Apex-2 / README.md
YOON1v's picture
Link base model YOON1v/Apex-2-Base
cb6dd6a verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
8.98 kB
metadata
license: apache-2.0
language:
  - en
library_name: transformers
tags:
  - text-generation
  - causal-lm
  - from-scratch
  - mixture-of-experts
  - moe
  - sft
  - code
  - qwen3_moe
pipeline_tag: text-generation
base_model: YOON1v/Apex-2-Base
base_model_relation: finetune
model-index:
  - name: Apex-2
    results:
      - task:
          type: text-generation
        dataset:
          name: HumanEval+
          type: evalplus/humanevalplus
        metrics:
          - type: pass@1
            value: 41.5
            name: pass@1 (greedy, chat)
      - task:
          type: text-generation
        dataset:
          name: MBPP+
          type: evalplus/mbppplus
        metrics:
          - type: pass@1
            value: 48.9
            name: pass@1 (greedy, chat)
      - task:
          type: text-generation
        dataset:
          name: GSM8K
          type: gsm8k
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 32.4
            name: acc (0-shot CoT)
      - task:
          type: text-generation
        dataset:
          name: IFEval
          type: google/IFEval
        metrics:
          - type: prompt_level_strict_acc
            value: 44.7
            name: prompt-level strict
      - task:
          type: text-generation
        dataset:
          name: MMLU
          type: cais/mmlu
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 28.6
            name: acc (5-shot)
      - task:
          type: text-generation
        dataset:
          name: HellaSwag
          type: hellaswag
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 62.2
            name: acc_norm (0-shot)

APEX-2

A from-scratch Mixture-of-Experts LLM: 3.87B total / 1.45B active parameters, pretrained on 86.5B tokens and instruction-tuned with SFT.

This checkpoint is the SFT release (pretrain β†’ 2-stage SFT). A DPO stage was tried and dropped because it lowered code, math and instruction-following scores (see below).

Model details

Architecture Decoder-only MoE Transformer, every layer MoE. GQA (16Q/4KV, head_dim 128) + QK-RMSNorm + RoPE (ΞΈ=10K) + SwiGLU experts + RMSNorm, weight tying
Parameters 3,869.1M total Β· 1,453.2M active per token (1,142.0M non-embedding active), measured
Layers Β· d_model 32 Β· 2048
Experts 16 per layer, top-4 routing with renormalized probabilities, expert width 1024
Router losses load-balancing aux loss 0.01 (global-batch statistics) + router z-loss 1e-3
Context length 4096
Vocab 151,936 (Qwen3 tokenizer), tied embeddings
Weights stored as bfloat16 (~7.7GB), cast from the float32 training export
Pretrain 54,250 steps Β· 86.5B tokens (web Β· code in 11 languages Β· math Β· curated), 1M-token batches; the last 20.4B tokens are an LR decay phase (web 30 / code 35 / math 15 / curated 20); parts trained with DiLoCo on 2Γ— GH200
Post-training SFT stage 1: 2.21B tokens (general 29 / code 44 / math 27). SFT stage 2: 0.28B tokens Γ— 2 epochs (execution-verified code, competition math, precise instruction following)
HF format Weights map 1:1 onto Qwen3MoeForCausalLM (the training model uses fused expert tensors; the export splits them per expert). Export check: logits relative difference 1.0e-6 and 100% next-token agreement against the training checkpoint

Usage

The model uses the ChatML template (<|im_start|>role\n...<|im_end|>) shipped in tokenizer_config.json; generation ends at <|im_end|>.

import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("YOON1v/Apex-2", dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="cuda")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("YOON1v/Apex-2")

messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Write a Python function that checks if a number is prime."}]
inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_tensors="pt", return_dict=True).to("cuda")
out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512, do_sample=True, temperature=0.7, top_p=0.9)
print(tokenizer.decode(out[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))

vLLM loads it directly as well: LLM(model="YOON1v/Apex-2", dtype="bfloat16", max_model_len=4096).

Benchmarks

Measured by us with vLLM greedy decoding and the chat template (prompt + answer ≀ 4096 tokens). Model-written code was executed in a sandbox.

Area Benchmark Apex-2 (SFT) Base
Code HumanEval 43.9 36.6
Code HumanEval+ 41.5 32.9
Code MBPP 56.3 54.8
Code MBPP+ 48.9 46.3
Code MultiPL-E HumanEval C++ 36.0 β€”
Code MultiPL-E MBPP C++ 41.6 β€”
Code LiveCodeBench v5–v6 3.2 β€”
Code β”” LiveCodeBench easy (84) 11.9 β€”
Code β”” LiveCodeBench medium (104) 1.0 β€”
Code β”” LiveCodeBench hard (154) 0.0 β€”
Code CRUXEval-O 8.5 β€”
Code CRUXEval-I 3.2 β€”
Math GSM8K 32.4 (0-shot CoT) 15.1 (8-shot)
Math MATH-500 (0-shot CoT) 21.0 β€”
Instruction following IFEval prompt strict 44.7 β€”
Instruction following IFEval instruction strict 56.6 β€”
Knowledge MMLU (5-shot) 28.6 28.2
Commonsense HellaSwag (acc_norm) 62.2 60.8
Commonsense ARC-e (acc_norm) 64.1 66.7
Commonsense ARC-c (acc_norm) 38.4 39.7
Commonsense PIQA (acc_norm) 74.8 73.9
Commonsense WinoGrande (acc) 61.8 60.1
Commonsense LAMBADA (acc) 52.8 54.5

Compared with similar-size models (official numbers; protocols differ, so this is a rough comparison):

Model Pretraining tokens HumanEval HumanEval+ MBPP MBPP+ GSM8K IFEval MMLU
Apex-2 (3.87B Β· 1.45B active) 0.087T 43.9 41.5 56.3 48.9 32.4 44.7 28.6
Apex-1 DPO (1.1B dense) 0.02T 8.5 β€” 5.2 β€” 1.9 β€” 24.9
Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct 18T 61.6 β€” 63.2 β€” 73.2 42.5 50.7
Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instruct 5.5T 70.7 66.5 69.2 59.4 β€” β€” β€”
Qwen3-1.7B (non-thinking) 36T β€” β€” β€” β€” β€” 68.2 64.4
Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct 9T β€” β€” β€” β€” 44.4 59.5* 49.3
Gemma-3-1B-it 2T 41.5 β€” 35.2 β€” 62.8 80.2* 38.8
OLMoE-1B-7B (1.3B active) 5.1T 62.3 54.4 β€” β€” 72.4 66.4* 55.1
DeepSeek-Coder-1.3B 2T 65.9 60.4 65.3 54.8 β€” β€” β€”

DeepSeek-Coder numbers are the Qwen2.5-Coder report's re-evaluation. * Different IFEval metric: Apex-2 and Qwen report prompt-level strict; the others report an average of metrics or do not specify.

With 1/23 to 1/400 of the pretraining data of these models, Apex-2's base model matches Qwen2.5-1.5B (18T tokens) on HumanEval+ (32.9 vs 32.9). The big gaps are knowledge (MMLU) and math, which mainly track pretraining scale.

SFT data was 13-gram decontaminated against HumanEval(+), MBPP(+), GSM8K test, MATH, MMLU, ARC, HellaSwag, PIQA, WinoGrande, IFEval and LAMBADA. For LiveCodeBench only the newer v5–v6 problems (after 2024-08) were used, to reduce contamination risk.

Why no DPO: DPO on allenai/Dolci-Instruct-DPO (220K pairs) made answers 2.3Γ— longer (320 β†’ 733 tokens on average). Chosen-answer likelihood also fell during training. In evaluation HumanEval+ went 41.5 β†’ 32.3, MBPP+ 48.9 β†’ 37.3, GSM8K 32.4 β†’ 14.3 and IFEval 44.7 β†’ 35.7, so this SFT checkpoint is the release.

Known limitations

  • English-centric. Other languages, including Korean, barely work (multilingual data was excluded from SFT).
  • Limited world knowledge (MMLU ~29%), so it often states wrong facts with confidence.
  • Weak at competitive programming (LiveCodeBench medium ~1%) and at predicting code execution (CRUXEval).
  • 4096-token context. No tool use, no thinking mode.

Training data

  • Pretrain: 40 deduplicated sources, including:
    • web: FineWeb-Edu, DCLM, FinePDFs
    • code: StarCoder-family and The Stack-derived code in 11 languages, OpenCoder corpora, synthetic code
    • math: FineMath, InfiWebMath, Nemotron-CC-Math
    • curated: Wikipedia, StackExchange, peS2o, Cosmopedia, Gutenberg
  • SFT:
    • general: allenai/Dolci-Instruct-SFT (tool-use, multilingual and identity subsets removed)
    • code: OpenCoder opc-sft-stage1/2, nvidia/OpenCodeInstruct (unit-test pass rate β‰₯ 0.9), bigcode self-oss-instruct, m-a-p/Code-Feedback
    • math: nvidia/OpenMathInstruct-2, AI-MO/NuminaMath-CoT

Some SFT sources contain synthetic data generated by third-party models (e.g. GPT-4-class, Llama-3.1-405B, Qwen2.5-Coder); check each dataset's terms for your use case.

License

Apache 2.0.