MARS: Modular Agent with Reflective Search for Automated AI Research
Abstract
MARS is a modular AI research automation framework that uses budget-aware planning, modular construction, and reflective memory to achieve state-of-the-art performance in autonomous machine learning research.
Automating AI research differs from general software engineering due to computationally expensive evaluation (e.g., model training) and opaque performance attribution. Current LLM-based agents struggle here, often generating monolithic scripts that ignore execution costs and causal factors. We introduce MARS (Modular Agent with Reflective Search), a framework optimized for autonomous AI research. MARS relies on three pillars: (1) Budget-Aware Planning via cost-constrained Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explicitly balance performance with execution expense; (2) Modular Construction, employing a "Design-Decompose-Implement" pipeline to manage complex research repositories; and (3) Comparative Reflective Memory, which addresses credit assignment by analyzing solution differences to distill high-signal insights. MARS achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source frameworks on MLE-Bench under comparable settings, maintaining competitiveness with the global leaderboard's top methods. Furthermore, the system exhibits qualitative "Aha!" moments, where 63% of all utilized lessons originate from cross-branch transfer, demonstrating that the agent effectively generalizes insights across search paths.
Community
MARS uses budget-aware planning, modular design, and reflective memory to automate AI research, achieving strong performance and cross-branch knowledge transfer.
hello guys, great results, i noticed table 1 shows, mars+ is more likely to win gold than bronze, so it does not degrade gracefully but agents appears to suffer from logic corruption. could this be because of hallucination or memory degradation?
Could you provide further clarification on this question? Specifically, since winning a gold medal implies achieving a bronze medal, I am curious how to interpret the statement "Agent is more likely to win gold than bronze". Additionally, could you define what is meant by "logic corruption" in this context?
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- SPIRAL: Symbolic LLM Planning via Grounded and Reflective Search (2025)
- ROAD: Reflective Optimization via Automated Debugging for Zero-Shot Agent Alignment (2025)
- EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots (2026)
- Evolving Excellence: Automated Optimization of LLM-based Agents (2025)
- SYMPHONY: Synergistic Multi-agent Planning with Heterogeneous Language Model Assembly (2026)
- Can LLMs Do Rocket Science? Exploring the Limits of Complex Reasoning with GTOC 12 (2026)
- Agent Alpha: Tree Search Unifying Generation, Exploration and Evaluation for Computer-Use Agents (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper