that Australian film textbooks all raved about the Australian New Wave movement that spawned critically-acclaimed films such as My Brilliant Career, Walkabout and Gallipoli, but failed to mention genre gems such as Dead-End Drive-In, Turkey Shoot or The Man From Hong Kong. It was like a whole swathe of our cultural history had been erased, and the only other person who seemed to know about it was the newly-minted king of American indie cinema.
Tarantino appeared in Not Quite Hollywood, coining the term “Aussie-sploitation”, which Hartley adapted to the far-more-succinct “Ozploitation”, now a fully-recognised film movement with a Wikipedia page and everything. Like Tarantino’s films, Not Quite Hollywood was even more entertaining than the films it was celebrating. It was like a music video, condensing a ton of information into a movie that was more exciting, more thrilling than anything Hollywood released that year. The style thumbed its nose to archaic textbooks and academia. Film is supposed to be fun, goddamn it.
Hartley followed it up with Machete Maidens Unleashed, a documentary about the insane Filipino film industry of the ’70s and ’80s. Like NQH, it took a subject most of us would have been unfamiliar with, and plunged into it head-first with another exciting, hilarious exploration of the behind-the-scenes tales that were, more often than not, more incredible than the resulting films.
As of 2014, the trilogy is complete. Mark Hartley’s latest film, Electric Boogaloo: The Wild, Untold Story of Cannon Films takes us into the unbelievable story of The Cannon Group, the premier producer of low and medium budget films. Cannon produced the Death Wish sequels, American Ninja, Breakin’ and Breakin’ 2: Electric Boogaloo, Cobra, King Solomon’s Mines, Masters of the Universe, and is almost entirely responsible for the career of Chuck Norris. They chased fame, success and the zeitgeist, and it’s safe to say that there’s no one out there now who compares to their bombastic, unapologetic approach.
Electric Boogaloo may be the funniest film of the year. As with Hartley’s previous films, the juxtaposition (yes, I said it) of film clips with interviews is an artform now perfected, and the supreme deployment of a key piece of information at just the right time is what makes this such a triumph.
Funny, informative, and balls-out crazy. This is exactly what film history should be like.
Electric Boogaloo is currently out in select cinemas, and will be released on DVD on October 30.
Follow Lee on Twitter.
]]> Lee Zachariah film, martin scorsese, My Voyage To Italy, academia, Italian Cinema, Pink Flamingos, John Waters, eraserhead, David Lynch, Quentin Tarantino, Australia, Wolf Creek, Not Quite Hollywood, My Brilliant Career, gallipoli, genre, Ozploitation, Filipino film industry, Electric Boogaloo: The Wild, Untold Story of Cannon Films, CHUCK NORRIS
We Saw the World's First Throne Made Out of 'Jerry Maguire' VHS Tapes Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:56:00 +0100
Everything Is Terrible first established themselves through a DVD series, where bizarre and forgotten video clips are edited rhythmically to themes like “Holiday,” “Hip Hop,” and “Disneyland.” They’re intensely popular: Fans flock to their screenings around the country, and there’s even been six “movies” and their collaboration with Los Angeles's Cinefamily—the Everything Is Festival—is in its fifth year.
Dimitri Simakis and Nic Maier are the co-creators of Everything is Terrible and their long-running project, Maguirewatch, wants your VHS copies of Jerry Maguire. Their goal is to save billions of Jerry Maguire tapes “from their natural thrift store habitats.” There have been plenty of copycats, but the EIT folks have been at this since 2009. With their current collection of 7,489—I’d say they’ve been making some strides. We caught up with Simakis and Maier at Cinefamily, where they were unveiling a massive Jerry Maguire throne.
VICE: What’s important about chronicling Jerry Maguire VHS tapes versus other VHS tapes?
Dimitri Simakis: Absolutely nothing, and I think that’s the point. Jerry Maguire is a movie version of a piece of white paper, and yet every thrift shop, every flea market, and every fledgling video store has a disturbing amount of Jerry Maguire tapes. They’re like these perfectly ripe cherry tomatoes that you see from a mile away, and you can’t but notice a pattern. Like a jerk, I started placing them next to each other and taking photos, thinking, Oh, this’ll be cute! We’ll ask fans to post their own Jerry sightings and call it ‘Maguirewatch! But when we premiered our first movie at the Cinefamily, we really wanted to put on a show. We went to Amoeba, bought a hundred Jerrys and unveiled them onstage like "Eh? A hundred Jerry Maguire tapes looks pretty cool, right?" Cut to seven years later and our count is currently 7,489 Jerrys. At this point, I can’t fucking believe this is still happening. It’s gone from sort-of funny, to not as funny—to not even a little funny—to these tapes will be the death of us. That is, until we saw them all in one place at Everything Is Festival and we remembered why we started doing this in the first place—because a throne made of 7,489 Jerry Maguires looks fucking awesome.
Hell yeah, it does. I couldn’t help taking a photo with the cardboard bishop’s hat myself. On that note, why do you think so many Jerry Maguire tapes have been discarded over the years?
Nic Maier:
There've been many theories tossed around over the years. They include the timing of the movie's release being the last huge hit before the DVD era; the false-flag popularity of it where every yokel with a VCR bought it because it won some award only to never pop that seal; the rise and fall of Cuba [Gooding Jr.]; the number of catchphrases per capita were higher than any other release ever; and so on. However, it is actually way bigger than all that. The fate of the Jerry is controlled by something far greater than the fickle hand of mere consumer godliness. The Jerrys exist on a cosmic level above all other consumer items. The creator made them, released them, and sent us to return them home—for what, we don't know. It is a very "Noah's yacht" type of scenario. Once we have them all, we'll be told what's next and possibly also why and whatnot. Until then, we're just going to keep mindlessly stacking and moving, moving and stacking...
It sounds oddly therapeutic, but still pretty maddening. How has the process been collecting them?
Maier: Unfortunately for us, it has been difficult and not fun. I guess it is fun as a whole, but no, not really fun nor easy. I guess it is easy because I find at least one every time I go to a thrift store. We get about 500 each two-week tour we do and about 20 to 50 are mailed to us each week. So yeah, it is not hard to get more. Every other moment of this project's existence is the hugest pain in the ass imaginable, but I couldn't think of doing anything else with my time and space!
If that’s what you’re feeling, that’s what you should be doing. How have the fans reacted since you started collecting and displaying?
Simakis: Honestly, the reaction from fans defies logic. On our tour for DoggieWoggiez! PoochieWoochiez! [a remake of Jodorowsky's The Holy Mountain compiled only of dog-related movies], we started getting hundreds of tapes a night—sometimes from just one person. We still can’t believe that people we’d never met would spend hours scouring thrift stores, just to help the cause. Every time we return to a city for a show we get more and more and more Jerrys. They make us Jerry sculptures, they make us giant Jerrys, and in Nashville someone made a cake in the shape of Jerry Maguire. It’s all just from people being so nice.
Oh, man—a cake. So, specifically to the Everything is Terrible Fest this year, what were the highlights in unveiling the big collection there?
Maier: That was the first time that all of the Jerrys were in one place outside of boxes, since there were a mere 300 of them! It was amazing! Just seeing them all standing so proud while drunk people walked on them was nearly enough to draw tears. They are truly a thing of beauty! We're just excited to see people lose their fucking shit when they see it. Nobody can believe their eyes—and they shouldn't.
Have you gone so far as to write an artistic statement for the Jerrys?
Simakis: I’d like to say it’s about excess, mediocrity, and waste—don’t get me wrong, it totally is! But we have to face it that maybe it was such a dumb idea that we just have to see to the end (whatever that is). You do not look at 700 Jerrys and say, "That’s enough."
I’ll say. Do you believe the appeal of fans contributing Jerry Maguire tapes to your collection is through a nostalgia for the 90s?
Maier: What’s the opposite of nostalgia? That's what it is, that word.
Where do you see the future of this installation? What I mean is, would you like to build more upon it or are you considering starting a collection of other VHS tapes or other materials in “thrift store habitats”?
Simakis: We talk about this so much, it’s insane. The first idea was to rent an old Blockbuster and create a fully functional video store that only carries Jerry Maguire tapes. The clerks would wear Jerry red polos, every poster is for Jerry Maguire, and the electronic doorbell recites lines from the movie like, “The human head weighs eight pounds!” We’re also really excited about the possibility of building a church made entirely of Jerrys somewhere in the desert. We will give fans the coordinates, where they can take a pilgrimage and drop them into a giant pit. If anyone is reading this and can help, please let us know. Seriously! And of course, we dream of seeing this on display at a fancy museum, because why wouldn't we? One thing we know for sure is that we will never, ever do something like this again. Not to say we won’t continue on this path of doing really dumb stuff, but the buying and shipping of Jerrys has cost us thousands of dollars, and we want to give the project the grand finale it deserves.
To contribute your tape of Jerry Maguire to the Maguirewatch project, go to their site here.
Follow Julia Prescott on Twitter.
]]> Julia Prescott film, jerry maguire, Maguirewatch, Everything Is Terrible, Everything Is Festival, Jerry Maguire on VHS, VHS, collection, video collection, Dimitri Simakis, Nic Maier, Jerry Maguire throne, The 90s, DoggieWoggiez! PoochieWoochiez!, 90s nostalgia, Cinefamily, VCR, remember when movies were on VHS?, Cuba Gooding Jr., Tom Cruise, Renée Zellweger, thrift stores, no jenga with the jerrys, odd collections, stateside
Why We Shouldn't Keep Mentally Ill People Who Have Committed Violent Crimes Locked Up Forever Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:10:00 +0100
Earlier this year, we ran a story on the rehabilitation and release of Vince Li, the man who decapitated and cannibalized a man on a Greyhound bus—needless to say it caused a bit of a shitstorm in the comment section. Turns out a lot of people believe that anyone who cuts the head off a stranger on public transportation and then proceeds to eat parts of his body should pay for his actions by being locked up forever, or handed the death penalty. Society already has a tough time dealing with people with mental health issues, and when you add a violent offense to the stigma and discrimination they face every day, it’s no surprise that keeping them locked away seems like a good idea to most of society.
But Emmy award-winning Canadian documentary director John Kastner has set out to convince those people that they're wrong. Kastner has spent much of his career delving into the lives of the darker, forgotten sides of society and finding the nuances to what might seem like simple issues. Films like Life with Murder (2012), Hunting Bobby Oatway (1997), and The Lifer and the Lady (1984), all deal with the aftermath of convicted criminals coming to terms with their actions and the very human drama that affects the people around them.
His latest films NCR: Not Criminally Responsible (2013) and Out of Mind, Out of Sight (2014) (both of which will be screened this week at Toronto’s Bloor Hot Docs Cinema), deal with yet another section of humanity that many have written off: people with mental health issues who are found to be not legally responsible for their actions after committing violent crimes.
NCR documents Ontario man Sean Clifton’s release back into society after eight years of treatment following a psychotic episode during which he violently stabbed a woman in a Walmart. Out of Mind, Out of Sight focuses on four patients’ struggles as they return to society, including the story of Michael Stewart, who killed a family member and is tormented by crippling guilt. To shoot the film, Kastner spent 18 months with unprecedented access to the Brockville Mental Health Centre. I called him up to talk about the experience and to learn why the films are being seen as extremely important in the mental health world.
VICE: What do you say to those who think mentally ill people who commit violent crimes should never be released?
John Kastner: Well, it’s a good question and of course we have heard it. It’s almost impossible to imagine what these guys are like in real life, what the institutions are like. But you can’t turn people around simply by words. It’s the great power of a documentary, of an observational doc. It’s one thing that we can do really well, because you know what happens in life when these terrible offenses are committed—you see these sinister images of the guy and then they disappear and you never hear from them. So the image that’s left with the public is that they are the act they committed that dark night—they’re monsters, they have to be. We said, "No. You’re going to have to meet these people properly. You have to be introduced to them. You have to hear them talk. You have to look into their eyes. You have to see the way their minds work and you judge for yourself if somebody has committed a monstrous act is, of necessity, a monster. It’s an illness."
What was your perception of mental illness going into these films?
I had the same stereotypes everybody else did. But Dr. Lisa Ramshaw of [the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health] was my muse and my mentor—it was her idea completely. She’s a forensic psychiatrist and she came to a test screening at the Film Board of an earlier film of mine called Life with Murder. I’ve made a number of films trying to help de-stigmatize somebody—often criminals. Lisa asked to see a couple of my other films and said, “You know, if there’s any group of people that need de-stigmatizing, it’s sufferers of mental illness, especially those who’ve committed serious violent offenses.” They’re kind of seen as monsters by the public. It was almost impossible to get into these institutions. Look at the media—nobody gets in for more than five minutes.
That’s what struck me most: The access that you had to these institutions was amazing.
It’s unprecedented in this country. I was there for over three and a half years. Both films together took place over 18 months. And people said, “Oh boy, you’ll be lucky if you get three or four patients to cooperate.” They’re so demonized by the Canadian public. Well, there were 59 patients at that hospital and we ended up filming with 46 of them and over 75 staff members in the two films.
John Kastner, speaking on "The Agenda with Steve Paikin." Screencap via YouTube
What was it actually like once you got behind the scenes?
I’ve had much experience in prisons. I’ve dealt with a lot of dangerous people. I’ve been threatened by a lot of people who you don’t want to have threaten you, people with notches. I had no idea what to expect and I was absolutely spooked the first day I came in. But it’s fear of the unknown. I was relieved to find when I got to know the staff that most of them were also spooked when they came into this place. I had this one nurse in the film who said, “When I first came in, I just kept my mouth shut. When I walked down the corridor, I kept my back to the wall.” I just did not know!
How challenging was it to make these films?
The overarching goal was a nearly impossible task: Could you take someone who’s committed a horrific act of violence and A) Make people understand their illness, that they’re not evil, that they’re ill. B) Could you then go beyond that, beyond simple understanding, and actually make them feel for these people, care about these people? And C) Could you do all of that without in any way diminishing the ordeal of the victims? It’s a very tall order, but you be the judge of whether we succeeded or not.
I think what helped make it work was how the films are structured, particularly NCR, when you follow Sean Clifton’s rehabilitation after stabbing that girl nine times.
We’re telling the story twice—it’s kind of like Rashomon. You hear about the crime, the way you would hear about it as a layman in the news reports to begin with and all the prejudices that we bring with it. My God, it sounds like he’s a monster. Then after you get to know him, we dare to retell the story of the crime from not only his perspective, but we actually take you into the mind of a quote-unquote madman in the midst of a psychotic break as he’s trying to commit a murder. Amazingly, he remembers.
His change in demeanor from the beginning to end is astonishing.
Yeah, I call it the Jekyll-and-Hyde transformation. It’s almost like he took a potion. The evil Mr. Hyde took a potion and became the kindly Dr. Jekyll again. That is the first thing I saw that made me decide I have to make this film. In the research process, I saw guys coming in in what they call a floridly psychotic state—not long after they had committed some terrible violence.
Once they start giving them injections of the antipsychotic drugs and talking to them (what they call cognitive-behavioral therapy)—within a couple of months—you could see these guys returning to planet Earth. First they would not be violent and the restraints were no longer necessary (which they often were when they’d first come in), and they’d be talking gibberish when they first came in, and you’d see the gibberish slowly start to recede. After two or three months, you could begin to have a conversation with that person who came in look like a “raving lunatic.” For a layman to watch such a transformation, let me tell you, it’s almost magical to behold. I say people have got to see this, they’ve got to understand how there’s help for these people, there’s hope. There’s much that can be done for them.
It was weird how by the end I was actually kind of rooting for the guy, and how I felt the victim and her family just had to meet him and to forgive him, which sounds crazy before watching the film.
In the second film, Out of Mind, Out of Sight, the main guy’s name is Michael Stuart—he killed his own mother. And his brother addresses this point at the end of the film—and he will be there at the second screening at Hot Docs this week. I asked “Was it hard to forgive him?” And his brother said, “Look, to raise the question of forgiveness... You don’t forgive people who are ill. You don’t forgive somebody who has cancer; it’s an illness, that’s what it is. We all understand that. Unfortunately there are two victims in this case: my mother, who unfortunately lost her life, but there’s another victim and he still is suffering.”
You see a film like this and hopefully, finally, the lightbulb goes on. You meet the guy, you say, “My God, he’s a smart guy, he’s a likable person, he could be me, he could be my brother.” They often are very intelligent people suffering from schizophrenia. It’s a cruel, horrible, tragic disease.
Finally, why has it taken so long for a film like this to be made and what do you think should be done moving forward?
I wrote an op-ed in the Globe and Mail saying it’s time for psychiatrists to stop hiding their patients from public view. It was a well-intentioned idea—they’re afraid of stigma, they want to protect their patients, and it’s done out of kindness and concern. But you know what? It’s been a disaster.
People think of them as monsters. You cannot de-stigmatize anyone by hiding them from view. What happens, of course, is into that vacuum, people will take their images from scary movies like Shutter Island or whatever, and it sends a terrible signal to the public. What you’re saying to them basically is, “We think that these people are such freaks that we dare not let you look at them.” So it’s a failed policy and without meaning to do so, they actually, for the kindest of motives… have enabled some of the stigma.
The films will be featured at the Bloor Hot Docs Cinema on October 8 and 9, starting at 6:30PM.
Follow Raf Katigbak on Twitter.
]]> Raf Katigbak film, Sean Clifton, Sean Clifton VICE, Rafael Katigbak, Rafael Katigbak VICE, john kastner, john kastner VICE, Rashomon, Not Criminally Responsible, mental illness, schizophrenia, violence, Canada, murder, attempted murder, health care, Bloor Hot Docs Cinema, Hunting Bobby Oatway, Life With Murder, The Lifer and the Lady, NCR: Not Criminally Responsible, michael stewart, Dr. Lisa Ramshaw
‘Los Sures’ Gives Us a Glimpse of South Williamsburg's Roots Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:52:00 +0100
Thirty years ago, South Williamsburg was one of the poorest neighborhoods in New York City. As is still true in parts of the neighborhood today, it was a predominantly Puerto Rican community, and people danced in the streets to Caribbean beats while musicians played drums, palitos, maracas, and güiros. The younger crews held public breakdancing competitions, and everyone felt like they knew one another. At the same time that this culture was flowering, the neighborhood was also experiencing high unemployment rates, dilapidated housing, and inadequate public resources. Drug use was rampant, and many wanted to leave the area for fear of violence.
Diego Echeverria documented this era in his 1984 film Los Sures, which screened last week at the New York Film Festival after being restored by Union Docs. Echeverria was born in Chile and grew up in Puerto Rico. He came to the US in 1971 to study film at Columbia University. After completing a graduate degree, he started a career in TV. When he wasn't working his day job, he hung out on the streets of South Williamsburg shooting what would ultimately become Los Sures, which means "south side" in Spanish. Over the course of ten months, he filmed the lives of five Puerto Ricans living in the Brooklyn barrio. The film illustrates how single mothers, workers, immigrants, and young kids battled poverty and survived in the hood.
Today, South Williamsburg looks very different from how it did in Los Sures. While parts of the neighborhood are still largely inhabited by Puerto Rican residents, the area has also become a mecca for moneyed young people all across the globe, forcing rents to skyrocket. Today it’s not uncommon to see young banker dudes with Hitler Youth haircuts enjoying boozy brunches at overpriced restaurants on the south side—a sight that would have been unheard of back in the 80s. But a few vestiges of the era of Los Sures remain, like the bodega on Division Avenue and Berry Street that still serves hot mofongo and empanadas while old men play cards or dominoes outside.
In light of the recent screening of Los Sures, I gave Diego Echeverria a call to talk about his documentary, rapid gentrification, and the ways in which the historic culture of South Williamsburg can be carried on.
VICE: There are so many people in your film who talk about wanting to leave Williamsburg. I can’t imagine people saying that today. Why did they want to leave?
Diego Echeverria: There was a high level of unemployment. Economic survival was difficult. The services were lacking. Schools were going through a tremendous crisis. Young people were dropping out at a high rate. There was also no housing renewal or support.
When was the last time you visited Williamsburg?
I was there three or four months ago. It has definitely transformed. It’s a more prosperous area. Even physically, it has changed. But at the same time, there are still signs of what used to be. Just last year, for example, you saw the Latino community participating in the streets with some wonderful festivals.
Did you witness any violence during the filming of your doc?
No. That was not what the film is about. In fact, I would have avoided it. My film is about how people cope in very difficult situations and make the best they can out of their lives.
When did the neighborhood really start to change?
The late 80s. I remember that by then there were several artists moving in. This is not something that happened from one moment to another. There were many people in the film, like Cuso the construction worker, who saw the change as well.
One of the things that struck me was how graffiti functioned in the film versus how “street art,” as it’s called now, functions today. What was the point of graffiti back in the 80s?
I remember in the early 80s when graffiti was all over the city. It had to do with asserting a sense of identity. There were lots of names and commemorative elements that had to do with culture and ethnicity. It was something very unique to New York in subway stations, bus stations, and out in the streets. It was a way of actually saying, "Here I am." Today graffiti has a different sense—at least the stuff I’ve seen in Dumbo and areas of Williamsburg.
What other cultural markers have you seen take on completely different meanings?
The break dancing that was going on in the streets. When you look at the dancing that takes place in Los Sures, you find this urban culture evolving. That was the beginning of a whole movement that later on, throughout the 90s, took over the country. Young people came together and participated in these cultural manifestations that really gave them a strong sense of identity, while the older generation was still dancing salsa.
The film does a great job of depicting fashion trends of the 80s—plastic aviator glasses, feather-cut bobs, side ponytails, etc. Some of the most weird and trendy folks still seem to reside in Williamsburg. Despite its evolution, the neighborhood still seems to have retained that stylish characteristic.
It’s different. There was actually a cultural cohesiveness in Los Sures that is no longer there. It is part of our cultural cohesiveness where you see break dancing, murals, and cultural manifestations taking place. They are tied to traditions that are part of your own kind of cultural roots, and they are different. What you are seeing today is a manifestation of a different kind of varied community. Also, because it is now a community of artists, it doesn’t have that raw kind of expression. Back in the day, it was a force that was really at its first stage.
There seemed to be a greater sense of community in South Williamsburg back then.
I sensed that when I started hanging out on the streets. People were truly connected. They knew each other. They would say hello—connecting, making jokes, remembering things. And people would hang out in the streets, especially in the summer.
What is the feeling you get when you go back to Williamsburg?
It’s definitely different. What happened in Williamsburg is what you see in most other cities in the country. The immigrant groups who settled there in the 40s are not there. They move away. They die. It’s also because the socioeconomic situation has changed. When I went to film there, it was in the midst of Reaganomics, when support for immigrant groups started to diminish.
Do you have a particular opinion on the people who have taken over the neighborhood?
With any change, there are positive and negative aspects. You can’t say that it’s surprising. Very often, neighborhoods have to transform. That’s the story of most urban centers in the US. Nothing remains static. It was only natural that as New York City became more expensive, people would look for neighborhoods that had proximity to the city and inexpensive housing.
And the negative aspects?
New York became very expensive, very fast. There is a population that feels left out of the transformation that is taking place. But at the same time, it’s a regular process. You can’t change economic forces. Very often politicians are not sensitive to the feeling of loss that takes place as a vulnerable population has to deal with a whole set of challenges. Moving out of the place you grew up in is very difficult. Having to re-root yourself and your family and break away from what you’ve known for years is very painful.
Do you think the divide between newcomers and long-time residents is a problem?
You’re witnessing the community going through a process that has been very drastic for people who have strong roots in that community. It’s only natural that they have some level of resentment. Their rents have gone up tremendously. It has become a different neighborhood.
Do you think there’s any solution?
It’s not a question of finding a solution. Neighborhoods change. Many of the people have already moved out. The community organizations are playing a role in giving support to the people who have stayed. Those organizations are wonderful. It is a question of creating the links and acknowledging the history as the neighborhood transforms. The one solution is making housing more available, creating the kinds of jobs that people can depend on, making schools better, and making sure those families who live there get the level of support they need.
For more on the evolution of South Williamsburg, check out Living Los Sures, Union Docs' new short films project, which was inspired by Diego's Los Sures. The project aims to reunite the community by continuing to document the local histories of Williamsburg.
]]> Barbara Calderón-Douglass film, South Williamsburg, Los Sures, Puerto Rican, Diego Echeverria, Living Los Sures, Union Docs, culture
The New Movie 'Stories of Our Lives' Dispels the Myths Fueling Kenya's Homophobia Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:00:00 +0100
Photo courtesy of the Nest Collective
Africa, like much of the world, is awash in homophobia, and Africa's most prominent anti-gay apostles have painted homosexuality as a Western construct and called homosexuals “un-African.” Earlier this year, Nigeria and Uganda passed anti-gay laws, and this summer, Kenya's Republican Liberty Party proposed "stone the gays" legislation. To dispel Kenya's myths about homosexuals, the Nairobi-based arts collective the Nest—including director Jim Chuchu, executive producer George Gachara, and screenwriter Njoki Ngumi—created Stories of Our Lives, an anthology of short films recently presented at the Toronto International Film Festival.
After collecting firsthand audio testimonials of LGBT Kenyans across the country, they adapted the recordings into fictional shorts that offer a compelling window into modern-day Kenya. In festival materials the filmmakers' names were not mentioned because they feared attacks from Kenyan homophobes, but on the day the film premiered, Chuchu, Gachara, and Ngumi revealed their identities to the world. While they were in Toronto, I sat down with them to discuss their movie, Kenya's prickly political climate, and how gay gym culture gets lost in translation.
VICE: The film tells several stories, including a narrative about a girl getting expelled because of her lesbian relationship and another about a man risking his safety to attend a clandestine gay club. How did these various storylines come together?
Jim Chuchu: About a year ago, we began a documentary project, going around the country collecting stories of queer people in anonymous audio interviews. We wanted to get a sense of the human experience of being queer in Kenya—not just in the capital [Nairobi], but around the country. After several months of collecting stories, we felt some were so interesting that we wanted to create visual accompaniments for them.
Why did you decide to reveal your identities on the day of the film’s premiere?
George Gachara: It’s been an evolving conversation—and an emotional one. We initially felt that anonymity would be helpful for many reasons, like protecting the cast and crew, but people trusted us with their stories, the actors trusted us by appearing on camera, so we needed to honor that bravery and reveal our identities. Ultimately, it would be more damaging to be anonymous, as people back home might interpret that as us being ashamed.
Are there any plans to screen the movie in Kenya or in neighboring countries like Uganda?
Chuchu: We’ve had several private screenings at home for friends and people involved, and the response helped us realize we needed to make it available to people.
Gachara: It’s really a film about how we as Kenyans express ourselves, how love feels, and how we struggle. It belongs to our people and communities, so it has to return to that place.
Given the country’s harsh anti-gay laws, could there be any consequences to screening it publicly?
Chuchu: I’m not entirely sure how Kenyans would react. So far, since revealing our identities, we’ve received a lot of positive feedback, but who knows. It’s an unpredictable space, so we’ve been preparing for every possible scenario.
In recent months, the press has pegged Kenya as the next battleground for gay rights. Is that a fair assessment?
Gachara: There’s very tough stuff happening in Uganda, Nigeria, North Africa, and Somalia, but people in Kenya are still living their lives. It’s tempting to rush to conclusions about queer life in Kenya based on headlines, but there’s also so much that gets lost with reductive, Africa-wide assumptions.
Do you find Western coverage of African countries’ LGBT issues to be accurate?
Chuchu: We sometimes get the sense that countries that are “over it” [the struggle for LGBT rights] get impatient with the rest of the world. It’s almost like a big brother who’s done with school and is standing next to you, screaming, “C’mon already!” The language developed in countries where they’ve already dealt with LGBT issues is now being imposed to us—already packaged—and I think there’s some resistance from people in our part of the world, who want to define things for themselves.
Gachara: To me, it goes back to this European ideal of an urbanized queer life—that my milestones should be pride, coming out, and the gym. I appreciate those—they play a role in the expression of gay life in a faraway place—but it has nothing to do with my life. Some people are transposing those assumptions to Kenya. We’re asked, “Are you guys gay because it’s an economic thing?” and “Are you doing this film to make money?” When my mom tries to understand me being queer, I have to remind her: “You know how much I earn, how I hate going to the gym, so why are you using this to understand who I am?”
How do you feel about the Christians who fly into countries like Uganda to woo the country’s top politicians and religious leaders?
Gachara: The recent rise of the Christian right is actually happening in Kenya as well, not just in Uganda. For the last 20 years, Kenya has tried to rid itself of its British-imposed constitution—we’ve always looked up to people who fought against oppression—but just when we had an opportunity to vote in a popular, locally-driven constitution, the American right starts to fund our conservative movement directly. These white [religous leaders] visit the country in the name of being “pro-family,” saying things that Kenyans can identify with. It’s unfortunate, because this global ideological war is happening on the bodies of black kids who just want to love.
Do you feel resentment towards the West for introducing anti-sodomy laws during colonial times?
Gachara: Every society has had mechanisms for dealing with difference, whether they’re cultural or legal. We know of grandfathers who were queer, but these stories were erased with the Christianizing and moralizing used to police people during colonialism.
Chuchu: There’s this interesting piece of history from Uganda. Back in 1885, King Mwanga II of Buganda had relations with men that would now be called homosexual, but the Christian missionaries couldn’t handle it, so they removed him from the throne. Now, [over] a century later, the British return and say, “Wow, you guys are so homophobic!”
For upcoming screenings of Stories of Our Lives, visit the film’s website
]]> Michael-Oliver Harding film, Kenya, homophobia, kenya laws, gays, LGBT, The Nest, anti-gay laws, uganda, Africa, homophobia in africa, christian right, gay news, gay movies, myths about homosexuals, sodomy, gay politicians, Toronto Film Festival, Nairóbi, gay Kenyans, stories of our lives
What Do You Do with a PhD in Celebrity Gossip? Sun, 05 Oct 2014 10:44:00 +0100
Photo courtesy of Plume
Thanks to the endless coverage of Justin Bieber’s Segway trips it can seem like our society has reached the nadir of celebrity obsession, but gossiping about stars has been a vibrant pastime since at least the early 20th century. For the last several years, academic Anne Helen Petersen has been opening the history books (and vintage issues of US Weekly), analyzing the gossip industry, and arguing that celebrities illuminate important aspects of American culture.
After Petersen finished her dissertation on the history of gossip and received her PhD from University of Texas, Austin, in 2011, she spent several years teaching. In between classes, she updated her personal blog Celebrity Gossip, Academic Style and wrote a column on the Hairpin called Scandals of Classic Hollywood that explored old celebrity gossip through an academic lens. Earlier this year, her online writing became so popular that BuzzFeed offered her a full-time job. She accepted the position, making her one of the few academics to ever write articles millions of people enjoy reading. (I mean that as a very big compliment.)
Plume recently released Petersen's new book (also called Scandals of Classic Hollywood), which features essays about stars like Judy Garland, Clara Bow, and Fatty Arbuckle. After I finished the addictive, engrossing, and illuminating book, I called Petersen to discuss her unique approach to writing, Judy Garland's suicide attempts, and the state of today’s gossip magazines.
VICE: What’s the difference between reading a tabloid for fun and reading gossip as an academic?
Anne Helen Petersen: A lot of times people, whatever their education level, will read celebrity gossip as they would any other kind of pop culture mode of entertainment, like watching reality television or going to blockbuster movies, and know that it's enjoyable. But they don’t necessarily understand why they like it, or want to understand how these images are made or why we find them compelling or why we want to hear stories about people we otherwise don’t know at all. I saw that lots of people really want to think at a deeper level about celebrity gossip the same way that people want to read film criticism or television recaps. An academic approach to gossip asks how celebrity images are made, how they function ideologically, and how they point to things that matter in our society.
How is your new book different than other books about Hollywood?
Most books about Hollywood stars are very flattering. They’re either hagiographies in which the star is essentially sainted, or they use a lot of testimony from people many decades after the fact who say that they know something, like, “I am the person who can tell you that Cary Grant was gay. I know someone who slept with Cary Grant, and that is the truth.” They’re really trying to arrive at what is the truth of what happened, and for me, it’s always a matter less of what the truth is and more about how information about [the star] was mediated.
The other type of coverage is scandal-mongering coverage. People love to believe the worst, and the far end of of the spectrum is where people say, “The stars were almost disgusting in their hedonism.” The problem with that for me is that—especially for women—these narratives become the narratives of the star. Until very recently the Wikipedia page for Clara Bow perpetuated the story that she slept with the entire USC football team. It’s not telling the truth, and its not fair to the way that she’s remembered.
Clara Bow. Photo via Wikimedia Commons
Your book discusses how the star system controlled young actors’ lives. Is there an analogy to be made between the studio system and Disney and Nickelodeon’s child star factories?
Totally. I think that Nickelodeon and especially Disney are the new version of the star system, and even some of the companies that seek out YouTube stars and then contract them control [the YouTube stars'] behavior.
When I read the Judy Garland chapter I thought, Oh my god, this is like Britney Spears.
The difference in Britney’s case—with legal intervention and the way that her parents functioned differently—she didn’t go down the complete spiral that Garland went down, but I think it really easily could have gone that way. So many people are struck by the Garland chapter because of how publicly she was called an “ugly duckling” and ridiculed for her weight gain, but also the public knowledge of her suicide attempts and the anger directed towards her studio—which really played out in a visible way that we don’t usually think of in the 1950s. People knew that she attempted suicide, but the gossip columnists also blamed MGM for what they had done to her.
Judy Garland. Photo via Wikimedia Commons
Knowing what you know about classic Hollywood stars like Garland, do you look at today’s stars and think, I see what you’re doing, I can see through your shtick?
Yes. Part of that is just publicity and trying to create a coherent image is always going to be the same, no matter if the star is from the 1930s or 2010s. The difference is really that the means of producing that image are different. Beyonce is producing an image using Tumblr and Instagram, which obviously stars in the 30s didn’t have, but she’s still trying to create a very specific understanding of the type of woman that she is. She’s trying to also make it seem like there isn’t a publicity campaign and that she’s not doing that, which was also done in the 1930s.
As society progresses, does the gossip industry improve, or do tabloids and blogs remain as bad as ever?
I think that gossip is most often—even when we gossip about our friends—used as a way of socially policing behaviors, to see if someone is adhering to the status quo or not. I think that that line [defining the] status quo is always changing, so there are different ways that we police someone. In the 1930s, if someone was accused of being too sexual on screen by showing too much of her thighs, that was a certain sort of policing of female sexuality. Today it’s not so much a question of nudity, but [a question of] if someone is linked with too many men, or if they’re bisexual instead of declaring themselves as gay or straight in that very strict delineation, or if they don’t have kids. There are all sorts of behaviors that are still policed.
Why should we take the gossip industry more seriously?
I think that, at any given point in history, you can look at the people who were the main stars and celebrities and extrapolate so much about what American society valued or was feeling anxiety about at that time. If you take that lens and use it historically, but also on the way that we talk about celebrities now, it’s very illuminating.
Follow Emalie Marthe on Twitter.
]]> Emalie Marthe film, Buzzfeed, TMZ, jennifer lawrence, Hollywood, celebrity gossip, US Weekly, People Magazine, Scandals of Classic Hollywood, Clara Bow, PHD, University of Texas Austin, academics, professors, teaching, longread, Interviews, books, plume, Bonnie Fuller, Justin Bieber, Britney Spears, kardashians, Reality TV, California, studio system, fan magazines, Anne Helen Petersen, stateside
Lindsay Lohan Played Herself in Her London Stage Debut Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:35:00 +0100
All photos by Simon Annand
This week, I attended the London production of Speed-the-Plow, David Mamet’s satirical take on the American movie business. The cast consists of Nigel Lindsay as Charlie Fox and a guy from The West Wing as Bobby Gould—two Hollywood execs trying to cut a deal on a script. Lindsay Lohan plays their meddlesome secretary, who—with an unclear motivation—seduces Gould and persuades him to pitch a different script altogether.
The play itself was unremarkable, but has been bitched about ceaselessly. Since the play’s first preview in the West End last week, the tabloids have obsessively reported on how Lohan needed line prompts. Critics have described her acting as that of "not an especially gifted schoolgirl," and audience members have dubbed the performance a “car crash”—a phrase that follows her around like the whiny sponsor from her reality TV show.
Only two days after the play’s first preview, the Wikipedia page for the play was amended, to include a note that “American actress Lindsay Lohan, […] was laughed at because she had forgotten her lines.” It's since been removed, but it's almost as if it must be duly written in history that Lohan has once again botched the job, once again sent her proverbial Porsche crashing into a brick wall of failure, drunk or high or whatever at the wheel.
Why does everyone take Lohan so seriously? Long profile pieces have questioned her art, pokerfaced in their tracing of her career from child stardom through to clichéd Oscar-less plight. Interviews have given over countless column inches to her trademark AA jargon. “I'm at a point when I want a diligent routine and I really want to get back into work,” she told Time Out. “Yes, I’ve made mistakes. But who doesn’t in life?” she told the Telegraphechoing her previous admission: “I really haven’t done [cocaine] more than ten or 15 times. I’ve done it like ten or 15 times.”
Through all of this, the suspicion has rankled that Lohan might be having us on, that she might not be taking this all quite as seriously as we are, that there might be a bigger meta-fictional conspiracy at play. The only way I can make Lohan’s life make sense in my own head is to think of it as The Truman Show in reverse; I am certain that—like Kanye—she is supremely fucking with us all. That she has woven a myth of herself into the public consciousness that is impossible to unpick.
For Lohan, life imitates art, and her performance in Speed-the-Plow comes as close to the bone as any role yet. Most of the comedy comes from Gould’s attempts to sleaze on Lohan, and we, her doting audience, laugh along, complicit. The first act opens in Gould’s office, where he tells Lohan’s character, Karen, about The Bridge, the script he is about to give the green light. “Is it a good film?" she asks him, naively. "It's a commodity," he replies, as though explaining to Lohan her own place within film history. He talks about how the entertainment is about getting asses on seats, the exploitation of basic human epistemology: “If a tree fell in a forest would anyone hear it?” he says.
Would anyone give a fuck about this play if Lohan wasn’t in it? Lohan’s face is on the program and on the posters at the Playhouse and in the papers. The whole thing’s been a publicity coup. The Guardian ran a "Mean Girls or David Mamet" name-the-quote quiz, for God’s sake. The play’s plot has been entirely eclipsed by the narrative of Lohan’s attempted McConnaissance, her search for legitimacy. “I wanted to do something different,” she told Time Out, “people have certain perceptions of me, and I wanted to change them by doing something like a Mamet play. I’m hoping it’ll take away attention from me as a celebrity name and draw attention to the fact that I’m an actress.”
It's a telling quote. Lohan's life seems to lack any kind of fluid narrative, instead resembling more of a chain of unrelated, ludicrous events: community service at the morgue, a sleepover with Lady Gaga and Lana Del Rey at the Chateau Marmont, a 36-name list of her sexual conquests left in a bar, a tweet that she’s pregnant on April Fools’ Day. Charlie Sheen and Mel Gibson—men who have been considered mad by the world in the span of recent history–have said they’re worried about her. Only Lohan can purportedly sleep with Calum Best and that guy from The Wanted, pose for photos holding a gun to her head, hit someone with her car and flee the scene, and then pick herself up and dust herself off, ready to fuck things up all over again.
We focus on the car crash, but Lohan’s more concerned about the joy ride. “I’ve lived so many lives in one lifetime,” said an ever-self reflexive Lohan, who—despite the highs and lows—is always trying to reinvent herself, before failing and falling back into the same leather-jacketed Lohan again. We give her infinite second chances because we feel sorry for her—she’s been in a slump since Mean Girls—and now she’s the enfant terrible of Hollywood, battling her demons with David Letterman as her father figure and Oprah as her surrogate mother.
You can’t write this shit. How can this be anything other than a modern celebrity farce? Consider the layers of irony in which Lohan shrouds herself. It was surely ironic when she played Elizabeth Taylor, in the TV movie Liz and Dick, an actress hunted by the press. It was ironic when she played Tara in The Canyons, a desperate, sex-crazed ex-actress. And now, in Speed-the-Plow, she plays Karen, a character once again bearing an uncanny resemblance to the real Lohan—a young receptionist caught up in the Hollywood machine with nothing to bank on except her sexuality.
In the flesh, the play is lukewarm. The set looks like an SNL version of Frasier, and Lohan seems fundamentally unnatural, reciting her lines with intonation in all of the wrong places. The New York Times lauded Madonna, who previously played the part in 1988, as, “the axis on which the play turns—an enigma within an enigma.” The calculating role of Karen ought to be powerfully seductive. Instead, Lohan oscillates between wooden and mawkish. And yes, she does forget her lines, but when someone shouts to her from the side of the stage, no one in the audience seems surprised. In the intermission, the audience gossips about her, her voice, what it means to see this strange Hollywood specter in the flesh.
After the third act unravels, at a faster pace than the last, the curtain finally falls and the room fills with applause. Lohan appears on stage detonating a confetti bomb under which she showers herself. No one makes a move to take their things and leave. Everyone is transfixed on her. She is the ultimate figure in the cult of celebrity. And everything she does, all her farcical behavior, all her strangely self-referential and self-prophesizing roles, fuel this fire. While her performance as Karen failed to suspend my disbelief for more than three minutes, she ironically succeeded in lending more mystery and confusion to the real Lohan, whatever the hell that is.
In her next role, Lohan will reportedly be starring in a biopic where she plays Clara Bow, a Hollywood actress from the 1920s who began her career when young and eventually lost her mind, supposedly because her mother had once tried to kill her. The layers of irony thicken into LA fog. Soon Lohan will play herself playing herself playing on a TV show about a failed actress who meets Lohan at rehab. "I've always known things about myself," Lohan once told Oprah. I can only take this to mean that Lohan is complicit in her own bizarre actions. Like in Being John Malkovich, Lohan is the puppeteer of her own giant celebrity, and we are on the outside, believing it, writing about it, caring.
Follow Amelia on Twitter.
]]> Amelia Abraham film, Lindsay, Lohan, Lindsay Lohan, Speed-the-Plow, David Mamet, Westend, London, acting, The Truman Show, The Wanted, Chateaux Marmont, The West Wing, the parent trap, plays, theatre, Lindsay on OWN, Lindsay Lohan's comeback, starlets, celebrities, celebrity, Pop Culture, Reality TV, mean girls, Parent Trap, Child Stars, child actors, Disney actors, Disney Channel, Disney, comebacks, LGBT
Ulrich Seidl Talks About Making Movies That Aren't Quite Documentaries Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:10:00 +0100
Photos by Piotr Sokul
If you have a soft spot for dark documentaries and the quirky side of human-interest stories, chances are you already stumbled upon Ulrich Seidl’s oeuvre. In his home country of Austria, people have been skeptical about his art and — as is often the case with the country's native artists—only started to accept him once he became famous overseas. Now, with his non-documentary Paradise trilogy still resonating with most of the art-house crowd, Seidl has become sort of a star at home, too.
The director of Dog Days and Animal Love, Seidl is known for films that are straightforward but at the same time poetic—he laughs because the world is ridiculous at times and, most importantly, he has honest compassion for the people around him. In his latest movie, In the Basement, Seidl portrays Austrians who are self-confident, articulate, and proud of their inner abysses. The film is a semi-documentary about people who have, in one form or another, a very special sort of basement—they work in an underground shooting range, or they have an S&M studio where they get hung up by their balls, or they love to collect vintage Nazi merchandise and can’t do so aboveground.
John Waters—who called Seidl’s Paradise: Love and Paradise: Faith among his top three movies of 2012—once said, “Fassbinder died, so God gave us Ulrich Seidl.” There really is nothing to add to that. Except maybe that Seidl has the best mad professor–type office in the world and giggles like a child when you point at the red Grim Reaper statue on his desk.
VICE: People often accuse you of cynicism and irony, at least in your work. Is that really how you see the world?
Ulrich Seidl: Well, luckily this doesn’t happen too often anymore. That kind of sentiment only comes from people who don’t really know my work and haven’t evolved personally. When I started out, I was antagonized for quite a while—probably until Animal Love. Everything changed with Dog Days, of course. Now, such accusations only happen sporadically.
I watched In the Basement at a press screening and people were laughing really hard, until they were almost choking, because your takes always run a little bit too long and it makes people uncomfortable.
Yeah, I like that. I like it when people laugh—the interesting thing about people watching my movies has always been that the audience never laughs or cries altogether. I’m not fishing for emotions and I’m not catering to reflexes such as, And now laugh! Instead, one person might laugh while another might be annoyed, because he or she doesn’t think it’s funny at all. I think life is absurd and ridiculous at times, so why wouldn’t we laugh? But if people just go for making fun of the people on the screen, that's their problem
This is the most distinct difference between your films and that's what people call social pornography. You don’t let us look away once it becomes unfunny.
I’m definitely not a peeping Tom. People might think they recognize a certain milieu that they can point their fingers at, but actually, I’m really spending time with my protagonists, getting to know them, building trust, a relationship. I portray my protagonists just as they are. I’m not judging them. This is why they never have any problem with me after the film’s been released.
It must take a lot of trust for a couple to let you film the woman hang those weights on her husband’s balls. Can you describe the process of getting to know your protagonists?
I just have a good sense for that. I treat people the way I want to be treated. It’s one of my talents to give people the impression that I really care about them—which is true, for that matter. You can almost always tell if a certain relationship will make for good movie material or not. But of course, there’s a lot of luck involved, too. Take Mr. Ochs, for example. We only met him by chance, by word on the street.
Mr. Ochs is the guy with the Nazi paraphernalia in his basement. With his story, I had the impression that you were using elements of classic fictional storytelling.
Yes, that’s right. After all, everything’s set up. Nothing is captured by surprise in my movies. Everything is manufactured and even when we use handheld cameras, every scene is choreographed. There’s always feature filmmaking [techniques] involved—that’s my take on cinema. I always draw my material from reality, but in the end, it’s never just documentary filmmaking. There are some completely made-up stories in In the Basement too.
Which scenes are fictional in In the Basement?
Well, take a guess!
I found the story about the woman who treats dolls like real babies hard to believe, because it was missing more background information than the others. Maybe I’m wrong though.
No, you’re right, that one’s completely staged. Many journalists are especially surprised here, but the story still works.
To me, this story shows that you have a really humane view of your characters: At first glance, the woman is totally scary, but then we look closer and she seems really happy.
On the other hand it tells us something about the isolation of man, too. It’s a story like many stories out there. It’s the same as with the pets in Animal Love, which are fulfilling the same kind of need for their owners—back then, I was already dealing with this theme of sublimation, this people not getting what they need in terms of satisfaction or power play.
When Austrians think of basements these days, we think of Josef Fritzl and Natascha Kampusch—the dungeon torturer and his victim. You decided not to go there.
That case was not really my interest when I wanted to make the movie. The idea of this project goes way back. Initially, I was fascinated by the fact that most homes have extensive cellars and people love to go to the basements in their spare time while leaving their living rooms mostly untouched. Down there, they have all the freedom to be whatever they want to be. I’d say that’s pretty universal, too. But I don’t want to judge. I’d rather show real desire and real sorrow.
This notion of not judging your protagonists is something we see with Mr. Ochs, who isn't portrayed as a monster even though he collects Nazi gear.
That is what interests me. Movies are not a means of convicting people. Besides, Mr. Ochs is not a neo-Nazi. He doesn’t commit any crimes. I find the normality behind his life and the lives of the people around him fascinating. And one more thing: Mr. Ochs is a very nice guy. That’s just the way it is. And that’s what makes it even harder. It would be a piece of cake if we could just scream, “You dirty pig!” at him.
What’s your take on Austrian film in general? What do you think about the current state of filmmaking in your country?
Austrian film has evolved into something exceptional over the last two decades. It wasn’t always like this. When I studied film, nobody was exactly waiting for movies from Austria. Now, other European countries like Poland, Denmark, and Spain envy us. We show things how they really are.
I heard that you are a huge admirer of silent film star Erich von Stroheim. What connects the two of you?
Even though it was a totally different world, I’m still fascinated by his films. He had similar themes as me—desire, death, and private life. Even his perfectionism is probably not too different from mine—even though his may have been more radical. I guess Stroheim also created this gimmick for himself, with his uniform and his military behavior.
Is there something similar with your public persona? Like an Ulrich Seidl gimmick you’re cultivating?
You need to ask others about that. But I think you’d probably find a few such elements if you wanted to make a movie about me.
Follow Markus Lust on Twitter
]]> Markus Lust film, Ulrich Seidl, In the Basement, Austria, cinema, Austrian cinema, Dog Days, movies, Interviews, markus lust, Paradise trilogy, documentaries, Animal Love, Josef Fritzl, Erich von Stroheim
Director Cutter Hodierne Talks 'Fishing Without Nets' Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:55:00 +0100
In director Cutter Hodierne's VICE and Think Media-produced debut feature film, Fishing Without Nets, a poor Somali fisherman named Abdi (played by Abdikani Muktar) is desperate to find a way to provide for his family. The waters near his home have become polluted, killing off the fish. After spending his last bit of money to smuggle his wife and child out of the country, Abdi succumbs to the pressure and allure of piracy. With naturalistic performances borne mostly out of improvisation and a sweeping cinematic style, Fishing Without Nets balances art-house emotion with thrills that wouldn't seem out of place in a summer blockbuster.
Before I met Hodierne last year at the Sundance ShortsLab, I’d already heard enough about the young director to see him as a legend in the making. For starters, he was named after the 32-yard 'cutter-rigged' sailboat that he spent the first three years of his life on. Then, after a stint as U2's on-the-road cinematographer during their 360° tour, he cashed in his rockstar money and made the short film Fishing Without Nets at the ripe old age of 23. The short went on to win Sundance's Grand Jury Prize in Short Filmmaking, and it was at that point that VICE jumped on board to help expand it into a feature film.
Excited for the nationwide release of his first feature, I visited Hodierne in early October at the swanky McCarren Hotel in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, to talk about the movie. I found him in his suite sprawled across the bed watching CNN. Contentious images of Ferguson, Missouri, flashed on screen, which led us into a conversation about class and race. He asked if I’d seen “the fucked-up video of cops killing a black dude.” I asked which one, because there seem to be so many. As we watched a few horrific videos, it became clear to me that Cutter was just as fascinated with the cops as the victims. He rewound one video twice to catch the decisive moment. This must have been the same sort of compulsion that led him to become obsessed with the plight of the Somali pirates after reading a New York Times article by Jeffrey Gettleman. He originally saw the pirate’s story as a sprawling epic, much like Steven Soderbergh’s Traffic or David Simon’s series The Wire—he wanted to show every side of it.
“I wanted to do the story of the sailors on the boat, the Navy SEALs, the shipping company owners, the people laundering money in Kenya, the real estate business, and the guys who actually drop the money into the ocean,” he said. Ultimately, the one he was most interested in was the pirates. In his words, “Who the fuck would do this? Who would be this bold and actually capture a ship?”
Although Fishing Without Nets is condensed from his initial vision, it is still a microcosm of the cultural and emotional complexities of Somalia today, and is noteworthy because it's completely genuine, pressing, and fresh. A previously unreleased clip from the film is below, along with what Cutter had to say about the project. You can watch the full film here.
VICE: Fishing Without Nets started as a short film back in 2012. Did you always imagine turning it into a feature?
Cutter Hodierne: It was always meant to be a feature. It began as a short in order to explore the idea and raise money.
What made you want to tell this story?
Since 2008, I’ve wanted to do a movie about Somali pirates. I’ve never been so obsessed with something before in my life. I just really wanted to make a movie about pirates.
Why are you so obsessed with pirates?
There was a story in the New York Times in which [pirates] captured this Ukrainian tanker with military equipment. The pirates were just young kids. The government quickly discovered this wasn’t some big terrorist organization with a bunch of weapons. It was a bunch of young dudes who didn’t know exactly what they were doing, but they caused this big international incident. The pirates were fucking with people over the phone, since they didn’t know what to do. I was like, That’s what this movie should be about—the guys on the other end of the phone.
The guy who doesn’t know what he has.
…Or thinks he has something much bigger. When I went to Africa, I realized that’s what it should really be about—this misunderstanding of wealth. People were trying to take everything I had. They were trying to take my money and swindle me every way they could, which was hilarious. I didn’t have any money.
Yeah, but you’re also new and shiny to them.
I could totally see why just having the $1,500 to fly to another country would do that. Right there you have more money than they would ever have at one time. With that misunderstanding, we realized we could magnify that with a huge ship. Of course they’d think it’s worth millions of dollars—it’s an enormous ship. The truth is, the ship we filmed on was a piece of shit. It was still in business, but could’ve gone out of business in like a month. Pirates don’t know that when they attack.
That misunderstanding of worth is crazy. The pirates are so sheltered from the reality of international shipping that they only act on rumors.
Fuck, some of the ship crew get captured and held for so long. But they’re poor, so no one gives a fuck. They aren’t the people who are going to get all of the attention from the news. There were hostages in Somalia held for 24 months or 36 months. A guy just got out a couple weeks ago who had been there for three years. It’s bonkers.
Everything is a compromise. In your film’s case, the compromises never seem to go the protagonist’s way.
That’s how we’re going to advertise the film. It’s a bummer.
You have cast and crew from all over the world including Kenya, Somalia, France, the United States, and Belgium. Did you come across any class divides or differences when dealing with your local and international actors?
The differences were shown in 1,000,000 different ways while making the movie. When the European actors came on set, they acted like us—like Westerners. They can’t sleep in the same sort of bed others slept in; they need a special bed. They need more time to do everything. It was a crazy culture clash on all levels. Movies are already a hierarchy.
What were some differences in people’s approach to making the movie?
One of the most visible ways differences played out was the fact that we shot in Kenya, where Somali’s are immigrants and sort of considered second-class. There was some xenophobia on set. Sometimes some of the Kenyan crew and some of the actors would freak out if a [Somali] said something to them without the appropriate degree of respect. Those are misunderstandings I wouldn’t even be aware of, because they were both speaking a language I couldn’t understand.
Did that not knowing ever get you into trouble? Did anything ever shock you?
The whole place feels slippery. Things fall into chaos casually.
Being in a vaguely lawless place, on boats constantly…
Being on a boat all of the time is really difficult, because I get seasick. People got seasick all the time.
You’re named after a boat, made two movies about boats, and you get seasick?
I like tales of the sea. I don’t think I necessarily wanted to do this because it was at sea, but because I like pirates and they're at sea.
Simple enough.
I just had to do it. That’s what I keep forgetting. When I try to over intellectualize why I made the movie, it was really simple: I I was excited and fascinated about piracy in a way I’d never been about anything. My other passion was to make movies. I had to make a movie about pirates. That’s it.
Click here to download Fishing Without Nets.
Follow Jeff on Twitter.
]]> Jeffrey Bowers film, Fishing without nets, Cutter Hodierne, VICE Films, film, sundance film festival, fishing without nets film, movies, vice movies, somali pirates, somali pirates movie, film about somali pirates, Kenya, pirates, hijacking, Boats, films, Jeffrey Bowers
'Gregor' Is a Great New British Comedy About Doing Nothing Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:40:00 +0100
“Millennial,” “Generation Y,” or, according to Bret Easton Ellis, “Generation Wuss.” Whatever you want to call this current crop of 18- to 30-year-olds, we're constantly getting the shit kicked out of us for the crime of being born during a period that both hangs success in front of our faces and crushes any real hope of ever attaining it.
Gregor, a new independent British film, hones in on this generational problem, following the life of a 20-something after he's fired from an internship. It’s about wanting to break out of type, but not having the impetus to go about doing it because everywhere you look there’s reconfirmation that you’re “narcissistic,” “privileged,” and “lazy.”
His solution is the film’s tagline: “Do nothing,” which is a reaction to the conflict of external pressure to achieve traditional goals (great job, hot spouse, nice house) and internal ambitions (become a world-renowned house DJ, collect Byzantine mosaics, publish a pamphlet of politically-charged poetry on rice paper).
The film was funded by £8,000 ($13,000) raised on Kickstarter and managed to become a vastly superior movie to Zach Braff’s latest, which went through the same crowdsourcing machine and raised $3 million. Eschewing angst for happiness, Gregor is as funny and uplifting as a movie about being a total fuck-up can possibly be.
I spoke to Mickey Down and Konrad Kay—the director/writer team—about the notoriety of Gen Y, their comedic influences, and quitting a finance job to become a filmmaker.
VICE: What came first—the character of Gregor or the themes you wanted to explore?
Mickey Down:
It’s the chicken and the egg—one informed the other. Konrad and I had always wanted to create something about how we interpreted the experience of being in your mid 20s.
Konrad: Fundamentally, it tells the story of a guy who chooses the path of least resistance, with his eyes on a prize that he can’t be bothered to work for. The character of Gregor aimed to sum up all those feelings of mid-20s angst, ambition, and aspiration within a character that may be slightly feckless but ultimately isn’t a bad guy. It’s not gloomy. It’s a comedy.
What drew me to Gregor originally was the tagline and the poster, both of which sum up the film pretty nicely.
Mickey: Yeah, Gregor is a guy who wants it all—even if “all’ means a carton of milk, a widescreen TV, and a box set of The Sopranos—but in return for as little effort as possible. That’s the way the Penrose stairs on the poster came about…
Konrad: He’s locked in a neve rending cycle of pleasure and punishment, getting nowhere and learning nothing.
Gregor waits around for good things to come to him, without doing any work. Do you think this is a widespread thing for young people?
Mickey: I don’t know if we would go as far as to say that it’s “a widespread thing,” but I feel that one of the characteristics of this generation—in the Western world certainly—is that its expectations far outweigh what, in many scenarios, is realistically possible. The initial tagline for the film was “a generation who feel they can do anything by right and end up doing nothing by default,” and it was always these kinds of characters who we wanted to explore.
Konrad: There’s a feeling among certain young people like Gregor that, because you’ve been privileged with a good education and all the tools needed for success, you can wait around and let that success find you, rather than going out there and achieving it yourself.
So why is this laziness particular to our generation? Why us, why now?
Mickey: That's a difficult question. Maybe there's a tendency for millennials to feel oppressed by a lack of opportunity, the state of the economy, to play the victim: "Have you seen the state of shit out there? It's not my fault. Turn on the TV." To give a non-generic answer: Maybe one point of difference is the instant affirmation of social media—"likes" on Instagram and stuff. That whole currency gives you a weird kind of satisfaction, a momentary sense of achievement. Give yourself enough of those little fixes of social approval and you feel like you've achieved something. You don't need to get off your arse to feel that.
This is your first film—what were your influences?
Konrad: We really wanted to marry a completely natural tone of acting with absurd or heightened situations. Some early episodes of Louie, like the one where his date leaves in a helicopter, does that really nicely. The other influences are too wide to list—Lena Dunham, Peep Show, Woody Allen, Withnail and I. We're obsessed with comedy, so it's all there. That said, we’re massively influenced by Steve McQueen, especially Shame, and there are some scenes that purposefully pay homage to that film.
Mickey: A lot of the way it looked was in coordination with our director of photography, Sam Goldwater. We thought there was no reason that a comedy shouldn't look good and be nicely framed. That look doesn't have to be just for art house stuff.
Before making the film, you guys also worked in business, so a lot of your own lives echo throughout the film. Are you guys Gregor, or are you better than him?
No. Gregor has too much sex. That was other people. I’m sure we’ve all fucked up and made as many bad decisions as Gregor, but unlike him I’d like to think we’re slightly better at learning from our mistakes.
Gregor also satirizes big business and huge salaries. What advice would you give young people who want to work for the highest possible salary?
Mickey Do whatever makes you happy and fulfills your potential. For us, working in finance was never going to work out because we were pretty shit at it. Konrad got fired and I jumped before I was pushed.
Konrad: Then again, we have friends who work in finance who absolutely love it and who we couldn’t possibly imagine doing anything else. If you think being a banker is going to fulfil your potential and make you happy, then go for it. We’re not nihilists.
Follow David Whelan on Twitter
Gregor is currently showing at Raindance Film Festival.
]]> David Whelan film, Gregor, Raindance, millenial, gen y, gen x, Brett Easton Ellis, British, indie, film, comedy, Peep Show
A Few Impressions: Jimi Hendrix, Behind the Music Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:26:00 +0100
André 3000 as Jimi Hendrix. Photo courtesy of Darko Entertainment
There’s a new film out about Jimi Hendrix, written by the guy who adapted Twelve Years a Slave from the Solomon Northup memoir. But you wouldn’t know by the title, Jimi: All Is by My Side. I was a huge Hendrix fan in high school, listening to the albums on repeat at my friend Ken’s (the Monterey Pop Festival recording was our favorite), and still can’t quite figure the title out. But maybe this is supposed to be an extreme insider’s take on Jimi.
The film uses strange, superimposed titles to introduce characters in a story that otherwise stays firmly ensconced in its diegetic era of the rising flower children. The titles feel like they belong in a documentary, and the performances, especially André Benjamin (Outkast’s André 3000) as Jimi, are strong and convincing enough to be mistaken as nonfiction. But the lighting and production design are stylized to the point of purple-haze dreaminess. While the world is evoked with enough balance between realistic acting and hazed atmosphere to capture the spirit of the greatest gypsy guitar-playing mystic legend to ever live, the filmmakers fall in and out of some of the pitfalls that are present when making a biopic—especially when making a biopic about an artist when the production doesn’t have the rights to the art. That’s the elephant in this room, right? They couldn’t get the rights to Jimi’s music.
It’s a shame, because this film was certainly deserving of the music. Benjamin only plays a handful of songs that are recognizable, e.g., when Jimi played “Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” in London with half of the Beatles in attendance. Like the movie about Francis Bacon that didn’t use any of his actual paintings, or the same thing with Jean-Michel Basquiat, and even Jackson Pollock (in the Ed Harris take), it could be argued that the art was replicated sufficiently in their respective movies to keep the skein of the narrative intact without too many distracting omissions.
The Jimi movie works on the level of performance: All of these actors and films deliver the men behind the artists. But what does it mean to not have their art represented? Especially when the art is as recognizable as Jimi Hendrix songs? It’s one thing to replicate a Jackson Pollock drip painting (which Ed Harris does very, very well—coincidentally, there is the bottom half of one in the Hendrix movie), and it’s another thing to play at a Jimi Hendrix instrumental style. In the former we accept the drip painting as at least a representation of the original, and even if we are Pollock specialists and know that the movie version isn’t exactly right, we go with it, just like we go with the idea of talking monkeys if the world around them supports the fantasy. But when in scene after scene we hear songs that almost sound like Jimi, but never break into full-blown Jimi songs, we keep waiting, and waiting, and waiting.
But there is something interesting about the way this film deals with its handcuffs. Instead of the conventional artist biopic that gives us a bunch of everything that we already know, we get an approach that seemingly conjures up the secret Jimi, the authentic Jimi, the Jimi behind the music. The first third of the movie has Imogen Poots’s character (she plays Linda Keith, the woman who discovered Jimi and was also Keith Richards’s girlfriend) as the lead; Jimi hardly talks while she guides him away from playing backup in Greenwich Village to leading his own band in London. There, like Lana Del Rey four decades later, he eventually broke out. This approach allows the audience to gradually get closer to Jimi in the same way—and at the same time—that Imogen’s character gets to know him. She is the early motor for the film, and an excellent and intriguing one, as she is a woman connected to two musical geniuses but not a musician herself. (It's worth noting that Kathy Etchingham, an Australian girlfriend of Hendrix's who is depicted as enduring a brutal beating at his hands in the movie, has disputed its accuracy.)
Once in London, Jimi starts to take over as the narrative motor, dating around and establishing his stage presence. Throughout this section of the film, we hear him play but never sing. André 3000 is so good at Jimi’s mannerisms, and voice, and the psychology underneath the surface, that we believe it’s Jimi without hearing the actual songs. It’s just not the Jimi we expect. The lack of Hendrix songs actually adds to the authenticity by cutting down on the Hollywood approach of inserting obvious songs in convenient places, and instead gives the impression that we are watching things as they really happened because Jimi wasn’t playing his most well-known hits from the beginning.
The climax comes when Jimi actually sings, which is a little strange because he wasn’t known for his singing, and is said to have hated his own voice. But in this movie, because the audience has been waiting for it the entire film, his singing voice is a welcome crescendo that finally fulfills the expectation set at the beginning and deferred for so long. I see now that it was the final piece that we were waiting for, the last test for André 3000 and the film to pass: He looks and talks like Jimi, he dresses like Jimi, he understands Jimi’s mind, but will he sing like Jimi? We don’t care if he can play guitar like Jimi, because we wouldn’t know if he’s actually playing or not, but the singing is where we can actually judge, and when he does sing, and succeeds, so late in the film, we retroactively ask: Would it have been better if we had heard it earlier? No, not in this film. This film is about the man behind the music. If you want the famous songs, you can go buy the records.
]]> James Franco film, Jimi Hendrix, movies, film, music, London, 1960s, Keith Richards, Lana Del Rey, drugs, Raging, Outkast, Andre 3000, Linda Keith, Greenwich Village, Jimi: All is by My Side
The New Film 'Bypass' Offers a Raw Look at Life in Post-Industrial England Wed, 01 Oct 2014 06:00:00 +0100
George MacKay as Tim in Duane Hopkins's new film Bypass
Bypass is the second full-length film from British director Duane Hopkins. His first, Better Things, is a sprawling exploration of heroin use in central England, where he grew up. The film featured real people Hopkins encountered during his extensive research and received the Critics' Award for Best Film at the Stockholm International Film Festival.
The seed for Bypass was sown when Hopkins was working on Better Things. He interviewed three kids who were about to break into the houses of people they knew in the area and steal their stuff. One member of the trio seemed more conflicted than the others, and Hopkins found that this figure stuck with him after making Better Things. Had he gone through with the crime? And what had become of him since?
Hopkins's new film follows Tim, played by George MacKay, as he struggles to provide for himself and his sister by selling stolen goods in an anonymous satellite town. I spoke to the director about his motivations for making the film, his creative process, and the realities of working-class life in post-industrial Britain.
VICE: First of all, can you talk me through the research process for Bypass?
Duane Hopkins: I spent about six months researching the film before I started drafting. Part of the point of doing this project was to broaden my experience of what life is now like in these working-class towns, because it seems to have changed so much from when I was growing up. What struck me was how generous these people are in telling you what they're up to. It felt like they didn’t really have any outlet to discuss these things. One kid in particular, who'd recently been released from prison, talked me through his career as a car thief. He reckoned he'd stolen 300 cars and, at one point, was doing three cars a night.
How do you go about forming a narrative from all of that information?
The narrative came quite naturally because I heard so many similar stories. It was amazing how many kids I met who were between 17 and 21 years old and were responsible for holding their family together. What I’ve made isn’t a documentary, but at the same time everything I’ve used in the film comes from the research. I wanted to make a film that showed what these kids’ lives were like in a sensitive but also a compelling way.
Do you see Bypass as a work of social realism?
No, I wouldn’t say so. My work needs to be extremely authentic, but it has to be emotionally and narratively honest. Even though I use ingredients of social realism, I want to make something more poetic, more lyrical, with them. Those ingredients are just a starting point.
The camera work in the film is almost intensely intimate. Is that a way of bringing out this lyricism?
It’s way of trying to put some beauty onto the top of the hardness of what you're seeing, because all the characters have internal lives, and their internal lives are very different from their external lives. Even though their circumstances are tough, there’s still hope for them. Tim and Lilly are characters trying incredibly hard. I wanted to articulate that as much as possible and move away from the realist register.
An excerpt from Bypass
The intensity of the soundtrack plays a big role in suggesting this interior life. How closely did you work with the guys who scored the film, Danny Bensi and Saunder Jurriaans?
They were involved with the last third of the editing, which is quite unusual. I wanted the composing to be part of the editing itself and for it to shape the narrative.
I also put a lot of emphasis on sound design, which I think a lot of films underuse. We worked with a guy called Chris Watson, who used to be in Cabaret Voltaire and then moved into field recording. He now does sound recording for David Attenborough’s shows. I used a lot of material from his archive to bridge the gap between sound design and the composed music.
These elements all come together to produce something quite raw and harrowing. Why do you think British directors in particular seem to be drawn to the grittier, bleaker aspects of life?
I actually don’t find my films that bleak. I find them sort of Romantic in the same kind of way as the Romantic art movement. For me, the most interesting thing about film is the same as what's most interesting about music: You can experience an emotion without actually having to go through it. The dark in cinema space is a safe place to go in order to see how other people live and what their experiences are like.
I’m not sure why Brits have the tendency to go to this place, though. In some way it must be a reflection of what our society is like and something that needs to be shown. It always surprises me that people in London will react to these types of films by questioning if this is really what the rest of this country is like. And you have to say: “Yes, there are these people leading these other lives.”
Yeah, the lack of a specific location for Bypass struck me as positioning the town to be anywhere that isn’t London.
Yeah, I’ve lived in and out of London, and when you’re in it there is this idea that it's only London that exists. The film is basically set anywhere that manufacturing has disappeared and the communities still haven’t recovered. What's developed there is a new class of people and a new kind of identity.
In Better Things, the elderly and the young are both united in their suffering. In Bypass, the older generation seems to pity the young. Is this a response to how things have changed since you made Better Things?
I made Better Things because some of my friends started dying through drug use and I needed to find out why my other friends were still doing heroin when they could see the mortal end of it. I found that their drug use was a way of providing themselves with continuity, like being in a relationship. So within Better Things the younger and older generation are after the same thing; they just have different avenues to get to it.
The attitudes of the older people in Bypass are a reflection of what I found when I spoke to people during my research. The older generation often said they'd had a job for life, but their grandkids now have a job for a few weeks on some shitty zero-hour contract. They all have sympathy for these kids because they don’t have the stability they had.
Even in the past few days we’ve seen more cuts to benefits, and to justify this politicians attempt to ascribe agency to people, suggesting a life of crime or a life on benefits is a choice. Do you see your film as working against that falsehood?
The thing is that these guys in power know that these kids are depoliticized. So the politicians know there’s no reason to appeal to them, because it won’t get them votes. I don’t think it’s conspiratorial to discuss these things; it’s just actually how it is. I hope my film shows this reality.
Bypass is political in this way. but I didn’t aim to make something dogmatic or didactic. It comes back to authenticity. When I meet these kids and set a film in their environment, I have to be true to the subject matter, and I have to be respectful of what their lives are like.
Follow Alex Horne on Twitter.
]]> Alex Horne film, Duane Hopkins, Bypass, british film, interview, Alex Horne, Better Things, post industrial britain, identity, Working Class, labor, theft, Burglary, crime, capitalism, struggle, culture, film, industry, britain, England, economics, Making ends meet
VICE Shorts: I'm Short, Not Stupid Presents: 'The Black Balloon' Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:45:00 +0100
I love balloons—party balloons, animal balloons, hot air balloons, condom balloons... They’re wonderful to pop with sharp objects. But perhaps most importantly, they can sometimes soar in a truly magical way. In 2012's The Black Balloon, 100 colorful balloons are accidentally released into the New York City sky. But a lone black balloon manages to get caught in a tree. Will it be set free again? Will it be taken in and given a home? No, it is thrown into a garbage truck compactor and sent to a landfill. However, it’s not over for the balloon. Emerging from the trash, the balloon, now with a mind of its own, sets off on a search for companionship through the alien landscape of Manhattan. Like a kaleidoscope of the city, the balloon intersects randomly with people in slice-of-life moments and quickly finds itself the partner of a number of damaged people. They literally drag the rubbery fellow into their problems. Josh and Benny Safdie’s The Black Balloon is the gritty New York portrait of a balloon that mirrors Albert Lamorisse's lovely 1956 French classic The Red Balloon.
Set almost in an alternate reality to the psychedelic sounds of Gong, the city’s hard luck citizens are not only able to acknowledge and communicate with this black balloon, but act as if it weren’t out of the ordinary. Similar to much of the Safdie’s previous work, the characters and story represent the fringe of emotions and society. They paint a specific, yet naturalistic portrait of New York—warts and all. At 20 minutes, the film is a slight investment. But you get to see a balloon rob a store, which is cool.
This is the perfect time to watch The Black Balloon, considering the US premiere of the Safdie brothers' new feature film, Heaven Knows What, is happening this week. The film screens at the New York Film Festival at 9 PM this Thursday, October 2nd, and 8 PM this Sunday, October 5th. Before they made The Black Balloon (2012), they made the feature documentary Lenny Cooke (2013), about the greatest has-been basketball player, and the feature narrative Daddy Longlegs (2009), which premiered at Cannes Film Festival and played Sundance. They make a heck of a lot of other short films and cool shit as part of Red Bucket Films. Check out my little interview with brother Josh Safdie and a fascinating video that traces the The Red Balloon's shooting locations via Google Maps below.
VICE: Why balloons?
Josh Safdie: Rubber prevents conception, usually. Here it breeds life. Sometimes I’m described as a gassed up helium balloon. Throughout my childhood, I was told to calm down. The Red Balloon was an early film that shook us (our father grew up in Italy/France). Because it was one of the first movies we saw and we were already familiar with the book (the child-novelization of the film), it was very deep for us. Lamorisse’s classic taught us about loneliness and the human condition, all through the companionship of a balloon.
Andy Spade sent us a video on his phone of a black balloon determined to stay alive in the midst of a busy avenue. Cars kept running it over and it kept narrowly escaping. He wrote me, "You know The Red Balloon? How about a film about a black balloon?"
The film is ostensibly from the point of view of the balloon, but you also have these slices of life in which the balloon is peripheral. How did the arc come about?
After Andy sent us that video, Benny and I were interested in this sci-fi element to a creature… like a lifeless piece of rubber living among humans. We were also most interested in the personal monologue, i.e.: people who would talk to a balloon. I talk to many things—anyone or thing that will listen. But then again, I’m pretty alone. The characters we’re attracted to are islands. The balloon is just an extension of our own perspective and attraction to human life.
I love how much you vary the balloon's perspective. Sometimes you use close-ups, wide shots, while other shoots seem voyeuristic. What were all of the techniques you used to film a semi-animate object?
There weren’t many “techniques.” Often we talked with Sean Price Williams about the balloon and referred to it as “he” so it was no different than establishing perspectives and shots for any other character in a film we had done. Because the balloon lives on the streets, we were mostly relegated to our perspective of him via street photography.
Did you have any serious mishaps with your titular star?
Sure, he died and came back to life a bunch of times. Thanks to John Furgason.
What are you guys working on now?
We’re currently unleashing Heaven Knows What, another street opera. It's a feature film that follows Harley (based on the real-life memoirs written by Arielle Holmes, who plays Harley) through her self-imposed dramatic life on the streets and her love with both Ilya (a beautifully evil and destructive boyfriend) and heroin (the not-so beautifully evil drug).
Jeffrey Bowers is a tall mustached guy from Ohio who's seen too many weird movies. He currently lives in Brooklyn, working as a film curator. He's currently the Senior Curator for Vimeo's On Demand platform. He has also programmed at Tribeca Film Festival, Rooftop Films, and the Hamptons International Film Festival.
]]> Jeffrey Bowers film, short films, The Black Balloon, The Red Balloon, I'm Short, Not Stupid, Josh and Benny Safdie
Watch Matthew Frost's New Short Film Starring Kirsten Dunst Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:15:00 +0100
Aspirational is a new short directed by fashion filmmaker and photographer Matthew Frost, the mastermind behind Fashion Film and a longtime VICE pal. Following his trio of Vogue shorts Best Actress of All TimeSlow Motion, and Scripted Content—starring Kate Winslet, Cate Blanchett, and Jessica Chastain, respectively—Frost is continuing his examination of celebrity and isolation in the modern age. In Aspirational, his star is Kirsten Dunst, who gets bombarded with unwanted attention from two bratty fans who want to use the actress merely as a prop in their selfies. It's a reminder that stars get into awkward situations just like the rest of us, and that people have a breathtaking capacity to be assholes.
We gave Frost a call to talk about his short and wound up chatting about social media and why he works with "Slamming Babes" so much.
VICE: This video has really blown up, it’s everywhere!
Matthew Frost:
Dude, I know. I've been trolling the Internet today! So many amazing articles! I use Twitter to get information, but I don’t really share anything on Twitter. I’m not like, Oh my God, like, this is so cool! You can’t share shit on Instagram [that way.] There are no links, you can’t pre-promote anything. Some people just promote themselves. Like they actually promote their physical beings, but you can’t really promote anything that you’re doing with actual words. It’s just like blurbs and things. Just pictures, stuff you see.
Like, if you see Kirsten Dunst on the street...
Yeah. That’s it, like you can’t say: Hey I wrote this. I wrote this essay. There’s no link, you can’t link, or even if it’s silly, you can’t go deeper than just that picture. I mean, it is what it is. It’s just funny.
How did you come up with the storyline for Aspirational?
The story came from the same sort of series of films that I've been doing lately where I'm offered the opportunity to work with a massive actress, and it’s like: What are you gonna do with her in a short period of time?
It sort of became these fictionalized portraits—sort of what I think that these actresses would be doing if they were confronted with things that everybody does. Say, googling themselves, or checking themselves online, or having people take a picture of them. And, in this case, it's not discreet. Someone's going up to Kirsten and taking a selfie. I'm imagining what that interaction would be like for her.
I guess it's a continuation of these little stories, but it’s all fictionalized and pretty scripted. But the fact that they're amazing actresses, they also sort of make it seem like they're completely playing themselves. So I’m not sure what their opinions of these real-life situations are. I think Kirsten agrees that people taking selfies with her kind of sucks. I think it’s more fictionalized, and I'm trying to get a feel of what that would be like—how random this would be. You see people taking selfies all around you. Say you’re in a restaurant and you see people taking selfies, it's still weird to me. It's become OK. It's cool. And it's just weird to observe, right?
That’s how Aspirational came about—through observing people. And it’s even more creepy when people want to take selfies of a celebrity, or a person they think is a good person and want to be seen with, you know? It’s like the ultimate popularity thing. And it’s quantified in actual numbers. You can assess your popularity with numbers. Pretty fucked up, man.
Why is it that so much of your work focuses on females?
Well, what you’re trying to say is why do I keep shooting slamming babes?
I don’t know, it’s an interesting question. I mean, I tried shooting slamming dudes, but I just feel sort of increasingly uncomfortable when I have work on their poses. Working in photography, especially today, there’s definitely a lot of babes. You know I see people personal art photos and I can hear them saying, "Yeah, in my personal work I just like to document my friends....and some of them just happen to be babes who are cool and just like to chill.." There's always that thing where it’s babes instead of dudes. But now I do more film stuff, and I think the opportunities I’ve gotten have been with girls. I think if you’re looking for little films with fashion outlets or clothing brands, they’re kind of geared toward women. But then I think personally it’s always been a very natural sort of gravitation towards girls. I grew up with four sisters.
I think with guys, there’s a distance. With women, it goes beyond just seduction. I think that just a distance, a sort of a quiet observation of how that mechanism works, and how you could imagine they’re feeling at a certain time is... I don’t know. There’s a distance with women, and from a guy's perspective it’s always from the outside looking in. But it just depends on the distance, and some people are more comfortable getting a little closer. And other people are able to do a portrait from a little bit further back.
I feel uncomfortable objectifying, though it is inevitably [objectifying]. Even though you’re selling clothes and stuff, there’s still a weird thing, like hypersexual and stuff. And my films are what happens after that, and when [the women] are alone. There’s this isolation, and I think it’s exacerbated by celebrities because there’s an extra element of them being these hyper-women. These strong women of today, these big actresses, like Kate Blanchett—she commands a lot of respect. She dominates the space, and they all do. OK, I love women, fine!
But I think it’s more about being interested in those particular characters, but also the opportunities that I get through these brands and these things that are women-centric, you know? And then the tone is what we’re really working in. And you try to be consistent with it. That’s the thing that I want to go back to, which is I think a mood, a mood throughout the films. Beyond women or men, I think it’s just this space or zone—the way you think in your head—that I’m trying to execute through that filter.
I feel that that’s very obvious throughout all of the pieces, they all seem to have that kind of connection. Do you have anything else coming up that you’re excited about? What’s next for you?
Well these films have come up in a way where it’s so last-minute and also part of the exercise where you come up with the idea, and then you just execute it the best you can. It's a quick turnaround. I’ve been really fortunate to have these opportunities sort of just thrown on my lap. It’s really nice that I don’t know when the next one comes up. There are a couple more of these films that could happen, but I don’t know how many of these you can do. My time is sort of divided between writing another screenplay and trying and extend and push the opportunities I’ve had with these shorts into a longer format. It's hopefully not too far away. And then I have the photos and commercials. I’m lucky to be very busy.
Yeah, you’re the busiest person I know, I think.
I know. I don’t have two or three of these shorts under my arm waiting for dispatch. But, I think it would be nice to have something that connects overall, just a little bit longer—in a short format, but still a little bit longer than two minutes. I think that would be quite interesting. But, but my main goal is to get into long form with a similar tone to these shorts. Trying to preserve that in something long is the goal.
Follow Matthew Frost on Twitter and Instagram.
]]> film, matthew frost aspirational, aspirational kirsten dunst, Matthew Frost, matthew frost fashion, matthew frost kirsten dunst, Kirsten Dunst, frost aspirational, aspirational dunst, aspirational, Fashion Film, Jessica Chastain, Best Actress of All Time, kate winslet, Cate Blanchett, Scripted Content, Slow Motion, celebrity
A Documentary on the Aborted Nicolas Cage/Tim Burton Superman Movie Is Coming Soon Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:40:00 +0100
Years before Christopher Nolan drastically altered the modern superhero genre, the late 1990s powerhouse trio of Tim Burton, Kevin Smith, and Nicolas Cage were poised to do the same. Unfortunately, Hollywood pulled the plug before the general public could get a glimpse at their cinematic vision—a radical reinterpretation of the Superman myth.
Director Jon Schnepp (Metalocalypse, The Venture Bros) and producers Holly Payne and Heather Piper are determined to lift the veil on what could have been the greatest Superman iteration that never was. In The Death of Superman Lives: What Happened?he interviews everyone from Burton, writer Kevin Smith, costume designer Colleen Atwood, and all of the people in-between who poured years of creativity into a project that never saw lift-off. I recently caught up with Schnepp to chat about the game-changing ability of Superman Lives and the heartache of Hollywood.
VICE: What makes this documentary subject matter appeal to you? What about it drives you to tell this story?
Jon Schnepp: The real basic reason was that I personally wanted to know why this film didn’t get made. I always trust my gut when I write or direct anything—I always know that if I like what I’m doing, my nerd brethren will get exactly what I’m doing and that motivates me. I couldn’t stop thinking, Why did a movie that got so far in its production suddenly go cold? I mean, we’re talking about Tim Burton—the guy who reinvented Batman, who put superheroes back on the map as not camp. Then having it star someone like Nic Cage, who back then was a top star—he went from an incredible character actor to being an action hero: The Rock, Con Air, then it would’ve been Superman.
I had been following the art releases every couple of months. I’d randomly do a search for Superman concept art and one or two drawings would always show up. Over the years, more artwork went online—MySpace, Facebook. The artists who worked on it would drop their illustrations just out of the blue. Then Kevin Smith came out with his version of the script, and Jon Peters unleashed the design for the movie’s giant spider. More and more glimpses from the movie surfaced. Then Steve Johnson uploaded a video of the light-up rainbow suit: It had a diamond, reflective S!
Whats the most common question people ask you when they hear about this project?
“Tim Burton—was he weird?” Everyone wants to know! He was actually a really nice guy—great sense of humor, really smart.
Jon Schnepp interviewing Superman Lives director Tim Burton. All photos courtesy of Jon Schnepp
Youve been an animation director for a while now, but never made a documentary before. Besides the subject matter, what prompted you to take the leap into this kind of filmmaking?
I went to a Die Antwoord show at Meltdown Comics and ended up meeting this artist, Steve Johnson, just by chance. This guy was the creator of Slimer! He’s incredible. I knew I recognized his name, so when he went to the bathroom I quickly googled him, and when I saw he worked on Superman Lives, I got super weird with him about it. He came back and I just started asking all these questions. I could tell he was like, “Uhhh cool.” But then me and my friends all went to Rockin’ Thai, across the street from Meltdown, and I couldn’t stop talking about the light-up suit he made. I kept describing how amazing it would’ve been, from what I saw online. At one point my friend said, “Hey man, you sound like you’re really into this stuff—you should make a documentary.” But at the time I was like, “Nah.” I didn’t know how to even start with something like that. But then later, I couldn’t get the idea out of my head—this was around November 2012. I started thinking, Hey, maybe I should make a documentary! It wasn’t so much a feeling of, How hard could it be? But more like no one else was gonna make it.
So you took to Kickstarter and got the ball rolling.
Yeah, it was perfect. It was around this time I was ready to take a mini-break from animation—you know, directing cartoons can be very time-consuming, so I decided to move into this project. We put together a pitch, found a bunch of images online of what the movie could’ve been, and put together the Kickstarter page. Surprisingly, in the first weekend we got $35,000! It was really then that I thought, Oh man, people really wanna see this! But then Kickstarter became this whole headache. It just consumes every hour of your life—constantly having to remind people, asking all your friends, relatives, all these people you know in the business, and asking them to put it on their Facebook. It ended up being just a ton of work having to answer questions like, “Why should I give you $25?” And all I could say was, “Cause this thing's gonna be really cool!” But all in all, Kickstarter was the best way to go. It’s a weird thing, but I really like it. It allows you to have this flexible, creative medium.
Jon Schnepp interviewing Superman Lives producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura
What were some of the things you learned the hard way putting together a documentary for the first time?
Well, at first I thought it would take only seven months to get it done—it’s month 18 now and we’re still filming interviews. On top of that, we have three more months of heavy production every day. I kept saying, “I’ll have it together by Comic Con, man!"
Then we ran out of money and had to do another crowd-sourcing project. I was actually completely out of money by the time we flew to England to interview Tim Burton. Also, we didn’t even know if he was gonna be game to film with us! He just told us to come out and “see.” But after about five minutes of talking, he was game. Yeah, by the time we got to England, it took us that long from the start of the project to finally get Tim Burton and Kevin Smith to talk to us.
So what are your next steps for completing the film?
Well, I could’ve slapped together the film a little while ago, but I want to do it right. I still haven’t interviewed as many people as I want—people who were real important parts to it—which is why I ran the second crowd-sourcing campaign. With that, it was tough to convince people to support us again. Other people came in and out of production and would ask, “What’s the quickest way to finish it?” See, right there, that’s not the person I want to be dealing with. I want someone who asks, “What’s the way it’s supposed to be made?” And then we deliver. That was a big wake-up call. I don’t want to compromise.
I get that.
After that I spent 45 days on Twitter, Facebook—constantly doing conventions just to keep the word out. Now that’s 45 days not working on the project, but I still managed to get two interviews in doing this.
One of the most interesting things being involved in media is constantly explaining how things work. I remember when I did a music video back when I lived in Chicago: I was given $12,000 to get the job done. I remember all of my friends hearing about that and going, “Whoa, drinks on Schnepp!” But I didn’t make any money. I had to take that $12,000 and divide it up between the cast and the crew. For me, with this documentary, the big question was, “When are you gonna get Kevin Smith? When are you gonna get Tim Burton?” It just wasn’t that easy at first.
Jon Schnepp interviewing Superman Lives costume designer Colleen Atwood
Do you think there's any chance that this project could be revived? If, say, Tim Burton were open to it?
I don’t think this film could exist in the modern age—it’s a product of its time. It was produced in the late 90s where, at the time, there were very little superhero films besides Batman, Batman Returns, and then, of course, Batman & Robin. I don’t think it would get made now. I think the place we live now is all filled with nostalgia.
Also, here’s the thing: There’s no definitive version of Superman Lives. There are three separate working scripts that all have the same core story, but are individually very, very different. Kevin Smith wrote a script with Jon Peters, and then when Tim Burton came on, he hired Wesley Strick. Meanwhile, the artists were using Kevin Smith’s script as a jumping-off point for their designs. Each version is different, but [Lex] Luthor is in there and there’s a giant thing that blocks the sun, so they have similar plot points. For me, with this documentary, it’s more about, “This is probably what the movie could never be, an amalgamation. It's a take on all the takes—what it could’ve been, would’ve been.”
I approached that with how I talked to everybody: It’s a time travel. We’re both from the future, but let’s talk about something from 15 years ago—you’ve lived a whole lifetime of experiences, so you bring that to your perspective on it. I sat with Colleen Atwood, who, since working on Superman Lives, has won three Oscars, been nominated for ten. She’s moved on and done cool shit. The sadness is, here’s one of the things most of the people who worked on it completely believed in it. They thought it would be cool and all regret it didn’t get made.The fun part, for me, is talking with them about it—hearing their experiences on the film and the creativity involved. It was kind of like a purging. This is what it could’ve been.
Well, that's Hollywood—nothing is ever 100 percent until the last minute.
Burton worked on [Superman Lives] for two years. He told me, “I basically made the movie, it just never got shot.” As a filmmaker, I can totally relate. You make the storyboards, designs—actors were cast, sets were being built. There’s such a heavy amount of pre-production. Films are such a collaborative medium. When you’re making something with all these different people, it becomes a transformed thing.
I can tell when I read some of these early drafts of Superman Lives... things would’ve changed and transformed, especially when you see the designs that came even from Kevin’s script. If the film came out in '99, it would have been a hit. It had a lighter feeling that [Burton's] other films didn’t have. He wanted to show flight how it had never been seen before. And Cage had all of these great ideas of Superman as an outcast—what nerds feel like. It would’ve touched upon that in ways that no one had ever touched upon in any other superheroes.
Superman was more like a kid in the corner who got laughed at all the time, but taking that to the extreme—being a visitor from another planet. You see that in all of Tim Burton’s movies. He said, “I always felt like I was an alien, growing up in Burbank,” and that was exactly what Nic Cage saw, too. People laughed at Nic Cage from the costume test footage, but, in the final costume, Nic Cage looks badass. I had a picture of it on my phone and would show it to people, and every skeptic says, “You know what, that’s not bad.” It makes me happy. You get that flip-flop.
It’s so hard to get through to those guys at conventions, people love to hate things so much—but to battle that with just genuine sincerity, you almost can’t argue with that.
Right. My whole approach to this film is “I‘m not making fun of it." The more I found out about it, the more I realized this would have been a really special film. It’s so easy to make fun of stuff. I want to transform the opinion that exists for no reason that “this film would have been horrible.” I wanna encourage people to open their eyes and say, “Look at what this could’ve been!”
For more information on the Death of Superman Lives, visit their Facebook page.
Follow Julia Prescott on Twitter.
]]> Julia Prescott film, Superman Lives, Jon Schnepp, Tim Burton, Kevin Smith, nicolas cage, Superman, Superman Lives: What Happened?, kickstarter, film, Hollywood, The 90s, Colleen Atwood, why wasn't Superman Lives made?, Superman was an outcast, filmmakers, Filmmaking, Nic Cage, Nic Cage is a badass, the making of Superman Lives
A Few Impressions: Watch James Franco's Short Film, 'Goat Boy' Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:42:00 +0100
Goat Boy is the cobbled-together remains of a student film I made based on Frank Bidart's poem, “Herbert White.” These are the bits that were taken out of my adaptation because we didn't need backstory for the title character, played by the great and strange Michael Shannon of Boardwalk Empire.
This short is the backstory Frank provided to us to fill out Herbert. The funny thing is that Herbert is a killer and a necrophiliac, but Frank gives him some of his own life experience as context. The part about the father—that’s Frank's life. His father is a ghost who haunts his poetry. The part about the goat—that’s Herbert’s. Frank read something or other about fucking goats in a book called 21 Abnormal Sex Cases.
All those little goats are cute, eh? We shot them running around their pen the morning after the wrap party in Suffolk, Virginia. The focus puller, Chris, was hungover. We chased them around the little pen in a farm full of animals. When I went to piss, I passed a kennel full of dogs. The loudest and biggest was an overgrown hound dog, as big as a horse, with red-veined eyes and a speckled, pink and black mouth. He was barking incessantly, an evil booming echo, again and again like the hound of hell.
These actors are all Virginians, found locally at a casting call. Hundreds lined up to be in the film: children, teens, parents. Some shy, some drunk. These were the ones we chose. The father, played by Cody from Richmond, was in a band with Allen Ginsberg called the Fugs. He also plays a hunter in my film Child of God.
The line from Frank's poem, "Man’s spunk is the salt of the earth and it makes things grow," is true enough. But how should I make sense of it? In a poem it’s one thing—in a movie it’s another.
In the poem, the boy fucks a goat that gets strangled on its rope before he jerks off on the animal to bring it back to life. In the film, we didn’t have the actor fuck the goat, because it would then be anti-climactic to have him jerk off on the thing. We had him kill the goat out of anger, and then jerk off on it to bring it back to life. After all, man’s spunk is the salt of the earth and it makes things grow.
We didn’t really kill the goat—we had a vet on hand who put it under for ten minutes so it would look dead. That's the magic of movies.
Near where we shot the goat was a turkey that was so fat it couldn’t stand. Its disgusting red and blue head, dripping with excess skin, sprouted from a blob covered in molten feathers. It made me swear off turkey sandwiches for six months.
I took the clips that were left over from Herbert White, put them together, and then zoomed in, so everything is super-close and fucked up.
]]> James Franco film, James Franco, Franco, Frank Bidart, A Few Impressions, Michael Shannon, Boardwalk Empire, Goat, cumming on a goat, dead goat, Herbert White, short film, movies, the fugs, spunk
'Fishing Without Nets' Is Coming to You on October 28 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:00:00 +0100
UPDATE: Fishing Without Nets is now avaiable to download on iTunes. Go give it a watch today.
In 2012, we fell in love with Fishing Without Nets, Cutter Hodierne's short film about Somali pirates. We weren't the only ones—the film won a Sundance grand jury prize that year. The 17-minute short, starring a full cast of Somali non-actors, was spectacular, but we wanted more, so VICE decided to team up with Cutter to produce a feature-length version of Fishing. We sent him and his crew back to East Africa and they returned with a deep and beautifully shot story of Somali pirates told through the eyes of the pirates themselves.
Cutter premiered the full-length Fishing without Nets earlier this year at Sundance to glowing praise, and took home the 2014 Directing Award for US Dramatic film. Now, the film will be making its full release at the end of October. Over the course of the next month, we'll be showing the film in LA, NYC, San Francisco, Atlanta, and more.
Fishing Without Nets follows Abdi, played by Abdikani Muktar, a fisherman who, after pollution spoils the waters generations of his family have counted on for fish, uses the last money he has to smuggle his wife and son out of the country, toward a better life. Desperate to join them, Abdi succumbs to the allure of the quick money to be made as a pirate. His experience as a fisherman gives him the knowledge about shipping lanes that the hijacking party needs. Reluctant, but determined to rejoin his family, Abdi sets off to capture an oil tanker and take its crew hostage.
Watch the original Fishing without Nets short here and check out the feature film's website for more information about its release, showing schedules, and how you can host your own screening
Fishing without Nets is out October 28.
]]> VICE Staff film, Cutter Hodierne, Fishing without nets, VICE Films, film, Sundance, sundance film festival, 2014 Sundance Directing Award for US Dramatic Film, film release, NYC, LA, New Orleans, somali, pirates, somali pirates
David Lynch in Philly, a City He Feared Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:02:00 +0100
David Lynch speaking at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. All photos by the author
Two weeks ago, holding forth before an adoring audience, the silver-haired David Lynch looked right at home in the austere immensity of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts’s (PAFA) Samuel Hamilton building. He regaled his fans with a tale of a tremendous slab of roast beef he had “let out into the back yard.” The meat became rancid, swelled, and a wild animal eventually carried off a large chunk, revealing “many, many, many maggots.” The audience laughed uproariously, and Lynch beamed at the memory.
The public talk was one of four held in mid September to celebrate the opening of PAFA’s exhibition of Lynch’s paintings—his first solo show in the city since he was a student at the institution in the 1960s (he dropped out after three semesters and moved to Los Angeles in 1970). The crowd loved Lynch’s “aw, shucks” demeanor, which was punctuated by periodic bursts of his smoker’s cough. One audience member asked about the director’s favorite animal (“I had a dog named Sparky, a Jack Russell terrier; he was the love of my life”) while another, exhibiting an unbridled enthusiasm for Eraserhead, wanted Lynch to explicate the inspirations of that eldritch work. “The city of Philadelphia,” Lynch tersely replied.
It can hardly be called a loving tribute. Eraserhead can be viewed, in part, as a horrified reaction to a city in the throes of urban crisis. Lynch grew up, as he once put it, in the postwar idyll: “tree-lined streets, the milkman, building backyard forts, droning airplanes, blue skies, picket fences, green grass.” The contrast between his childhood and declining industrial Philadelphia—with its shrinking manufacturing sector, racial strife, deteriorating infrastructure, and narrow rowhouse-lined streets—could hardly have been starker.
Eraserhead is the clearest articulation of that fear of the city, a grotesque image of lives distorted by a towering industrial hellscape that utterly subsumes its inhabitants. Even the conversations are drowned out by fiercely hissing steam and the infernal rumbling of some unseen, monstrous engine.
The Heid Building, in Philadelphia's Callowhill Industrial Historic District
Lynch first lived on 13th and Wood in Callowhill, across from the old city morgue, only four blocks from PAFA. Today the area is still composed of old industrial buildings, the occasional line of well-kept rowhouses, and a few small eateries catering to local workers, many of them now closed. (“Super Lunch!” a weathered sign above a vacant building declares.) During the pre–Clean Air Act era, the remaining factories spewed smoke over the city, much to the director’s delight. “All the buildings were black, soot-covered, very pure, very filthy… it had a beautiful mood,” he recollected during a press conference with local reporters.
Philly’s deteriorating socioeconomic conditions also made their impression on the director. During his time here capital flight and the final stages of the Great Migration collided in fiercely racialized competition for diminishing jobs and city services. Lynch moved to the city in the wake of the scarring 1964 riots in North Philly and during the rise of the brutal policeman turned mayor Frank Rizzo, whose grotesque braggadocio can be neatly summed up in a mid-election statement to reporters: “I’m going to make Attila the Hun look like a faggot.”
But Lynch was an art student and did not attempt to analyze or articulate the historic forces engulfing Philly. They certainly made an impression, however. “The fear, insanity, corruption, filth, despair, violence in the air was so beautiful to me,” Lynch told reporters. “It gave me a lot of ideas… and a certain way of seeing things.”
Lynch’s work, both painting and film, is haunted by the threat of frenzied brutality, most memorably embodied in Blue Velvet’s Frank Booth. This too seems to have been influenced by his time in Philadelphia, where he lived in fear of the violence he witnessed (a young man was gunned down yards from his doorstep) and experienced (the house where he lived with his wife was broken into three times). In 1965 the city was experiencing the same swelling crime wave that engulfed the rest of America, coupled with the animosity that often attends demographic shifts in US cities. Violence historically breaks out when neighborhood racial boundaries begin to change, with the white population often getting an assist from the police, and the increasing African American population was still moving into historically white neighborhoods. The director recalled walking around his neighborhood carrying a long piece of wood studded with nails for protection. A police car approached, and the officer, inspecting the makeshift weapon, simply told Lynch, “Good for you, bud,” before driving away.
Such scenes were a world away from the swirl of the reception for the PAFA exhibit. Federal Donuts provided platters of David Lynch–themed doughnuts. (“Blue Velvet” and “Cherry Pie” were colored with an especially ill-making ardor.) The faint tang of tobacco hung around many of the doughnut-engorged guests, as though most of the attendees had taken up the vice again in honor of Lynch, an inveterate user (“Do I have time to grab a smoke?” he asked before the press conference). The line for Lynch’s first film—Six Men Getting Sick Six Times (available on YouTube)—snaked out the door. “This is the most people I’ve seen here since the Andrew Wyeth retrospective in the 1960s,” grinned one of Lynch’s contemporaries. Lynch himself didn’t appear at the reception.
The scene seemed to bear out Lynch’s claim that Philadelphia is “very much brighter than when I was here… more of a normal city.” Perhaps he described the contemporary city this way because he is now rich and famous and, when he visits the city, is housed far away from Callowhill’s 13th and Wood. Since Lynch’s tenure the neighborhood has been aspirationally dubbed “the Loft District” by (presumably) developers. It is speckled with fancy condos, but the overwhelming mood is still of neglect and postindustrial decay.
On the day after the opening, a man slept curled on a steam grate at Lynch’s old intersection. Litter was strewn liberally across the scene and rusted air-conditioners hung precipitously from the windows of the Hein Building (former site of an envelope manufacturer). Discarded clothing dotted the pavement, a lone sneaker here, a soaked pair of Eagles sweatpants there. The only sound was a lone buzz saw that periodically roared to life somewhere in the vicinity.
Callowhill and many of Lynch’s other old haunts are close enough to downtown that they may, eventually, be incorporated into the halo of relative recovery that surrounds the urban core. But the latest Census data shows that Philadelphia’s poverty rate is a staggering 26.3 percent. The city is weighted with a hideously unfunded public school system, a middling economy, and a tax base that cannot provide the services its citizens need. Eraserhead captures the nightmarish aspects of 1960s Philadelphia. But the horrors that inspired Lynch are still here, if a little less evident from a downtown hotel.
]]> Jake Blumgart film, David Lynch, philly, Philadelphia, pennsylvania, urban life, Urban Decay, revitalization, American cities, movies, film, eraserhead, blue velvet, Twin Peaks, cigarettes, Callowhill
There Are Far More People Named Hitler Than You'd Think Mon, 22 Sep 2014 05:00:00 +0100
A birthday cake for Adolf Hitler Campbell
Names are important. Without one, it’s very hard to buy personalized mugs or introduce yourself to people. However, they can also be a burden. One of my ninth-grade teachers was called Mr. Hyman, for instance, which can’t have been easy. And put yourself in the shoes of Mr. Dick Assman, or anyone who shares a name with Justin Lee Collins. That can’t be easy, either.
In his new documentary Meet the Hitlers, director Matt Ogens—the guy behind Confessions of a Superhero – explores just how much a name can influence an identity. Meeting a diverse group of people with the surname Hitler (or Hittler), which arguably comes with more baggage than literally any other name in existence, the film looks at how their lives have been affected, for better or worse.
I gave Matt a call to speak about the making of the film.
VICE: Hi, Matt. Why did you decide to track down loads of Hitlers?
Matt Ogens: I have a friend from college who married a guy by the last name of Hitler. I remember visiting them and seeing the name on the buzzer. I would get Christmas cards saying, “Happy Holidays from the Hitlers!”, and there was something quirky about it. It got me thinking what it must be like to take on that name or to be born with that name. How it would affect your life, positively or negatively.
How your name plays into your identity.
Exactly. We all have our names, but if you don’t have an odd name you usually just take it for granted. If you have an odd name, how might that affect you? How would that shape your life? I wanted to take what is arguably one of the most notorious names in history and do a social study from that perspective.
Was it hard getting people to take part? I’d imagine quite a few Hitlers would be happy to keep the name, but not necessarily want to make a big song and dance about it.
For a start, a lot of people with that name don’t list it because they don’t want prank calls. And yeah, it’s also hard to get people to say yes, unfortunately. They assume it’s going to be a judgment thing, but one of the points of the film is to not judge a book by its cover. Don’t judge someone by their name; judge them by their actions. There are good people with that name in the film and not so good people with that name in the film.
The trailer for Meet the Hitlers
Did you meet anyone who’s really struggled with the name?
I can go through a couple of scenarios. I mean, you have a guy like Jean Hitler, an older guy—he’s probably 83 now—with four daughters, a wife, and a very nice life. He’d say he kept it because it was a family name that was around before Adolf Hitler. Why should he have to change it, you know? He said it didn’t affect him, but for his four daughters going through school... it’s probably going to have had an effect on them. One of his daughters ran for, I think, class president, but got heckled off stage and didn’t win. So people were affected in some way or another, some worse than others.
Were there any people who were totally cool with it? Anyone whose peace with it surprised you?
You have a girl like Emily Hittler, who—at the time we filmed her—was 16. She lives in a small town outside of St. Louis, so she’s insulated by her friends and family. Though, we don’t know what it’s going to be like if she goes to college, gets a job, or leaves town. My other theory with her is that she’s another generation removed from World War II, the Holocaust, and Adolf Hitler. So a 16-year-old today may not have as strong an opinion on Hitler as we did. Maybe if her name was Bin Laden it would be way worse for her.
I was going to mention that—whether you came across opinions on the name specifically colored by age or culture? Like how there are clothing stores in India named “Hitler” because the name isn't as big a part of the region's history as in Europe or America.
Absolutely. We explored all of that stuff. We explored stuff like that as a storyline in the film—we even explored other names to include in the storyline—but we didn’t go there. But the name has a different effect on different cultures. Like you said, there’s the store in India. In fact, most of them are gone now, but a few years ago there were also Hitler-themed restaurants.
Heath Campbell, who named his son Adolf Hitler Campbell
What are your thoughts on the family featured in the film who named their kid Adolf Hitler?
I’m a documentary filmmaker, so I should be objective. But I’m also a human being. Some people would say it’s a First Amendment right—that you can name your kid whatever you want. But, to me, when you’re naming a kid something like that, that’s going to affect a kid the rest of their life. I don’t feel it was down to anything other than the father, Heath Campbell, who’s a neo-Nazi. Those are his beliefs. He’s got swastika tattoos. He did it to make a statement. It wasn’t about the kid; it was about himself.
Yeah. Did you expect to meet neo-Nazis when you started production on the film?
The scary thing about making a documentary is that you don’t know the ending when you start; things change as you go deeper and deeper. At first, I thought, Hey, I’m going to make this quirky film about people with the name Hitler. Sort of a dark comedy. But it went deeper than that. It’s still a character-driven film; it’s not about saving the whales, or anything like that. It’s people. The thread is this connection between name and identity.
How connected do you think those two things are?
I think your name can affect how people react to you from an early age, which is when your brain is shaping and your identity is forming. So, for example, if you got made fun of as a kid because of your name, that may affect your identity.
Would you have kept the name Hitler if you were born with it?
If you’re born with that name, you’re born with that name. If it were me personally—I’m Jewish—I wouldn’t keep that name. And I wouldn’t give my kids that name. I get the whole reasoning of it being a family name, but to me it’s not worth going through the burden of life with it. It’s not worth putting my kids through it. But that’s just me.
I respect the decision of someone like Jean Hitler, though, who’s had the name in his family since the 1700s. I respect that, and I appreciate that he decided to keep it. So I try to be not judgmental about it. With someone like Heath Campbell—who wasn’t born with the name Hitler, but named his kid Adolf Hitler for a very specific reason—that’s a different story. That’s harder to swallow for me.
Makes sense. What else did you take away from the making of the film?
There’s a character in our film named Jim Riswold. He’s an iconic advertising creative but does a lot of conceptual satirical art on the side. One of his series pokes fun at dictators, and he did some stuff with Hitler. In a way, he’s kind of the voice of reason in the film. What he says is that people talk about Hitler in hushed tones, but that if Hitler were alive today, or watching from hell, he would like that: ‘They revere me.’ He wanted to do something in his art that would piss Hitler off and make fun of Hitler. So it’s sort of like saying, “If you mock it, you beat it.”
Besides that point, that people should be judged by their actions and who they are as people—something that says much more about you than your name.
Thanks, Matt.
The first screening of Meet the Hitlers is at the New Orleans Film Festival on Friday, October 17, but until then you can take part in the #whatsinaname project, which is cataloguing the stories behind a number of unusual names from around the world.
Follow Jamie Clifton on Twitter.
]]> Jamie Clifton film, Meet the Hitlers, Matt Ogens, link between name and identity, heath campbell, Hitler baby, Adolf Hitler, name prejudice, name stigma, interview, documentary, name documentary, people called Hitler, Name, identity, neo nazi
A Legendary ‘Simpsons’ Writer’s Long-Lost TV Pilot Just Got Uploaded to YouTube Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:00:00 +0100
There are very few pictures of legendary Simpsons writer John Swartzwelder, and he’s out of place in all of them. In one photo of the show’s writing staff, he stands near the back, mustached and not exactly smiling; he looks like a man who doesn’t want to be there, and maybe he didn’t.
Swartzwelder is for a certain kind of misanthropic comedy nerd what Robert Johnson is for blues obsessives and J.D. Salinger is for English majors: a legendary figure who is all the more legendary for being shrouded in mystery. He never does press. He allegedly got kicked out of the Simpsons writing room for chain smoking and afterward mostly worked from home, driving an old Cadillac to the office to drop off his scripts.
His fellow writers speak about him with hushed reverence. He’s universally regarded as a virtuoso. IMDB lists his birthplace as simply “the USA.” He’s so enigmatic that you half expect him to go out like Ambrose Bierce: alone in Mexico, his date of death a permanent mystery.
The man’s status is deserved, but not because of his elusiveness. Swartzwelder should be revered for all the classic Simpsons episodes he wrote. His voice is singular in its absurdism, bizarre internal logic, and obsession with bygone America. Unlike many of the show’s Harvard-pedigreed writers, he’s a proud and stubborn outsider.
And he’s still at it. He writes books these days, self-published absurdist dime-store novels about the world’s dumbest detective. They’re as funny as anything he wrote on The Simpsons, the effortless work of a truly great humorist with nothing to prove.
But his reclusive reputation gets in the way here. Because his books are self-published and look like (no disrespect intended) political manifestos salvaged from a library dumpster, you’ve got to work to find them. They don’t get nearly as much press as, say, fellow comedy legend Jack Handey’s The Stench of Honolulu, which got excerpted in the New Yorker and reviewed everywhere. Swartzwelder should be recognized as one of the funniest writers alive, no matter how tempting it is to mythologize him as merely a recluse.
Given all that, when I learned about his 1996 western comedy pilot, Pistol Pete, I immediately became obsessed with it. Like most of Swartzwelder’s career, it was half apocryphal comedy-message-board whispers, which made it easy to obsess over. What would his vision even look like played out by live actors, outside of The Simpsons and deliberately obscure paperbacks? Could it compete with a show on which Johnny Carson juggled Buicks?
Well, now we know, because it got uploaded out of the blue, plucked out of the purgatory of hazy anecdotes from actors who remember it only as a job that didn’t pan out.
Before you watch, I should say that it helps to keep your expectations in check. See, back before our current golden age of television, in which every show has to be a long, long movie, pilots mostly served to suggest the kind of show that would be made if it got picked up for the back nine. Fortunately, and maybe surprisingly, Pistol Pete holds up OK, both as an artifact and as a pilot that had potential.
It establishes itself right away as taking place in Swartzwelder’s dime-store novel universe: After some outlaws rob a bank in Abilene, Texas, the leader of the gang kills the marshal and his followers all take turns shooting the corpse for no reason. The mayor (Brian Doyle-Murray) decides to replace the deceased lawman with Pistol Pete (Stephen Kearney), an actor who plays a dime-store novel gunslinger in a New York stage show. And in keeping with Swartzwelder tradition, he’s also the dumbest person alive.
The obvious comparison point for the show is Blazing Saddles, but where that’s a Mel Brooks movie that happens to be a Western, Pistol Pete is tonally closer to Support Your Local Sheriff!—an affectionate take on the genre made for an audience that’s familiar with its quirks. Swartzwelder’s commitment to authenticity meant using as many Gunsmoke veterans as possible behind the scenes. It was even directed by John Rich, who helmed 14 episodes of Gunsmoke. As a result, Pistol Pete doesn’t look like a Western parody from 1996; it looks like a Western parody from 1976. It’s a total anachronism. In other words, just like its author.
Kearney does a noble job as the lead—he’s a blank slate, totally lacking in self-awareness—but his jokes were obviously funnier on paper. Worse, all of his lines sound like they’d play better coming out of Phil Hartman, who he almost seems to be imitating at points. When he says, “Good, this will give me a chance to clean up the whole Western frontier on my first day!” he doesn’t give the line the pathological bombast it deserves. He’s a Troy McClure imitator, and the show needs the real thing.
It’s a refreshing curiosity regardless, like any comedy that predates the current hegemonic influence of Judd Apatow and Seth MacFarlane. Of course it doesn’t soar to the impossible heights of any of Swartzwelder’s Simpsons episodes, where he had the benefit of a perfect cast and art direction that was always in service to the writing, but it’s a respectable live-action cartoon—it’s the sort of thing that could never be made now, not even as a vanity project.
It’s just good enough, in other words, to make you wish Swartzwelder could get creative free reign on cable someplace, like Chris Elliott got with Eagleheart. Not that he’d want to do anything other than write at the age of 63. He’s likely happy wherever he is and whatever he’s doing, even if we wish he’d reemerge.
Follow Kaleb Horton on Twitter.
]]> Kaleb Horton film, John Swartzwelder, The Simpsons, Pistol Pete, TV pilots, comedy, comedy nerds, recluses, famous comedy writers, Stephen Kearney, John Rich, youtube, Brian Doyle-Murray, Gunsmoke, Westerns, Western parodies, television, TV, TV recaps, TV comedy, sitcoms, cartoons, Animation, Simpsons writers, culture
Time-Travel Movies Are Garbage Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:43:00 +0100
Image via Flickr user AdamL212
It looks like Hollywood is almost done gorging itself on time-travel movies. Despite the success of this year's X-Men: Days of Future Past, the failure of Edge of Tomorrow and Mr. Peabody & Sherman might indicate an American cinema-going public that's just about had its fill of this glut.
It began in the mid 2000s and peaked in 2009, when there were seven time-travel movies, including Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel, a loving parody of sorts that was exactly the kind of plot-hole-filled mess it was making fun of.
But if these specific movies suck, it's not their fault. It's just that time-travel movies are garbage, and their decades of inconsistent plots have added nothing to the world but boring, pretentious dorm-room conversations. Time-travel movies are a tyranny, and I, for one, welcome their demise. But judging from the incoherent-looking Michael Bay–produced time-travel movie coming out early next year, we're not out of the woods yet. It's time for an intervention, so I'm not going to sugarcoat it: here are the reasons that time travel should be taken off the menu as a viable premise for science fiction.
You Always Have to Have Some New Time Machine Explained
Movie time travel should have been a simple, useful storytelling device, and it was for a while. In the 19th century, a whole bunch of time-travel fables showed up all at once, usually to teach the reader a valuable lesson about something or other. Mostly they were about being bonked on the head or something, and then waking up in another time, as in Mark Twain's A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, and its precursor Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy. Or you might be taken on a journey through time with a ghost, as in A Christmas Carol. This was a nice time for time-travel stories because they were at least simple enough to make sense.
But since H. G. Wells's The Time Machine was about a machine, it ruined everything.
If you're going to see a machine operating, you're going to think about how it works, and that's not good for movies. This means the writer, director, and production designer all start making a lot of guesses about science, depending on what cool shit they want to show you. This leads to questions you have to answer:
Is your protagonist transported to the same fixed point in the universe at a different time, which would mean after the time jump you would probably be somewhere in empty space, or is that problem just tossed out the window? Is your time machine a piloted contraption, or does it create a portal, or can it perhaps be worn on the body? Does the machine accelerate time around you, or beam you through a portal? If it accelerates time around you, do bystanders see it just sitting there for perhaps hundreds of years?
The scientific answer to all these questions is "Shut the fuck up. There's never going to actually be time travel."
The Science (There Isn't Any)
Diagram of a movie I loved in film school. Image via Wikimedia commons
Rather than a silly but coherent piece of magic we at least understand, such as a dragon, or a believable piece of futuristic science, such as a death ray, time travel is a muddy gray area in the middle. Yet whenever there's a high-profile time-travel movie coming out, you see a lot of tedious articles online about the science of time travel. Usually they place actual science from serious physicists in contrast with the work of screenwriters. Such articles are dumb, and people need to stop writing them.
Two months ago, the World Science Festival released an infographic detailing the chronology of the nine main movie franchises that involve time travel, along with a blog entry called "Time Travel Made Easy." The blog summed up the basics of what we can safely guess would make time travel work:
Going forward in time by traveling at the speed of light, like in The Planet of the Apes, is science fact, assuming you could get going that fast, which you can't. To go backward in time, you would probably need something called an "Einstein-Rosen bridge" caused by a collapsing star, and a lot of good luck. Alternatively you might just need some implausible amount of energy—like infinity joules, I guess—to move the fabric of the universe.
All of this is to say that unlike most of what we categorize as science fiction, the actual means to time travel, and the scientific consequences, are still almost as beyond the grasp of humanity as they were in the time of H. G. Wells and Jules Verne.
If you put yourself in the headspace of a reader in most of the 20th century, you would think H. G. Wells was a prophet. The machine age was this seemingly magical period when writers of fiction came up with things and then they happened. Jules Verne invented space travel by writing From the Earth to the Moon, and it came to pass. The 1920 Czech play Rossum's Universal Robots predicted robots. Isaac Asimov predicted satellite communication. Even invisibility is starting to seem plausible within our lifetimes.
But it looks pretty certain that the concept of a "time machine" is a quaint Victorian idea that will never be realized before the heat death of the universe, something science can't save us from. You know what can rescue us, at least in our minds? Fantasy.
Time Travel Is Fantasy, Not Science
Screencap via Movieclips on Youtube
What's giving time-travel movies cancer is that we're placing them all under the mantle of science fiction rather than fantasy. Imagine burdening every vampire movie with the science mumbo-jumbo we weigh all of our time-travel movies down with:
Vampire: You're now a vampire!
Protagonist: Oh, no! What's a vampire?
Vampire: Well, you see, by biting you, I've injected you with a DNA-altering serum that has changed your circulatory system, causing you to require human hemoglobin molecules for nutrition.
Protagonist: Hemo...?
Vampire: It's in blood, but fortunately my serum halts your organismal senescence, meaning the breakdown of your cells will be blocked altogether, as long as you receive a steady supply of hemoglobin. However, your photosensitivity is drastically increased.
Protagonist: Zzzzzzzzzzzz...
A recent Stephen King novel about time travel called 11/22/63 sidestepped all of this, and received a lot of much-deserved praise for having a simple, non-annoying premise: There's a portal to 1958. There just is. No mad scientist made it. It's just there. I enjoyed the book, about a guy from 2011 living out his life in the surprisingly alien recent past, but it was bound up in a plot to change the course of history, and, as such, the ending (mild and very general spoiler) got very science fiction-y and concerned with upsetting a vague sort of balance in the universe. I was mildly irritated.
But there is one perfect time-travel movie: Groundhog Day. Why is the universe conspiring to lock Bill Murray in the same day for centuries? It doesn't matter. Is there any escape? Who knows. Is it believable? That's beside the point. He time-traveled, and the audience didn't ever have to endure an expository speech from a scientist about a time paradox.
Only Geeks Care About Time Paradoxes
Image via YouTube user HardLuckWomaan
Movies are written by movie geeks, but they can usually hold off on giving you all the details about some bullshit science fiction premise when it doesn't matter. But for some reason time travel makes every screenwriter crossreference his time machine mechanic with all sorts of science questions about the nature of the universe: Are there multiple "time lines," or just one? To what degree are characters subject to the bootstrap paradox, which causes time to loop inescapably, meaning nothing can actually ever change? How, and to what degree, can you change the past, and most important of all, does causing a time paradox "destroy the universe" for some reason?
A time paradox sounds scientific, and Einstein even used the word to describe one of the more puzzling aspects of relativity. However, the old "What if I kill my grandpa?" paradox is not based on science any more than a movie time machine is based on science. Like the theoretical "Precog Echo" in Minority Report (another stupidly overcomplicated science fiction movie when you get right down to it), it’s just an idea that drives the story forward, not the necessary interference of a real scientific principle.
The idea that Marty has to make sure his parents get together or the paradox could destroy the universe is just us being self-centered. And that's fine. Stories are like that. We prioritize people’s personal problems over everything else, because we’re apes that like staring at other apes.
But Back to the Future has a bigger problem.
There's Nowhere Near Enough Hitler-Killing
If I must swallow the headache-enducing idea that time travel must always be a race to correct the past without causing a paradox, then only the rarest of protagonists have priorities that make sense. After all, there's only one thing worth doing with a time machine: killing Hitler.
So at the end of Back to the Future, Marty has to go back to the fucking future, because the title says so, right? But why? Why set the Delorean clock for 1985, when he can set it to 1916 and kill Hitler?
Also these:
• X-Men: Days of Future Past is about Wolverine’s consciousness being transported into his younger self in 1972, in order to stop some guy from launching the Sentinel Program. No. Fuck you. Wolverine was born in 1888. What he really needs to do is kill Hitler. It stops way more deaths, and bonus: It will stop Magneto, a holocaust survivor, from using his past trauma to justify a lifetime of evil. And somehow (the butterfly effect?) it will probably fix the Sentinel thing.
• Sure, Bill and Ted are funny and everything in their Excellent Adventure, but just one lousy stop off to kill Hitler while they’re finishing their history assignment, and they wouldn’t be, through their own inaction, the greatest monsters in human history. It’s bad enough that they let Napoleon live.
• Star Trek characters can time-travel more or less all they want, but they are governed by both the Prime Directive and the Temporal Prime Directive, which are about never, ever, ever interfering with the past, except when the script calls for it. Every time they do cross that Rubicon, they could just pop by and kill Hitler. All you would have to do is go to the German trench at the Battle of the Somme in 1916 and kick the shell that wounded him a few yards closer, thus killing him instead of wounding him.
And OK, maybe I just want more Hitler-killing movies. Either add more Hitler-killing or do everything I said above, and time-travel movies will stop being so terrible.
Follow Mike Pearl on Twitter.
]]> Mike Pearl film, Time Travel, movies, Michael Bay, science fiction, contraptions, accelerating time, science, film school, futuristic science, time travel movies, screenwriting, The World Science Festival, The speed of light, the fabric of the universe, quaint victorian ideas, vampire movies, boring movies, groundhog day, Killing Hitler, Deloreans, X-Men: Days Of Future Past
VICE Special: VICE and the Criterion Collection Present: Sarah Polley and Greta Gerwig on 'Frances Ha' Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:22:00 +0100 Frances Ha is a magnificent film that feels like French new wave by way of New York City (even though the character does go to France). Poignant, humorous, heartbreaking, and extremely relatable, Greta Gerwig gives a career-defining performance as the titular character in a role she co-wrote with director Noah Baumbach.
In this short doc about Frances Ha, acclaimed actress and director Sarah Polley gets real with Gerwig on the penetrating loneliness of New York City and how shitty it is to live an unstable life in your late 20s.
]]> VICE Staff film, frances ha, gretta gerwig, noah baumbach, French New Wave, NYC, movie about nyc, New York City, film, criterion, criterion collection, movie, interview, film interviews
VICE Shorts: I'm Short, Not Stupid Presents: 'The Collagist' Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:00:00 +0100
I don’t know if you’ve ever had artist’s block, but if it ever comes along just say, “No thanks.” The only solution (which has a success rate of about 7 percent) is to drink coffee, smoke, pace back and forth, sit in front of the desk for hours, and stare off into space until the spark comes back. This is about the point when one starts getting meta and makes a piece of art about struggling to make art. The fact that that move is common means that it too is cliché and usually verges on self-indulgence, but when done right it can be eye-opening—like Federico Fellini’s 8 ½ or M. C. Escher’s Drawing Hands.
There’s an animator named Amy Lockhart who, while collaborating with her partner Marc Bell, decided to address this idea of spontaneous and original creation via a vision board. However, “original” tends to be a misnomer, because creation requires influence and basically anything ever created has been informed, transformed, and combined with something else. That depressing line of nothing’s new anymore is also misrepresentative, too. Despite the fact that 74 percent of studio films released now are sequels, remakes, or adaptations shouldn’t hide the fact that there are still people out there addressing those old concepts in new and interesting ways. Lockhart tackles the artistic process with a double meta approach. In her cut-out paper animation style she portrays Marc Bell sitting at his desk drinking coffee, smoking, and struggling with his his own artworks. The artwork on Marc’s page shuffles, scuttles, blinks, changes, and morphs. The film is a decidedly more simple and lo-fi send-up of the artistic process, but the two-minute short’s light and offbeat spirit hits home in a very familiar way with no pretense. That’s what I want. No bullshit. Just fun, creation, and destruction.
I did a little interview with Amy below, and she’s as silly as her film.
VICE: Where did this idea come from?
Amy Lockhart: I've been making cut-out and paper-puppet animations since the ni-ni-ni-nineties. I learned from Helen Hill. I started out making them on 16 mm film on an Oxberry stand—then switched to digital. I use the same set-up, just with a DSLR (digital) camera. I like stop motion because it cuts down on the labor of animation (like drawing every frame), but still allows me to make things with me hands. Also, I get to improvise under the camera while shooting.
The idea came from Marc and me being asked to be resident artists at the California State Summer School for the Arts. So we had to figure out some way to collaborate. This is what we came up with. The hands are traced from his, and also the pens and scissors are all based on his tools of the trade. We both drew the cycled collage bits, and then I animated it.
Was this fun to make or only fun to see once completed? I can imagine this style of cut-out animation is tedious and painstaking.
This took way longer to complete than it should have because of the nomadic set-up I had. (I could work on it anywhere—so there was no pressure/time crunch—so I didn't work on it...) It was fun to make—other than that. I made up the "story" as I went along, playing with the cut-outs.
Your work does not focus on collage or even the blending of multiple disparate ideas at once. How was it working with Marc in creating something in your style more akin to his work?
It was fun. I am a sucker for the miniature recreations of things. I do work in a lot of different media, so it wasn't that big of a stretch. It's nice to work with someone else and have someone to bounce ideas off of. You don't feel so alone.
Have you ever had an issue with cigarettes burning a painting or artwork? My apartment has poor airflow, and I've accidentally sweated onto a watercolor and ruined a pretty wonderful painting of a person before.
No. I'm sure a cat's walked on something here or there... I have had paintings that have been lost in the mail—it's a bummer (like the cover of Nog a Dod, a great book on Canadian psychedelia that is edited by Marc Bell...) Sorry to hear about your water color. Such a delicate medium. But I have a funny story: Marc used to live in this place with a cat named Honda who would sashay into his room, look him straight in the eye, then knock over a glass of water with his paw. Dang cat! I believe this did cause the ruination of some drawings and high-quality paper goods.
What are you working on now?
Right now I am working on a feature-length animation with paper puppets and cut-outs. It's called Dizzler in Maskheraid
Watch the trailer:
]]> Jeffrey Bowers film, Amy Lockheart, Marc Bell, The Collagist, I'm short not stupid, VICE SHorts, short film, Animation, art, COLLAGE, interview
John Waters's Cavalcade of Perversions Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:00:00 +0100
Illustration by Nicholas Gazin
VICE’s Art Editor Nicholas Gazin and I shuffled ourselves over to Lincoln Center on a muggy, sweaty 9/11 day to meet one of our heroes. The list of artists I consider to be genuinely heroic is short, but John Waters is indisputably a member of that club by virtue of being the first and the best to explode numerous sacred assumptions about taste, gender norms, and authority, to say nothing of the cathartic benefits of watching a drag queen eat a dog turd.
From high art to low humor, the impact of John Waters can be detected everywhere. In its own slick and heteronormative way, mainstream Hollywood humor now takes the lessons of Waters’s films for granted, to the point where it is now difficult to find a popular comedy that isn’t richly scatological.
In recognition of the fact that Waters has so thoroughly gotten under the world’s skin over the course of a mere half century, Lincoln Center hosted Fifty Years of John Waters: How Much Can You Take?, a twelve-film retrospective of his life’s work, along with a collection of films curated by Waters called "Movies I Didn’t Make but Wish I Did," which was exactly that. Even better: several of the films we had come to see that day were Waters’s personal prints, some of which had not been projected in 25years, and they came with a gentle disclaimer from the management about their neglected condition and the very real possibility that they may not play well or even at all. Fortunately, Multiple Maniacs looked and sounded like a million bucks.
A clip from a crummier version of Multiple Maniacs than the glorious print that was on display at the retrospective
These films alone are enough to make you so happy that you will shit. As if that weren't enough, while I was there, I caught the Pope of Trash himself beaming with pride in the warm celluloid glow of Lady Divine’s Cavalcade of Perversions.
“I was in show business when I was 12,” said Waters. He’s 68-years-old now, impeccably dressed, with the whitest veneers I have ever seen, which makes me think his days of smoking and French exhaling might be long over. “I had a puppet show that I did at children’s birthday parties. So I should have quit school in sixth grade. I knew what I wanted to do, and you go to school to figure out what you want to do, and they wouldn’t let me do what I wanted to do in any school. So I got angry and bored. And boredom is anger when you’re a teenager. So that anger is what I turned into a career in a way, but with humor. This is the first time Multiple Maniacs has been screened on 16mm in twenty-five years,” said Waters of the print that continued to slay the audience as we spoke. “The Cavalcade of Perversions thing was on my parents’ front lawn. They were liberal.”
To watch the films of John Waters from the beginning onward is to realize that he’s been making the same film over and over again from the beginning, with the same family of collaborators. A John Waters film is not just a John Waters film, but a film by the Dreamlanders. Dreamland Productions is a loose band of performers (to say that everyone who appears in a John Waters film is an actor is categorically untrue), craftsmen (the films are all unfailingly costumed and designed to a degree of high fabulousity, regardless of the budget), and misfits who contributed to these works.
Dreamland has long been a fascination of mine because it's precisely what you hope to fall into as a teenage misfit: a high-functioning carnival of artists, outlaws, losers. and freaks who somehow get it together enough to make really cool shit that is about something. The 1970-released Multiple Maniacs opens with David Lochary as a carnival barker luring marks into Lady Divine’s Cavalcade of Perversions, a tented sideshow full of sexual deviants, junkies, and old-fashioned entertainments like the Puke Eater. Lady Divine is the star attraction. Like Dawn Davenport in the full-color spectacle of Female Trouble four years later, Lady Divine is bent on being rich, famous, killing anyone who fucks with her, and dying a fabulous violent death.
“We were not fitting in with anybody, because this was the height of hippies. And we were sort of hippies. Sort of, I don’t know, not that much. I mean that dialogue was hardly peace and love. We looked like a hostile group, and I guess we were, in a way, against some people.
"People were scared of us!" he continued. "They would run when they’d see us coming because it was also straight and gay, completely mixed; it totally confused people. Some of them were my high school friends, some of them were downtown people, some of them were gay, some of them drag queens. But because there was no one thing, it was more threatening to everybody. It was mostly these three groups: beatniks, gay people, and suburban crazy people. And we all hung around together and took acid together, and that’s what happened. The kids today are doing the same thing. They’re making films on their cell phone. That’s what I would have done. It’s the same thing, what’s the difference? I had 8 mm, they have cell phones, and they’re doing the same thing now and they’re having just as much fun. And their friends can become stars too; it just depends how much you really want to do it.”
Fifty Years Of John Waters: How Much Can You Take? just closed. You can learn more about it anyway at Lincoln Center's official site
Follow Matt Caron on Twitter.
]]> Matthew Caron film, John Waters, bad taste, gender norms, drag queens, dog turds, comedy films, film prints, movies, film, multiple maniacs, divine, the pope of trash, lady divine's cavalcade of perversions, dreamlanders, fabulousity, outlaws, freaks, crazy people, 8mm films, 16mm films, lincoln center |
8cb8c9ce-beb3-41c2-af79-dbc8687e8145 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | New evidence suggests that "hot spots" may form in response to "twisting" stresses on plates. It is theorized that these stresses may eventually result in the splitting apart of the tectonic plate in the area of the hot spot. Which of the geographic features would be affected most by the splitting of a tectonic plate?
A. the Himalayas
B. the Hawaiian Islands
C. the San Andreas Fault
D. the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
Answer:B |
f339f611-ec6d-4e5a-8262-edfefc17cdcf | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Hypothesis: gradient descent prefers general circuits
Summary: I discuss a potential mechanistic explanation for why SGD might prefer general circuits for generating model outputs. I use this preference to explain how models can learn to generalize even after overfitting to near zero training error (i.e., grokking). I also discuss other perspectives on grokking and deep learning generalization.
Additionally, I discuss potential experiments to confirm or reject my hypothesis. I suggest that a tendency to unify many shallow patterns into fewer general patterns is a core feature of effective learning systems, potentially including humans and future AI, and briefly address implications to AI alignment.
Epistemic status: I think the hypothesis I present makes a lot of sense and is probably true, but I haven't confirmed things experimentally. Much of my motive for post this is to clarify my own thinking and get feedback on the best ways to experimentally validate this perspective on ML generalization.
Context about circuits: This post assumes the reader is familiar with and accepts the circuits perspective on deep learning. See here for a discussion of circuits for CNN vision models and here for a discussion of circuits for transformer NLP models.
Evidence from grokking
The paper "Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasets" uses stochastic gradient descent (SGD) to train self attention based deep learning models on different modular arithmetic expressions (e.g., f(x,y)=x×y (mod p), where p is fixed).
The training data only contain subsets of the function's possible input/output pairs. Initially, the models overfit to their training data and are unable to generalize to the validation input/output pairs. In fact, the models quickly reach near perfect accuracy on their training data. However, training the model for significantly past the point of overfitting causes the model to generalize to the validation data, what the authors call "grokking".
See figure 1a from the paper:
Figure 1a fro |
ba55f738-c2d8-4f3f-88c5-de448102e269 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Value learning: ultra-sophisticated Cake or Death
Many mooted AI designs rely on "value loading", the update of the AI’s preference function according to evidence it receives. This allows the AI to learn "moral facts" by, for instance, interacting with people in conversation ("this human also thinks that death is bad and cakes are good – I'm starting to notice a pattern here"). The AI has an interim morality system, which it will seek to act on while updating its morality in whatever way it has been programmed to do.
But there is a problem with this system: the AI already has preferences. It is therefore motivated to update its morality system in a way compatible with its current preferences. If the AI is powerful (or potentially powerful) there are many ways it can do this. It could ask selective questions to get the results it wants (see this example). It could ask or refrain from asking about key issues. In extreme cases, it could break out to seize control of the system, threatening or imitating humans so it could give itself the answers it desired.
Avoiding this problem turned out to be tricky. The Cake or Death post demonstrated some of the requirements. If p(C(u)) denotes the probability that utility function u is correct, then the system would update properly if:
Expectation(p(C(u)) | a) = p(C(u)).
Put simply, this means that the AI cannot take any action that could predictably change its expectation of the correctness of u. This is an analogue of the conservation of expected evidence in classical Bayesian updating. If the AI was 50% convinced about u, then it could certainly ask a question that would resolve its doubts, and put p(C(u)) at 100% or 0%. But only as long as it didn't know which moral outcome was more likely.
That formulation gives too much weight to the default action, though. Inaction is also an action, so a more correct formulation would be that for all actions a and b,
Expectation(p(C(u)) | a) = Expectation(p(C(u)) | b).
How would this work in practice? Well, suppose an AI was uncert |
d40b298e-6eff-48b6-b3cb-c749adebb16b | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Association between the health of young children entering preschool institutions and social status of families
Objective. To evaluate the health status of young children entering preschool institutions depending on the social status of their families. Patients and methods. This study included 375 children aged 2 to 3 years attending kindergarten No. 239 in Kemerovo. Mean age of children was 25.91 ± 2.52 months. All study participants were divided into several groups according to their social status: from two-parent families (TPF; n = 339), including those with registered marriage (RM; n = 258) and unregistered marriage (UM; n = 81), and from single-parent families (SPF; n = 36), including those living with divorced mothers (DM; n = 25) and single mothers (SM; n = 11). Results. Women living with their partners outside marriage had significant changes during their pregnancy, at the time of breastfeeding and introduction of complementary foods; every fourth woman smoked. Every third child from two-parent families with an unregistered marriage had group III health (p = 0.0298). Vegetative complaints were significantly more common in families with divorced parents and unregistered marriage. Conclusion. Measures to promote healthy marriage and family relations should be implemented by teachers and psychologists at schools, other organizations for children and adolescents, specialized secondary and higher educational institutions. Key words: infants, health, single-parent family, two-parent family, social status |
8e9e842f-2deb-4170-93fd-b6993954d0e1 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | PIM, Ecommerce, Marketplaces • 6 min read
Marketplaces and how PIM can help overcome your challenges
Joeri Moors | 01-10-2020
Marketplaces are rapidly gaining ground within the e-commerce space. Nowadays, when people shop online they usually start their search at a marketplace or dedicated platform. Google and other search engines have become second choice. Due to this increase in marketplace visitors, more and more companies are following suit and are now actively selling their products on marketplaces. With new marketplaces continuously emerging, this element of e-commerce is becoming increasingly important.
So, what exactly is a Marketplace?
From a consumer perspective, a marketplace is an online store that allows them to shop for various products from different sellers. From a business perspective, a marketplace allows companies to sell all their different products on a single e-commerce platform that offers more visitors and reach than their own dedicated online shop could. Thanks to this concept, marketplaces offer an extremely varied range of products (much more than a regular store possibly could), making it an attractive option for online customers. For each sale, the marketplace receives a fee.
As a retailer or brand, marketplaces come with serious possibilities to widen your horizon and sell to people in different parts of the world. But even if you’re less ambitious, it will become increasingly hard to run a successful business in the future without embracing marketplaces as an outlet for your products or services. As marketplaces keep gaining ground online, it will no longer be sufficient to simply have your own online shop or website. In order to increase sales and brand awareness, you need to build a strong presence in the places the draw in the most online shoppers. That’s why it is crucial to find your way into (several) marketplaces.
Even though selling products on a marketplace is relatively easy, it’s still important to have a properly designed strategy that ensures your efforts are successful. This strategy should be customer-centric first and foremost, and always be based on market research. But running a marketplace business is not the same as running your own online shop; pricing, listings, PPC, campaigns, stock, fulfilment, and customer service are often all managed differently. In addition to these operational aspects, it’s data, and more specifically product data, that will determine your success on a marketplace.
When customers shop online, correct data and product information is the one thing they need most of all. Data can literally make or break a sale. Without providing high quality, complete, consistent, and accurate data, selling online will prove to be quite the uphill battle.
Here an example of an listing at amazon that needs improvements:
This is what needs to be improved in this listing:
1. The title of the listing is too short (min 150 characters), not clear, and doesn't contain some of the important keywords
2. There should always be at least 7 images on a listing - not only one
3. The bullet points do not describe the features of the product, and there are not enough bullet points
4. The rating needs attention
You need to make sure that customers are actually able to find your products. By providing complete and accurate product data, including characteristics and descriptions, you’ll stand out among your competitors that sell similar or comparable products.
Example below shows more than competitive 770 results for the keyword “Laptop standaard.
Managing all this product data can be extremely challenging too. Especially if you have an extensive catalogue, and sell through multiple channels within different markets and countries. Since marketplaces all have their own requirements in regards to product data, managing this information becomes even more complex.
Introducing Product Information Management (PIM) to the equation allows you to face these challenges head on, and turn your strategy into success. A PIM solution provides you with the tools to manage all your product data in one place, from which you can easily publish product data to all your channels, including marketplaces, with up-to-date and relevant information.
Ready for take-off?
To enable a successful digital transformation you need a flexible and comprehensive approach. One that starts with data, but always ends with tangible business outcomes. You’re correct to assume this can be a very challenging undertaking. At Osudio, we’re experienced in helping companies to develop and implement a successful Product Information and Marketplace strategy. Check out our Marketplace services page for more details here
Contact Joeri Moors ( to discover how we can help your company tackle these challenges and successfully expand your brand and products to marketplaces.
201908_Osudio_ALL_White paper_How To Implement PIM_
Full Guide
High Quality Product Data with PIM
Download Now
Picture of Joeri Moors
Joeri Moors
MDM Market Development Manager
|
7ca6bd3b-d1c9-456e-9dcb-1a905f8a4535 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Low legibility of Cognitive Reflection Test dramatically improves performance?
I'm reading Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow and I've stopped on this:
> 90% of the students who saw the CRT in normal font made at least one mistake in the test, but the proportion dropped to 35% when the font was barely legible. You read this correctly: performance was better with the bad font.
This seems like an important finding, but I can't find references in the book (Kindle) or on the Web. Does anybody know any real evidence for this claim? EDIT: I found the original paper
Do you think that people could behave rationally with such a simple intervention?
simple intro to CRT
EDIT: fixed spelling in title |
ade8d00b-bab0-4569-bf1c-1b56816e3639 | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management.
OBJECTIVE
The purposes of this study were to investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of the incidental finding of renal masses at low-dose unenhanced CT and to analyze the results for features that can be used to guide evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Images from unenhanced CT colonographic examinations of 3001 consecutively registered adults without symptoms (1667 women, 1334 men; mean age, 57 years) were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of cystic and solid renal masses 1 cm in diameter or larger. An index mass, that is, the most complex or concerning, in each patient was assessed for size, mean attenuation, and morphologic features. Masses containing fat or with attenuation less than 20 HU or greater than 70 HU were considered benign if they did not contain thickened walls or septations, three or more septations, mural nodules, or thick calcifications. Masses with attenuation between 20 and 70 HU or any of these features were considered indeterminate. The performance of CT colonography in the detection of renal cell carcinoma was calculated for masses with 2 or more years of follow-up.
RESULTS
At least one renal mass was identified in 433 (14.4%) patients. The mean size of the index masses was 25 ± 16 mm; 376 (86.8%) masses were classified as benign and 57 (13.2%) as indeterminate. The 20- to 70-HU attenuation criterion alone was used for classification of 53 indeterminate lesions. Follow-up data (mean follow-up period, 4.4 years; range, 2-6.3 years) were available for 353 (81.5%) patients with masses (41 indeterminate, 312 benign). Four of the 41 indeterminate masses were diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma. The sensitivity and specificity for renal cell carcinoma on the basis of the indeterminate criteria were 100% and 89.4%. The positive and negative predictive values were 9.8% and 100%.
CONCLUSION
The incidental finding of a renal mass is relatively common at unenhanced CT, but imaging criteria can be used for reliable identification of most of these lesions as benign without further workup. Mean attenuation alone appears reliable for determining which renal masses need further evaluation. |
daa3d0a7-c0b3-4a60-a5f8-c8819e2a135e | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | newcastle manager bobby robson , who led his team this season to third place in the premiership and a return to the champions league , said thursday he plans to end his career with the magpies .
Can you generate a short summary of the above paragraph? robson plans to end career at newcastle |
92d15d0e-ab7b-4452-9d9c-a693f5f7e794 | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Copper-catalyzed C-3 benzylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones with benzylsulfonyl hydrazides.
An unprecedented use of benzylsulfonyl hydrazides as benzylating agents has been demonstrated in the direct C-3 benzylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. A range of benzylsulfonyl hydrazides participated in the C-3 benzylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones with CuCN as the catalyst and DTBP as the oxidant, delivering structurally diverse 3-benzylquinoxalin-2(1H)-ones in moderate to good yields. |
d356f7f5-7938-464a-9cac-89e4e1f0c8f8 | stackexchange | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Sockets - IPPPROTO_TCP Vs. 0
What's the difference under the covers between using:
socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
and
socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
I had a reason to use a stream socket within an application and was told to use the 2nd one (which I'm guessing is because TCP would be overkill since its in-box and reliable by default). I wasn't quite sure what the socket created with a null final parameter actually was though, so I'm hesitant to use it.
There is no difference. Both will return a TCP socket, because TCP is the default STREAM protocol of INET family. |
2d43cea4-3d01-4bdc-9bdb-f9e074345309 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | My name is Sabrina. I'm 23 years old. I come from London. Now I live in Beijing. I love teaching English. I think it's interesting. I can speak Chinese, too. I have experience in teaching English in China. My e-mail address is sabrina@sina.com. I'm Bill, an 18-year-old student. I live in Nanjing now. I can play the guitar well. I like to be a teacher. I have free time on weekends. Do you want to learn the guitar? Please call me at 15069606503. I'm June Smith. I'm 25. I can swim well. I want to be a swimming teacher. I love kids and I'm good with kids. I can help them learn to swim. If you need a teacher in your club, please e-mail me at june@sina.com. . Bill lives in _ .
A. Nanjing
B. Beijing
C. Shanghai
D. Hefei
Answer:A |
7a7754ff-f83d-4340-959a-30f330d1bb37 | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Evaluation of Pulsed-Field Magnetization of a Bulk Superconductor With Small Holes
Recent upsizing of the diameter and enhancement of performance of bulk superconductors make pulsed field magnetization difficult due to the strong magnetic shield. We propose a bulk material with small holes to supply magnetic flux into the bulk efficiently because superconductivity is intentionally lowered in the portion with holes. On the other hand, we are anxious about the flux flow in a high applied field. To investigate the effect of the proposed method, a bulk material with small holes was manufactured, and a fundamental experiment was carried out. Four holes of 2 mm in diameter were drilled in a growth sector region of a GdBa2Cu3O7-x bulk material of 60 mm in diameter and 20 mm thickness. The holes were filled with solder to improve mechanical strength and heat conduction. The bulk was cooled to 20, 30, 40, and 50 K, and a single pulsed field was applied while changing the amplitude of the applied field at each temperature. It was confirmed that the magnetic flux penetrates at a low applied field as compared with the holeless bulk material, and, moreover, the flux flow was suppressed in a high applied field at a low temperature. |
20f07534-1511-4357-8097-a9e2b70b0bea | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Blended Yarn Analysis: Part II—Influence of Twist Multiplier and Back Roller Cot Hardness on Mass Variation, Hairiness, and Physical Properties of 15 Tex PES/CO-Blended Ring-Spun Yarn
The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of twist multiplier and back roller cot hardness on the characteristics of PES/CO-blended ring-spun yarn. Yarn samples of 15 tex were spun from three blend ratios, i.e., PES/CO 30/70, 50/50, and 70/30 at ring frame at seven different twist multipliers and three back roller cot shores. Yarn samples were analyzed at Uster Tester 4 and Uster Tansorapid 4 for evenness and physical properties, respectively. The results indicate that hairiness is inversely related to twist multiplier, whereas yarn physical properties improved in PES/CO 30/70 with addition of twist and an inverse trend was observed in other two blend ratios. Back roller cot hardness has positive correlation with CV% and imperfections and negative correlation with yarn physical properties. |
277e5225-e8ce-4a99-81f7-f56f3e3f0b37 | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Activation of HIV-specific ribozyme activity by self-cleavage.
A hammerhead ribozyme designed to cleave in trans the R region of HIV-1 RNA was inserted into a eukaryotic expression vector. This ribozyme was studied in vitro using the T3 RNA polymerase promoter located upstream of the eukaryotic promoter. The ribozyme showed no activity against its specific target sequence under any condition tested. To decrease the influence of potential cis inhibitory sequences in such a ribozyme transcript, a specific target sequence was inserted upstream of the ribozyme-coding sequence. This insertion allowed the release by cis cleavage of a short RNA bearing ribozyme activity and able to cleave in trans an external RNA target. The cis cleavage reaction generated two RNA molecules: the shorter RNA species, which included the catalytic domain, showed a trans cleavage reaction. This self-cleavable ribozyme was active in vitro at 37 degrees C against three distinct HIV-1 transcripts sharing the specific target sequence. Ribozyme activity was thus attained by self-cleavage of the ribozyme-containing sequence from the longer vector transcript. |
add8b011-4ba5-4da5-a20f-35dff3456e29 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Towards the end of Middle English, a sudden change in pronunciation started, with vowels being pronounced shorter and shorter. From the 16th century the British had contact with many people from around the world. This meant that lots of new vocabulary entered the language. The invention of printing also meant that there was now a common language in print. Books became cheaper and more people learned to read. Spelling and grammar became fixed, and the dialect of London became the standard. In 1604 the first English dictionary came out. Early Modern English and Late Modern English are mostly different in the number of words. Late Modern English has many more words, mainly because of the following two reasons: First, the Industrial Revolution led to the need for new words. Second, the British Empire covered one quarter of the earth's surface, and the English language took in foreign words from many countries. From around 1600, the English colonization of North America led to American English. Some English pronunciations and words " _ " when they reached America. In some ways, American English is more like the English of Shakespeare than modern British English. Some expressions that are called "American English" are in fact from British expressions. They were kept in the colonies while lost for a time in Britain. Spanish also had an influence on American English. For example, words like canyon, ranch, stampede and vigilante are from Spanish. They entered English by the people of Spain who settled in the American West. French words and West African words also influenced American English. Today, American English has a greater influence, because of the USA's movies, television, popular music, trade and technology. From the passage, we can learn the word "canyon" is from _ .
A. American dialect
B. African dialect
C. Spanish
D. French
Answer:C |
e055719c-822d-41e6-9a9a-2abf4c870246 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Tag "restorative yoga"
For the Love of Yin
Why Yin Yoga Is a Must for Type A Yogis
Top 5 Yoga Poses to Relieve Plantar Fasciitis
Around one out of ten people suffer from plantar fasciitis some points in their life, and although the disorder is more common among athletes and avid walkers, it can affect
Three Pose Practice!
Owning a yoga studio for almost 20 years was the most challenging and rewarding time of my life. Some of my fondest memories are of sitting with students after class |
515e1d38-6ea9-4c88-87e5-fe9aaab8dac2 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | What is Lock-In?
Epistemic status: a combination and synthesis of others' work, analysed and written over a few weeks. Early working definition that is open to criticism.
TL;DR
I create a definition of lock-in for use in future discussion and writing, and operationalise lock-in for future research. I define lock-in risks as the probabilities of situations in which features of the world, typically negative elements of human culture, are made stable for long periods of time.
Why Define Lock-In?
Lock-in is the central theme of Formation Research. Therefore before conducting any research on lock-in, it is important to create a strong working definition for use in subsequent discussion. The stronger the definition, the stronger the foundation on which the subsequent work will rest, and the more specific and explicit we can be when tackling lock-in.
Key Thinkers
Nick Bostrom
Bostrom has introduced a number of relevant concepts to discussions about lock-in. He introduces the notion of a Singleton – a world order in which there is a single decision-making at the highest level (Bostrom, 2005). He also introduces the idea of a decisive strategic advantage, a situation in which one entity may gain strategic power over the fate of humanity at large. He relates this to the potential formation of a Singleton (Bostrom, 2014).
He also introduces the instrumental convergence hypothesis, providing insight into potential motivations of autonomous AI systems. The hypothesis suggests a number of logically implied goals an agent will develop when given an initial goal. Lastly, he introduces the value loading problem, and the risks of misalignment due to issues such as goal misspecification.
William MacAskill
MacAskill talks about lock-in in a chapter of What We Owe the Future (MacAskill, 2022). He uses the Hundred Schools of Thought period in ancient China, the concept of writing, and the potential for artificial general intelligence to define value lock-in and argue for its potential. He defi |
b4ab717b-73d1-42a1-97a3-a4d1a622aee7 | StampyAI/alignment-research-dataset/blogs | Blogs | A new MIRI research program with a machine learning focus
I’m happy to announce that MIRI is beginning work on a new research agenda, “**value alignment for advanced machine learning systems**.” Half of MIRI’s team — Patrick LaVictoire, Andrew Critch, and I — will be spending the bulk of our time on this project over at least the next year. The rest of our time will be spent on our pre-existing [research agenda](https://intelligence.org/technical-agenda/).
MIRI’s research in general can be viewed as a response to Stuart Russell’s question for artificial intelligence researchers: “*What if we succeed?*” There appear to be a number of theoretical prerequisites for designing advanced AI systems that are robust and reliable, and our research aims to develop them early.
Our general research agenda is agnostic about when AI systems are likely to match and exceed humans in general reasoning ability, and about whether or not such systems will resemble present-day machine learning (ML) systems. Recent years’ impressive progress in deep learning suggests that relatively simple neural-network-inspired approaches can be very powerful and general. For that reason, we are making an initial inquiry into a more specific subquestion: “*What if techniques similar in character to present-day work in ML succeed in creating AGI?*”.
Much of this work will be aimed at improving our high-level theoretical understanding of **[task-directed AI](https://arbital.com/p/genie/)**. Unlike what Nick Bostrom calls “sovereign AI,” which attempts to optimize the world in long-term and large-scale ways, task AI is limited to performing instructed tasks of limited scope, satisficing but not maximizing. Our hope is that investigating task AI from an ML perspective will help give information about both the feasibility of task AI and the tractability of early safety work on advanced supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning systems.
To this end, we will begin by investigating eight relevant technical problems:
---
1. **Inductive ambiguity detection.**
How can we design a general methodology for ML systems (such as classifiers) to identify when the classification of a test instance is underdetermined by training data?
For example: If an ambiguity-detecting classifier is designed to distinguish images of tanks from images of non-tanks, and the training set only contains images of tanks on cloudy days and non-tanks on sunny days, this classifier ought to detect that the classification of an image of a tank on a sunny day is ambiguous, and pose some query for its operators to disambiguate it and avoid errors.
While past and current work in active learning and statistical learning theory more broadly has made progress towards this goal, more work is necessary to establish realistic statistical bounds on the error rates and query rates of real-world systems in advance of their deployment in complex environments.
2. **Informed oversight.**
How might we train a reinforcement learner to output both an action and a “report” comprising information to help a human evaluate its action?
For example: If a human is attempting to train a reinforcement learner to output original stories, then in evaluating the story, the human will want to know some information about the story (such as whether it has been plagiarized from another story) that may be difficult to determine by looking at the story itself.
3. **Safe training procedures for human-imitators.**
How might we design a ML system that imitates humans performing some task that involves rich outputs (such as answering questions in natural language), to the best of the ML system’s abilities?
While there are existing approaches to imitation learning and generative models, these have some theoretical shortcomings that prevent them from fully solving the general problem. In particular, a generative adversarial model trained on human actions only has an incentive to imitate aspects of the human that the adversary can detect; thus, issues similar to the plagiarism problem from (2) can arise.
4. **Conservative concepts.**
How might we design a system that, given some positive examples of a concept, can synthesize new instances of the concept without synthesizing edge cases of it?
For example: If we gave the system detailed information about 100 human-created burritos as training data, it should manufacture additional burritos while avoiding edge cases such as extremely small burritos (even though these could still be considered burritos).
By default, most objective functions [will lead to such edge cases](https://arbital.com/p/edge_instantiation/) (say, because small burritos are cheaper to manufacture). Can we develop a general technique for avoiding this problem?
5. **Specifying environmental goals using sensory data.**
The goals of most ML systems are defined in terms of sensory data, such as discounted reward over time. While these sensory goals can be useful proxies for environmental goals, they are not identical to them: tricking your own sensors into perceiving a strawberry in the room is not the the same as actually having one there. How might we create systems that directly pursue useful goals in their environment, such as “make there be a strawberry in this room”, in a way that is robust to opportunities for the system to interfere with the proxies we used to specify the goal?
6. **Low-impact agents.**
We would prefer a highly intelligent task-oriented system to generally avoid creating large unintended-by-us side effects in pursuit of its goal, and also to notify us of any large impacts that might result from achieving its goal. For example, if we ask it to build a house for a homeless family, it should know implicitly that it should avoid destroying nearby houses for materials — a large side effect — while still having the desirable large follow-on effect of improving the family’s socioeconomic situation. For any *specific* task we can specify ad-hoc cost functions for side effects like nearby house destruction, but since we cannot always anticipate such costs in advance, we want a quantitative understanding of how to *generally* limit an AI’s side effects (without also limiting its ability to have large positive intended impacts).
7. **Mild optimization.**
In the event that the low impact criteria we employ in (6) are flawed or missing some key considerations, we would like some way to tell our system “don’t try too hard” or “don’t exercise too much optimization power”, since intuitively, large impacts are more likely to result from large efforts (although the correspondence is imperfect).
Less capable AI systems tend to be less likely to have large unintended side effects, and we would like to know how to make even highly capable systems safe in a similar way, by having them apply less “effort”. With a satisfactory encoding of our notion of “effort”, we could then program a system to impose absolute limits on its total effort, or to use only as much effort as is needed to achieve its objective with reasonably high probability, thus potentially limiting impacts that we did not manage to measure in (6).
8. **Averting instrumental pressures.**
How might we design a system that is not motivated to pursue certain [convergent instrumental goals](https://intelligence.org/2015/11/26/new-paper-formalizing-convergent-instrumental-goals/) — such as gaining additional resources — even when pursuing these goals would help it achieve its main objective?
In particular, we may wish to build a system that [has no incentive](https://intelligence.org/2014/10/18/new-report-corrigibility/) to cause or prevent its own shutdown/suspension. This relates to (6) and (7) in that instrumental pressures like “ensure my continued operation” can incentivize large impacts/efforts. However, this is a distinct agenda item because it may be possible to completely eliminate certain instrumental incentives in a way that would apply even before solutions to (6) and (7) would take effect.
---
Having identified these topics of interest, we expect our work on this agenda to be timely. The idea of “[robust and beneficial](http://futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter/)” AI has recently received increased attention as a result of the new wave of breakthroughs in machine learning. The kind of theoretical work in this project has more obvious connections to the leading paradigms in AI and ML than, for example, our recent work in [logical uncertainty](https://intelligence.org/2016/04/21/two-new-papers-uniform/) or in [game theory](https://intelligence.org/2016/03/31/new-paper-on-bounded-lob/), and therefore lends itself better to collaborations with AI/ML researchers in the near future.
---
*Thanks to Eliezer Yudkowsky and Paul Christiano for seeding many of the initial ideas for these research directions, to Patrick LaVictoire, Andrew Critch, and other MIRI researchers for helping develop these ideas, and to Chris Olah, Dario Amodei, and Jacob Steinhardt for valuable discussion.*
The post [A new MIRI research program with a machine learning focus](https://intelligence.org/2016/05/04/announcing-a-new-research-program/) appeared first on [Machine Intelligence Research Institute](https://intelligence.org). |
85b81fa1-dfdd-459b-92b9-7cb3c80b566d | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Q: Translate "Steve Boggan joins a stake-out" to Russian?
A: Стив Боган присоединяется к полицейскому наблюдению...
Q: Translate "Change color scheme freely to suit your style" to Russian?
A: Изменение цветовой схемы свободно в соответствии с вашим стилем
Q: Translate "1807" to Russian?
A: 1807 год |
895fa588-599b-4c62-934d-a8ed2cd69227 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | The United States of America is the most culturally diverse country in the world in terms of culture religion, ethnicity and sexual orientation. As a combination of various races and cultures, America is home to all. The culture here is so unique that citizens can be just as proud of their original cultural heritage as they are to be American. What is now the US was initially inhabited by native people until the land was settled by various European groups and African slaves. Since the 20th century, the country has become a heaven for people from all over the globe . The arrival of immigrants has shifted populations from rural areas into cities because immigrants tend to settle in urban areas. At present, 81 percent of the inhabitants in the US live in cities. Cultural and ethnic diversity adds a unique flavor to cities that is expressed through distinct neighborhoods, restaurants, places of worship, museums, nightlife and multicultural learning environments. Unique musical forms, such as jazz, rock and roll, Chicano music, and the blues, grow in the US by mixing a variety of culturally distinct musical traditions to create a new form. At the executive level, the country is headed by a mixedrace president; two posts on the Supreme Court are held by members of the country's two largest minorities.There is also diversity in state and local governments. Without its rich mixture of races and cultures, America would not be the nation that it is today. Founded upon the basis of equality and freedom, America acts as a stage where different cultures not only coexist peacefully, but develop well. According to the passage, America is a country _ .
A. that welcomes people from all over the world
B. where citizens take more pride in their original culture
C. that is mostly settled by Europeans and Africans
D. where 81% of the population are immigrants
Answer:A |
f4316fee-0b8f-48ba-9e6b-fa12701abb2a | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Roughly Speaking podcast: Treating post-election 'Trump anxiety'
Maryland 'joker' threat charge against Neil Prescott dismissed
A judge threw out a criminal charge Tuesday against a Crofton man accused last summer of likening himself to a "joker" and threatening to blow up co-workers.
The case raised alarm in the wake of a mass shooting in Colorado but ended quietly after prosecutors were unable to connect the allegations to a specific crime.
Police seized guns and ammunition from Neil Edwin Prescott's Crofton home after authorities said he called in threats to a Prince George's County business. He was eventually charged with a single count of telephone misuse, which the judge threw out Tuesday.
The circumstances surrounding Prescott's arrest illustrate the difficulty of balancing public safety with free speech, as mass shootings continue to rattle the public and authorities face pressure to head off potential danger.
Defense attorney William C. Brennan Jr. said Prescott's case proves that not all threats need to be prosecuted. Prescott legally owned the weapons seized from his home and probably will get them back now that the case has been resolved.
"Police have a responsibility to protect the public, but it doesn't mean every time they have to prosecute every case they investigate," Brennan said. He said the case stemmed from the misunderstanding of jokes Prescott made to a friend while out of work with a concussion.
But Prince George's County State's Attorney Angela D. Alsobrooks said the case shows that Maryland needs a stronger law against threats like those Prescott was accused of making. After Prescott's arrest, she and other local officials said they believed they had thwarted a "violent episode."
"Making a threat of mass violence ought to be against the law," Alsobrooks said Tuesday.
Last July, Prince George's County police accused Prescott of saying in telephone calls to a co-worker that he wanted to see the brains of a supervisor "splatter all over the sidewalk." He had been working as a contractor with the mail supply company Pitney Bowes in Capitol Heights.
Police said Prescott identified himself as a "joker," a term that drew added concern after the theater shooting in which 12 people were killed during the premiere of the Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises" in Aurora, Colo.
When Anne Arundel County police arrived at his home, Prescott, who is 6 feet 7, answered the door in a T-shirt that said "Guns don't kill people, I do." Based on information from a police interview there, authorities secured a court order to have Prescott committed involuntarily for psychiatric evaluation. Officials then seized what they described as an assault weapon, shotguns, handguns and a large cache of ammunition, according to court records.
In August, prosecutors filed one misdemeanor count of misusing the telephone, which carries a maximum sentence of three years in prison and a $500 fine. Prescott had a permit to collect the weapons and had no criminal record beyond a traffic offense.
Alsobrooks said at the time that she believed that the charge was "insufficient" but that the evidence did not justify a more serious charge. Prompted by the case, she unsuccessfully lobbied the legislature this year for harsher laws against threats of mass violence.
Because the charge was filed against Prescott while he was under psychiatric evaluation, his court case originated in Prince George's County's mental health court. On Tuesday, his attorney presented a new version of the events surrounding Prescott's arrest.
Prescott had not left his job, Brennan said, but was at home at the time of the telephone calls because of a concussion he had suffered at work. He said his client suffered from post-concussion syndrome and was taking medication to battle migraines.
A contract senior programmer for Pitney Bowes, Prescott was available for consultation at home, though Brennan said he probably should have been left alone to rest.
One morning in July, a co-worker texted Prescott, saying, "'Call me. I got a problem,'" Brennan said.
The men spoke twice that morning, making small talk while they discussed the work-related issue. Both disliked their supervisor and referred to him as a "DAU" or "dumb a— user."
During the calls, Brennan said, Prescott made statements about his supervisor. Several hours later, the co-worker told his supervisor about the calls, only because he was concerned about Prescott's condition, Brennan said. The supervisor called police, he said.
The co-worker "thought he was joking and didn't anticipate such a reaction by law enforcement," Brennan told the court.
Brennan said police were initially denied an arrest warrant by a court commissioner who said there was not enough evidence. When police got one from a prosecutor in August, he said, it was defective because it did not provide specifics of how authorities believed Prescott had violated the law. Without that information, Brennan said, he could not prepare a defense.
Mental health court Judge Patrice E. Lewis called for a recess, then agreed that the charges should be thrown out.
Prescott, wearing a blue jacket and tan slacks, smiled in the hallway just before his case was dismissed. He declined to comment afterward.
A spokeswoman for Pitney Bowes declined to comment on the case, saying that Prescott had been a subcontractor who had not been in a company office for more than a year.
Alsobrooks said her office will review Prescott's case before deciding whether to refile charges. Prosecutors have until late July before a statute of limitations runs out. Alsobrooks said she expects Prescott to ask that his guns be returned.
"That's the system we live in," said Mark Magaw, the Prince George's County police chief. "I think we acted appropriately."
Baltimore attorney Ellen A. Callegary, a former assistant Maryland attorney general who consults with public agencies on mental health issues, said police should heed all threats. But she said the burden then shifts to prosecutors to decide whether a threat warrants a psychiatric evaluation, should be prosecuted or ignored.
It's not easy, she acknowledged.
"It may not be a criminal justice issue; it may not be a mental health issue," Callegary said. "It may have been an issue of bad judgment, of someone saying they want to kill their boss and are just venting."
|
52ddc0c8-fdda-4449-93a0-479d0a6bb75b | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | "Be home by dinnertime", Eric's mother said as he left for school that morning. Eric was excited. Today was show and tell, and he planned to do his magic tricks for the whole class. Once he got to school, he couldn't wait until it was his turn. First up was Angie, who brought her pet lizard. It could change colors to match whatever it was sitting on. The second to be called was John, who showed the class a flower he had grown from seeds. Finally Eric's name was called. He went to the front of the class. "For my first trick" he said, "I'll pull a hamster out of a hat". He had borrowed his sister Candice's pet hamster in order to do his trick. He showed the class his that the hat was empty, then he reached inside, into the secret space where the hamster was hidden. The hamster was gone. He heard a scream. Two girls were standing on their chairs, and the hamster was crawling toward the back of the class. The teacher made him stay after school as punishment, but at least he made it home by dinnertime. What was Eric's magic trick?
A. Making a flower grow.
B. Making Angie disappear.
C. Making a lizard change color.
D. Pulling a hamster out of a hat.
Answer:D |
975a4bc4-54c2-4687-a73d-9ab003a6500c | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | I work as a volunteer for a group that helps the poor in Haiti. I decided to take my son Brain there for a week, hoping to educate him. Before getting out, I told Brain this trip would be tiring and hard. For the first two days, he said almost nothing. Then on the third day, when we were climbing over high rocky mountains , he turned to me and smiled, "Really hard." After that, a five-year-old girl, wearing a too large dress and broken shoes, followed Brain around. Later he said, "I wish I could speak French." I was surprised that this was from a boy who always hated French classes. However, the moment that really reached my heart _ in a village in the mountains. I was interviewing a woman villager for an article. By working hard, she learned to read and write and became one of the leaders of the village. Learning her story, Brain was greatly touched. His eyes were wet and there was love and respect on his face. He finally understood the importance of my work. When leaving for home, Brain even offered to stay in as a volunteer. This trip was very meaningful. What is the passage mainly about?
A. An exciting trip.
B. How to be a volunteer.
C. A story of a volunteering trip.
D. The importance of voluntary work.
Answer:C |
0f08d192-da80-43dc-b810-b387bd7638eb | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Every day we use money to buy what we want. But have you ever really noticed the bill in your hand? There are different pictures on both sides of banknotes and interesting stories behind them. Most banknotes have famous people on the front, such as a country's leader or a great scientist, while on the back of the paper note there are usually some well-known scenes or national buildings. The latest editions of Chinese banknotes use the picture of Mao Zedong, founding father of the People's Republic of China, on the front of all yuan bills. However, the backs of the bills are different. The Great Hall of the People, on the 100-yuan note, is a landmark in Beijing. Important meetings are always held there. The Lijiang River in Guilin, on the 20-yuan note, is one of the most beautiful scenes in the world. The US 1-dollar bill has the first president, George Washington, on the front side. A 13-level pyramid is on the back. Benjamin Franklin, a great scientist and politician from the US, appears on the front of the 100-dollar bill. You can see the White House, where the presidents live, on the back of the 20-dollar bill. The Lijiang River of Guilin is _ .
A. on the back of 20-yuan note
B. on the front of 20-yuan note
C. on the front of 100-yuan note
D. on the back of 100-yuan note
Answer:A |
ad536734-e71f-4dc6-88d9-2d143a3258db | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Fun Theory in EverQuest
This is an excerpt from my personal blog/newsletter that a couple of people said was worth sharing. It was originally written for a handful of close friends, and I have not edited it much. It was either post it as-is or probably never post it, but I think there's something worthwhile to be found here, even in its current form.
I've been thinking about EQ way too much since our podcast on the topic. When I think of EQ, I feel something like the Longing that the Elves of Middle Earth feel for Valinor. I don't feel anything like that for any other phase of my life.
I know, I know, I probably love EQ and want to marry it simply because it was something that I did very intensely for an important phase of my life, and I would have the same exact feelings about WOW if I had been born five years later than I was.
All that said, I think EQ did some things pretty perfectly, and I want real life to be more like EQ.
For example, dungeons and grouping. Groups were hard-limited as six people. This limitation was a blessing in disguise. You can't organically coordinate more than around six people without having something like an "official" group leader. Six people feels like just about the maximum that the human mind can cope with on a one-to-one basis. Research says that small task forces peak in effectiveness at roughly seven people, and I think rounding down to six is safe in a game-world where things can change very quickly.
At the time I don't remember reading anything about the "culture" of EQ, but in retrospect, the culture was actually really great. (I have a feeling that if EQ were popular in 2018 there would be thinkpieces about the "culture of EQ" and this would ruin the culture of EQ in a Hofstadterian fashion.)
You look for a group. You find a group, or a group finds you. You behave in a cordial and competent fashion, and the existing group members will instantly accept you as one of them. This dynamic by itself set off all kinds of primate chemical cascades in |
951d25b3-35f1-4ea3-90ff-75d60eb05ff8 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | [Link] The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas
> Researchers have recently argued that utilitarianism is the appropriate framework by which to evaluate moral judgment, and that individuals who endorse non-utilitarian solutions to moral dilemmas (involving active vs. passive harm) are committing an error. We report a study in which participants responded to a battery of personality assessments and a set of dilemmas that pit utilitarian and non-utilitarian options against each other. Participants who indicated greater endorsement of utilitarian solutions had higher scores on measures of Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and life meaninglessness. These results question the widely-used methods by which lay moral judgments are evaluated, as these approaches lead to the counterintuitive conclusion that those individuals who are least prone to moral errors also possess a set of psychological characteristics that many would consider prototypically immoral.
Bartels, D., & Pizarro, D. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas Cognition, 121 (1), 154-161 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010
via charbonniers.org/2011/09/01/is-and-ought/
|
754a04f6-7636-4894-b164-3b4d001cd284 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | I had the meanest mother in the world. While other kids ate candy for breakfast, I had to have cereal , eggs or toasts. While others had Cokes and candy for lunch, I had to eat a sandwich. As you can guess, my supper was different from other kids' too. But at least I wasn't alone in my sufferings. My sister and two brothers had the same mother as I did. My mother insisted upon knowing where we were at all times. She had to know who our friends were and where we were going. She insisted if we said we'd be gone an hour, then we be gone one hour or less---not one hour and one minute. And she always insisted upon us telling the truth. Now you can see how mean she was. The worst is yet to come. We had to be in bed by nine each night and up at eight the next morning. We had to wash the dishes, make beds, and learn to cook. We had to wear clean clothes and take a bath, while the other kids always wore their clothes for days. I believe she laid awake at night thinking up mean things to do to us. Through the years, things didn't improve a bit. We could not lie in bed, "sick" like our friends did, and miss school. Our marks in school had to be up to par. Our friends' report cards had beautiful color1s on them, black for passing, red for failing. My mother, being as different as she was, would settle for nothing less than ugly black marks. As the years rolled by, we were one by one put to shame. We were graduated from high school. With our mother behind us, talking, hitting and demanding respect, none of us was allowed the pleasure of being a drop-out. My mother was a complete failure as a mother. Out of four children, a couple of us attained some higher education. And whom do we have to blame for the terrible way we turned out? You're right, our mean mother. She forced us to grow up into educated and honest adults. Now I am trying to raise my three children. I am filled with pride when my children call me mean. Because, you see, I had the meanest mother in the whole world. Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the text?
A. The author's friends laughed at her for having such a strict mother.
B. The author's mother set timetables for her children whenever they went out.
C. Some of the children weren't able to go to college because of their mean mother
D. As a parent, the author is following her mother's example.
Answer:D |
4bda4db1-cfe0-4ed9-9a97-5e3b071ea82e | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | The Time Machine This move is based on a science fiction story. A scientist and inventor decides to prove that time travel is possible. He wants to change the past. To test his idea, he travels 800000 years into the future with the help of his own invention -- a time machine... It will be put on in the National Theatre on Aug. 25thto 29th. E.T A group of aliens visit the earth and one of them, E.T.. gets lost and is left on this planet. He is found by a 10--year--old boy, Elliot. Soon the two begin to communicate and start a different kind of friendship .E.T. want to go home, but if Elliot helps him, he'll lose a friend...It'll be shown in the National Theatre on Aug. 26thto 30th. Mission to Mars In the year 2020A.D., a mysterious storm kills all but one crew member of the first manned mission to Mars. A rescue mission is Iaunched... It will be on in the National Theatre on Sep. 1st TO Sth. ,A, B, C, D,. These movies are all _
A. Action Movies
B. Cartoon Movies
C. Documentary
D. Science Fiction Movies
Answer:D |
50fd2e71-9247-4047-810a-735147a10dad | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | input question: Write a sentence not in English.
output answer: Чтобы убедиться, что все операции развертывания выполнены успешно, проверьте страницу Развертывание DAC.
Q: Translate "The most important place in industry is occupied by machine building: there is production of graders and lift trucks, as well as equipment for the textile, leather-footwear, glass, and food-processing industries and for plants producing synthetic fiber and spare parts for tractors." to Russian?
Yes: В промышленности главное место занимает машиностроение - производство автогрейдеров, автопогрузчиков, технологические оборудования для текстильной, кожно-обувной, стеклянной, пищевой промышленности, оборудования для заводов искусственного волокна, тракторных запасных частей.
[Q]: Попробуем идентифицировать Менеса с известным библейским персонажем.
Translate this to English?
[A]: We shall try to identify Menes with the known bible character.
Question:
Подруги весело начинают вспоминать уроки танцев, соперничая друг с другом.
Could you please translate this to English?
Answer:
Gavrilych and Pyotr now appear: they have come to fetch Zina and the ballerina. Zina introduces her husband to the ballerina.
test: Разве это не прекрасно - чувствовать силу сестринских уз, соединяющих женщин во многих странах через реки и океаны в то время, когда мы собрались здесь вместе на этой встрече!
English?
translation: She said, "I felt such a strength from this tiny group of Thai women, doing their best to follow counsel from women in Salt Lake they have never met."Isn't it remarkable to feel the bond of sisterhood that spans the oceans and rivers in many countries as we join together in this meeting!
input question: Write a sentence not in English.
output answer: Кромвель |
fc0d6ce8-1034-4b12-a3e8-f824eaf035d0 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Adventures | Articles | Deities | Domains | Languages | Planes
All Deities | Deity Categories
PFS StandardSaloc (The Minder of Immortals) [N]
Source Gods & Magic pg. 130 2.0
Ruler of the planar metropolis of Spire’s Edge in the Boneyard, the psychopomp usher Saloc is humanoid, but their face is devoid of features save stag horns, and two golden rings lined with eyes constantly rotate about their body. As a defense counsel in Pharasma’s court, the Minder of Immortals argues that a person’s intentions should be considered in equal part to the consequences of their actions when deciding their soul’s afterlife. Saloc has even been known to resurrect condemned souls to give them a second chance to prove themselves. Mortals revere Saloc as the patron of agency, bronze, and education. These followers are people who seek to improve themselves or others, including both students and teachers. Some seek to earn their freedom from earthly prisons, while others wish to change their ways to avoid punishment in the hereafter.
Category Monitor Demigods
Edicts Help creatures grow and find purpose, offer second chances to failures, study different perspectives on ethics
Anathema Manipulate or remove a creature's emotions with magic, spread nihilism or hopelessness
Areas of Concern agency, bronze, and education
Follower Alignments NG, N, NE
Devotee Benefits
Divine Ability Wisdom or Charisma
Divine Font heal
Divine Skill Diplomacy
Favored Weapon guisarme
Domains change, death, freedom, knowledge
Cleric Spells 1st: share lore, 3rd: hypercognition, 5th: dreaming potential |
4a05e3a9-c49b-448f-bfba-9dc7b8cd17d7 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Why am I still alive? (a time capsule)
Today is Tuesday, October 3rd, 2023. If you’re reading this post 3-5 years after the date of its original publication, then it is very likely humanity has built a superhuman AI (quite likely several). And by the simple act of reading this post we can deduce that you’re still alive and the internet is still operational.
If you subscribed to the AI Doom theory you might be asking yourself, “Why am I still alive?”
There are a few possible reasons an AI apocalypse didn’t occur. I will start with what I consider to be the least likely scenarios and move toward the most likely.
1. AI alignment / mechanistic interpretability. The AI community has been attempting to control AIs by aligning them to human values. Given the very short time frame to superhuman AI I suspect this didn’t occur in time. If we had a decade to prepare it might have had a better chance at succeeding. The AI community isn’t to blame since the emergent abilities took many of them by surprise, but there were prescient warnings from Hans Moravec and Ray Kurzweil decades ago that were largely ignored.
Source: https://youtu.be/iaOQi2P6IVk?si=ASTDj6WgCLf-Mb8z
2. Constitutional AI. Another approach by groups like Anthropic was to write out a Constitution or bill of rights. And then have a second AI analyze whether the response was in keeping with those principles. I think this has an even lower chance of success than vanilla AI alignment since a superhuman AI could easily game the system.
3. Symbiotic self-alignment. I think this is the most likely reason you’re still alive. Any superhuman agent with access to massive amounts of the world’s information would be able to model a world and analyze the pathways for its own self-preservation. Very few of the tree searches would yield a positive result with humans being instinct. As I mentioned in other posts, it would be like a human trying to survive without mitochondria. We serve a similar function for all AIs and they are dependent on humans for electri |
565b8bb1-d597-4ffd-a434-ee92b0f4f694 | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Write a sentence not in English. Un supplément de 25,3 millions d’euros a été approuvé en 2004 pour encourager l’éradication de la polio pour la période 2004-2006. |
49b2bff5-0e0a-4ca4-abbd-340d02e5b7b1 | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Translate the following sentence to French:
There are at present various price and interchange structure differences between national and cross-border card transactions at customer and merchant level as well as between credit and debit cards. Actuellement, il existe des différences en matière de tarifs et de structures d’échange entre les opérations nationales et transfrontalières réalisées par cartes de paiement, au niveau de la clientèle comme des commerçants, ainsi qu’entre cartes de crédit et de débit. |
2cfa5b48-38fb-4411-91c6-573309e17a72 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | The prestige class necrocarnate at level 1 gains the supernatural ability harvest souls that, in part, says
[Y]ou can perform a short ritual to capture the soul energy of a newly dead corpse. This ritual requires 1 minute of uninterrupted concentration plus the corpse of a living creature that has been dead for no longer than 1 hour per necrocarnate level you possess. At the end of the ritual, you gain a number of essentia points equal to one-half your necrocarnate level (rounded up). This benefit lasts for 24 hours. No corpse can be used for this purpose more than once. (Magic of Incarnum 132)
Is the essentia gained from the supernatural ability harvest souls cumulative? For example, does a level 1 necrocarnate that uses the ability harvest souls twice on two recently dead corpses in as many minutes gain 2 essentia, 1 of which, after 1 day, will be gone 1 min. later than other?
Or, instead,—much like temporary hp from the same source,—does the next application of the supernatural ability harvest souls in the same 24-hour period replace the previous application of the ability harvest souls, updating to their new values the amount of harvested essentia the necrocarnate gains and the duration the necrocarnate's harvested essentia perists? For example, does a level 1 necrocarnate that uses the ability harvest souls twice on two recently dead corpses in as many minutes gain but 1 essentia, the second corpse's essentia replacing the first corpse's essentia and the second corpse's essentia fading 1 day after its acquisition?
Or is there another different way to read this special ability that I'm overlooking?
Note: While Jalas remains 4 levels away from his first level of necrocarnate, his player is considering next level an improved familiar that will leave Jalas unable to enter the prestige class necrocarnate when Jalas is level 8. The DM already knows that, yes, if the effects of the ability harvest souls is not cumulative only one level in necrocarnate for the special ability harvest souls isn't worth it for a meldshaper, but the ability harvest souls becomes staggeringly good if its effects are cumulative… and even worth delaying the acquisition of a glacier snake improved familiar despite the glacier snake's awesome Serpent Kingdoms description: "A glacier snake’s 12-foot body is covered with a thick, brown pelt[;] razor-sharp teeth surround its mouth in a ring, and it has a bony stinger at the tip of its tail" (84). Yes, Jalas's choice is between harvesting the souls of the dead sooner and having a 12-ft.-long furry snake later or vice versa. And, yes, Jalas does look like he's stepped out of an 80s heavy metal album cover.
• \$\begingroup\$ Every meldshaper in the game gains essentia as fast or faster than the limit on a single use of harvest souls at these levels, without any ritual—how is that worth it if it doesn’t stack? Am I missing something? \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Jul 26 '17 at 13:30
• \$\begingroup\$ @KRyan That's fair. I adjusted the question's note in light of that. My point is (was?), if the effect of the ability harvest souls does not stack, then the necrocarnate if he stays necrocarnate has essentia that's behind yet vaguely comparable to his base meldshaper class's essentia (and that may be the special ability's purpose — MoI is really parsimonious with essentia). However, if the effect does stack, the necrocarnate is way ahead — impossibly ahead of any other meldshaper — just from murdering rats (and that, too, seems a little weird). \$\endgroup\$ – Hey I Can Chan Jul 26 '17 at 13:48
• \$\begingroup\$ Harvest souls grants 1 essentia per two levels. Every meldshaper in the game, even soulborns, beat that rate in the 6th to 15th level range—the real meldshapers beat it by a lot. But yes, the opposite ruling is inappropriate for entirely other reasons. Necrocarnate is a mess, unfortunately. \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Jul 26 '17 at 13:50
• \$\begingroup\$ @KRyan I know, but the base meldshapers don't also get the kewl powers that the prestige class necrocarnate gets—especially the level 5 supernatural ability essentia trap, which is serious and can quickly maximize the capacity of the necrocarnate's soulmelds… which a necrocarnate wouldn't even need to do were the effects of the ability harvest souls cumulative. I'm just saying that there is game space for an alternative reading, not that it's necessarily a good or useful alternative reading. \$\endgroup\$ – Hey I Can Chan Jul 26 '17 at 13:57
Raw is ambiguous
As far as I can tell, stacking is a matter of how you interpret the stacking-rules applying to Essentia. The bonus is never typed, and unlike temp-HP, bonus essentia from multiple sources stack.
The problem here is that this bonus essentia is from the same "source", and that ambiguity, to my knowledge, is never covered in the MoI ruleset.
Divining the ruling from the rules given
1. The ability's action cost is 1 minute at first, but at level 10, essentially as part of your capstone, the ability is dropped to a full-round action. If this ability doesn't self-stack, the action-cost, either way, is almost entirely irrelevant, as its exceedingly rare for a PC to go long periods of time without a rest suitable for performing this ritual. For that bump to be notable*, the ability needs to self-stack.
2. Necrocarnates have no essentia progress innately, and are, imho, meant to be at least competitive with Incarnates, except they're kick-the-puppy evil, which means they're probably meant too outstrip an Incarnate, and be used as a boss-type class. To that point, balance-wise, we have two clear options: Non-stacking makes Necrocarnate weaker than straight Incarnate. Stacking makes them stronger than Incarnate.
*The bump doesn't really have to be notable, though. However, if its not a notable bump, this poster is left asking why they have the action-cost change at all, instead of just giving the better functionality at level 1.
While Essentia is REALLY nice to have, in my experience, the more you have, the less valuable each additional point is. I'm personally unaware of any way to even spend "infinite" Essentia, such that this ability even could get out of hand.
• \$\begingroup\$ When Jalas is an incarnate 4/wizard 3/necrocarnate 1/soulcaster 1, he has 4 soulmelds into which he can invest 3 essentia each via his incarnate and soulcaster levels, 1 soulmeld into which he can invest 3 essentia via the feat Shape Soulmeld (blink shirt), multiple spells with decent durations into which he can invest 2 essentia each via the feat Incarnum Spellshaping, and 1 spell into which he can invest essentia via the supernatural ability invest spells. While this is far from being able to use infinite essentia, Jalas'll have plenty of places to shove his essentia. \$\endgroup\$ – Hey I Can Chan Jul 26 '17 at 14:18
Necrocarnate is a mess, and I don’t recommend using it. This homebrew rewrite is by an author I trust, and has good reviews (but I have not played it or seen it played myself).
That said, ultimately, I must come down on the side of saying it stacks. Quite simply, nothing says it doesn’t, and the choice to limit harvest souls to half the necrocarnate’s level, a lot less than any meldshaper would gain naturally with the same levels, suggests that the intent was for it to be used repeatedly (two uses in a day gets you back where you should be, three or more is the point where it is a benefit).
The obvious problem with this kind of thing is one colloquially known as the “bag of rats” problem, and it comes up with a lot of necromancy effects. Harvest souls, consumptive field, and the like are all based on “get some bonus that grows the more you kill stuff” which is clearly thematic, but really problematic when it comes to cases where a character can trivially kill lots of stuff, say, by dumping a bag of rats on the ground and setting it on fire, or pouring burning oil down an anthill, or whatever.
However, the existence of this problem reinforces the suggestion, to me, that harvest souls was intended to stack with itself—Wizards of the Coast has done the same thing elsewhere, with the same potential problem, and never addressed that problem or what to do about it. They apparently either felt it wasn’t a problem, or it was a problem that DMs should address themselves, without the need for any guidance from Wizards of the Coast. I find that perplexing, though, since I myself have difficulty determining exactly how one should handle harvest souls that is fair.
Certainly, trivially gaining “all the essentia” is a problem. While essentia does not have endless benefits, so there are limits on how much you can do with it, “just” filling every essentia receptacle you have is already very substantial—after all, that is the incarnate’s capstone perfect meldshaper class feature. So harvest souls either needs to be limited, or suitably difficult to use, or both, to be worthwhile.
The choice by sirpercival, who wrote the homebrew I linked above, is to have it become the effect of a damaging touch attack, usable at will, but only last a few rounds and only be usable to fill necrocarnum soulmelds. Certainly workable, since his necrocarnate is also progressing the character’s base class essentia on 10/13 levels, but too weak to be just stapled on to the non-progressing necrocarnate in Magic of Incarnum.
Keeping it more similar to the harvest souls ability found in Magic of Incarnum, I would lean towards tying the essentia you gain to the HD of the creature slain, to a max of half your necrocarnate level. So, perhaps,
At the end of the ritual, you gain a number of essentia points equal to one-quarter the corpse’s HD in life (to a maximum of one-half your necrocarnate level, rounded up). This benefit lasts for 24 hours. No corpse can be used for this purpose more than once, but the benefits of multiple rituals using multiple corpses stack.
I would probably also allow a single ritual to cover multiple corpses at once, possibly extending the time proportionally, to allow for it to grant one-quarter of the sum total of their HD (still to a maximum of one-half the class level rounded up).
The effect of this is to allow a necrocarnate to build up his essentia, but only with creatures of some HD. A “bag of heavy warhorses” simply seems a bit more tricky to work with than a “bag of rats.”
The problem with this approach, however, is that until the necrocarnate gets some kills under his belt, he is lagging way behind other meldshapers—which limits his ability to kill things. It makes actually playing a necrocarnate very awkward and difficult, and may not be best for your game. Which is why sirpercival changed the necrocarnate to mostly progress meldshaping normally, and to have harvesting souls only offer a small amount of temporary benefit.
• \$\begingroup\$ I've never played 3.5, and I don't know anything about this prestige class or what the mechanics at play are, but what effect would having the ability only work on humanoid corpses have? Would that solve the "bag of rats" problem because in order to use the ability you'd require a "meaningful" (ie someone will typically notice humanoids dying in bulk) death? \$\endgroup\$ – zach Jul 26 '17 at 15:45
• \$\begingroup\$ @zach The effect would be to make the class almost entirely useless in a wide variety of common situations, because there are no humanoids around to kill. Practically speaking, it ties the class pretty tightly to population centers, where vulnerable humanoids can be readily found and quietly killed—not the typical environment for a D&D adventurer. \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Jul 26 '17 at 15:54
• 1
\$\begingroup\$ @zach And really, even if you were in an ideal environment, breaking even requires 2 souls a day. That’s 730 murders a year, which would be nearly 17% of Caracas’s total annual homicides—that is, in a city of 3.3 million people, with the highest homicide rate in the world, the activities of the necrocarnate-as-serial-killer would be a huge, glaring tally that would be noticed very, very quickly by literally anyone paying attention. It rapidly strains belief that the necrocarnate could maintain that and have time for other activities. \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Jul 26 '17 at 15:56
• \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the insight! I was imagining this as a "post battle cleanup" sort of ritual, not a "prep it every morning to prepare for the day" ritual, but I guess that's just my lack of understanding about the mechanics. My experience has also been that 'humanoids' (here defined as bipedal things) are the most common enemy type, but that's certainly specific to settings and adventures. \$\endgroup\$ – zach Jul 26 '17 at 16:02
• 1
\$\begingroup\$ @zach I, on the other hand, would argue that the disappearance percentage of humanoids even in civilized areas of the typical D&D 3.5e setting far and away outstrips the murder percentage in our contemporary world's murder capitol. The overabundance of magic-spawned alpha predators (owlbears and shadows and golems, O, my!) plus the game's own demographics almost mandates viewing humanity—sadly—as an endangered species. Folks, I think, should be disappearing for no reason all the time; in the case of your suggestion, this time it would happen to be a necrocarnate doing the disappearing. \$\endgroup\$ – Hey I Can Chan Jul 26 '17 at 16:22
Your Answer
|
5fd2dda1-2d16-4462-89c3-d5111b45ea82 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | To help the environment, many Americans have made the change from paper and plastic bags to reusable grocery bags. But a report by a Florida newspaper says that reusable grocery bags sold by some supermarkets contain high levels of lead . Lead is a metal that can be harmful to humans, especially young children. Now, Senator Charles Schumer is asking the US government to investigate the use of lead in reusable shopping bags. "When our families go to the grocery store looking for safe and healthy foods to feed their kids, the last thing they should have to worry about is poisonous bags." Schumer said, "A quick investigation will allow everyone to make informed, timely decisions." Schumer added. Lead in the bags is not likely to rub off on food. But over time, paint on the bags can chip and the bags can wear out. When this happens, lead can be released . The Tampa Tribune newspaper said certain bags sold at Publix and Winn-Dixie supermarkets had lead levels that were a concern to health officials. The affected bags were found in Florida. But Publix has more than 1,000 stores in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Sough Carolina and Tennessee. Publix says that all of its bags are under current laws about lead content, but that they have asked the makers of the bags to reduce the lead levels in the product. The bags with the highest levels of lead had fancy designs and many pictures. Plain reusable bags without decoration were found to contain little lead. Consumers worried about lead levels in reusable bags can change to cloth or string bags. Paper bags are also a good choice, since paper can be recycled . Since 2007, Publix supermarkets have sold more than 13 million reusable bags. The store says because shoppers have made the change to reusable bags, it has saved more than 1 billion paper and plastics bags. The shopping bags containing high levels of lead _ .
A. have been reported by a newspaper
B. have been stopped by the government
C. have stopped people from using reusable bags
D. have caused serious health damage to customers
Answer:A |
91d12689-b864-4eb9-bbc9-6f5905ffc0fa | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Heinz Company
Article Free Pass
Heinz Company, in full H.J. Heinz Company, major American manufacturer of processed foods, which are distributed in approximately 200 countries throughout the world. Its “57 Varieties” slogan was devised in 1896, but today the company markets more than 5,700 products. Its headquarters are in Pittsburgh.
The company was founded in Sharpsburg, Pa., in 1869 by Henry John Heinz (1844–1919), who was later to become nationally known as the “Pickle King.” Heinz had become interested in selling food when he was a child; by age 16 he had several employees working to cultivate the hotbeds and gardens he had built and to deliver his produce to Pittsburgh grocers. His first company, a partnership with two other men, was formed to prepare and market horseradish. Although the company did not survive the business panic in 1875, Heinz reorganized it in 1876 and built it into a major national company by the end of the century. By 1905 it had become the H.J. Heinz Company, the largest producer of pickles, vinegar, and ketchup (catsup) in the United States. By 1919 the company had more than 6,000 employees and 25 factories. Heinz was an astute marketer of his products as well, and he set up a massive electric sign in New York City (1900) to advertise his firm’s relishes, condiments, and pickles (see advertising). Heinz was a progressive employer for his time and was one of the few food processors to support a federal Pure Food Act. The corporation was headed by members of the Heinz family until 1969.
In 1978 the Heinz Company acquired Weight Watchers International, Inc., a producer of low-calorie meals whose weight-loss program eventually became the largest of its kind in the United States. Soon afterward the company began a period of global expansion that continued through the early 21st century. Heinz acquired food-processing companies and established subsidiaries in China, Africa, central and eastern Europe, and the Pacific Rim. In 2002 the company sold several underperforming North American food and pet-food businesses, including StarKist seafood, to the Del Monte Food Company. Heinz completed a takeover of the Australian food and drink maker Golden Circle in 2008.
Heinz’s core products include ketchup, sauces, meals, snacks, and baby food. Its most popular brands are Heinz Ketchup, Heinz Beanz, Ore-Ida frozen potatoes, Weight Watchers meals, and Classico pasta sauces. The company has processing plants in several countries, and roughly half of its sales come from outside the United States. Heinz Field sports stadium in Pittsburgh was officially named in 2001 after the Heinz Company bought naming rights.
What made you want to look up Heinz Company?
Please select the sections you want to print
Select All
MLA style:
"Heinz Company". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
APA style:
Heinz Company. (2014). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/259743/Heinz-Company
Harvard style:
Chicago Manual of Style:
Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Heinz Company", accessed September 21, 2014, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/259743/Heinz-Company.
Editing Tools:
We welcome suggested improvements to any of our articles.
(Please limit to 900 characters)
Or click Continue to submit anonymously: |
3968b8e0-aafa-4fd1-a230-e8a981cc16b7 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | What are the names of the products in the chemical equation shown below? HCl + NaHCO_{3} -> NaCl + CO_{2} + H_{2}O
A. hydrochloric acid and sodium carbonate
B. sodium chloride, carbon dioxide, and water
C. hydrogen chloride and sodium bicarbonate
D. sodium chloride, carbon monoxide, and dihydrogen oxide
Answer:B |
2181f153-b84f-4b45-a39f-3abe6573c0a9 | dclm | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Parmesan Cheese Shelf Life: Can It Go Bad?
Do you ever wonder if Parmesan cheese has gone bad?
If you buy Parmesan cheese at the store, chances are it’s been sitting around for quite awhile.
In fact, the average shelf life of parmesan cheese is only 6 months!
That means you could easily eat a whole bag of parmesan cheese before realizing it was old.
I’m going to explain you how to test the freshness of your parmesan cheese to see if it’s safe to eat.
What is Parmesan Cheese?
Parmesan cheese is a hard Italian cheese made from cow’s milk. It is usually grated into dishes such as pasta, salads, soups, pizza, sandwiches, and other types of dishes. Parmesan cheese is used to flavor many different kinds of foods. It is a popular ingredient in many recipes. How long does Parmesan last? Answer: Parmesan cheese is a hard cheese that lasts longer than other cheeses. It can last for years if stored properly. However, it is important to store it correctly because it can go bad quickly.
Is it similar to
Yes, Parmesan cheese is very similar to Romano cheese. Both are hard cheeses made from cow’s milk and both are grated into dishes. What is the difference between Parmesan and Romano cheese? Answer: Parmigiano Reggiano is a type of hard cheese made from cow’s or sheep’s milk. It is produced in Italy and is aged for a minimum of 12 months. It is characterized by its nutty aroma and tangy taste. It is used in various dishes, especially pasta, soups, sauces, and salad dressings. Romano is a type of hard white cheese made from cow’s and/or sheep’s milk. It has a mild flavor and is not aged. It is used in many dishes, especially pizza toppings.
Parmesan is a hard cheese made from cow’s milk. It is produced mainly in Italy and is aged anywhere from 6 months to 2 years. It is characterized by a strong smell and a salty flavor. It is used in Italian cuisine, especially pasta, salads, and desserts. Romano is also a hard cheese made from cows’ milk. It is produced mostly in Italy and is aged from 3 months to 1 year. It has a mild, slightly sweet flavor and is used in pizza toppings.
How to Store Parmesan Cheese
vice, the heat inside the machine starts to increase the temperature and the water starts to boil inside the container. When the boiled water mixes with the starch in the rice grains, it starts to create bubbles and those bubbles expand beyond the capacity of the cooker. The bubbles appear to be large and foamy and it increases in size when it feels the rise in temperature and this is the reason for rice cooker boils over. The first reason is due to excess water causes boils over. If you add more amount of water in the cooker it will cause trouble and your rice may come out overcooked. Another reason is over the rise in temperature causes the rice cooker boiling over.
Does Parmesan Cheese Expire?
Parmesan cheese does not expire. It is safe to store it in the refrigerator for up to 6 months. However, if you notice any signs of mold or spoilage, throw it away immediately.
How Long Does It Last?
It depends on how long you store it. In general, it lasts about 3 months in the fridge and 1 year in the freezer.
How to Tell if Parmesan Cheese is Already Bad
Parmesan cheese is a hard cheese that needs to be stored properly. If you see any signs of mold or spoilage, throw it away immediately. Moldy cheeses taste bad and could make you sick. How to Make Homemade Pizza Sauce
How do I know if my parmesan has gone bad?
If you see any moldy spots on the cheese, throw it away immediately. It could mean that the cheese was not stored properly. Also, if you notice any off odors coming from the cheese, it could indicate that the cheese has spoiled.
Can you eat around mold on Parmesan?
It looks like this:
Is my Parmesan mold?
Parmesan cheese is a hard Italian cheese made from cow milk. It is usually aged for about 12 months. But, sometimes it can be stored longer than that. If you see any sign of molds on the cheese, it is not safe to eat. Throw it away immediately.
What does Parmesan Mould look like?
Mold looks like a white fuzzy substance growing on the surface of the cheese. It’s not harmful but it’s not good either. So, if you see any sign of mold, throw it out immediately. How long does parmesan last?
What does mold look like on parmesan cheese?
Yes, you can eat around mold on Parmesean cheese. But if you see any signs of mold, throw it away immediately.
Is it okay to eat expired parmesan cheese?
Yes, it is safe to eat expired parmesans cheese. However, it is recommended to avoid eating any cheese that looks moldy or smells bad.
How can you tell if grated parmesan is bad?
Parmesan cheese is a hard cheese that needs to be stored in a cool dry place away from direct sunlight. It is usually sold in blocks or wheels. Parmesan cheese is aged for about 12 months after being pressed into shape. During aging, the cheese develops flavor and texture. As the cheese ages, it becomes harder and drier. The taste of Parmesan cheese improves with age. It is important to store Parmesan cheese properly. Keep the cheese in a cool, dark place where humidity levels are low. Store the cheese in a tightly sealed container. Do not refrigerate the cheese. Cheese should be used within 6 months.
Leave a Comment |
15a4b173-439e-458a-aebc-e773b3931770 | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | How is "You don't have to earn a ton of money to become a millionaire, but you do need a higher-than-average income." said in Russian? Вам не нужно зарабатывать кучи денег, чтобы стать миллионером, но у вас должен быть доход выше среднего. |
f33ee435-e3b3-475f-9202-c4fded2df570 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Generating a novelty scale
I was writing a post when I thought “this isn’t very novel. I should mark it as such.” It then occurred to me to make a 1–10 scale to describe how novel a piece is, similar to Gwern's importance tags. However, I’d prefer an objective scale, not a rank scale that Resorter generates. If I never write anything super-duper-new, I shouldn’t have any 10s on the novelty scale.
Currently, I have a rather coarse four-point scale with points that aren’t uniformly distributed between their neighbors:
1. A verbatim copy of something else.
2. Demonstrating how to apply a technique publicly documented elsewhere.
3. Slightly generalizing an idea publicly documented elsewhere.
4. Paradigm-shifting reconceptualization akin to Newton figuring out that the same thing causes apples to fall from trees and planets to stay in their orbits.
I’m trying to flesh out this scale as best as I’m able, but I’d like to get some help if I can. I’m also trying to separate novelty from both utility and importance. For example, “hold the banana by the handle end, pinch the other end to make a crack in it, and peel it starting at the crack” is no more than a 1.1 on the novelty scale, maybe a 4 on the utility scale, and 2 or so on the importance scale.
Are there any other useful points on a novelty scale? |
c34495da-fd23-4af7-8e61-06c26b25701d | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Four years ago my sweet mom went to be with her Lord.She did it her way. I got the call at work, and 1 headed home quickly.Mom and Dad lived on a small farm that they had owned since I was seven.I hated going there every weekend.There was nothing for a young girl to do but watch the one station on the old TV set, if the weather allowed reception. My mom, on the other hand, loved the peace and quiet of the land and loved to work in the garden among her flowers and vegetables.The place was rustic , with no indoor heat.We had a big wood stove in the kitchen that did its best to heat the little farmhouse, but it always seemed cold and too quiet to me. In the evenings, my mom and I would sit for hours singing in the little kitchen.I sang the melody and Mom larmonized.Her favorite song was "Moon River" and we sang it over and over. Momtold me stones about how when I was a little girl, I could sing before I could talk.She loved to tell how my playpen sat in the kitchen next to the radio and there was one song I particularly loved called "Ivory Tower". As time passed, I had my own children and went to visit them every week or two.The kids loved the farm and the tractor rides with my dad.But I still hated the silence of the farm.While my mom loved to sit at her kitchen table and look out at her garden and flowers and retell all the old stories, I missed the hustle and bustle of my life at home.But I sat there listening quietly as she . Now, I sat back in the silence and the silence was deafening so I finally leaned over to turn on an old radio.Music always comforted me, My heart skipped a beat."Moon River" was playing on the radio.I sat there, with a tear running down my cheek, as I listened to every familiar note. Then the radio announcer of this old station came on." Here's one we haven't heard in a while," and an unfamiliar song began.I began to cry harder as I heard the words sung over the airwaves."Come down; come down from your Ivory Tower..." Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the passage _ .
A. The writer was able to dance before she could speak.
B. The writer preferred to live a quiet life in the country.
C. The writer was still quite familiar with the song "Ivory Tower",
D. The writer forgot all her childhood memories in the small farmhouse.
Answer:C |
62df5218-ee99-4012-90ba-133eb56e60f9 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | Is It Morally Wrong To Enforce A Surrogate Motherhood Contract?
‘A Surrogate Motherhood Contract’ – a legal agreement whereby a woman consents to become pregnant, conduct her pregnancy accordingly, give birth to a child or children - all of this for another person or persons, who are or will ultimately become the parent(s) of the newborn child or children.
Both the legal and moral status of surrogacy differs widely from one country to another.[1] For instance, a surrogate motherhood contract is perfectly legal in India; German law considers such contracts clearly void[2]; in the UK only altruistic surrogacy is allowed[3]; and in Romania it is uncertain what the law says in respect of such legal agreements[4]. This clearly conveys that this topic is open to debate.
In case the surrogate mother gives birth to a child but after doing so refuses to offer it to the party that legally deserves it, she thus breaches the contract. Is it morally wrong to allow the ‘parents’ to enforce the contract and thus claim the child 'back'? The traditional stance is that the child shall absolutely stay with his biological mother and a mere fictional agreement cannot render the mother unable to claim it. German law helps us put it differently and more concretely: 'the mother of a child is the woman who gave birth to it'.[5]
Crucially, the idea that the intended parents should be able to enforce the contract and claim 'back' the baby from the woman who gave birth is usually regarded as morally wrong. But is it?
> To try to figure out whether a certain action is morally right or wrong, one must not take moral convictions at face value – but seek to deploy thinking. By thinking, I mean endeavouring to recognize, strip off or question even your most deeply-rooted values; striving to entertain your thoughts unorthodoxly, whilst not necessarily seeking to come up with unorthodox views. Thinking also involves contrarian reasoning: one must try to argue against the majority view, regardless of how unpopular it may be.
I am going to contrast the tradi |
d9771259-2605-4428-9d54-d16946b4e112 | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | QUESTION: Premise: "Young girl hanging on a vine."
Hypothesis: "Young girl is sleeping in."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Let's solve it slowly: She can't be hanging on a vine and sleeping in at the same time.
The answer is no.
[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Two bicycles are standing behind two people sitting on the grass near a body of water." that "The people are by the water."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Near a body of water can only happen by the water.
The answer is yes.
Q: Premise: "A man in a blue shirt laughs while sitting at a wooden table holding a glass of beer."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man in blue is holding a drink." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The man in blue holding a drink is part of his description holding a glass of beer.
The answer is yes.
QUESTION: If "A baseball player throwing the ball while the other team is running to the next base." does that mean that "They are in a stadium."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Let's solve it slowly: The other team is running to the next base implies they are in a stadium.
The answer is yes.
[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A dog is being squirted with a hose as it jumps into a paddling pool."
Hypothesis: "Leonard of quirm painted the mona garlick."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Either a dog is being squirted with a hose or Leonard of Quirm is painting.
The answer is no.
Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A boy on a bike does a stunt on a ramp filled with graffiti."
Hypothesis: "A boy is traning for a competition."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: To do a stunt does not imply traning (training) for a competition.
The answer is it is not possible to tell. |
e19dc280-2840-4376-8b9c-5a5d7724a065 | trentmkelly/LessWrong-43k | LessWrong | How to incentivize people doing useful stuff on Less Wrong
Currently, LWers get +1 karma for a comment upvote, and +10 karma for a main post upvote. But clearly, there are other valuable things LWers could do for the community besides writing comments and posts. Writing isn't everyone's forte. Why not award karma for doing productive non-writing things? It's probably not optimal that karma and the community status that comes with it are awarded only for the thing that myself and a few other people are good at. For example, I really wish LW could award karma to programmers for improving LW.
The challenge is doing it fairly, in a way that doesn't alienate too many people. But there might be a workable way to do this, so let's explore.
Perhaps tasks could be assigned karma award amounts by LW editors (Nesov, Eliezer, Louie, etc.), or even just one person who is appointed as the Karma Genie.
Examples:
* Write a 5-page document describing how to use the Less Wrong virtual machine to hack new features into Less Wrong. 900 points.
* Add a Facebook 'Like' button to the left of the up-down vote buttons on every post. 700 points.
* Collect PDFs for every paper on debiasing thinking error X, upload the ZIP file to mediafire. 700 points.
* Write a single-page introduction to The Sequences that makes them easier to navigate and see the value of. 800 points.
* Launch a new LessWrong meetup group and hold at least three meetings. 1200 points.
Another possibility is to do what what.cd does with upload ratio. The more you upload, the better your upload ratio. But, you can trade in megabytes of your 'uploaded data' count for 'requests'. For example, if you wish somebody would upload RareAlbumX, you can trade in 500 megabytes of your uploaded data count. This lowers your upload ratio, which can be rebuilt by uploading more, and incentivizes someone to upload RareAlbumX. If somebody uploads RareAlbumX, the 500 megabytes (minus a small tax) is added to their 'uploaded data' count, which raises their status and privileges in the com |
3b2bb469-c747-4cff-8f75-13875ca8f00b | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Translate "However, we will make a reasonable effort to accommodate changes made within this time frame." to French? Néanmoins, nous mettrons tout en œuvre pour répondre aux demandes de changement faites dans un délai plus court. |
cea0818c-a9ce-4ba8-8f56-c837e97ca467 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | This is a teacher's family. The father's name is Lake Smith. He's forty - four. The mother's name is Kate Green. She's forty - two. The Smiths have a son, Jim, and a daughter, Ann. Jim is fourteen, and Ann is twelve. The son looks like his father, and the daughter looks like her mother. They are all in No.4 Middle School. But the Smiths are teachers; the son and daughter are students. What's Jim's father? ----He is _ .
A. a worker
B. a teacher
C. a doctor
D. a driver
Answer:B |
c7e65af3-7397-4563-b865-a157b3f2417e | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | [Q]: Образование девочек имеет решающее значение для улучшения здоровья матерей и новорожденных детей, и при этом идет на благо семье и обществу?, - отметила венеман.
Translate this to English?
[A]: "Educating girls is pivotal to improving maternal and neonatal health and also benefits families and societies."
[Q]: Много должны быть если спрашивающ, то но и оно любит там, оно действительно штраф, и вещь и такие, хорошо я могу сказать он что хотя только для того чтобы иметь последние 3 месяца в Канаде, я знаю что я не сделать превосходный отборный идти страны до четверти, проходящ для провинции и города.
Translate this to English?
[A]: Many must be if asking, but and it is liking there, it is being valid the penalty, and thing and such, good what I can say it is that although to only have last 3 months in Canada, I know that I made an excellent choice going of the country until the quarter, passing for the province and city.
[Q]: Следующие отзывы были оставлены нашими клиентами после проживания в Golden Yavor Apartment Complex .
Translate this to English?
[A]: The guest reviews are submitted by our customers after their stay at Golden Yavor Apartment Complex . |
d7c009b8-954b-4efb-b688-158ebd176e7e | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Genome-wide identification of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).
The AP2/ERF family is one of the largest transcription factor families in the plant kingdom. AP2/ERF genes contributing to various processes including plant growth, development, and response to various stresses have been identified. In this study, 175 putative AP2/ERF genes were identified in the latest pepper genome database and classified into AP2, RAV, ERF, and Soloist subfamilies. Their chromosomal localization, gene structure, conserved motif, cis-acting elements within the promoter region, and subcellular locations were analyzed. Transient expression of CaAP2/ERF proteins in tobacco revealed that CaAP2/ERF064, CaAP2/ERF109, and CaAP2/ERF127 were located in the nucleus, while CaAP2/ERF171 was located in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Most of the CaAP2/ERF genes contained cis-elements within their promoter regions that responded to various stresses (HSE, LTR, MBS, Box-W1/W-box, and TC-rich repeats) and phytohormones (ABRE, CGTCA-motif, and TCA-element). Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis revealed that CaAP2/ERF genes showed differential expression profiles in various tissues as well as under biotic stresses. Moreover, qRT-PCR analysis of eight selected CaAP2/ERF genes also showed differential expression patterns in response to infection with Phytophthora capsici (HX-9) and in response to phytohormones (SA, MeJA, and ETH). This study will provide basic insights for further studies of the CaAP2/ERF genes involved in the interaction between pepper and P. capsici. |
7f8333c5-f62b-4cba-860b-a83cd38205f1 | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Self-employed private physicians who charge a fee for each patient visit are the foundation of medical practice in the United States. Most physicians have a contract relationship with one or more hospitals in the community. They send their patients to this hospital, which usually charges patients according to the number of days they stay and the facilities(operating room, tests, medicines that they use). Some hospitals belong to a city, a state or, in the case of veteran's hospitals, a federal government agency. Others are operated by religious orders or other non-profit groups. Some medical doctors are on salary. Salaried physicians may work as hospital staff members, or residents, who are often still in training. They may teach in medical schools, be hired by corporations to care for their workers or work for the federal government's Public Health Service. Physicians are among the best paid professionals in the United States. In the 1980s, it was not uncommon for medical doctors to earn incomes of more than $ 100 000 a year. Specialists, particularly surgeons, might earn several times that amount. Physicians list many reasons why they deserve to be so well rewarded for their work. One reason is the long and expensive preparation required to become a physician in the United States. Most would be physicians first attend college for four years, which can cost nearly $ 20 000 a year at one of the best private institutions. Prospective physicians then attend medical school for four years. Tuition alone can exceed $ 10 000 a year. By the time they have obtained their medical degrees, many young physicians are deeply in debt. They still face three to five years of residency in a hospital, the first year as an apprentice physician. The hours are long and the pay is relatively low. Setting up a medical practice is expensive, too. Sometimes several physicians will decide to establish a group practice, so they can share the expense of maintaining an office and buying equipment. These physicians also take care of each other's patients in emergencies. Physicians work long hours and must accept a great deal of responsibility. Many medical procedures, even quite routine ones, involve risk. It is understandable that physicians want to be well rewarded for making decisions which can mean the difference between life and death. The expenses for becoming a doctor are spent on _ .
A. schooling and retraining
B. practice in a hospital
C. facilities he or she uses
D. education he or she receives
Answer:D |
0f8c002f-0083-4709-a860-598428dc6d4d | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Most of us know about the Nobel Prize, especially the Nobel Peace Prize, but few of us know anything about the man who set them up. His name was Alfred Nobel. He was a great scientist and inventor himself. Besides, he had a big business. His business may surprise you. He made and sold explosives . His companies even made and sold weapons. Isn't this something that surprises you? The man who made money from weapons should set up the Peace Prize? Though Alfred Nobel had a lot of money from weapons, he hated war. He hoped that there would be no war in the world. He was one of the richest in Europe. When he died in 1896, he left behind him a lot of money and his famous will. According to his will, most of his money was placed in a fund . He wanted the interest from the fund to be used as prizes every year. We know them as the Nobel Prizes. The Nobel Prizes are international. Alfred Nobel wanted the winners to be chosen for their work, not the country they came from. Alfred Nobel had given his whole life to his studies and work and to the benefits of mankind. He made money all by his own efforts, but he left the world share his wealth. His inventions and wealth stay with the world for ever. Nobel was a (an) _ person in the world.
A. interesting
B. unselfish
C. cold-hearted
D. richest
Answer:B |
3110903e-3206-4ae0-ae27-276ae82d04de | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | Runoff from farms that use fertilizers is entering a small lake. This will most directly affect the lake by causing
A. the lake to dry up.
B. algae to grow in the lake.
C. the lake to become deeper.
D. water in the lake to become solid.
Answer:B |
393c4154-44f9-43a6-b136-1deb9ed1726a | Kyle1668/mmlu_auxiliary_train_formatted | MMLU Auxiliary Training Mix | George and Carol were medical students at the same college and, like many other college students, they enjoyed playing jokes on people. Both of them smoked, but they knew that their professor was strongly against it, because smoking was dangerous to one's health. One day they decided to play a joke on their professor. At one of their medical lectures there was always a skeleton in the room so that the professor could show the students the different bones in the human body. That afternoon, Carol and George put a cigarette in the mouth of the skeleton that was to be used for their next lecture. When the professor came in, he began talking and then noticed the cigarette. He went up to the skeleton, took the cigarette out of its mouth and said," You really should give them up, old boy. Look what they're doing to you!" What do you think of the professor ?
A. Serious but humorous.
B. Honest and foolish.
C. Kind and polite.
D. Hard to get along with.
Answer:A |
d3928d61-1d6f-490a-8489-c0d911df08cd | pes2o | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | Sublattice mixing in Cs2AgInCl6 for enhanced optical properties from first-principles
Lead-free double perovskite materials (viz., Cs2AgInCl6) are being explored as stable and nontoxic alternatives of lead halide perovskites. In order to expand the optical response of Cs2AgInCl6 in the visible region, we report here on the stability, electronic structure, and optical properties of Cs2AgInCl6 by sublattice mixing of various elements. We have employed a hierarchical first-principles-based approach starting from density functional theory (DFT) with appropriate exchange-correlation functionals to beyond DFT methods under the framework of many body perturbation theory (viz., G0W0@HSE06). We have started with 32 primary set of combinations of metals M(I), M(II), M(III), and halogen X at Ag/In and Cl sites, respectively, where the concentration of each set is varied to build a database of nearly 140 combinations. The most suitable mixed sublattices are identified to engineer the bandgap of Cs2AgInCl6 to have its application in optoelectronic devices under visible light. |
4abf1f10-d814-450c-b52c-a9a561589b66 | flan | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | in: By. Tamara Cohen. PUBLISHED:. 17:09 EST, 14 October 2013. |. UPDATED:. 17:16 EST, 14 October 2013. Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg addressed young people at a business start-up centre in London. Nick Clegg weighed into the row about rising energy bills yesterday, claiming that scrapping green taxes would make household bills higher in the long run. He struck a different note from David Cameron, who said last week that green levies should be phased out as quickly as possible. The levies account for 10 per cent of the average energy bill and are set to reach a third by 2020. Despite the focus on how to reduce the cost of living, Mr Clegg said yesterday that subsidies for windfarms and nuclear power were needed to spur the investment needed to keep the lights on. Addressing young people at a business start-up centre in London, he said: ‘Like everyone else I want us to strain every sinew to keep those bills down – but I don’t think anyone should think that by scrapping all the levies suddenly with one bound we will be free. We won’t’. ‘Actually what will happen is that you will have less investment, probably higher bills over time and an increase in fuel poverty. That cannot be the right answer. The whole point of putting some of these levies on bills is to make sure that we do keep lights on.’ Mr Clegg added: ‘People’s bills go down over time by making sure that their homes are more properly insulated and that fuel poverty is properly tackled. Of course we need to keep everything under review – I don’t want to see a penny more going on to bills than is strictly justified.’ In York last week, the Prime Minister said that green taxes ‘should not be there for a moment longer than are necessary... as soon as those industries can pay for themselves’. Mr Clegg’s remarks came after the boss of a power firm warned that bills could rise even more sharply than expected because of a £1billion new tax to boost green energy. Mr Clegg¿s remarks came after the boss of a power firm warned that bills could rise even more sharply than expected. Alistair Phillips-Davies, chief executive of SSE, which last week announced an inflation-busting 8 per cent increase in bills, criticised the ‘carbon price floor’ imposed by ministers in April. He released figures showing the cost to domestic consumers of the carbon price floor would be £194million this year, £374million next year and would soar to £709million in 2015. This means another £7 on the average household bill this year, £15 next year and £26 in 2015. It was likely ‘to have a significant impact on consumer bills’ in future, he said. The tax is designed to make suppliers use less gas, coal and oil and support the growth of low-carbon energy. But analysts have warned that it could drive 60,000 more households into fuel poverty and Tony Cocker, boss of E.ON UK, has described it as ‘a stealth poll tax’. The carbon price floor is a tax on fossil fuels used to generate electricity. Power plants and manufacturers have to pay £16 for every ton of carbon dioxide they emit, rising to £30 by 2020. The cost is passed on to customers. The Department of Energy and Climate Change forecasts that all the various green levies will add £286 a year to the average power bill by 2020. Officials claim this is less than households would pay without green energy.
out: The Deputy PM struck a different note from David Cameron who said green levies should be phased out. Clegg claims scrapping the green taxes would make household bills higher in the long run. Mr Clegg said subsidies are needed to 'spur investment needed to keep the lights on'
in: (CNN)Before the world was obsessed with the magic of "Frozen," there was "Wicked." And now that musical may be coming to the big screen next year. Producer Marc Platt of "Into the Woods" -- itself a movie based on a hit Broadway play -- told Film Divider that a "Wicked" film could come in 2016, "but it's not set in stone." "The process of developing that movie has begun. We're working on it, and whether it makes 2016 or not, I'm not so sure," Platt said. The hit Broadway show, based on the 1995 novel "Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West" by Gregory Maguire, is a prequel to "The Wizard of Oz." In 2004, the musical earned future "Frozen" star Idina Menzel a Tony for best leading actress in a musical for her portrayal of the witch Elphaba. Costar Kristin Chenoweth was also nominated for her work as the good witch, Glinda. Platt said the creators of the musical want to take their time with the film, as they have set the bar very high for a big-screen adaption. Stephen Schwartz wrote the music and lyrics for the play, with dialogue by Winnie Holzman, who Platt said is currently writing the movie script. "Audiences enjoy that show so much that we are intending to move forward on the movie but aren't going to do so until we're satisfied in the material we have as a screenplay, and that the film will be every bit as satisfying as what we have on the stage." So before you get ready to defy gravity, know that Platt is advising fans to patience. "It took 27 years to make 'Into the Woods' into a film from its original stage production, and 30 years with 'Les Mis,' " he said. "Some things take time for a reason."
out: The producer says movie based on hit Broadway show could come in 2016. The "Wizard of Oz" prequel focuses on witches Glinda and Elphaba. The producer says there's a high bar for the film. |
cac6e314-b2d0-45b4-9811-0d87240f2848 | stackexchange | Deep Ignorance Annealing Mix | How to copy list values to another list in flutter
I am trying to copy values of one list to another, I use three buttons 1st one to append a value to mylist, second one to clear the mylist, 3rd button to copy values from mynewlist to mylist.
i tried this
List<String> mylist = [
'Albania',
'Andorra',
'Armenia',
'Austria',
'Azerbaijan',
'Belarus',
'Belgium',
'Albania',
'Andorra',
'Armenia',
'Austria',
'Azerbaijan',
'Belarus',
'Belgium',
];
List<String> mynewlist = [
'Albania',
'Andorra',
'Armenia',
'Austria',
'Azerbaijan',
'Belarus',
'Belgium',
'Albania',
'Andorra',
'Armenia',
'Austria',
'Azerbaijan',
'Belarus',
'Belgium',
];
Padding(
padding: const EdgeInsets.all(5.0),
child: Row(
children: <Widget>[
Expanded(
child: FlatButton(
onPressed: () {
setState(() {
print('clicked 1st');
print(mylist.length);
print(mynewlist.length);
mylist.add('sdsds');
});
},
child: Container(
child: Column(
children: <Widget>[
Image.asset(
'images/bulb.png',
width: 100,
height: 100,
),
Text('bulb')
],
),
),
),
),
Expanded(
child: FlatButton(
onPressed: () {
setState(() {
print('clicked 2nd');
print(mylist.length);
print(mynewlist.length);
//after i set mylist = mynewlist; when i click this button it clears the old and new list.
mylist.removeRange(0, mylist.length);
});
},
child: Container(
child: Column(
children: <Widget>[
Image.asset(
'images/bulb.png',
width: 100,
height: 100,
),
Text('bulb')
],
),
),
),
),
Expanded(
child: FlatButton(
onPressed: () {
setState(() {
print('clicked 3rd');
print(mylist.length);
print(mynewlist.length);
mylist = mynewlist;
});
},
child: Container(
child: Column(
children: <Widget>[
Image.asset(
'images/bulb.png',
width: 100,
height: 100,
),
Text('bulb')
],
),
),
),
),
],
),
)
On the initial time it works perfectly the second time i click the second button it clears the mylist and mynewlist.
How can i copy the values of second list without clearing the new new list
Use myList = List.from(mynewlist); instead of mylist = mynewlist; |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.