| --- |
| pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity |
| tags: |
| - sentence-transformers |
| - feature-extraction |
| - sentence-similarity |
| - transformers |
|
|
| --- |
| |
| # GitHub Issues MPNet Sentence Transformer (10 Epochs) |
|
|
| This is a [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) model, specific for GitHub Issue data. |
|
|
| ## Dataset |
|
|
| For training, we used the [NLBSE22 dataset](https://nlbse2022.github.io/tools/), after removing issues with empty body and duplicates. |
| Similarity between title and body was used to train the sentence embedding model. |
|
|
|
|
| ## Usage (Sentence-Transformers) |
|
|
| Using this model becomes easy when you have [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) installed: |
|
|
| ``` |
| pip install -U sentence-transformers |
| ``` |
|
|
| Then you can use the model like this: |
|
|
| ```python |
| from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer |
| sentences = ["This is an example sentence", "Each sentence is converted"] |
| |
| model = SentenceTransformer('Collab-uniba/github-issues-mpnet-st-e10') |
| embeddings = model.encode(sentences) |
| print(embeddings) |
| ``` |
|
|
|
|
| ## Training |
| The model was trained for ten epochs, using Multiple Negative Ranking Loss. We assumed that title and body of the same issue have to be similar. |
| We used the following parameters: |
|
|
| **DataLoader**: |
|
|
| `torch.utils.data.dataloader.DataLoader` of length 39221 with parameters: |
| ``` |
| {'batch_size': 16, 'sampler': 'torch.utils.data.sampler.RandomSampler', 'batch_sampler': 'torch.utils.data.sampler.BatchSampler'} |
| ``` |
|
|
| **Loss**: |
|
|
| `sentence_transformers.losses.MultipleNegativesRankingLoss.MultipleNegativesRankingLoss` with parameters: |
| ``` |
| {'scale': 20.0, 'similarity_fct': 'cos_sim'} |
| ``` |
|
|
| Parameters of the fit()-Method: |
| ``` |
| { |
| "epochs": 10, |
| "evaluation_steps": 0, |
| "evaluator": "NoneType", |
| "max_grad_norm": 1, |
| "optimizer_class": "<class 'torch.optim.adamw.AdamW'>", |
| "optimizer_params": { |
| "lr": 2e-05 |
| }, |
| "scheduler": "WarmupLinear", |
| "steps_per_epoch": null, |
| "warmup_steps": 39221, |
| "weight_decay": 0.01 |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
|
|
| ## Full Model Architecture |
| ``` |
| SentenceTransformer( |
| (0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 512, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: MPNetModel |
| (1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 768, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False}) |
| ) |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Citing & Authors |
| ``` |
| @article{Colavito_2025_Benchmarking, |
| title = {Benchmarking large language models for automated labeling: The case of issue report classification}, |
| author = {Giuseppe Colavito and Filippo Lanubile and Nicole Novielli}, |
| year = 2025, |
| journal = {Information and Software Technology}, |
| volume = 184, |
| pages = 107758, |
| doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107758}, |
| issn = {0950-5849}, |
| url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925000977}, |
| keywords = {Issue labeling, Generative AI, Software maintenance and evolution} |
| } |
| ``` |