Instructions to use jaredpalmer/kev-8b with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use jaredpalmer/kev-8b with PEFT:
Task type is invalid.
- Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Kev-8B
Kev-8B is a decision model: one document (the state) and a set of typed questions in, a probability distribution per question out, in one forward pass. No text generation. It is a LoRA adapter (r=16) plus a pointer head on Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Base (revision 49e3418f), serving TypeSafe's public /v1/systemone contract.
The most accurate kev. The best checkpoint of any size under a frozen, checksummed protocol: best in-distribution accuracy, best out-of-domain accuracy (0.796 on transfer-v4 dev, six points from Jev), best held-out rule reasoning of any Kev at 8B. Same recipe at two seeds: 0.796 / 0.774; this checkpoint is the seed selected on the development partition.
- Hub:
jaredpalmer/kev-8b(this repo; trialv7-final/00-trial-0) - Code, suites, every trial with hashes and paired bootstraps: github.com/jaredpalmer/kev —
PLAN.md,runs/leaderboard.md
Results (same frozen items for every row)
| | Kev-0.5B (prototype) | Kev-0.6B | Kev-4B | Kev-8B | Jev | |---|---|---|---|---| | in-distribution accuracy (decision-v4 dev, 1,200 q) | 0.712 | 0.801 | 0.854 | 0.863 | 0.845 | | out-of-domain accuracy (transfer-v4 dev, 560 q) | 0.561 | 0.620 | 0.790 | 0.796 | 0.857 | | out-of-domain Brier | 0.50 | 0.536 | 0.328 | 0.337 | 0.211 | | confident errors out of domain (p ≥ 0.9 and wrong) | – | 10.8% | 8.2% | 9.9% | 3.7% | | held-out policy structures, both siblings correct | – | 0.08 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.86 | | option-order flip rate | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Per-source out-of-domain accuracy (Kev-8B / Jev): QNLI 0.91 / 0.93, SciQ 1.00 / 0.99, TweetEval-offensive 0.79 / 0.81, PAWS 0.78 / 0.79, MMLU 0.70 / 0.90, Emotion 0.56 / 0.59, deadline (3-level date arithmetic) 0.60 / 0.93, (A and B) or not C 0.91 / 0.97, if A then not B else C 0.59 / 0.78.
Seeds: two seeds on decision-v7: transfer 0.796 / 0.774, held-out rule pairs 0.69 / 0.64 (Jev 0.86); this checkpoint is seed 0. Trained on decision-v7 (10k public records + 896 policy records over nine template families incl. four ordinal Score threshold families + 1,680 records from 60 random rule structures with negation anywhere); development/test items are byte-identical to v4, so every number here is comparable with earlier checkpoints.
Locked test, read once (runs/locked/kev-8b-v7-preview-ungated/): in-distribution 0.870 (Brier 0.193), out-of-domain 0.780 (Brier 0.327, confident errors 7.6%, held-out pairs 0.62). This partition will not be read again for this checkpoint.
What we learned building it
- Capacity dominates out of domain. With public examples and synthetic budget held equal, 0.6B → 4B is +14–19 pp; 4B → 8B is +1–7 pp.
- Fine-tuning erodes base capability, and the learning rate controls it. The 4B base, zero-shot with a letter readout, scores 0.688 on the same MMLU items and 0.787 on PAWS; the default recipe (lr 2e-4) trained down to 0.60–0.66 / 0.56–0.71. Lowering lr to 5e-5 recovers most of it and is the single largest recipe improvement we found; fewer LoRA target modules and smaller ranks help less.
- More public training data raises in-distribution accuracy and lowers transfer at 4B (10k vs 3.4k records: −3 pp). Knowledge MCQ sources (ARC, OpenBookQA, CommonsenseQA) raise in-distribution accuracy to 0.86 without moving transfer.
- Programmatic contrastive policy pairs teach the trained rule structures (both-correct 0.85–1.0) but transfer to unseen structures only partially (0.5–0.6 at 4B, 0.03–0.11 at 0.6B).
Known limits
- Held-out policy reasoning (unseen rule compositions, date arithmetic with grace periods) is far from Jev.
- Product-shaped questions with no training analogue are not guaranteed; measure on your own inputs.
- Out-of-domain probabilities are usable but not calibrated (raw ECE 0.128); temperature fitted in-domain does not transfer.
- 8B fp32 needs
33 GB and does not fit a 32 GB Mac;17 GB) does. Training took ~70 min on one H100.KEV_DTYPE=bf16(
Training
Frozen suite evals/v6/decision-v6 (development/test bytes identical to v4): 13,000 public records (1,000 per source: the ten v4 sources plus ARC-Challenge, OpenBookQA, CommonsenseQA) plus two programmatic policy arms of 448 records, two epochs, LoRA r=16 on attention and MLP projections, pointer head from scratch, cross-entropy on the option distribution, lr 5e-5 (OneCycle), effective batch 8, bf16 autocast with fp32 master weights, gradient checkpointing, one H100 (~70 min). Augmentation: option permutation, none-of-the-above insertion, distractors, none minimal pairs on 25% of Choice records. No Jev outputs were used for training.
Evaluation protocol
Development partitions select models; the locked test partition is read at most once per candidate. Every number carries suite hash, code hashes, and git commit in result.json. See PLAN.md for the corrections we made to our own earlier claims.
Use
uv run --extra serve python -m kev.serve --run jaredpalmer/kev-8b --port 8008 # KEV_DTYPE=bf16 on a 32 GB Mac
Any TypeSafe-compatible client works: TypeSafeClient(api_key="local", base_url="http://127.0.0.1:8008", model="kev-latest").
License
Apache-2.0 for the adapter and head; Qwen3 base is Apache-2.0; datasets carry their own licenses.
- Downloads last month
- 66
Model tree for jaredpalmer/kev-8b
Base model
Qwen/Qwen3-8B-BaseDatasets used to train jaredpalmer/kev-8b
allenai/openbookqa
tau/commonsense_qa
Space using jaredpalmer/kev-8b 1
Collection including jaredpalmer/kev-8b
Evaluation results
- accuracy on decision-v4/v6 development (1,204 records; trained public sources + programmatic policy pairs)self-reported0.869
- ECE, raw probabilities on decision-v4/v6 development (1,204 records; trained public sources + programmatic policy pairs)self-reported0.061
- accuracy on transfer-v4 development (764 records; six never-trained sources + held-out policy structures)self-reported0.796
- brier_score on transfer-v4 development (764 records; six never-trained sources + held-out policy structures)self-reported0.337